Originally posted by BingB: It is impossible to post a link to something that was never said.
But I posted the entire diary. No where in it does she accuse Joe of molesting here. she has never said anything like that.
The only people who believe that is true are the ones living in a right-wing bubble where the truth doesn't matter.
The only people who don't believe that Joe committed child sexual abuse are sicko Leftists like yourself who obviously believe that a grown man showering with a child is somehow appropriate and isn't sexual abuse, which includes indecent exposure
Leftists gotta Leftist for their own sexual gratification ...especially when it's sick and abusive to an 8 year old little girl
quote
Originally posted by BingB:
No where in it does she accuse Joe of molesting here. she has never said anything like that.
The word that you're groping for like Joe Biden at a child's birthday party is: her.
Moreover, the first word in your next malformed sentence should be capitalized, (i.e. "She").
Like I said previously, you paint a more and more vivid and sad sick picture of yourself with every jejune post you make "Mr. adult, educated, style manual."
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 05-18-2024).]
The only people who don't believe that Joe committed child sexual abuse are sicko Leftists like yourself who obviously believe that a grown man showering with a child is somehow appropriate and isn't sexual abuse, which includes indecent exposure
I did not say it was appropriate. I agree with Ashley that it was probably inappropriate.
But it is not molestation or sexual abuse. If there is no sexual content a child is not "molested" or "sexually abused" just by seeing a naked person.
These were the same kind of conversations we had with Greasemonkey back in the day... always excusing certain behaviors, questioning the validity of our culture on whether these ideas are normal... etc... etc...
These were the same kind of conversations we had with Greasemonkey back in the day... always excusing certain behaviors, questioning the validity of our culture on whether these ideas are normal... etc... etc...
These were the same kind of conversations we had with Greasemonkey back in the day... always excusing certain behaviors, questioning the validity of our culture on whether these ideas are normal... etc... etc...
We know how that ended.
quote
Originally posted by BingB: WHAT?
HE ACTUALLY DARED TO DISAGREE WITH YOU?
WHAT HAPPENED WHEN HE DID THAT????
He got free room and board, compliments of the state.
Originally posted by BingB: But it is not molestation or sexual abuse. If there is no sexual content a child is not "molested" or "sexually abused" just by seeing a naked person.
some of us are normal with out the extreme taboos life is different in the tropic's clothing optional is not abnormal or uncommon at local PUBLIC BEACH'S YOU NEED TO GET OUT MORE
Originally posted by randye: The word that you're groping for like Joe Biden at a child's birthday party is: her.
Moreover, the first word in your next malformed sentence should be capitalized, (i.e. "She").
Like I said previously, you paint a more and more vivid and sad sick picture of yourself with every jejune post you make "Mr. adult, educated, style manual."
A LOT OF LIES WITH NO LINK
aka his standard post approved by JBS in 62 and never updated
some of us are normal with out the extreme taboos life is different in the tropic's clothing optional is not abnormal or uncommon at local PUBLIC BEACH'S YOU NEED TO GET OUT MORE
I am sure that public nudity is not the culture in Delaware. Public nudity is not that same as taking a shower with your opposite sex child.
Public nudity is not that same as taking a shower with your opposite sex child.
Correct.
Public nudity is generally illegal under "indecent exposure" laws. But those generally only apply in public places. It is not illegal to be naked in your own home.
I don't think anyone is surprised at the direction this has gone. Disappointed, yes, but surprised, no.
So, the question to ponder is: The chicken or the egg.
Do they defend these things because Biden is their messiah? Or, do they defend Biden because he does these things?
In other words, do they overlook destructive, antisocial behavior because they can't afford to loose there star quarterback? Or, do they defend Biden because they believe he will make such things acceptable?
This is not a question of what is acceptable, that has already been decided over thousands of years of human civilization. It is a question of motive. Are they driven by tribalism or are they trying to change social norms? Either way, their experiment is destined for failure. I just don't want the country to be dragged down with it.
In other words, do they overlook destructive, antisocial behavior because they can't afford to loose there star quarterback? Or, do they defend Biden because they believe he will make such things acceptable?
