Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T
  Terrorist Attacks in Paris... Many Dead (Page 3)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version

This topic is 7 pages long:  1   2   3   4   5   6   7 
Previous Page | Next Page
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Terrorist Attacks in Paris... Many Dead by 1985FieroGT
Started on: 11-13-2015 04:56 PM
Replies: 247 (2906 views)
Last post by: fierosound on 11-27-2015 06:12 PM
rogergarrison
Member
Posts: 49601
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 551
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 08:54 AM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
If thats directed at me, you dont know what your talking about. Nothing in the last paragraph is remotely correct...except for one fact. If its not, my appology.
IP: Logged
avengador1
Member
Posts: 35467
From: Orlando, Florida
Registered: Oct 2001


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 571
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 09:24 AM Click Here to See the Profile for avengador1Send a Private Message to avengador1Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Reality is rearing it's ugly head in Europe and intruding into their safe zones.
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69672
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 09:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by jmbishop:


Once again proving you haven't really studied Islam and the profit Mohamed.

You saying it, does not make it true, no matter how many times you repeat it. One thing is for sure, I have certainly studied Islam enough to know that the person known as Muhammad was no prophet. A drug addict perhaps, prone to use hallucinogens, but not a prophet.

(If you are going to speak down to others regarding the study of Muhammad, Islam, and prophets, you might want to at least learn how to spell them.)

Do understand tho, your (and all) false allegations don't really bother me on a personal level.

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
Fats
Member
Posts: 5569
From: Wheaton, Mo.
Registered: Jan 2012


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 75
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 09:54 AM Click Here to See the Profile for FatsSend a Private Message to FatsEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

You saying it, does not make it true, no matter how many times you repeat it. One thing is for sure, I have certainly studied Islam enough to know the person known as Muhammad was no prophet.

(If you are going to speak down to others regarding the study of Muhammad, Islam, and prophets, you might want to at least learn how to spell them.)

Do understand tho, your (and all) false allegations don't really bother me on a personal level.


Don,

This isn't about what you believe, it's about what they believe.

Brad
IP: Logged
dennis_6
Member
Posts: 7196
From: between here and there
Registered: Aug 2001


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 115
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 09:59 AM Click Here to See the Profile for dennis_6Send a Private Message to dennis_6Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

You mean what the radicals believe? Sure I have, but beyond that, I have also studied what the great majority of individuals within Islam believes and it s not terrorism and "kill all the infidels". If it were, there would be killings in the name of Islam in the USA every single day, in every single medium-large city and they would be done by American citizens. It doesn't happen, because of free will.

I have known Christians in my adult lifetime that were in favor of blowing up abortion centers and if it killed the employees inside, so be it, but the vast majority of Christians would find that agenda to be horrendous. Again, free will.


The Quran gives a open ended kill infidels command, the Bible did not. In the Old Testament, God did tell the Jews to kill certain groups, but no open ended order to kill unbelievers. Muslims will tell you otherwise, but there is plenty of verses supporting open ended violence in the Quran. Those who attacked Paris, were following their book to the letter. The "good" muslims are backsliders.


The Quran:

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, "fitna", can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.



Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."



Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.



Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."



Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').



Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.



Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"



Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."



Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward " This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle). According to the verse, Allah will allow the disabled into Paradise, but will provide a larger reward to those who are able to kill others in his cause.



Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?



Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"



Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.



Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."



Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah" Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."



Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."



Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."



Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."



Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."



Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them." According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.



Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.



Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant." The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad". The context is obviously holy war.



Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam "superior over all religions." This chapter was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.


Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"



Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place." This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.



Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them" This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).


Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.



Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."


Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." How does the Quran define a true believer?



Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."



Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction." Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).



Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)



Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"



Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..." "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.



Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter." This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.



Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost." Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.



Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"



Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom." Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.



Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Islam is not about treating everyone equally. This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26..



Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way" Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist." (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.



Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success." This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above). It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.



Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The root word of "Jihad" is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.



Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at AnsweringIslam.org


From the Hadith:



Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."



Bukhari (52:256) - The Prophet... was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, "They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans)." In this command, Muhammad establishes that it is permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a perceived enemy. This provides justification for the many Islamic terror bombings.



Bukhari (52:65) - The Prophet said, 'He who fights that Allah's Word, Islam, should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause. Muhammad's words are the basis for offensive Jihad - spreading Islam by force. This is how it was understood by his companions, and by the terrorists of today.



Bukhari (52:220) - Allah's Apostle said... 'I have been made victorious with terror'



Abu Dawud (14:2526) - The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)



Abu Dawud (14:2527) - The Prophet said: Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious



Muslim (1:33) - the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah



Bukhari (8:387) - Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'. And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally."



Muslim (1:30) - "The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah."



Bukhari (52:73) - "Allah's Apostle said, 'Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords'."



