It could be true. It should be true that a restored President Trump, will save the world from a third ww and certain nuclear bombardment, a smoldering wasteland, here and there. How could a mere man be the savior of the Constitution, and simultaneously make a lasting peace with the many deceived marxists desiring totalitarian power ? You would have to believe he loves his nation, I have heard him express those sentiments. B.. B.. Biden_Joe... not so much. I don't believe anything the fraud utters, stutters or mumbles, drilled noggin, fake. So, yeah, sure, President Donald J. Trump as a hero of the United States of America, and all peace loving people of the Earth. ' He's a good man, and reliable, works harder than the others. ' He will need all the help he can get to make peace on Earth.
The Dogs of War - Pink Floyd, September 8, 1987
Dogs of war and men of hate With no cause, we don't discriminate Discovery is to be disowned Our currency is flesh and bone Hell opened up and put on sale Gather 'round and haggle For hard cash, we will lie and deceive Even our masters don't know the web we weave
One world, it's a battleground One world, and we will smash it down One world, one world
Invisible transfers, long distance calls, Hollow laughter in marble halls Steps have been taken, a silent uproar Has unleashed the dogs of war You can't stop what has begun Signed, sealed, they deliver oblivion We all have a dark side, to say the least And dealing in death is the nature of the beast
One world, it's a battleground One world, and we will smash it down One world, one world
The dogs of war don't negotiate The dogs of war won't capitulate, They will take and you will give, And you must die so that they may live You can knock at any door, But wherever you go, you know they've been there before Well winners can lose and things can get strained But whatever you change, you know the dogs remain.
One world, it's a battleground One world, and we will smash it down One world, one world
So is the case against President Trump about to be dismissed? President Trump says the FBI took Passports illegally? If it is true, the President Trump's civil rights will have been violated. The FBI says they do not have President Trump's Passports, and they are not listed on the confiscation receipts. IF, the FBI happens to have the Passports, they have botched the entire effort. AND open themselves to both civil and possible criminal charges. Not just for violations against President Trump, but for violations against his civil rights and the criminal charges would be related to not listing the Passports as confiscated items. That is both,... theft and a cover up. I am not sure what the repercussions of taking client/attorney privileged material would be, but apparently the FBI took some of that too. And people used to think Watergate was a big deal?? I would laugh till the next election if President Trump and his team planted the personal items in the boxes. IF, this is the case..... Shame on the FBI for being so sloppy in such a high profile case.
[This message has been edited by Rickady88GT (edited 08-16-2022).]
If you liked Ol'Joe's evacuation from Afghanistan, you're going to love the way the Mar-a-Lago invasion is shaping up. What would it look like if Jimmy Carter sent helicopters to the Bay of Pigs?
New revelations about the FBI's investigation into the "disgraced, twice-impeached, coup-staging, pathologically duplicitous ex-president's handling of classified material."
That's from the ever-effervescent John Heilemann, filling in again today as the anchor of MSNBC's Deadline White House.
CLICK FOR FULL SIZE
Heilemann, whose journalistic credentials include Showtime's political series "The Circus", tipped Deadline White House viewers to a new report from the New York Times' Maggie Haberman.
"F.B.I. Interviewed Top White House Lawyers About Missing Trump Documents"
quote
Pat A. Cipollone and Patrick F. Philbin are the most senior people who worked for the former president who are known to have been interviewed in the investigation into his handling of classified material.
Pat A. Cipollone and Patrick F. Philbin, the White House counsel and his deputy under President Donald J. Trump, were interviewed by the F.B.I. in connection with boxes of sensitive documents that were stored at Mr. Trump’s residence in Florida after he left office, three people familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Cipollone and Mr. Philbin are the most senior people who worked for Mr. Trump who are known to have been interviewed by investigators after the National Archives referred the matter to the Justice Department this year.
Mr. Philbin was interviewed in the spring, according to two of the people familiar with the matter, as investigators reached out to members of Mr. Trump’s circle to find out how 15 boxes of material — some of it marked as classified — made its way to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla. It was unclear when Mr. Cipollone was interviewed.
Mr. Cipollone and Mr. Philbin were Mr. Trump’s representatives to deal with the National Archives; they were named to the positions shortly before the president’s term ended, in January 2021. At some point after National Archives officials realized they did not have Trump White House documents, which are required to be preserved under the Presidential Records Act, they contacted Mr. Philbin for help returning them.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-16-2022).]
Wow! The priorities that Dems have with their derangement.
“This Mar-a-Lago story … might be the biggest story since 9/11,” the Democratic strategist told The Hill in an on-camera interview. “That’s not going anywhere.”
