I do not rate people according to their opinions. I rate them according to how they express them. Persistently nasty people or those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake always get negatives from me.
Rumor, I rated you green a long time ago, because your posts are clever and often hilarious, and you seem very good natured.
Those in the red? You are just a few, and you know who you are...
"I do not rate people according to their opinions. I rate them according to how they express them. Persistently nasty people or those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake always get negatives from me."
BTW, Ed - don't bother sending me any more abusive PM's - you (and your buddy CertifiedMechanic) have been blocked, just like I had to block your e-mail back when you were still EdsB52, for sending abusive e-mails back then.
Originally posted by I'm Back: "I do not rate people according to their opinions. I rate them according to how they express them. Persistently nasty people or those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake always get negatives from me."
The Part II to that thread also - don't feel like researching it.
These were nothing but controversial. So maybe that explains your 50/50 rating - other people use the same criterion for establishing their vote.
Ed, there are two major differences between us...
First, I just write what I think. If it makes people mad, I have no control over that. But, making people mad is not my goal. You, however, get off on creating controversy with your sub-stupid, vitriolic inanities.
Second, I don't give a shlt what my ratings bar does. You, however, after tangling with an intellectual superior and having a steaming plate of your ass handed to you with all the trimmings, and your ratings bar dipping perilously closer to "good riddance Ed", drop out of sight for a while to lick your wounds.
------------------ Veritas
[This message has been edited by fogglethorpe (edited 10-26-2004).]
BTW, Ed - don't bother sending me any more abusive PM's - you (and your buddy CertifiedMechanic) have been blocked, just like I had to block your e-mail back when you were still EdsB52, for sending abusive e-mails back then.
What a loser, LZNazi, I haven't corresponded with you for over a year. Such a victim. See, this is how the mob attempts to materialize their propaganda.
"I do not rate people according to their opinions. I rate them according to how they express them. Persistently nasty people or those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake always get negatives from me."
"...those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake..."
So what is this?
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum8/HTML/000042.html "If you read this, and are pissed off at me because I “offended” you, and you think you have a right to not be offended, and you think I care if I offended you, you’re a deluded, pompous turd."
Bonding material?
You're a hypocrite. Is this not controversial?
"First, I just write what I think. If it makes people mad, I have no control over that."
Why not just drop the "N" bomb and shrug your shoulders when people are offended? This is a lame rationalization for saying you have immunity for being controversial, but others must adhere to rules of such controversy. Conclusion: You're lame .
"But, making people mad is not my goal."
Well, I'm not mad, but being a hypocritical azz is what you do best.
"You, however, get off on creating controversy with your sub-stupid, vitriolic inanities."
And, "You're an Idiot, Part 1" is an intellectual masterpiece? You, sir, are a jackoff.
"Second, I don't give a shlt what my ratings bar does."
And this, unfortunately is where we meet eye-to-eye.
"You, however, after tangling with an intellectual superior and having a steaming plate of your ass handed to you with all the trimmings, and your ratings bar dipping perilously closer to "good riddance Ed", drop out of sight for a while to lick your wounds."
Who dropped out of sight when? Ass handed to me....... BAhahahaha. With threads like, "You're an Idiot, Part 1" I'm not real worried about you winning the Purlitzer Prize. Maybe the the Beavis and Butthead award for idiocy. I have found other boards to converse and am transitioning that way, as I have informed many PFFers, so your mono-hate style of pecking order will be free of me just after the election, or possibly re-appointment depending upon how it goes this time.
Another vast difference between you and me is that I can live w/o PFF.
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum8/HTML/000042.html "If you read this, and are pissed off at me because I “offended” you, and you think you have a right to not be offended, and you think I care if I offended you, you’re a deluded, pompous turd."
Most people had a sense of humor about that. Ed took it personally. Go figure.
quote
Why not just drop the "N" bomb and shrug your shoulders when people are offended? This is a lame rationalization for saying you have immunity for being controversial, but others must adhere to rules of such controversy.
Ed plays the race card again, without any provocation.
quote
And, "You're an Idiot, Part 1" is an intellectual masterpiece?
This thread has been eating Ed alive since I posted it months ago. I know this, because he keeps bringing it up. Perhaps he sees a bit of himself in it?
"I do not rate people according to their opinions. I rate them according to how they express them. Persistently nasty people or those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake always get negatives from me."
"...those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake..."
So what is this?
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum8/HTML/000042.html "If you read this, and are pissed off at me because I “offended” you, and you think you have a right to not be offended, and you think I care if I offended you, you’re a deluded, pompous turd."
Bonding material?
You're a hypocrite. Is this not controversial?
"First, I just write what I think. If it makes people mad, I have no control over that."
Why not just drop the "N" bomb and shrug your shoulders when people are offended? This is a lame rationalization for saying you have immunity for being controversial, but others must adhere to rules of such controversy. Conclusion: You're lame .
"But, making people mad is not my goal."
Well, I'm not mad, but being a hypocritical azz is what you do best.
"You, however, get off on creating controversy with your sub-stupid, vitriolic inanities."
And, "You're an Idiot, Part 1" is an intellectual masterpiece? You, sir, are a jackoff.
