 
     |
| Decisions have Consequences (Page 6/9) |
|
sourmash
|
JAN 26, 04:22 PM
|
|
Not sure why a leftist would complain about some guy who wants to retain his conservative position of rejecting an emergency approved injection.
I mean, the leftists are winning everywhere by having institutions mandate leftist conformity and compliance. Why all complaining?
|
|
|
blackrams
|
JAN 26, 04:47 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Lambo nut:
And it should cost the hospital dearly for discriminating. |
|
Consider this, the majority of Americans have been vaccinated, there is a very good chance that the donor was already vaccinated.
Let's presume that the panel of experts waved the requirement for the recipient to have been vaccinated.
This heart is a match which is tough to come by, it is or, it would not have been offered.
Should the recipient accept this contaminated heart?
Personally, I think he'd be foolish to not accept it but, I already think he's foolish for not getting vaccinated so he could get a heart that will prolong his life (assuming the operation is successful).
Like sand through the hourglass, so go the days of our lives......... 
Rams  [This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 01-26-2022).]
|
|
|
|
Patrick
|
JAN 26, 05:01 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by sourmash:
the leftists are winning everywhere...
|
|
Kind of late to the party. Where've you been?
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 26, 05:05 PM
|
|
|
Leftism is winning everywhere. People here can call me "racist, belligerent and conspritorial" and if I respond I get suspended.
|
|
|
|
Patrick
|
JAN 26, 05:15 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by sourmash:
People here can call me "racist, belligerent and conspritorial" and if I respond I get suspended.
|
|
It's not "if" you respond, it's how you respond. Actually, the problem precedes your responses. It's how you initially present yourself in most (all?) discussions here.[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 01-26-2022).]
|
|
|
|
blackrams
|
JAN 26, 05:15 PM
|
|
Anyone?
Consider this, the majority of Americans have been vaccinated, there is a very good chance that the donor was already vaccinated.
Let's presume that the panel of experts waved the requirement for the recipient to have been vaccinated.
This heart is a match which is tough to come by, it is or, it would not have been offered.
Should the recipient accept this contaminated heart?
Personally, I think he'd be foolish to not accept it but, I already think he's foolish for not getting vaccinated so he could get a heart that will prolong his life (assuming the operation is successful).
Like sand through the hourglass, so go the days of our lives.........
Rams
|
|
|
|
Cliff Pennock
|
JAN 26, 05:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 26, 05:25 PM
|
|
I'm looking and don't see what you're seeing. I sent a message adking but you didn't answer so, what was I supposed to think?
But I also wasnt the one who called someone else "racist, belligerent and conspiratorial".
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 26, 05:37 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Patrick:
It's not "if" you respond, it's how you respond. Actually, the problem precedes your responses. It's how you initially present yourself in most (all?) discussions here.
|
|
A person's ratings bar conveys a message to the other viewers about how to evaluate their contribution.
|
|
|
|
Patrick
|
JAN 26, 05:42 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by sourmash:
A person's ratings bar conveys a message to the other viewers about how to evaluate their contribution.
|
|
It'll be interesting to see yours if/when it appears.
|
|
|