I asked the same question when the Republicans star QB said this, “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.”
Originally posted by BingB: Actually there is zero evidence to show that a small child is damaged by seeing a naked adult if there is no sexual context.
Did you and your wife walk around naked in front of your children?
Originally posted by BingB: Actually there is zero evidence to show that a small child is damaged by seeing a naked adult if there is no sexual context.
In Colorado, indecent exposure to a child is a class 6 felony if the offender is more than 18 years old and more than 4 years older than the child, and knows there is a child under 15 in view of the exposure. The penalty for this crime is: Up to 18 months in prison, Up to $100,000 in fines, More intensive supervision during probation,
Colorado law makes NO distinction between public or private.
Originally posted by BingB: I asked the same question when the Republicans star QB said this, “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.”
Public nudity is generally illegal under "indecent exposure" laws. But those generally only apply in public places. It is not illegal to be naked in your own home.
If you stand nude in front of an open window in your home with the intent for others to see, you can be criminally charged with indecent exposure.
You are obviously having a very difficult time understanding indecent exposure and child sexual abuse, which isn't surprising for a Leftoid.
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 05-19-2024).]
Originally posted by randye: If you stand nude in front of an open window in your home with the intent for others to see, you can be criminally charged with indecent exposure.
You are obviously having a very difficult time understanding indecent exposure and child sexual abuse, which isn't surprising for a Leftoid.
the most uptight of the RWNJ'S
THE MOST VOCAL ABOUT SEX
ARE OFTEN VERY WORSE OFFENDERS
WHO'S REAL DIRTY DEEDS ARE THE PROBLEM THEY CON-DEM to the world
it sure was true about the gays in the Gop the most public HOMO-PHOBIC are gay in private and hide it
[This message has been edited by ray b (edited 05-20-2024).]
That's a crock ! Rabid pops his middle index finger out from between his buttocks, takes a whiff, holds it out, expecting you to do the same. ' What do you think ? ' he asks. ' I think you're deranged, a dempartie stool so deluded, you're too far gone to ever hope to be a rational man, coherent, perceiving reality ! It's not real man, they're false images, marxist lies. '
The truth is, Biden_Joe has been groping, sniffing, prodding, fingering teenie girls and women all of his life, making him a life long pedophile. ' Whitey L. Peters ' inadvertently exposed himself to children at the pool, the very same way he exposed himself to the usss female agent, an exhibitionist, a flasher in a raincoat, for big thrills, a prevert. When you watch Biden_Joe approach a girl from behind, lean over to take a sniff, grope and prod, imagine it was Ashley, in the basement TV den, when she was fourteen, Biden_Joe's intent was to bugger her again with the help of a few spoonfuls of 100/100 Bogota Blow, numbing the soft parts, that he had been dinking for two years, since she was twelve. ' Mommy, Daddy keeps bugging me, buggering me ! ' ' Oh ! Ashley ! You mustn't say anything to anyone, you will ruin everything, your Father is a great man, you must not tell anyone ! You will wreck everything, we will lose everything, you must be silent ! ' How that conversation went in the kitchen of the Delaware mansion, when Ashley was seventeen, making Biden_Jill an accessory to incest, rape, obstruction, many more charges. Entered into evidence, the flight logs of Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express, bound for Fantasy Island, where Biden_Joe was a regular visitor, teenie nookie the dish du jour, ' twelve please '. fjb with an indictment for treason. ' Look Joe, you know the score, here's the deal, you plead guilty of treason, or, we prosecute you for incest ! ' January 2025, Biden_Joe pleads guilty of treason ! fjb again to be sure, ' another wood stake for the pederast ! ' Land of Confusion Maybe it's true, maybe you don't know, don't know you've lost it, unable to see reality, living in a dream, a marxist nightmare. Go see a doctor.. a psy.. psy.. psychiatrist, get some sedatives, the repairs happening. Yeah, like that.
In Colorado, indecent exposure to a child is a class 6 felony if the offender is more than 18 years old and more than 4 years older than the child, and knows there is a child under 15 in view of the exposure. The penalty for this crime is: Up to 18 months in prison, Up to $100,000 in fines, More intensive supervision during probation,
Colorado law makes NO distinction between public or private.
