How come I see a ? inside of a small blue square, instead of a thumbnail-sized image of the helicopter?
I have been experiencing longer than usual time lapse today from the moment that I select the "Submit Reply" button, until the moment when the browser window updates with my new or edited forum message. Longer than what has been the previous and long established norm, with my setup.
This is outrageous... but is it only on my end? Not happening to anyone else?
EDIT Looks like whatever was broken with the forum functioning and format when I created this message has been fixed.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 06-03-2020).]
Yeah, It's been said by a seriously sick California mental patient cutting and pasting bullshit from TWO hard left sources who in turn are allegedly "quoting" some unnamed and unknown Twatter "spokesman".
Ronald you eat and puke back so much Leftist horseshit that you don't recognize the smell and taste of it anymore.
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 06-03-2020).]
While I was scrolling hurriedly over some rand-spam higher up on this forum page, I couldn't help but notice the phrase "hard left." As in "hard left" media.
Hard left media content? From FoxNews(.com)? A lot of overlap in this reporting from Fox News with the reports from Axios and Business Insider. Those were the two media venues that I posted higher up on this forum page, describing this ANTIFA-labeled messaging having been removed from Twitter after it was determined that it was created to promote an alt-right agenda by persons acting as provocateurs and aligned with the white identity or white nationalist movement known as "Evropa."
So, extrapolating from that rand-spam post, which I accidentally ingested (in part)... imagine a Venn diagram circle enclosing Axios, Business Insider and Fox News, and labeled "These are hard left media venues."
Is Fox News reporter Danielle Wallace actually a leftist who has infiltrated Fox News? A left wing provocateur, hell-bent on exploiting her relationship with Fox News to publish under the Fox News media brand? And Flying Under The Media Radar with reporting in Fox News that she is secretly and subversively slanting, in order to promote a Hard Left or Leftist media agenda? Like this report (again) in Fox News? https://www.foxnews.com/us/...onalist-group-antifa
Forum member randye is a wheelchair-sized sack of brain damage that continues to sh*t all over this forum with his incessant and endlessly insane, autism-like repetitive spam. Whatever happened to "threads about other threads"..? It's all just ONE thread with him. The whole effin'' T/OT section of Pennock's.
Comes to an open discussion forum and and sets his ass on fire like this in protest because not every other last forum member aligns closely enough with his ideas and preferences. You have to wonder if anyone at the VA or some other medical facility, or any of the co-residents at his Florida abode (family members?) are aware of how he is embarrassing himself here, online. Aside from whatever idiot online cronies that he has, who are likely just egging him on.
I wouldn't hesitate to suggest that I am likely the second to last forum member with any standing to insist just about every single day for more than six years running that some other forum member urgently needs psychiatric attention or confinement. The second to last forum member. Think about that. Then take a close look at this screen grab from just a few weeks ago. Another one of his disturbingly inane (and insane) "Ronald" rants. Take a close look at how he started it, and which forum member he was actually Quoting.
CLICK FOR FULL SIZE
And then there was the thread, quite some time ago now, about a backyard astronomy or stargazing topic, and then there was... well, I could bring these "randye moments" out like items from a large kitchen cabinet and post them again for review, from now to doomsday.
In the exact and recent words of another forum member who I won't single out (not one of the regulars here in T/OT) "F*ck you randye. You're TRASH."
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 06-03-2020).]
Originally posted by MikeMac: I always believed that too about protecting your business. Another story says those laws apply to defending your home not your business. Didn't the pawn shop owner in Minneapolis go to jail after shooting the looter Thursday or Friday night?
A South Philadelphia gun shop owner shot and killed a man trying to break into his store early Tuesday morning amid heightened looting concerns. The owner told police he was monitoring his surveillance camera and saw three or four people trying to get in around 4 a.m. ...the owner started shooting and shot one man in the head. That man died in the store, police said. The other men ran off.
Click to show
Where do you want to live, Pennsylvania or Michigan ? Georgia has a "Stand Your Ground" law.
quote
Originally posted by MikeMac: I took a course a few months back about self defense laws. The instructor was a cop and then had gone to law school. One of the first things he said was that 7 out of 10 people will be charged when shooting someone in a location other than their home property. I was stunned. After doing research I found him to be correct.
Please what sources did you research ? You were woefully ignorant about protecting businesses.
