

 |
| Rebuild of Indy Fiero #163 Super Duty 4 (Page 9/29) |
|
30+mpg
|
DEC 06, 10:26 PM
|
|
| quote | fierosound:Still working making it run/drive as good as it looks. Not fully broken in, so don't ask for dyno or 1/4 mile times.
Starts OK, idles like crap, cruises good, WOT is terrible - falls on it's face. TERRIBLE mileage - you can watch the fuel gauge needle move as you drive. Loud as hell, handles like crap, and can't get ECM to control TCC properly. Makes me feel sick to over how much went into this, and often wish I never bought it - since it wasn't really what I THOUGHT I was getting. Thanks Chester... |
|
Yeah, I'm beginning to understand how Chester came up with the name The Dirty Rat. If you want to see some of the problems I had with my 4t60 TCC, check http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum1/HTML/052684.html[This message has been edited by 30+mpg (edited 12-06-2008).]
|
|
|
fierosound
|
DEC 08, 10:14 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by fierosound:
... The stock cruise control parts (vacuum canister, diaphram, solenoid etc) were removed and a less bulky Delco electronic cruise unit was installed below the air cleaner.
|
|
Still haven't fixed the head, but I thought I'd post this today...
I needed room to mount the air cleaner where the cruise control vacuum canister, solenoid etc were. So I switched to the much more compact Delco electronic cruise module used after 1996 on many GM cars.
Details of the electronic cruise installed on this SD4 Indy here: https://www.fiero.nl/forum/...110502-2-090358.html
 [This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 09-02-2023).]
|
|
|
fierosound
|
DEC 11, 04:19 PM
|
|
As I said earlier, the Edelbrock AVS 500cfm is too damn big, and it's the smallest they make. Idle is not bad but could be better, part throttle driving is pretty good but WOT is terrible. The engine doesn't draw enough air to open the secondary air valve and pull the fuel properly.

Even though it's listed as a 500cfm, mechanically it looks identical to the 600cfm - the primary difference being the jet sizes. Specifically, we're looking at the throttle bores and venturi diameters. Smaller primaries and smaller secondaries are what's needed because at 3.3L displacement, the engine will only ever draw about 400cfm.

The Edelbrocks are a clone of the Carter Super-Quad AFB /AVS series of carburetors and are physically identical. Well, Carter DID make a 400cfm carb - the AFB 9400/9410 and it had smaller venturis and bores compared to the Edelbrock 500cfm. This should make it perfect for the 3.3L SD4.
Unfortunately, Carter hasn't made any for 20 years and since they were only made as a replacement carb for the GM 231 V6, they are very rare. A rebuilt one just sold on eBay 2 weeks earlier for $350 - darn!! And emailing all the carb rebuilders came up with nothing.
As luck would have it, I finally DID find a brand new, in the box Carter AFB 9410 400cfm from The Carb Shop. http://www.thecarburetorshop.com
It was likely the last and ONLY new one in existence and I paid dearly for it. It seems nothing is cheap with an SD4!

Unfortunately, it doesn't have the nice polished finish of the Edelbrock.
The smaller primary venturies would produce faster air velocity at idle and would greatly improve that function. And smaller secondaries are what's needed because at 3.3L displacement, the engine will only ever draw about 400cfm.

Here's a comparison of the throttle bores back-to-back (secondaries in middle). The primary bores are the same, but the secondaries are very different.
Carter 1-7/16" 400cfm on Left - Right is 500cfm 1-11/16" Edelbrock

Here's a comparison of the venturies back-to-back (secondaries in middle). The primary venturi on the 400 is slightly smaller, and the booster is a different shape. But here again, the bigger difference is in the secondary's primary venturi size.
Carter 1-1/4" 400cfm on Left - Right is 500cfm 1-9/16" Edelbrock

Because the Carter and Edelbrock are physically identical, installation requires nothing more than swapping carbs. All the lines and throttle linkages connected as before without modification.[This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 03-04-2019).]
|
|
|
TennT
|
DEC 11, 05:51 PM
|
|
Weren't the booster venturis the main difference on the 500 cfm and the 600 Edelbrocks? Holley used to make a 450 Economaster spreadbore, IIRC. No matter, you got your carb. tg
|
|
|
30+mpg
|
DEC 11, 06:01 PM
|
|
| quote | | TennT:Weren't the booster venturis the main difference on the 500 cfm and the 600 Edelbrocks?... |
|
Primaries, check Secondaries, check
Booster venturis???
|
|
|
FastIndyFiero
|
DEC 11, 06:18 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 30+mpg:
Primaries, check Secondaries, check
Booster venturis???  |
|
Secondary = Booster
|
|
|
fierosound
|
DEC 11, 07:42 PM
|
|

Holley 2-bbl carb, showing primary venturi (A), secondary venturi (B) and discharge tube (C). Secondary = Booster.
Yeah, I know. There's primary and secondary bores in the carb, then each bore has a venturi that has a primary and secondary component.[This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 12-15-2008).]
|
|
|
fierosound
|
DEC 11, 07:47 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by TennT:
Weren't the booster venturis the main difference on the 500 cfm and the 600 Edelbrocks? Holley used to make a 450 Economaster spreadbore, IIRC.
|
|
I didn't physically compare venturis between the 500 and 600, but according to Edelbrock's chart they are the same diameter bores and venturis - perhaps a different shape venturi??
I'm pretty limited here. A Holley won't fit the engine bay, a spreadbore won't fit the manifold without an adapter which then makes it too tall below the decklid.[This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 12-11-2008).]
|
|
|
TennT
|
DEC 15, 01:07 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 30+mpg:
Primaries, check Secondaries, check
Booster venturis???  |
|
Old school. My ship is slowing (age). Vernacular degeneration.... thanks for the clarification, guys. tg
|
|
|
fierosound
|
JAN 13, 01:06 AM
|
|
I've repaired the spark plug hole on Sunday and need 24 hours for the sealant on the insert to cure. Everything looks good and I will likely be starting the engine in the next day or two.
I used this kit. Worked great! Save-a-Thread http://www.thetoolwarehouse...hop/HEL-5334-14.html[This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 03-04-2019).]
|
|

 |
|