Bukhari (11:626) - [Muhammad said:] "I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes."



Muslim (1:149) - "Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause..."



Muslim (20:4645) - "...He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa'id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!"



Muslim (20:4696) - "the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'"



Muslim (19:4321-4323) - Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent children were killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers. His response: "They are of them (meaning the enemy)."



Muslim (19:4294) - "When the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment he would especially exhort him... He would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war... When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them... If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them."



Bukhari 1:35 "The person who participates in (Holy Battles) in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him do so except belief in Allah and His Apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty ( if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise ( if he is killed)."



Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, "Kill any Jew who falls under your power." Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad's men because he insulted Islam. Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill. An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Muslim.



Tabari 9:69 "Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us" The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.



Tabari 17:187 "'By God, our religion (din) from which we have departed is better and more correct than that which these people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding blood, terrifying the roads, and seizing properties.' And they returned to their former religion." The words of a group of Christians who had converted to Islam, but realized their error after being shocked by the violence and looting committed in the name of Allah. The price of their decision to return to a religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and the woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali.



Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: - “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”



Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 990: - Lest anyone think that cutting off someone's head while screaming 'Allah Akbar!' is a modern creation, here is an account of that very practice under Muhammad, who seems to approve.



Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: - "Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah." Muhammad's instructions to his men prior to a military raid.



Saifur Rahman, The Sealed Nectar p.227-228 - "Embrace Islam... If you two accept Islam, you will remain in command of your country; but if your refuse my Call, you’ve got to remember that all of your possessions are perishable. My horsemen will appropriate your land, and my Prophethood will assume preponderance over your kingship." One of several letters from Muhammad to rulers of other countries. The significance is that the recipients were not making war or threatening Muslims. Their subsequent defeat and subjugation by Muhammad's armies was justified merely on the basis of their unbelief.

http://www.thereligionofpea...ran/023-violence.htm
IP: Logged
jmbishop
Member
Posts: 4484
From: Probably Texas
Registered: Jul 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 169
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 10:08 AM Click Here to See the Profile for jmbishopSend a Private Message to jmbishopEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:


Do understand tho, your (and all) false allegations don't really bother me on a personal level.



No false allegations here, you claimed Muslims had a peaceful side and compared them to Christians. You haven't really studied Islam and you're spewing more PC garbage.

There is no condition where true believers of islam are supposed to live and let live. There is only dominance through lies, slavery and murder.
IP: Logged
mental floss
Member
Posts: 362
From: CSA
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 10:09 AM Click Here to See the Profile for mental flossSend a Private Message to mental flossEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Roger I didn't see your post so it wasn't targeted at you, but be assured I can substantiate everyrhing I post. I always invite anyone who disagrees to post evidence to disprove me.

 
quote
Originally posted by jmbishop:

Racial bias is racism. Positive or negative decisions made based on race is racism. Coleges required to manipulate admissions to fit set demographics is racist....


No, that would be the Politically Correct's approach to state that anything regarding race that's unPC shall be labeled "racist". We probably agree that giving someone free points above anyone is a formula for poorer and poorer resulta and is unfair, but we need to observe truth in definitions and not let them be perverted.
Racial bias is discrimination, not racism. Racism is the belief of superiority or inferiority of one race as compared to another. Discrimination can be worse than racism. The races are different and have superior and inferior abillities, however Marxist-socialism wants us to believe we're all the same and there are no races.
IP: Logged
carnut122
Member
Posts: 9122
From: Waleska, GA, USA
Registered: Jan 2004


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 83
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 10:12 AM Click Here to See the Profile for carnut122Send a Private Message to carnut122Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by mental floss:

France is taking citizen's guns precisely so the takeover can continue according to plans. And Greece or Slovenia, Hungary then Germany are next. North America is the last major obstacle. Wake up. It's not the invaders. It's those who brought them in. Global government , which was created after WWII beteeen the USA, Britain, France and our major ally the commumnist Soviet Union.
Dresden was wrong. Half of Germany and half of Eirope was given to our communist ally who raped their way across Poland and Germany
Look it up.


Germany was divided into 4 sectors, Russia only took control of one. Russia bore the brunt of the Nazi attacks (approximately 20 million casualties) and they had been invaded by Germany twice within a 30 year period (not to mention Napoleon's invasion in the 1800's). So, a Russian controlled "buffer zone" was logical. I'm having trouble connecting the dots between ISIS and this Global government. How are you connecting those events?
IP: Logged
jmbishop
Member
Posts: 4484
From: Probably Texas
Registered: Jul 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 169
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 10:17 AM Click Here to See the Profile for jmbishopSend a Private Message to jmbishopEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by mental floss:


No, that would be the Politically Correct's approach to state that anything regarding race that's unPC shall be labeled "racist". We probably agree that giving someone free points above anyone is a formula for poorer and poorer resulta and is unfair, but we need to observe truth in definitions and not let them be perverted.
Racial bias is discrimination, not racism. Racism is the belief of superiority or inferiority of one race as compared to another. Discrimination can be worse than racism. The races are different and have superior and inferior abillities, however Marxist-socialism wants us to believe we're all the same and there are no races.