Deadly Force to Protect Property - Texas Penal Code § 9.42 There is a three-part test an owner must meet in order to use deadly force to protect his property. A person is justified in using deadly force to protect his land or tangible property if:
He would be justified in using force against the other under § 9.41 of the Penal Code; He reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime or to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and He reasonably believes that the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means or the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
Shoot and kill at your own legal peril. The first thing the legal teams will do is search your social media and find your postings. They can and will be used against you. I don't have the time or the funds to defend a lawsuit whether criminal or civil.
Please what sources did you research ? You were woefully ignorant about protecting businesses.
You post a news story that has no conclusion as to whether the pawn owner will be charged and call me woefully ignorant? The family of the guy who was killed will file a wrongful death civil suit and the pawn owner will go broke paying his legal fees. I bet to mount a defense to that type of lawsuit will be 6 figures. It's just not worth it.
I'll trust the word of an Attorney that specializes in firearms defense cases that practices in my state over something posted on a forum!
[This message has been edited by MikeMac (edited 06-04-2020).]
Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 83.001 – Civil Immunity A defendant who uses force or deadly force that is justified under Chapter 9, Penal Code, is immune from civil liability for personal injury or death that results from the defendant’s use of force or deadly force, as applicable.
The family can still file a suit of course, but they won't find a district court anywhere in Texas that will hear the case.
But certainly, one has to follow the law and as David Crockett once said "Be always sure you are right, then go ahead."
I looked at a number of threedog's links. They are all brief clips or pictures with little or no explanation or supporting evidence. They are meaningless and useless.
He should know what click bait is, he is "educated".
Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 83.001 – Civil Immunity A defendant who uses force or deadly force that is justified under Chapter 9, Penal Code, is immune from civil liability for personal injury or death that results from the defendant’s use of force or deadly force, as applicable.
The family can still file a suit of course, but they won't find a district court anywhere in Texas that will hear the case.
But certainly, one has to follow the law and as David Crockett once said "Be always sure you are right, then go ahead."
This should be an amendment to the Constitution making it law across the land.
Shoot and kill at your own legal peril. The first thing the legal teams will do is search your social media and find your postings. They can and will be used against you. I don't have the time or the funds to defend a lawsuit whether criminal or civil.
Every social movement in the history of the United States has used rioting and violence to get rights.
The civil rights movement, suffrage, the labor rights movement, stonewall, the abolition of slavery, even the American revolution. They ALL used violence because peaceful protest doesn’t work.
Additionally, black Americans tried peaceful protest, they took a knee at a football games. Funny enough that was also too much for the o/t section of this website. Plenty of threads against them just the same.
Here we now have people calling for their heads. Literal authoritarians in this thread. There is no respect for the constitution, no “all men created equal”. This section of the website has always been “minorities need to stay in their place”. This just makes it all the more apparent.
You don’t care that thousands of black and Latino Americans are killed each year just like George Floyd and it has been happening for decades. It is truly frightening that so many here would jump to these fascist, authoritarian methods of control.
The protests did work Threedog. Many States reevaluated their use of force laws and did make changes, it is sad that you don't recognize a successful a peaceful change. The case of Floyd is not a Police issue, it is a failure of 4 individuals who chose to brake the rules that the Department has in place. In short, this is a crime committed by those 4 people NOT a systemic racial problem with America or the Police Department.
I've been reading these O/T diatribes for over 20 years, from a cast of revolving characters, and "Wow" about sums up my feelings as well.
Hmmm,
I'd guess (and this is strictly a guess) that there is an excellent chance someone on those juries would agree with some of those O/T diatribes. It only takes one ya know.
Rams
------------------ Rams
Isn't it strange that after a bombing, everyone blames the bomber, his upbringing, his environment, his culture, his mental state but … after a shooting, the problem is the gun.... Open your frigg'n minds, think about all the other tools that can be made into WMDs.
My wife told me to grow up. I told her to get out of my fort!
Originally posted by Rickady88GT: The case of Floyd is not a Police issue, it is a failure of 4 individuals who chose to brake the rules that the Department has in place. In short, this is a crime committed by those 4 people NOT a systemic racial problem with America or the Police Department.
The Floyd Case is a single event. But it is not the only "event".
A well made funny video. inferno bullets..........
I know, right?!! I fell out'my chair!
On A Side Note: I once witnessed a television broadcast of a comedy show (SNL?) that featured a skit about a new EXTREAME rollercoaster that was being covered on opening day with breaking news reports of injuries sustained during the ride.
I'll never forget the advertising line: "Coming out of a 15g assent, you're slammed into 14 neck-breaking turns at 8g's...FOLLOWED BY 2 FULL MINUTES UNDER WATER!!!