[This message has been edited by Wichita (edited 08-18-2022).]
When it comes to the National Archives, history has a funny way of repeating itself. And legal experts say a decade-old case over audio tapes that Bill Clinton once kept in his sock drawer may have significant impact over the FBI search of Melania Trump's closet and Donald Trump's personal office.
The case in question is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration and it involved an effort by the conservative watchdog to compel the Archives to forcibly seize hours of audio recordings that Clinton made during his presidency with historian Taylor Branch.
Say what you will, but John Heilemann, whose been filling in for the vacationing Nicolle Wallance as the anchor of MSNBC's Deadline White House, is wearing a "Wu-Tang Clan" embellished T-shirt in this photo.
A federal judge on Thursday said he is “inclined” to unseal some of the affidavit central to last week’s FBI search of former president Donald Trump’s Florida home, and has instructed the Justice Department to redact the document in a way that would not undermine its ongoing investigation if made public.
Federal Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart said from the bench that he would make a determination next Thursday after the government submits proposed redactions.
They will slowly feed us meaningless crumbs until after the mid-terms.
Propaganda 101: All of these articles fail to mention Reinhart's name up front. They simply say "a federal judge" or something similar, then put his name later in the article. They don't want JUDGE BRUCE REINHART to become a household name. Why do you suppose that is?
edit: The immediately preceding question is rhetorical. We all know why. Nobody needs to prove how smart he is.
[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 08-18-2022).]
Originally posted by williegoat: Propaganda 101: All of these articles fail to mention Reinhart's name up front. They simply say "a federal judge" or something similar, then put his name later in the article. They don't want JUDGE BRUCE REINHART to become a household name. Why do you suppose that is?
I've seen a lot of reports online in the legacy news media about various cases.
I think most of them are like that.
There might be some extra sensitivity in this case, because of the perception of threats to the judge's safety.
When Judge Reinhart was lawyering, he acted as a defense counsel for Sarah Kellen, who was the late Jeffrey Epstein’s personal assistant.
quote
Reinhart did at one point represent associates of Epstein. For example, court records reviewed by the AP show he was an attorney for Sarah Kellen, Epstein’s personal assistant.
Did he represent any other people in Epstein's circle?
Perhaps it's not unusual for a lawyer to act as a defense counsel for more than just a single one of the associates of a big time criminal defendant like Epstein.
The Biden_Joe pretendadent's regime falls into the toilet, drowning in their own effluent, grasping at the floaters to avoid consequences of criminal acts. That is why you may refer to the fibs as ' dirty '.
Any remaining honest and law abiding fibs would do well to consider the act of stepping forward, the honorable act of career suicide, a selfless seppuku, to rat out the real sheets within the ranks, to preserve the Union and the Constitution.
' This Makes No Sense ' nor should it to a rational American. You just have to accept that there are enemies inside the security alphabets.
The reason why. Eric O’Neill talked about the Robert Hanssen spy case. Thoroughly irrigated to flush the real stinkers out, insuring a clean, lawful fib. ' Well, not all the way clean, there is that Hoover thing, the gay society penetrators. ' ' Uummm, so... like, It's an annually thing ? Like a Russian sailor thingy ? ' ' Yep ! '
Biden_Joe, stroked out, an incompetent pretendadent. China will attack Taiwan as a direct result of the weakness displayed, a sour noodle. fjb sooner than later !
Magistrate Bruce Reinhart recusal, a conflict, an insight into the reason for the home invasion, the breaches of laws. ' Ok, Ok, I'll sign it, Ok, give me that pen, I'll sign it, put the weapon away, Ok, I'll sign it. '
The certain threat of arkancide right there in his office, while the fibs stood around his desk, smartphones held up displaying the videos from Epstein's penthouse suite, all those years ago. See, that is how and why, he was appointed Magistrate, a useful tool to attack President Donald J.Trump. Motive and opportunity, to avoid the incarceration resulting from the exposure of criminal activity.
Jim Trusty, a member of Ifrah Law, is a former federal prosecutor with extensive experience in complex, multi-district white collar litigation, especially in matters involving RICO, The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986.
He is among the team of five lawyers who are currently representing former President Trump in the documents seized at Mar-A-Lago case.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-19-2022).]
Originally posted by Valkrie9: Magistrate Bruce Reinhart recusal, a conflict, an insight into the reason for the home invasion, the breaches of laws. ' Ok, Ok, I'll sign it, Ok, give me that pen, I'll sign it, put the weapon away, Ok, I'll sign it. '
"Blowhard Bruce" seems to have a serious judicial bias problem, but for Leftists that is a "feature" not a bug and it motivated the Brandon DOJ to dig deep down into the roster to find an old politically motivated magistrate to sign a political fishing expedition search warrant for them.