I stand by what I said, it's about equal opportunity and when color is used to make any decision it is racist. It's not PC culture, PC culture wants to give pass to the minority, to whoever they deem the underdog. If we ignore color nobody gets a pass and people become their content.
IP: Logged
mental floss
Member
Posts: 362
From: CSA
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 10:31 AM Click Here to See the Profile for mental flossSend a Private Message to mental flossEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Jesus said, I did not come to bring peace to the world, but I have come to bring a sword. I come to pit a man against his father and daughter against mother.
He also said to his followers to sell their cloaks to buy swords.
Islam holds Jesus among it's highest prophets in the Quran. It also says a Muslim shall not harm The People of The Book. Guess which Book that is?
The lie we're all told (by those governing us) is that we're all the same and can live peacefully together.
If you are cinfusedabout what an Infidel is, it's a aomeone who doesn't believe in God the Father. It's even in personal lettera of our US founders and even Christian writings.
IP: Logged
mental floss
Member
Posts: 362
From: CSA
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 10:41 AM Click Here to See the Profile for mental flossSend a Private Message to mental flossEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

mental floss

362 posts
Member since Aug 2014
JM your argument is with the dictionary. Can you post a link to an accredited source supporting your definition? Politically Correct approach is to change meanings like "Assault Weapon" for semi auto which is actually select fire or full auto only.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Raydar
Member
Posts: 40749
From: Carrollton GA. Out in the... country.
Registered: Oct 1999


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 460
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 10:43 AM Click Here to See the Profile for RaydarSend a Private Message to RaydarEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
IP: Logged
E.Furgal
Member
Posts: 11708
From: LAND OF CONFUSION
Registered: Mar 2012


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 278
User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 10:44 AM Click Here to See the Profile for E.FurgalSend a Private Message to E.FurgalEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by williegoat:

The world has waited long enough for the good muslims, for the silent majority of islam to stand up, grab the miscreants by the scruff of the neck, bring them out into the light of day and cause them to face judgment. We have waited long enough. It will never happen because there are no good muslims. The silent muslims are thus not because they are peaceful, but rather because they await their time to join the fight.

As I have said before, I tried to believe otherwise, but I can no longer ignore overwhelming evidence.



sadly, I now find myself feeling the same way.. I hate myself for it, but it is most likely the truth..
the muslums that claim they are Peaceful/good out number the bad 5000 to 1, yet they do nothing,, I question their true motives
IP: Logged
dennis_6
Member
Posts: 7196
From: between here and there
Registered: Aug 2001


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 115
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 10:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for dennis_6Send a Private Message to dennis_6Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by mental floss:

Jesus said, I did not come to bring peace to the world, but I have come to bring a sword. I come to pit a man against his father and daughter against mother.
He also said to his followers to sell their cloaks to buy swords.
Islam holds Jesus among it's highest prophets in the Quran. It also says a Muslim shall not harm The People of The Book. Guess which Book that is?
The lie we're all told (by those governing us) is that we're all the same and can live peacefully together.
If you are cinfusedabout what an Infidel is, it's a aomeone who doesn't believe in God the Father. It's even in personal lettera of our US founders and even Christian writings.


The not bringing peace, meant following Christ "taking up your Cross" would tear families apart. It still does. That is the "sword" He brought.
As far as sell your cloaks for swords.. Jesus told the apostles that, they said they had one sword, and He said that was enough. It was only to show, even His closest would not fight for Him in His hour of need.
That is all taken out of context and outright liberal lies...

"Unbelievers are those who say: 'God is one of three.' There is but one God. If they do not desist from so saying, those of them that disbelieve shall be sternly punished." (Surah 5:73)
"Fight against such as those to whom the Scriptures were given [Jews and Christians]...until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued." (Surah 9:29)

"The Christians say: The Christ is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them." (Sura 9:30)

"Prophet make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home." (Surah 9:73)

"And say: All praise is due to Allah, WHO HAS NOT TAKEN A SON and WHO HAS NOT A PARTNER in the kingdom."(Sura 17.111)

[This message has been edited by dennis_6 (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
E.Furgal
Member
Posts: 11708
From: LAND OF CONFUSION
Registered: Mar 2012