Interesting... I have to agree with Ed on the "Your an idiot if" being controversial. However, IMHO it is a masterpiece at the same time. About the only thing that was "over the top" was the involvement of family members. Other than that it was a very thought provoking thread and I liked it. I still think you owe fog an apology for the mother slander but hey man.. fuggit. I would also like to apologize to you Ed for busting your ballz, it wasn't my place to do so. What was between you and fog should have stayed between you and fog because my opinion don't mean crap...
quote
"Second, I don't give a shlt what my ratings bar does."
And this, unfortunately is where we meet eye-to-eye.
"You, however, after tangling with an intellectual superior and having a steaming plate of your ass handed to you with all the trimmings, and your ratings bar dipping perilously closer to "good riddance Ed", drop out of sight for a while to lick your wounds."
Who dropped out of sight when? Ass handed to me....... BAhahahaha. With threads like, "You're an Idiot, Part 1" I'm not real worried about you winning the Purlitzer Prize. Maybe the the Beavis and Butthead award for idiocy. I have found other boards to converse and am transitioning that way, as I have informed many PFFers, so your mono-hate style of pecking order will be free of me just after the election, or possibly re-appointment depending upon how it goes this time.
Another vast difference between you and me is that I can live w/o PFF.
WTF man... since when have I been removed from your christmas list, not that I give two craps about christmas or lists but I like the way you cut cross grain.... it's refreshing.
Funny thing is, foggle cuts cross grain sometimes too. Oddly it's more acceptable for some reason, people find it more "thought provoking" and not just provoking.
Get used to it, Ed, you piece of feces - it's the only response you're worth from here on out. It's the only response you've been worth ever since you begged Cliff to let you back in here after he banned you the first time.
And get a clue, dipsh*t - who said anything about getting e-mails from you within the past year? You were sending me abusive e-mails back when you were EdsB52, until I blocked your address. I don't have them anymore, because I flush the toilet when I'm done reading your filth, but you and I both know it's true so stop playing to the masses like you're anything but the complete and utter piece of feces that you are.
I bet you're sore and raw from masturbating to all the attention you've gotten the last few days, but with any luck, it'll be your last.
Here's a tissue - go mop up now and have a cigarette.
Don't bother replying to Bill on my account, fierobear - Bill's already given me his negative and I've done likewise, so there's no point in making the effort. Your point was well-made.
Don't bother replying to Bill on my account, fierobear - Bill's already given me his negative and I've done likewise, so there's no point in making the effort. Your point was well-made.
Since you have become the spokesperson of fierobear then how about you explaining to me why fierobear made such comments. What I mean is, are you so impotent that you need another person to rush in and rescue you from the clutches of Ed's opinion? Is Ed's credibility (IE opinion) that much more than yours?
If you want me to change fierobears rating then please, by all means answer for him. It seems as though he can't answer my question anyway and my rating of him will reflect that thus proving his post was nothing more than a trolling attempt.
fierobear can do as he pleases - however, if his attempt was to sway your viewpoint from Ed calling me a Nazi, I let him know that it wasn't worth his wasted effort to do so, since A.) your opinion is set in stone, and B.) your opinion means nothing to me in the first place.
Since all you were up to was trolling for him to spend more time providing words for you to twist against him, as a friend, I thought I'd save him the effort. But he's free to spend his time as he wishes, even if it's wasting his energy responding to you regarding a comment that was made with the intent to insult me.
But, get all that crap out of the way, and you're still an a$$, Bill. Won't be anything changing that fact.
Originally posted by LZeitgeist: A.) your opinion is set in stone, and B.) your opinion means nothing to me in the first place.
Don't try thinking for me by posting wild assertions about what I think and do. Stone is obviously the substance the resideds between your ears and not what my opinions are set in.
quote
Originally posted by LZeitgeist: Since all you were up to was trolling for him to spend more time providing words for you to twist against him, as a friend, I thought I'd save him the effort. But he's free to spend his time as he wishes, even if it's wasting his energy responding to you regarding a comment that was made with the intent to insult me.
Ahhh... so the truth avails itself atlast... Apparently you and fierobear are cohorts in cohersion and troll buddies looking to start crap with other members you don't like. Ed was correct, you are indeed a weak Nazi. My question to fierobear was to reveal the nature of his post and now that you have spoken for him I will now switch him to a negative.
quote
Originally posted by LZeitgeist: But, get all that crap out of the way, and you're still an a$$, Bill. Won't be anything changing that fact.
Yes by all means lets start with te immature name calling as a means of starting crap with members in addition to your ignoring the forum rules about circumventing the profanity filter.
Speaking of plummeting ratings, I'm about to be kicked out of the Greenbar Syndicate. I'm not sure who I pissed off. Ironically, I've been staying away from the political threads and spending more time in TDQ and GFC lately. Figures...
Speaking of plummeting ratings, I'm about to be kicked out of the Greenbar Syndicate. I'm not sure who I pissed off. Ironically, I've been staying away from the political threads and spending more time in TDQ and GFC lately. Figures...
Anyway, back to our regularly scheduled argument.
You know you want to join us.
------------------ Member of the Central Cartel, the Switzerland of PFF. Bringing Moderation to the Red Green Show.
Speaking of plummeting ratings, I'm about to be kicked out of the Greenbar Syndicate. I'm not sure who I pissed off. Ironically, I've been staying away from the political threads and spending more time in TDQ and GFC lately. Figures...
Anyway, back to our regularly scheduled argument.
It was probably your greenie buddies that did it to you anyways, so you're better off.. Less trouble down here anyways.. We accept others opinions.. Thats why we're red and they're green..
.
