Tolerances and body size can and do make a difference. One beer in not going to affect a 300 lb man as much as it will a 100 lb man.
Can we at least agree on that?
Steve
Sure we can agree on that. But, 1-2 40 ounce bottle of malt liquor, as shown in the video, is going to impair both a 100lbs and 300lbs man.
Can we agree from what was stated in the video that both the company and union both stated that drinking on one's break and then going to work is unsafe and against the company policy and rules?
[This message has been edited by aceman (edited 09-24-2010).]
IP: Logged
11:55 AM
partfiero Member
Posts: 6923 From: Tucson, Arizona Registered: Jan 2002
We are talking about 10 people out of a workforce of over 1,000. What is that 1%? Is that so high?
Tolerances and body size can and do make a difference. One beer in not going to affect a 300 lb man as much as it will a 100 lb man.
Can we at least agree on that?
Steve
That is the ones who got caught, who know how many actually do this. The solution is simple. Employees should have to pay out of their paychecks workers comp insurance and money awarded for lawsuits that arise from employees that are stoned on the job. Then they can have at it.
Can we agree from what was stated in the video that both the company and union both stated that drinking on one's break and then going to work is unsafe and against the company policy and rules?
This, is the only part that is relevant. I seriously doubt that the rules the company set forth and the employees agreed to, specify a sliding scale depending on a person's weight, size, or tolerance.
IP: Logged
12:39 PM
jaskispyder Member
Posts: 21510 From: Northern MI Registered: Jun 2002
New reporter, "Sorry to be a buzz kill, but aren't you guys suppose to be building cars?"
If I was allowed to drink and smoke pot on my job I'd be fired on the spot! I wonder what area in the plant these drinkers work at?
No worries. These guys are professional drinkers and potheads. They've built up a tolerance that allows them to perform their jobs up to standard. (The standard must be half-assed.)
IP: Logged
07:05 PM
Old Lar Member
Posts: 13797 From: Palm Bay, Florida Registered: Nov 1999
I suspect the union will enroll them into a drug rehab (sans Linsey Lohan) and they'll keep their jobs building Jeeps. Just run out and purchase a Jeep built by a few drunk pot heads. If the union wasn't so corrupt these guys would join the ranks of the unemployed.
IP: Logged
08:45 PM
Boondawg Member
Posts: 38235 From: Displaced Alaskan Registered: Jun 2003
Think they will incorporate that video into their coming ads? Our workers drink and build them, so you can feel safe drinking and driving them. Alcohol tested cars, only from Chrysler!
IP: Logged
09:54 PM
PFF
System Bot
Sep 25th, 2010
ditch Member
Posts: 3780 From: Brookston, IN Registered: Mar 2003
I can't believe we're sitting here debating whether or not drinking beer on a lunch break is appropriate or not. Seriously, when exactly did we lose common sense in this country? Are we that far gone? I know that in general we are very uninformed (just look at who got elected in 2008 as proof of that), but come on, this is a no brainer.
For all those who actually think this is acceptable practice, answer me this: If it is OK, then WHY did Chrystler suspend these workers when they were caught doing it? Also, if it's OK, WHY did they run away when being caught??? Heck, the UAW even condemned it!
I know the answer, and it didn't take half a brain cell to figure it out.
[This message has been edited by ditch (edited 09-25-2010).]
IP: Logged
09:05 AM
MidEngineManiac Member
Posts: 29566 From: Some unacceptable view Registered: Feb 2007
I can't believe we're sitting here debating whether or not drinking beer on a lunch break is appropriate or not. Seriously, when exactly did we lose common sense in this country? Are we that far gone? I know that in general we are very uninformed (just look at who got elected in 2008 as proof of that), but come on, this is a no brainer.
For all those who actually think this is acceptable practice, answer me this: If it is OK, then WHY did Chrystler suspend these workers when they were caught doing it? Also, if it's OK, WHY did they run away when being caught??? Heck, the UAW even condemned it!
I know the answer, and it didn't take half a brain cell to figure it out.
Annnnddddd......when society decides to go on a witchhunt over stimulants, we will be having this conversation over if its appropriate to drink a coffee at lunch.
IP: Logged
11:21 AM
aceman Member
Posts: 4899 From: Brooklyn Center, MN Registered: Feb 2003
Annnnddddd......when society decides to go on a witchhunt over stimulants, we will be having this conversation over if its appropriate to drink a coffee at lunch.
They already did. Ephedrine was once legal over the counter. Now it's illegal. Coffee doesn't have enough stimulants in it to really cause harm to yourself and others.
IP: Logged
11:28 AM
82-T/A [At Work] Member
Posts: 22892 From: Florida USA Registered: Aug 2002
They already did. Ephedrine was once legal over the counter. Now it's illegal. Coffee doesn't have enough stimulants in it to really cause harm to yourself and others.
Someone once told me that it's good to have some coffee before taking a test. Soo.... I drank four cups of coffee and ate some chocolate covered coffee beans, and then drove to school.
In the 1.8 mile drive from school... I managed to run a stop light (accidentally), cruise through two stop signs (accidentally) and drive over two parking stops (also accidentally).
I was 18... what can I say?
For what it's worth, I think I bombed on the test... got like a C or something.
I finally saw hte video of the workers drinking. They were having a single beer, it just happens to be a 40 ounce beer. One place I used to work at called these liquid lunches.
[This message has been edited by avengador1 (edited 09-25-2010).]
IP: Logged
12:00 PM
Sep 27th, 2010
jim94 Member
Posts: 1222 From: jacksonville, fl. usa Registered: Jan 2010
Thirteen plant workers at the Chrysler Jefferson North Assembly plant in Detroit have lost their jobs after a video showing some of them drinking during their lunch break was aired on the Detroit Fox affiliate.
"It has been determined that 13 employees engaged in behavior that violated the company's Standards of Conduct and these 13 employees were discharged today," the company said in a written statement, MyFoxDetroit.com reported. "Two remaining employees will receive a one month disciplinary layoff without pay."
An exclusive investigation by MyFoxDetroit.com showed workers at the plant drinking beer and smoking joints while on a half-hour lunch break just two months after President Obama praised the plant in a speech.
The TV station's investigation -- conducted over several weeks and based on tips from workers at the plant -- had outraged the auto giant's top executives, who called the behavior "totally unacceptable."
Chrysler had told MyFoxDetroit.com it was able to identify all 15 employees captured on video and suspended them all indefinitely without pay within 36 hours of learning about the investigation's findings. On Monday, it announced it had concluded its investigation and punished the 15 workers.
IP: Logged
11:23 AM
jaskispyder Member
Posts: 21510 From: Northern MI Registered: Jun 2002
I wonder if the prosecutor will be following up with warrants for open intoxicants and smoking weed? That would be sweet... just icing on the cake. There are people out there who want a job and don't goof off like this.