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 278
User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 10:59 AM Click Here to See the Profile for E.FurgalSend a Private Message to E.FurgalEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
odd note, that
the islam cheerleaders are AWOL
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69672
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:01 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
What neither dennis nor jmbishop recognize is that the vast majority of Muslims around the world (including the ones in this country and on this forum) simply don't accept the commands to kill infidels, or to denigrate women by treating them as chattel (personal property). There are untold #s of laws, (religious, statute and case) that are simply ignored by great majorities of people every single day in every demographic imaginable, while small minorities take advantage of those laws and project an unfair and unjust appearance to those looking in from a different vantage point.
To an outsider for instance, America is often viewed as a bunch of cutthroat criminals with guns, simply because we have a fairly high crime rate and a comparatively lenient gun ownership policy, with a small minority of our citizens that create mayhem and murder with firearms. What the rest of the world does not see, is that the vast majority of Americans are law abiding citizens, including the vast majority of gun owners.

All the passages that Dennis6 posted, are well known, you can view them on multiple websites, but the truth is, the vast majority of the world's 1.6 billion Islamic worshipers simply chose to ignore that part of the Koran and those hadiths of violence that followed.
It matters little, what laws or commands may be in any religious text, if the majority of those believing in that religion ignore those laws and commands.
Free will.

I have not always felt this way, but I do after a lot of impartial research of the realities in Islam as it applies to the majority of Muslims.
There was a time in my life I was all for a scorched and barren Mideast devoid of population, but that is in the past.
(There was also a time when I very badly wanted to return to Vietnam in the nose of a B-52 dropping nukes but that inclination too has passed.)

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
mental floss
Member
Posts: 362
From: CSA
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:07 AM Click Here to See the Profile for mental flossSend a Private Message to mental flossEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by carnut122:
Germany was divided into 4 sectors, Russia only took control of one.

I said about half of Europe. Did we give them all of Eastern Europe, German Prussia and half the scientists, patents and intellectual property of Germany? Did we partner with and arm the communists who murdered 20 or 30 or maybe 60 million people, largely Christians in the Communist Revolution? And we gave it to them after watching them rape millions of Ukranians, Poles and mainly Germans from as young as 8 yrs old. Patton was right. He watched and was revolted at the Russian rape hoards. Germans were driving out communists. We saved Communism

 
quote
Russia bore the brunt of the Nazi attacks (approximately 20 million casualties) and they had been invaded by Germany twice within a 30 year period (not to mention Napoleon's invasion in the 1800's). So, a Russian controlled "buffer zone" was logical. I'm having trouble connecting the dots between ISIS and this Global government. How are you connecting those events?

Napoleon was French and France allied with Russia then too against Germany. In WWII Germany was trying to drive out the same bankestrs enslaving us today and they were dr

[This message has been edited by mental floss (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
dennis_6
Member
Posts: 7196
From: between here and there
Registered: Aug 2001


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 115
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:12 AM Click Here to See the Profile for dennis_6Send a Private Message to dennis_6Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

What neither dennis nor jmbishop recognize is that the vast majority of Muslims around the world (including the ones in this country and on this forum) simply don't accept the commands to kill infidels, or to denigrate women by treating them as chattel (personal property). There are untold #s of laws, (religious, statute and case) that are simply ignored by great majorities of people every single day in every demographic imaginable, while small minorities take advantage of those laws and project an unfair and unjust appearance to those looking in from a different vantage point.
To an outsider for instance, America is often viewed as a bunch of cutthroat criminals with guns, simply because we have a fairly high crime rate and a comparatively lenient gun ownership policy, with a small minority of our citizens that create mayhem and murder with firearms. What the rest of the world does not see, is that the vast majority of Americans are law abiding citizens, including the vast majority of gun owners.

All the passages that Dennis6 posted, are well known, you can view them on multiple websites, but the truth is, the vast majority of the world's 1.6 billion Islamic worshipers simply chose to ignore that part of the Koran and those hadiths of violence that followed.
It matters little, what laws or commands may be in any religious text, if the majority of those believing in that religion ignore those laws and commands.
Free will.

I have not always felt this way, but I do after a lot of impartial research of the realities in Islam as it applies to the majority of Muslims.
There was a time in my life I was all for a scorched and barren Mideast devoid of population, but that is in the past.
(There was also a time when I very badly wanted to return to Vietnam in the nose of a B-52 dropping nukes but that inclination too has passed.)



I do understand the vast majority of Muslims are apostate, and the fight should not be against people, but against the doctrine of Islam. Islam is evil and it is a doctrine of death. I hate to say a religion should be outlawed, but Islam should be outlawed in every nation under the sun.

BTW, I also used to think we should have carpet bombed Vietnam with the largest nuclear devices in our Arsenal and turned the middle east into a glass parking lot, along with Somalia. I haven't felt that way for about a decade though, and am not advocating killing muslims. I am calling for, people to see that Islam is a evil religion cult.

