| | | quote | Originally posted by uhlanstan:
Total rat feces,another ray b liar post,, the queer involved has denied this ever happen he like Mitt,,3 forum pages because ray b is a liar & beleaves every rat liar cheeze morsel from demo rodent HQ..
..the democ rats robbed the social security fund over & over when they had power, no one heard the republican screams ??
because the major media is part of the democrat party
the omissions & lies of NBC.ABC,CBS & major newspapers brought you Obumbles the worse president in history,,I thought it was inhumanly possible to be worse than Jimmy Carter,,remember 20% home loans??OBUMBLER?? champion failure(untill we elect another democrat)
the internet keeps the democrats in check only a little bit
taxes are like crack to rat fornicating demomarxist
|
|
NO LIES EVEN ROMNEY ADMITS AND APOLOGIZED
NUT-CON'S TRYED AND FAIL
un like the right I do not tell lies
this thread is about romney NOT OMAN
about gay bashing not preachers
the character romney not anybody else
please nut-con's stay near the subject
we know you do not like the president
this thread is not about that
it is about the GOP leaders character
and very very poor memory
have we got an other brain dead GOP candidate like raygun ?
'
Wash. Post Ombudsman: Accounts From The Five Sources "Remain Unchallenged." From a May 11 post by Washington Post ombudsman Patrick Pexton on his blog:
The Post changed the story after talking to White again and discovering that White only learned of the prank in recent weeks after being told of it by a Cranbrook classmate.
Kevin Merida, national editor of The Post, said on Friday that "We should have updated it with a note." I agree with Merida. I would have used strike-through text online to make it clear to readers that that part of the online story was changed. I think that's just the better part of candor. There is now an editor's note at the very bottom of the story. The Post is not calling it a correction. I think it is a correction, but not germane to the central theme of the story.
This part of Horowitz's story is tangential at best. It is only about how one person, who was not an eyewitness, felt about the incident.
Four of the five witnesses to the forcible haircut cited by the Post are on the record, by name, and remember it well. Their accounts remain unchallenged. I also think it's important to point out that Romney quickly apologized after the story was published, and although not a detailed apology, I think his demeanor in the apology seemed genuine. [WashingtonPost.com, Omblog, 5/11/12]
And Romney Himself Said He's "Not Going To Argue" With "Reports" About The Incident
Romney: "I've Seen The Reports -- Not Going To Argue With That." On the May 10 edition of his Fox News show, host Neil Cavuto asked Romney about the Post story. Romney said that he didn't "recall the incident" but that he was "not going to argue with" the "reports." From the show:
ROMNEY: Well, first of all, I had no idea what that individual's sexual orientation might be. Going back to the 1960s, that wasn't something that we all discussed or considered. So, that's simply just not accurate. I don't recall the incident myself, but I've seen the reports, and not going to argue with that. There's no question but that I did some stupid things when I was in high school. And obviously, if I hurt anyone by virtue of that, I would be very sorry for it and apologize for it. [Fox News, Your World with Neil Cavuto, 5/10/12]
FROM
http://mediamatters.org/research/201205120001
