The first 2020 'official' election prediction thread..... (Page 72/76)
maryjane JAN 10, 09:16 PM

quote
Originally posted by williegoat:

PFF...come for the car, stay for the show!
Patrick JAN 10, 09:40 PM
Pretty sure one of those Elvii is Nick (fierofetish).

[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 01-10-2021).]

Raydar JAN 10, 10:07 PM

quote
Originally posted by Patrick:

Pretty sure one of those Elvii is Nick (fierofetish).





All kidding aside... Not a chance in hell. Sadly.
sourmash JAN 10, 10:54 PM
I found this quite interesting post when doing a little digging. The post was from 2018?
http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum6/HTML/123027.html


quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:


So much for deadlines and cutoff rules and regulations. Imagine an election where there is not deadlines? 2020 could be the longest running election in history, recounting ballots every week until the ballots stop coming in. That would mean endless election campaign commercials I know we all love those

The "I VOTED" stickers would then read "I'M VOTING" and election day would then become the start of "election season" and some would even vote more than once, like getting hunting tags during hunting season. Vote once, or twice each day during "election season" till the last recount announces the end of the season.




Oh, and Patrick. My brief enterlude here was just to get a snapshot perspective from the O/T. See what the temp is.

Things are looking good. The fact that a person with Trump's beliefs can be elected by a group that won't be shouted down is hope that a better nationalist leader has a huge base waiting.
Because it wasnt like that not long ago. SOME Republicans (we need more) have woken up a bunch and go along to get along Rs were the norm nationwide and in the O/T. They're still here and even in Texas.
But I was right. I'm going to keep being right.

[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 01-11-2021).]

cliffw JAN 11, 08:00 AM

quote
Originally posted by theBDub:
... I’ll be curious what you can dig up.



Let me Google that for you, .
82-T/A [At Work] JAN 11, 09:48 AM

quote
Originally posted by Patrick:

The more of your posts I read, the more I feel the need to floss the mental recesses of my mind. Know what I mean?




Sourmash, Patrick drives me insane most days, but I know where he stands. His views are rooted in his influences which lend him to the (much) more liberal side. But I will say (politely) that you are really the wildcard here. I'm not really sure where you stand half the time, and in many cases it feels like I'm talking to someone who is bi-polar. Many of your responses seem to be very stereotypical of Jews, which is a very 1990s-Democrat ideology (e.g. Jews secretly rule the world and banking...) and you also seem to have a lot of mildly odd things to say about world events. I will say though, you keep this board interesting, even if I don't agree with all your conspiracies!
sourmash JAN 11, 10:27 AM
It's fine. You're very respectful and I get what you're saying. It's something I'm accustomed to. Speaking in NON-literal extremes, the NAZIs think I'm a jew. The Jews think I'm a NAZI.

You're a benefit to the site.
Cliff Pennock JAN 11, 12:52 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:

Cliff has posted that he needs more traffic and started a thread about allowing banned members who haven't done the unforgivable so are you now claiming Cliff's position as board owner?




Errrrrrrr. Nope.

I posted a thread about allowing banned members back because I believe in second chances. People can change over the years. And as long as it benefits our (my) beloved cars and they behave, I don't see a reason why they shouldn't be allowed back. I don't think for one second those few returning members would make any considerable impact on the traffic to PFF. What did make a considerable impact is when a certain facebook page stopped using "Pennock's Fiero Forum" as its name. People actually thought the facebook page was what people were referring them to.
Patrick JAN 11, 03:32 PM
.

[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 01-11-2021).]

theBDub JAN 11, 03:44 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
I'd like to really make a point here that I encourage you to consider. I don't know if you were using "Google" as a disassociative verb, or if you were literally suggesting using Google.



I was using it as a verb. On computers, my default is Bing. On my phone, it's Google. I get good results with both, maybe 5% of the time I need to switch to Google for better Maps support. Point taken, but I don't think the curbing is nearly as political as you say. I think there is an intention towards less fake news. Is that a good thing, or should we trust our public to be educated enough to see through it, I can't tell you. I'd probably prefer the second, but... I've seen many apparently intelligent people fall for some fake crap on Facebook.

Don already provided rebuttals for the rest. Just because you see some grainy cell-phone video of a CCTV feed where someone does something that you can't 100% verify without context, doesn't mean there was fraud involved. Recounts verified counts.