[This message has been edited by dennis_6 (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69672
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:14 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by mental floss:

Napoleon was French and France allied with Russia then too against Germany. In WWII Germany was trying to drive out the same bankestrs enslaving us today and they were dr




Why not come right out and say it MentalFloss--"We're enslaved by the Jews" ?
How appropriate--an antisemitic comment in an anti-Islam thread.
IP: Logged
E.Furgal
Member
Posts: 11708
From: LAND OF CONFUSION
Registered: Mar 2012


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 278
User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:15 AM Click Here to See the Profile for E.FurgalSend a Private Message to E.FurgalEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

What neither dennis nor jmbishop recognize is that the vast majority of Muslims around the world (including the ones in this country and on this forum) simply don't accept the commands to kill infidels, or to denigrate women by treating them as chattel (personal property). There are untold #s of laws, (religious, statute and case) that are simply ignored by great majorities of people every single day in every demographic imaginable, while small minorities take advantage of those laws and project an unfair and unjust appearance to those looking in from a different vantage point.
To an outsider for instance, America is often viewed as a bunch of cutthroat criminals with guns, simply because we have a fairly high crime rate and a comparatively lenient gun ownership policy, with a small minority of our citizens that create mayhem and murder with firearms. What the rest of the world does not see, is that the vast majority of Americans are law abiding citizens, including the vast majority of gun owners.

All the passages that Dennis6 posted, are well known, you can view them on multiple websites, but the truth is, the vast majority of the world's 1.6 billion Islamic worshipers simply chose to ignore that part of the Koran and those hadiths of violence that followed.
It matters little, what laws or commands may be in any religious text, if the majority of those believing in that religion ignore those laws and commands.
Free will.

I have not always felt this way, but I do after a lot of impartial research of the realities in Islam as it applies to the majority of Muslims.
There was a time in my life I was all for a scorched and barren Mideast devoid of population, but that is in the past.
(There was also a time when I very badly wanted to return to Vietnam in the nose of a B-52 dropping nukes but that inclination too has passed.)



you might be right.. or they are following islam to the letter..
as it tells them it is ok to lie for the greater good..

My opinion is, if the other muslums are as you say, why haven't them fought then killers head on??

These same other muslums you talk about are the same ones that if we ever have another 9/11 will be cheering..
just like they did the first time..

ACTIONS speak louder than words, them standing by, doing nothing as the killers give islam a bad name.. Speaks VOLUMES
IP: Logged
Csjag
Member
Posts: 3170
From: Ocklawaha,Fl, USA
Registered: Dec 2013


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:23 AM Click Here to See the Profile for CsjagSend a Private Message to CsjagEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I think the big question is: What can be done about the Muslims who murder civilians? I just don't know. I did see men who looked to be of middle eastern extraction in the videos of people who escaped the theater massacre.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
jmbishop
Member
Posts: 4484
From: Probably Texas
Registered: Jul 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 169
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:27 AM Click Here to See the Profile for jmbishopSend a Private Message to jmbishopEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by mental floss:

JM your argument is with the dictionary. Can you post a link to an accredited source supporting your definition? Politically Correct approach is to change meanings like "Assault Weapon" for semi auto which is actually select fire or full auto only.


The dictionary is a tool and the reason they want to manipulate it. There is a definition for "unicorn" in the dictionary, does that make them real? There is a definition for "agnostic-atheist", does that make it real? Dictionaries don't dictate language, they are just an interpretation influince by pop culture.
IP: Logged
mental floss
Member
Posts: 362
From: CSA
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:32 AM Click Here to See the Profile for mental flossSend a Private Message to mental flossEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Dennis, stating that scripture means something other than what it clearly states is heresy. Are you a Christian? Do you believe scripture is word of God?
http://www.answering-islam....an/Versions/ali.html
If you don't speak Arabic, old Greek and ancient Aramaic then you are just picking a direction in which you will "believe".
Muslims state Jesus was born of virgin birth and is among the highest of prophets.
Did you know the Talmud says Jesus is the son of a whore and is boiling in excrement, and anyone who follows him will suffer the same fate?
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69672
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:34 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
I hate to say a religion should be outlawed, but Islam should be outlawed in every nation under the sun.


Careful what you wish for--where do you draw the line once precedent is set? There are a great multitude of people in the world that believe all religion should be outlawed, at least 3 on this very forum have stated so publicly over the years.

