I've been looking around the forum and it makes my heart glad to see so many members tuning up and keeping there Fieros in good working order. However one thing that has been weighing on my heart that I think should be brought up for all 2.8 members is the Air Chrage Temp Sensor. See the 2.8 uses a system called speed density to measure the amount of air coming into the engine. It uses the MAP and the Air charge sensor together for this calculation. If you air charge isn't old worn out or malfunctioning your ECM cannot calculate the correct amount of air coming into the engine and this will lead to bucking, shuddering, loss of MPG, and loss of power. When I first got my 88GT it had 140 or 160 thousand miles on it, I can't remember exactly, and I drove it for another 60 thousand or so and the air charge temp sensor had NEVER been changed it was still the stock sensor from GM. When I did my tune-ups yeah they helped but man when I finally changed that baby it was like night and day difference.
For those of you that don't know this sensor is screwed into the air filter canister on the left hand side of the engine bay.
IP: Logged
10:26 AM
PFF
System Bot
tjm4fun Member
Posts: 3781 From: Long Island, NY USA Registered: Feb 2006
Good post. that sensor is an ope one, and rust can effect the sensor part. it can even be simply checked with an ohm meter, and a thermometer. it uses the same values as the coolant and guage sending units:
this sensor can also cause that problem that people will be posting about the hunting idle that usually starts in the spring, tho not the only cause, I verified that if it is way off, it will cause that problem. (I swapped in a variable resistor and got the reading out of whack with the true ambient temp, and caused the hunting idle on my car, which does not have the problem normally)
IP: Logged
10:50 AM
Khaos88GT Member
Posts: 329 From: Lake Charles, LA Registered: Sep 2007
This is also a case where a scanner or WinALDL can be very useful. They will tell you what temperature the ECM is actually reading from the sensor, which verifies not only the sensor but also the wiring between the it and the ECM.
IP: Logged
11:15 AM
Robert 2 Member
Posts: 2401 From: St Hubert Quebec Canada Registered: Jan 2006
Unplug it and put a meter on the sensor's contacts. Look up on the chart for the air temp (at the sensor) and compare the resistance you are supposed to read with what you actually read.
IP: Logged
11:58 AM
Robert 2 Member
Posts: 2401 From: St Hubert Quebec Canada Registered: Jan 2006
Yeah, the Air Charge Temperature sensor ( aka Intake Air Temperature sensor) is just a resistor. It changes its resistance according to the air temperature. Hence the table above.
I remember having a problem with a hunting idle and occasional stalling on deceleration with my V6. When I finally got around to checking the intake air temp sensor, it was reading over 60°C (140°F) at room temperature! The engine was being starved for fuel during idle and deceleration.
Yes... good write up. Also see cave. L4 DIS ignition. I cover MAT, same thing has ACT, sensor and error it causes for L4.
ACT temp reads about ambient air temp (local weather temp) all the time because where it is. (Idle air temp is warmer but not as much as L4) MAT sensor reads intake manifold temp. At Idle, air temp is 150*F in intake when weather is 30-45*F.
And I think WinALDL will read MAT/IAT/ACT sensor.
------------------ Dr. Ian Malcolm: Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should. (Jurassic Park)
Just a note on that sensor: some people think they are useless and you can run without it even connected and some have, however I found that not to be true. We had burned a custom chip to accomodate our hi-flow intake, headers dif injectors and few other mods and found that the car would not idle correctly. Thinking we had too much we burned another chip and the idle still was NG? I put our wideband on the engine and noticed that the fuel mix at idle was all over the place -making the engine stumble one minute and rev high the next. I put an ohm meter to the MAT sensor and found the impedencing changing. One secound it told the ECU it was 100+ degs -it was actually in the 30s- then the next min it told the ECM that is was like -20! The ECU kept trying to reset the fuel mix taking idle all over the place. A new MAT sensor fix it. So, yes they do serve a purpose. BTW: they are cheep to.
Just Picked mine up this afternoon from Advanced Auto parts for $16.00
Autozone has it for $16.00 as well.
BTW Both Places call it a "Air Charge Sensor"
Mine definetly looked like it needed replacing. And it was seized up in the canister. Make sure you put a wrench on the welded nut on the canaster before you try wrenching the sensor off.
Car definetly seems to idle better.
[This message has been edited by deezil (edited 03-28-2010).]
IP: Logged
10:56 PM
Mar 29th, 2010
Oreif Member
Posts: 16460 From: Schaumburg, IL Registered: Jan 2000
Just so everyone knows the "magic power chips" sold on Ebay are nothing but a single resistor that takes the place of the IAT sensor. These "chips" do not work and will cause more problems. You can see by the above posts why the correct sensor is needed.
[This message has been edited by Oreif (edited 03-29-2010).]
IP: Logged
07:04 AM
DLCLK87GT Member
Posts: 2717 From: South Jersey, USA Registered: Feb 2009
good to know, thanks! BUT what if you are running an aftermarket intake and a K&N filter that bypasses the OEM canister alltogether. What do you do then?
IP: Logged
11:54 AM
deezil Member
Posts: 779 From: St Louis Mo USA Registered: Mar 2010
The sensor was always put on the intake pipe of every Cai I have seen. If yours doesn't have it I would zip tie it somewhere close to the filter And call it done.