So how far down the roster of seniority did Brandon's DOJ have to dredge to their boy dumb enough and biased enough to sign their "Florida fishing license"? TEN DEEP....that's how deep.
The truth always eventually comes out and it is NEVER what Leftists or their media originally told you... IF they even told you.
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 08-20-2022).]
False submissions in the affidavit application for the warrant. Reinhart should have recused himself, as he did a month before. Unlawful magistrate overturns the Constitution by signature under duress. Whoops ! ' There, It is done, I have hereby dissolved the United States of America, over riding the Constitution by this Bic ® Carbon-Ball pen ! '
' Ignorance is a great time saver. You can form opinions without having to get the facts. '
' Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten,every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.' ~ George Orwell
' Before a revolution can take place, the population must lose faith in both the police and the courts.' ~ Robert A. Heinlein
Are we there yet ? A home invasion of the President would indicate true, a clue, a fact. Evidence of corruption, ' Would you like to know more ? '. :[ Peace in Our Time China, far on the Eastern Horizon, readies the war machines to expand their Imperialist ambitions to invade Taiwan. The ccp pla have said plainly, openly that Taiwan is not Taiwan, Taiwan is China's, a simple statement, meaning global war, with nukes. At the heart of the Mar a Lago home invasion is Hillary's criminal acts of evidence tampering and destruction, attempting to conceal her treasonous crimes. ' Those are hanging offences Hillary ', said Bill on the secure phone as he enjoyed Teenage Head in the Oval office. ' UuggnnnH ! '
Originally posted by Rickady88GT: cnn trusty, brian stelter trusty, msnbc trusty, jeff epstien trusty. Ya, good luck rinselberg trusty.
Jim Trusty (see my previous post in this thread) is representing, and so, in effect, defending former President Trump in the FBI search at Mar-A-Lago case.
He's not prosecuting any case against the former President.
I was looking at that remark (from Rick) and thinking, maybe he (Rick) didn't see that.
Of course, maybe he did see that.
I just thought, "What can be said about that remark (from Rick)? Is there a sub-remark (so to speak), under the surface of the remark? A particular motivation behind the remark that isn't explicitly expressed by the remark itself?"
And I came to that.
This is the point at which another Pennock's member could well come in and say, with just a twist of sarcasm-infused bemusement "Good. Glad we've cleared that up." But that can't happen. Because that Pennock's member (the one I have in mind) has been excommunicated. De-platformed.
Just something else that unexpectedly came to mind.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-20-2022).]
During an on-air interview on Friday with regular Fox News commentator Mark Levin, Jim Trusty, one of the lawyers representing the former President, signaled that he is about to go to court with a challenge to the FBI's search and seizure of documents at Mar-A-Lago on Fourth Amendment grounds. The Constitutional protection for private citizens against "unreasonable searches and seizures."
This report includes skeptical and mocking reactions from Harry Litman, Stephen (Steve) Vladeck, Orin Kerr and George Conway, a coterie of lawyers and legal scholars who have been consistent opponents of Donald Trump in the public sphere.
Here's Trump on Truth Social:
Personally, I don't see how the Fourth Amendment offers any safeguards to private citizens against a "seizure" like that.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-20-2022).]
Personally, I don't see how the Fourth Amendment offers any safeguards to private citizens against a "seizure" like that.
The home invasion and theft by government forces at the Trump residence is exactly what the 4th amendment was designed to prevent.
quote
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Trump committed no crime. The rogue Leftist regime did.
[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 08-20-2022).]
Originally posted by rinselberg: Personally, I don't see how the Fourth Amendment offers any safeguards to private citizens against a "seizure" like that.
A while back I posted that I was dropping out of politics.
A couple of months ago I wanted Trump to step aside and allow someone else to run.
Now, if I have to, I will crawl naked through Antifa and BLM riots to vote for Trump in 2024.
100% my feeling as well. I was starting to waiver and was thinking... ok, I like DeSantis, and he would be a great president. I still feel that way, but I 100% now am affirmed, without a doubt, and completely remembered why I voted for Trump in the first place. My primary vote in 2024 is locked in for Trump.
We have been in a severe drought out here in the west for several years now. The water level in Lake Mead has dropped so low that so far this year, they have discovered five dead bodies.
Trump or Desantis, I don't care as long as he fires up the dredge pumps on his first day in office.