I personally believe that this group should be outlawed and their membership banished to a 3rd world country or to a distant inhabitable planet as soon as the technology arrives to facilitate their demise , but cooler minds will prevail and they will be left to their own ignorance and childishness.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2...ad-in-license-photo/
(Actually, I don't believe that at all but you get my point I'm sure)

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
mental floss
Member
Posts: 362
From: CSA
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:47 AM Click Here to See the Profile for mental flossSend a Private Message to mental flossEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

Why not come right out and say it MentalFloss--"We're enslaved by the Jews" ?
How appropriate--an antisemitic comment in an anti-Islam thread.


I don't follow you. You're apparently saying banksters are Semites? Arabs are Semites. Most Semites are Arab. So when you just state a thing it's true except if JM or someone else does it.
German Nazis were authoritarian andI oppose such. Nazis were trying to drive out communism and banksters to start. Ethnic Germans (not Nazis) were being starved in their land due to the Treaty of Versailles. That gave rise to the Nazis.

You sound like the same people shrieking RACISM when see something you don't agree with. ANTI-SEMITE!
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69672
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 11:55 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Semite can mean any group, race, or nationality in the Mideast, tho generally, in popular and modern usage, antisemitism is interpreted as a slur against the Jews.
You can believe it or not, doesn't bother me either way.

 
quote
Pre-Nazi Germany is yet another of the dramatic examples of the rise of
Jewish economic influence and control in European countries, in this case violently
ended by the Nazi destruction of German Jewry.

Jews numbered at most
about one per cent of the German population between 1871 and 1933, and this
percentage had been steadily declining [GORDON, p. 8] but by the end of the
eighteenth century, “a high proportion of the landed and liquid wealth in Prussia
was in the hands of either nobles or Jews.” [HERTZ, p. 36] By 1908, 12 of the
20 richest Berliners were of Jewish ancestry, as were 11 of the 25 richest people
in Prussia. [MOSSE, W., 1987, p. 208] Of the top 200 Prussian millionaires, 55
were Jewish. Of the top 800, 190 were of Jewish extraction. [MOSSE, p. 30] 41%
of Prussian iron and scrap iron firms, and 57% of other metal businesses were
owned by Jews. [GORDON, p. 11] Although Jews in 1903 were only 0.74% of
the labor force in Prussia, 27% of all Prussian lawyers were Jews, as were 10%
of apprenticed lawyers, 47% of magistrates, and 30% of all higher ranks of the
judiciary. [GORDON, p. 13]

By the 1930s, 46% of German Jews were self-employed. [KOTKIN, p. 43] In
1932, six million Germans were unemployed. [RUBENSTEIN, R.L., p. 117] In
the town of Sonderburg, in the Rhineland area of Germany, “of the five largest
employers, two were Jewish firms; in one case, the Jewish-owned mill employed
hundreds of Gentile workers – as many as 20 percent of the working adult labor
force. In a very real sense, the Gentile community depended on Jews for
employment and for retail goods.” [HENRY, F., p. 52]

Gentile fortunes in Germany and its environs were based in landownership
and agriculture; Jewish fortunes were founded upon banking and finance.
[MOSSE p. 206] In Berlin, by the eighteenth century, “the income of Jews in the
middle of the Jewish tax scale would be about three times higher than the average
Berliner. The middle of the Jewish tax scale would thus be approximately
equal to the top ten per cent of Berlin households.” [LOWENSTEIN] The average
income of Jews in pre-Nazi Germany was 3.2 times higher than the rest of
the population. [NIEWYK, p. 16] “At the end of the eighteenth century 400
Jewish families formed one of the wealthiest groups in Berlin … In Bavaria, in
1808, 80% of government loans were endorsed and negotiated by Jews.”
[ARENDT, p. 17] By 1914 the Jews of Berlin – 5 per cent of that city’s population
– paid over a third of its taxes [MOSSE, W., 1987, p. 13] and there were “a
large number of domestic servants in the two most important Jewish areas of
Berlin during the 1920’s.” [GORDON, p. 15]

In 1923, 150 of the 161 privately-owned banks in Berlin were Jewish; [GORDON,
p. 11] “In Berlin alone,” notes Jewish author Edwin Black, “about 75% of
the attorneys, and nearly as many doctors, were Jewish.” [BLACK, p. 58] “All the
major Berlin department stores – Wertheim, Herman Tietz, N. Israel,
KaDeWe,” says Jewish author Peter Wyden, “were the properties of Jews. All the
principal newspaper publishers and thirteen of the drama critics were Jews.
Garment manufacturing, a major industry, was generally known to be in Jewish
hands.” [WYDEN, p. 21] “In Germany,” says Nachum Gidal, “Jews above all
developed the setting up of department stores, the manufacture and readymade
ladies and gentlemen’s clothing, the tobacco, leather, and fur industries
and the new film industry.” [GIDAL, p. 17]

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15155
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 286
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:02 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rogergarrison:

The liberals STILL wont see that this is what the radical muslims/islamists DO. They dont understand anything except being killed.
They even give up their own life to kill others. They dont care.