Joe Biden could not be convicted just for taking a shower with his young daughter because the law requires that the act be committed "with the intent to arouse or to satisfy the sexual desire of any person" C.R.S. 18-7-302 (1) (a)
I tried to explain this to you earlier
quote
Originally posted by BingB: But it is not molestation or sexual abuse. If there is no sexual content a child is not "molested" or "sexually abused" just by seeing a naked person.
You just do not understand the law.
[This message has been edited by BingB (edited 05-22-2024).]
Did you and your wife walk around naked in front of your children?
My wife jammed her bare breasts into my son's mouth.
Perverts like you would have her arrested for that. You don't understand how someone can be naked in front of a child without being sexually stimulated.
My wife jammed her bare breasts into my son's mouth.
May you and anyone you love never know the horror of what can happen to a child and then have the memories haunt them for the rest of their lives. A child's innocence is a fragile thing, it could take years before they even realize what was done. I hope no one here has a child that has to deal with that from any source.
There is loving a child and still being inappropriate. Showering with a young lady as an adult male would cross that line for me and everyone I know. Doesn't matter who they are. Breastfeeding a child is not the same thing, shame on you.
I only briefly read this thread and the last couple of posts caught my eye. Going back to other distractions as this topic sickens me.
Tell us again why Biden can't use title 42 to curb illegal aliens from entering our country.
Because there is not currently a medical emergency. The prevention of the spread of a communicable disease is not great enough to justify the use of section 265.
I have already explained this to you about a dozen times. Are you on some new medication or something?
Originally posted by Jake_Dragon: There is loving a child and still being inappropriate. Showering with a young lady as an adult male would cross that line for me and everyone I know. Doesn't matter who they are. Breastfeeding a child is not the same thing, shame on you.
I only briefly read this thread and the last couple of posts caught my eye. Going back to other distractions as this topic sickens me.
I guess the problem is that you only "briefly" read this thread then you would know that I have said from the beginning that I did not think it was appropriate. But the fact is that we live in a country that allows individual freedom. And right now there is no evidence that seeing a naked adult is damaging to a child if there is not sexual context. And that is what generally shapes our law. It generally takes more than just "nudity" to charge a parent with abuse of their own child.
Most people think it is improper. It is definitely a highly contested "gray area". I felt it was improper when my daughter was that age. But under the law I don't think it is abuse or neglect. Of course I could be wrong about that. I am not going to spend the time researching something that I don't really support.
What I do support is the truth. Some people on the right are selling this story as an admission that Joe sexually molested his daughter. That never happened, and it is one of the lowest lies that you can tell against a person.
And not only is it a disgusting tactic, but it is coming from the crowd that support Donald "grab them in the p***y" Trump. One guy might have violated a social mores based on some vague statements from his daughter's diary. The other guy is on tape condoning sexual assault.
If you were to ask Biden_Joe if he denies grabbing Tara Reade by the pushy, he would lie, predictably, a chronic liar, a chronic diddler, a compulsive pedophile. Biden_Joe pucked Ashley's ash when she was thirteen, an entire year of incest before he thoroughly penetrated her starfish, 100/100 high test Bogota Blow numbing her bum bum, direct from Colombia. Indict Biden_Joe for treason ! ' A spoonful of coke and a dollop of spit helps the glide ! ' ~ sage advice from Biden_Joe, pumping Ashley, buns up in her bed, Delaware, 1995. ' Gaping Ashley as a teen, was an erotic adventure, so very hot ! ' Later that evening, he creeped into Ashley's bed, she had just got out of the shower, Herbal Essence. The man is a psychopathic incestuous serial rapist, needs to be in a prison, or better yet, buried beneath it's concrete lavatory floor. What did they do to his victims on Lolita Island ? What were their fates ? fjb
Originally posted by BingB: Because there is not currently a medical emergency. The prevention of the spread of a communicable disease is not great enough to justify the use of section 265.
That is not true. It says so in Title 42, section ****.