IP: Logged
11:59 AM
Apr 4th, 2010
fffttt1 Member
Posts: 662 From: Granbury, TX. Registered: Jun 2004
I've gone through almost everything on my '87 GT 2.8 5spd in the last 4yrs. I saw this thread and went out to Autozone and bought a new air flow/temperature sensor for $16. Figured it couldn't hurt, my old sensor was rusted, the car idled fine but hunted for awhile after stopping to find the idle. Anyways.........put in the new sensor. The car goes immediately to idle when stopping, mileage increased (22-25mpg to >26mpg), and the car feels a whole lot crisper all around. Still gonna do the 3800na swap next month, but this little sensor has made quite a difference! This thread deserves a bump back to the top. Thanks for the tip!! Ray.
My idle takes a while to settle down. I'm getting about 18mpg. I'm gonna change mine and see what happens. I know I've never changed it before and it does look a little rusty. I'll post my results.
Jonathan
IP: Logged
10:17 PM
PFF
System Bot
Apr 5th, 2010
Formula Owner Member
Posts: 1053 From: Madison, AL Registered: May 2001
Anybody got an idea how often this sensor should be changed?
I just replaced my O2 sensor, plugs, wires, pickup coil, and air filter. I decarbonized the engine, and had all the exhaust leaks fixed. My idle still hunts. But it could be due to the ECM not learning everything yet.
IP: Logged
11:51 AM
FieroCory Member
Posts: 13 From: Vero Beach, FL, USA Registered: Jul 2007
Anybody got an idea how often this sensor should be changed?
Test it before you replace it. They may fail but don't seem to wear out. I went to the junkyard and got a few from other newer cars for comparison, and the resistance all matched up to what I got from the Fiero's.
Test it before you replace it. They may fail but don't seem to wear out. I went to the junkyard and got a few from other newer cars for comparison, and the resistance all matched up to what I got from the Fiero's.
I know it's not totally dead. I have an Auto X-Ray scanner, and I can see reasonable numbers coming from it, but I don't really have any to know if those numbers are accurate. My scanner showed a temp of 80 °F at 75 MPH this morning when I suspect the outside temps were around 60 °F.
Anybody have an AC-Delco part number for this part for an 88 V6?
IP: Logged
05:36 PM
jim94 Member
Posts: 1228 From: jacksonville, fl. usa Registered: Jan 2010
car runs better , the idol is still alittle rough. took the hole stock air box out because the the sensor was frozen in. polished the air box, put a new piece of foam on the bottom for a better seal. put it back togeather and took it for a ride. seems a little more peppy. 16.00 dollars in autozone., thanks for the tip. i did the ground wire and it worked too.
I'm assuminig the meaning of "hunting" is the idle not returning to a fixed value but varying up and down for somoe period of time. Next chance I get I'll test mine but I wonder if it can cause the idle to stay high - which I'm still having trouble with.
My idle takes a while to settle down. I'm getting about 18mpg. I'm gonna change mine and see what happens. I know I've never changed it before and it does look a little rusty. I'll post my results.
Jonathan
I just measured the ohms on my sensor and it is only showing 3 and dropping! Wow! That's a long way off from 3K. Guess I need one.
Jonathan
IP: Logged
11:52 AM
Boostdreamer Member
Posts: 7175 From: Kingsport, Tennessee USA Registered: Jun 2007
I know that the V6 and the L4 both have these sensors but they are different part numbers. Does anyone know if they can be swapped in a pinch? I've got an L4 to pull parts from.
Jonathan
IP: Logged
12:01 PM
Boostdreamer Member
Posts: 7175 From: Kingsport, Tennessee USA Registered: Jun 2007
I pulled my L4 sensor and they look very similar. After checking the resistance on it and seeing that it also said 3 ohms, I finally noticed the little "K" on the screen. Looks like both of my sensors are good so I just put the V6 one back in. It looks very much like a 4-cylinder sensor could be used. It may be slightly different from a V6 sensor but it should work better than no sensor or a bad sensor. You probably couldn't tell the difference in performance between the two.
Jonathan
IP: Logged
12:43 PM
PFF
System Bot
Fieroseverywhere Member
Posts: 4242 From: Gresham, Oregon USA Registered: Mar 2006
Great post!! Just an FYI. This is exactly the same for the 4.9 also. Same issues, same fix. The only difference is the 4.9's sensor is located in the intake manifold (next to the alternator) and follows coolant temp almost exactly. A scanner will tell you, without a multimeter, if it is reading off. I have to replace mine again also. I'm getting the hunting idle and not the greatest MPG bacause of this sensor. I just wish the ones for the 4.9 were as cheap.
EDIT: Correction. The 4.9 uses the exact same sensor as the fiero. Apparently the only difference is the cadillac "premium" added to the price.
[This message has been edited by Fieroseverywhere (edited 04-06-2010).]
IP: Logged
12:53 PM
Francis T Member
Posts: 6620 From: spotsylvania va. usa Registered: Oct 2003
good to know, thanks! BUT what if you are running an aftermarket intake and a K&N filter that bypasses the OEM canister alltogether. What do you do then?
Our hi-flow intakes work fine with the stock sensor. If youre using a K&N typs cone filter directly on the TB, just drill and tap it for the sensor. BTW: Whiile those filters look neat; they are not really a good idea even with our intake. They let the engine draw hot air in instead of cooler outside -more dense- air. With our intakes we also recommend getting Rodney's mod for air filter system that opens up the inlet to the air filter. It does away with the water seperator. The stock intake can't outflow -CFM- the stock setup and thus it don't mater.
IP: Logged
10:00 PM
May 13th, 2010
centervilledon Member
Posts: 169 From: Centerville In USA Registered: Aug 2005