Yup. There are great rewards for martyrdom...

------------------
My World of Wheels Winners (Click on links below)

3.4L Supercharged 87 GT and Super Duty 4 Indy #163

IP: Logged
dennis_6
Member
Posts: 7196
From: between here and there
Registered: Aug 2001


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 115
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:03 PM Click Here to See the Profile for dennis_6Send a Private Message to dennis_6Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by mental floss:

Dennis, stating that scripture means something other than what it clearly states is heresy. Are you a Christian? Do you believe scripture is word of God?
http://www.answering-islam....an/Versions/ali.html
If you don't speak Arabic, old Greek and ancient Aramaic then you are just picking a direction in which you will "believe".
Muslims state Jesus was born of virgin birth and is among the highest of prophets.
Did you know the Talmud says Jesus is the son of a whore and is boiling in excrement, and anyone who follows him will suffer the same fate?


Christ often spoke in parables, so not heresy. At what point did Christ literally have or bring a sword. Look at the context of the verse with the preceding and following verses.
Muslims also do not believe Christ was the son of God or that He was Crucified or from my understanding that He was even Jewish.
BTW, I full well understand what the Talmud and the Jews say about Jesus.

If you would actually do in depth studies of the religions, you would understand, instead of repeating talking points.
IP: Logged
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15155
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 286
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:05 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by E.Furgal:

sadly, I now find myself feeling the same way.. I hate myself for it, but it is most likely the truth..
the muslums that claim they are Peaceful/good out number the bad 5000 to 1, yet they do nothing,, I question their true motives


Agreed.

Radical Islamics want to behead you.
Moderate Islamics hope the Radical Islamics behead you.

Moderate Muslims who DON'T feel that way are NOT considered “true Muslims” but apostates and are also TARGETS.
Is it any wonder that “vast majority” we keep being told about (IF it even exists) keeps silent?

Sure, not all Muslims are terrorists.
But these days, all terrorists ARE Muslim.

Why is it so Politically Incorrect to state that fact??

[This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
dennis_6
Member
Posts: 7196
From: between here and there
Registered: Aug 2001


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 115
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:08 PM Click Here to See the Profile for dennis_6Send a Private Message to dennis_6Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierosound:


Agreed.

Radical Islamics want to behead you.
Moderate Islamics hope the Radical Islamics behead you.

Moderate Muslims who DON'T feel that way are NOT considered “true Muslims” but apostates and are also TARGETS.
Is it any wonder that “vast majority” we keep being told about (IF it even exists) keeps silent?


It's the other way around...

Fundamental Islamics want to behead you. (They are following their *holy* book to the letter)
Moderate Islamics hope the Fundamentals behead you.
Muslims who DON'T feel that way are NOT considered “true Muslims” but apostates and are also TARGETS.

[This message has been edited by dennis_6 (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
jmbishop
Member
Posts: 4484
From: Probably Texas
Registered: Jul 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 169
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:09 PM Click Here to See the Profile for jmbishopSend a Private Message to jmbishopEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

What neither dennis nor jmbishop recognize is that the vast majority of Muslims around the world (including the ones in this country and on this forum) simply don't accept the commands to kill infidels, or to denigrate women by treating them as chattel ........

What MJ fails to realize is that muslims fit into 4 categories, the open true believer, the covert true believer, the ignorant or the oppressed forced participant. Not once have I claimed they are all murders and despite the picture MJ is trying to paint I have actually stated they are not all monsters.

Letting them go unchecked was what leads to these attacks, lying and positioning themselves in other cultures is their first step in domination. Their religion dictates this so when they pretend to integrate into society but stick closely to their religion and traditions it should be a red flag.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
williegoat
Member
Posts: 19628
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 104
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:13 PM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageSend a Private Message to williegoatEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierosound:

Radical Islamics want to behead you.
Moderate Islamics hope the Radical Islamics behead you.

Sure, not all Muslims are terrorists.
But these days, all terrorists ARE Muslim.



That's it, in a nutshell.
IP: Logged
Doug85GT
Member
Posts: 9485
From: Sacramento CA USA
Registered: May 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 121
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:15 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Doug85GTSend a Private Message to Doug85GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I found a lot of truth in this man's take on the attack.

IP: Logged
TheDigitalAlchemist
Member
Posts: 12470
From: Long Island, NY
Registered: Jan 2012


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 94
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:17 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TheDigitalAlchemistClick Here to visit TheDigitalAlchemist's HomePageSend a Private Message to TheDigitalAlchemistEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
So, what are our options?
Honestly. Realistically.
Removing all the masturbatory fantasies of glass parking lots and internment camps...

