People will find what ever answers they seek if, for no other reason than to justify their positions/perspectives/agendas. That doesn't make them right.
Rams
[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 11-20-2021).]
Originally posted by blackrams:I have to assume you're referring to more (or something other) than the verdict? Rams
Like most aware people, I'm referring to the topic which is the Rittenhouse trial. The motive of the trial is racial start to finish. The top office holder says it's racial.
Nope. "Justice" won't be done till his name is cleared. All of the hate speech, lies, false accusations and defamation against him needs to be addressed. I hope he takes some people to civil court and clears out their bank accounts. THEN "justice" will be done. I do not consider winning on a technicality " justice". That is how the people who want him to be found guilty see the verdict,....well that and the system let another racist off the hook. So as long as those idiots continue to get away with their lies and defamation of character,...then there isn't any justice,...only a continuous prosecution.
I get what you're saying now about the verdict and how the jury rose above the theme.
Seven women and five men.
The uncommon bravery of those jurors should not go unnoticed. They knew the risks they faced by not giving the mob the verdict they wanted, but they did it anyway.
The jury consultant for the Rittenhouse legal team said that during voir dire one potential juror said "One half of the country is going to end up hating us and the other half loving us no matter what we do."
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 11-20-2021).]
Personally, I wouldn't go so far as to call it 'courage or bravery'. Commitment and dedication to doing their 'duty' certainly. Finding the verdict, based only on the evidence presented at trial, and following the judge's instructions doesn't take any exceptional amount of courage. Juries have been doing it in this country for over 200 years now.
Personally, I wouldn't go so far as to call it 'courage or bravery'. Commitment and dedication to doing their 'duty' certainly. Finding the verdict, based only on the evidence presented at trial, and following the judge's instructions doesn't take any exceptional amount of courage. Juries have been doing it in this country for over 200 years now.
You can obviously see it any way you wish but having dedication and doing your duty with the certain knowledge of the violent Leftist mob outside the courthouse most certainly is courage and bravery in my opinion.
Those jury members are residents of the relatively small community of Kenosha and they know full well the hell their town went through and who perpetrated it.
It was revealed today that the jurors were filmed over a week ago by an "activist" while they were awaiting the jury bus to pick them up at their remote / secure parking area to transport them to the courthouse. Police took action.
Another person was caught filming or photographing the jury members *inside* the courtroom. Police took action again.
Then there was the incident of MSNBC following the jury bus taking jurors from the courthouse back to their remote parking area. Once again police action was necessary.
All of those incidents, and possibly more that have not been revealed yet, were fully known to those jurors.
I suppose it depends on the individuals. I've never been one to frighten easily, or at least not in many decades and that was very short lived. Days.
When DEA and local drug task force needed somewhere to heli-lift a crapload of weed, and I told them they were welcome to use my place, I never batted an eye even when they told me they were sure it was a Mexican cartel operation. Nothing changed in how I thought, went about my business or carried out daily routine over any concern, and everyone on this end of the county knows I own this property and what my name is. I didn't (and don't) see it any differently than my duty to vote or being on grand jury.
They can only kill ya once.
[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 11-21-2021).]
You can change playback time with the settings icon. I watch at 1.5 times speed to shorten video time.
Good point, I believe I can also set a starting point. I havent ever tried to insert a video with altered timelines or speed. But in this case the whole video is good, patient people or those seeking info might wish to catch it all. Speed it up mrore for the chipmunk version
[This message has been edited by 2.5 (edited 11-23-2021).]
As a reminder, this piece of sh!t was convicted on 11 counts of child molestation and inappropriate sexual activity with children, including anal rape, masturbation, and oral sex.. The victims were five boys ranging in age from nine to 11 years old.
Rittenhouse deserves a medal for ridding the world of this pedo scumbag.
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 12-05-2021).]
As a reminder, this piece of sh!t was convicted on 11 counts of child molestation and inappropriate sexual activity with children, including anal rape, masturbation, and oral sex.. The victims were five boys ranging in age from nine to 11 years old.
Rittenhouse deserves a medal for ridding the world of this pedo scumbag.
We must be careful to respect the gods of the liberal progressive culture. Or be canceled as if we are the ones who have reality screwed up. Strange World we live in now days where child molesters are martyred and animal experimentalists are worshipped while conducting mass experiments on the population.
[This message has been edited by Rickady88GT (edited 12-06-2021).]
"Judge Schroeder could reject the deal, or still just dismiss the original felony counts based on his ruling about the minors-with-firearms law in the Rittenhouse case."
Laid back Q+A conversation about it all with Kyle. More details the mainstream media wants to forget, (and some of them double down on anyway, because there seem to be no repercussions or concerns about facts).
It could happen.
