My wife was watching that show the other day. When it got to the monkeys that aggravate the millipedes to get them to secrete their poison as the explained they didn't know why they did it. I was looking at my wife saying "they do it to get high". Shortly after that hey said intoxication was one possible reason for it among those they are researching.
Besides all the reasons why I believe a monkey would not be interested in fire, creating fire, or using it to toast marshmallows:
I have to say I respect the source, but I don't believe a monkey can light a match without burning its finger. I don't believe he would repeat the process once that happened.
Besides all the reasons why I believe a monkey would not be interested in fire, creating fire, or using it to toast marshmallows:
I have to say I respect the source, but I don't believe a monkey can light a match without burning its finger. I don't believe he would repeat the process once that happened.
I am going to investigate this farther.
I agree. When he can make s'mores, I'll be impressed.
Besides all the reasons why I believe a monkey would not be interested in fire, creating fire, or using it to toast marshmallows:
I have to say I respect the source, but I don't believe a monkey can light a match without burning its finger. I don't believe he would repeat the process once that happened.
I am going to investigate this farther.
If he's "domesticated" i can see him doing all of it. They are smart and learn quickly. If they saw one of the people making fire and cooking, they are liable to emulate it.
If he's "domesticated" i can see him doing all of it. They are smart and learn quickly. If they saw one of the people making fire and cooking, they are liable to emulate it.
Notice it doesn't actually show him lighting the fire, and barely shows him even lighting the match. Also notice during the "marshmallow roasting" how big the logs in the fire are.
I believe he may actually not be afraid to be that close to fire (even light a match and quickly drop it), not be bothered by the smoke, and roasted the marshmallow and ate it, but it was a human that built the fire.
All they would have to do to prove me wrong is pull the camera back for a complete view of the whole procedure....... I couldn't help but notice the clever camera frames & cuts.
[This message has been edited by Boondawg (edited 10-26-2014).]
While it's cool watching a primate build a fire and roast marshmallows, I wonder if the primate hands and arms we saw in close up belonged to the ape that was eating the marshmallows, or a human in an ape suit. Either way, it was definitely a primate building a fire and roasting marshmallows.
Originally posted by Formula88: Either way, it was definitely a primate building a fire......
I don't think you can't definitively say that. Because that isn't shown in the video, in my opinion.
Notice how the pile of sticks are carefully built-up as he just hap-hazardly tosses his sticks on the carefully crafted "tee-pee" style woodpile....that's a human design from years of experimentation of what will & won't work when trying to get a fire going.
[This message has been edited by Boondawg (edited 10-26-2014).]
Like I said; The whole segment is about an Ape building and lighting a fire....why wouldn't they show him actually building or lighting the fire? Why aren't there any wide shots of this amazing new never-before-seen Ape ability?
P.S. I want more that anything for Apes to close the gap between us & them! And I believe it is their destiny to do so. If we don't advertently or inadvertently kill them first....it's going to take them a few million (thousands?) years to evolve to our grand level.
P.S. I want more that anything for Apes to close the gap between us & them! And I believe it is their destiny to do so. If we don't advertently or inadvertently kill them first....it's going to take them a few million (thousands?) years to evolve to our grand level.
The real question is, we will allow it....
We're well on our way to meeting them half way. Or more.
Anything about what the video definitively shows. The video does not show an ape starting a fire (or even a human, for that matter).
Now, if the whole argument is that humans are primates and therefore a primate indeed started the fire....fine. But the video doesn't even show that, either.
[This message has been edited by Boondawg (edited 10-27-2014).]
Really? Did you see it happen? (I am pretty sure, there was no video around in those days) If you didn't see it happen then you would be no less presumptuous in your assertion than Formula88. Man could have "captured" fire in various ways. Friction from rubbing tree limbs moving in the wind has started fires. There were even natural fission reactors eons and eons ago. (pre-man timeline if current archaeological science/paleontology is correct) Meteor strikes have brought fire to grasslands. Spontaneous combustion of rotting grass and plants have caused fires with no human interaction. And of course these have been around since before man and are still in the news today:
[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 10-27-2014).]