They want the French to stop bombing. So they do.
And then and the rest of he world stays away from that area entirely.

Will they be satisfied? No. Not till the whole world is Muslim, right?
And then there Re the groups which want conflict, because that will be the "end times".

So, we're stuck. Because of these goddamn terrorists.
It's like the "disgruntled ex-employee" or student pariah.
But worse, because they have a common core of hatred. A shared bad idea.

And we can't kill an idea.

So godd@mn frustrating...

And it's spreading, physically by foot and by psychologically via all various methods...

Sucks.
Let me know when you're done fighting with each other and have found a solution to this.

I'm all out of ideas.
IP: Logged
williegoat
Member
Posts: 19628
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 104
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:18 PM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageSend a Private Message to williegoatEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by mental floss:

I don't follow you. You're apparently saying banksters are Semites? Arabs are Semites. Most Semites are Arab. So when you just state a thing it's true except if JM or someone else does it.
German Nazis were authoritarian andI oppose such. Nazis were trying to drive out communism and banksters to start. Ethnic Germans (not Nazis) were being starved in their land due to the Treaty of Versailles. That gave rise to the Nazis.

You sound like the same people shrieking RACISM when see something you don't agree with. ANTI-SEMITE!

I think maryjane nailed it:

 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

Why not come right out and say it MentalFloss--"We're enslaved by the Jews" ?
How appropriate--an antisemitic comment in an anti-Islam thread.
IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member
Posts: 20794
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 305
User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:21 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

"Some" of Islam caused this.
"Some" of America caused the Oklahoma City bombing.


You are a fool.

Edit: I wish you would understand that you have limited access to anything other than reading material as your argument. Yes, you have traveled the world in the fight for America, but you have little to no living experience with the subject at hand. Then, you state "feelings" as your defense. Sorry MJ, but the views and lifestyles of these moderates is nothing like what you are preaching. To you it sounds as if I am spewing hate, but not a word has been anything but learned truths. I am sorry if you are not understanding, but basically you are wrong.

[This message has been edited by Tony Kania (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:21 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

What neither dennis nor jmbishop recognize is that the vast majority of Muslims around the world (including the ones in this country and on this forum) simply don't accept the commands to kill infidels, or to denigrate women by treating them as chattel (personal property).



Respecfully, I disagree to some extent at least with the attitudes towards women. It's part of their society and considered the norm, by both men and women.

Something so simple and he immediately goes back to being all smiles for the camera, and she's not even surprised.

To be sure there are varying degrees of views and I don't mean to equate brutal beatings, rapes and honor killings with a slap in the face but the attitude that women are beneath men is prevalent.

I do agree that many modern Muslims, I suspect mostly from the Western world, don't accept the violent parts of the religion and choose to focus on what comforts them. All religions do this to an extent. It's an important distinction to make. Fearing the entire group because of the actions of a radical subset is what led to Japanese internment in WWII.
IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member
Posts: 20794
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 305
User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by E.Furgal:

odd note, that
the islam cheerleaders are AWOL


I too wonder why? This is their time to shine, and explain as per usual rhetoric. This is telling to me.
IP: Logged
mental floss
Member
Posts: 362
From: CSA
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:36 PM Click Here to See the Profile for mental flossSend a Private Message to mental flossEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

Semite can mean any group, race, or nationality in the Mideast, tho generally, in popular and modern usage, antisemitism is interpreted as a slur against the Jews.
You can believe it or not, doesn't bother me either way

No, Assyrians are not Semites as many other groups aren't. A lot of Jews aren't genetic Semites.
I said banksters. Oh,did you make that leap because most bankers and hedge fund managers and the Fed Reserve is headed by Jews

It doesn't bother you? You accused me of being an anti-semite.
Modern usage is a sham because now European media is covering the increase in antisemetic actions...by Semites. See how stupid the usage is now? Most Semites by far are not Jews.

[This message has been edited by mental floss (edited 11-14-2015).]

IP: Logged
jmbishop
Member
Posts: 4484
From: Probably Texas
Registered: Jul 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 169
Rate this member

Report this Post11-14-2015 12:37 PM Click Here to See the Profile for jmbishopSend a Private Message to jmbishopEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by TheDigitalAlchemist:


Sucks.
Let me know when you're done fighting with each other and have found a solution to this.

I'm all out of ideas.

Unfortunately, there is no solution, we will never wipe them out(and I'm in no way suggesting we should) and they will never stop. The best we can do is take action to attempt to keep ourselves and our allies safe.
IP: Logged
Previous Page | Next Page

This topic is 7 pages long:  1   2   3   4   5   6   7 
next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery | Ogre's Cave
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock