Originally posted by Khw: The reality is as I stated in my last post though. It's been over a year and a half that it's been being investigated. From the investigation there has been a few indictments of people that in the grand scheme are really nobody. IF there WAS ANYTHING that tied to Trump, it WOULD be known by now and shouted from the roof tops by every liberal news agency out there.
Mike Flynn was an integral part of Trump's election campaign, and served--albeit briefly--as the Trump administration's first White House National Security Advisor.
Paul Manafort was one of the Trump election campaign's series of top level managers.
Rick Gates was close to Paul Manafort during their many previous years in the political lobbying and consulting fields. Rick Gates continued to interact with Donald Trump after Paul Manafort resigned as the campaign manager. Rick Gates was part of the Trump administration's Transition Team, from the day following the election of President Trump in November, to the first official day of the Trump presidency, just a few days into the new year (2017).
Just three of the "nobodies" in this risible mis-assessment of the Special Counsel's investigation, which started with a mandate to investigate Russian attempts to Interfere in the 2016 elections, and to investigate the possibility that there was Collusion by the Trump campaign or persons or groups that aligned themselves with the Trump campaign, and any other circumstances that are suspect, as they could emerge during the course of the Interference and Collusion investigating.
It's a risible idea, that if President Trump himself is not ever accused of directly and personally participating in a criminal conspiracy involving one or more foreign nations, then it follows that the Special Counsel's investigation would have been so much wasted effort.
Oh... and that last paragraph was much improved when I copied it to a text file and found the logical places to divide it into three smaller paragraphs. Much more readable. Not any better, in terms of content. But much more readable.
quote
The reality is as I stated in my last post though. It's been over a year and a half that it's been being investigated. From the investigation there has been a few indictments of people that in the grand scheme are really nobody. IF there WAS ANYTHING that tied to Trump, it WOULD be known by now and shouted from the roof tops by every liberal news agency out there. Instead, we get false story after false story and an investigation that is dragging on and on, not because there is any hope of actually finding a link to Trump, but so the investigation will still be open during the next election cycle so Democrats can try to use it to energize their base and try to rally a backlash.
It won't matter that there was no collusion, the investigation is still open so they can spin it as "if there was nothing to be found it would be closed". The saddest part is that so many people out there that have been lied to by their party. The people who had their party tell them "no, you can't have the guy you all turned out and voted for, you are getting Hillary Clinton". Yeah those people who after the insertion of Hillary despite their support for Bernie. Those people who were so upset over it that they now claim to be Independent instead of Democrat. Those people? They are lying to themselves.
They claim to be woke and are Independent voters but voted for HRC. They claim to be Independent, but still get all their news from the same democrat funded and democrat leaning news sources. They flood social pages with all the anti Trump propaganda out there proving the lie of their Independence. I have seen it time and time again. Push them and they will finally break down and express their seething hate for Trump. He could do everything the way HRC would have and they would STILL hate him. So no, they are not fooling anybody. They are not winning people over with all the BS lies they post everywhere. The only person they are fooling is themselves.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-26-2018).]
Addressing something that was already expressed in this discussion... that the [liberal] media colluded with HRC during the 2016 presidential debates.
CNN severed Donna Brazile's CNN "gig" as a political commentator after emails that surfaced on WikiLeaks revealed that Donna Brazile shared two of CNN's pre-arranged debate questions with HRC ahead of a CNN-sponsored voter town hall and debate event, featuring HRC and Bernie "Burn The Town Down" Sanders.
Snopes(.com) characterized a claim that HRC received debate questions in advance of the first of the 2016 presidential debates between HRC and Donald Trump as FALSE.
quote
The above-quoted story is a piece of fake news from a relatively new fake news site. While the Baltimore Gazette does not carry a disclaimer labeling its content as fiction, several factors give away that it is not the outlet of a legitimate newspaper or news organization, but rather a hastily thrown-together hoax site. Everything about Baltimore Gazette site is generic: the social media buttons don’t link to any online presence, several of the news topic sections are merely placeholders with no content, and the physical address provided in the “contact us” section is a non-existent one that would place the newspaper in the middle of the Lockwood Plaza shopping mall. The site also already has a track record of publishing demonstrably fake news stories.
This fake news story about the first presidential debate was a complete fabrication and is unrelated to later claims that Donna Brazile might have provided the Clinton campaign previews of questions to be asked at much earlier Democratic primary (i.e., non-presidential) events.
Snopes(.com) characterized a claim that HRC received debate questions in advance of the first of the 2016 presidential debates between HRC and Donald Trump as FALSE. Dan Evon for Snopes(.com); last updated 31 October 2016.
WTF is it with you leftard liars and Snopes?
Your boy Danny is another one of the young leftist Dopes At Snopes that has already been proven many times to be a LIAR just like you Ronald.
The two words that President Trump least wants to have being talked about on-air: "Deutsche Bank"Click to show
That's enough azz'ing around here for a while. For me, it's all about the Off Topic forum. Any and all Bad Hair Days for Donald Trump, or whatever does or does not happen with the President and the current administration... just Collateral Damage, from my perspective.
Just like you did on OptiBoard, the forum for eye care professionals which you are NOT, but you spammed the sh*t of it until the admin finally had to shut it down.
We also know its all about you constantly getting cornered in your usual BULLSHIT and then doubling down on your own stupidity and pivoting to another name or issue like the mentally ill troll you are.
*Limited immunity and scope*....thats 2 hints you mental midget
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 08-29-2018).]
I'm feeling a tad generous this evening so here's another giant hint for Ronald the Retard who doesn't know sh*t about what he's puking all over this forum.
It must be terribly humiliating and depressing being forever consigned to just being a follower like you are Ronnie.
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 08-29-2018).]
Some people would cut off their nose to spite their face.
Just trying to remember... Trump said he'd fix the terrible trade agreements. Obama said it was impossible. Trump is delivering. Trump saud he'd bring Kim Jun Fat to the negotiating table. Obama said can't be done. Happened. Trump said he'd boost the economy. Obama said no magic wand. Hello, magic wand. Trump said he'd bring back jobs. Obama laughed. Trump brought ys record low unemployment. Trump said he'd cut taxes. Taxes cut. Trump said...you get the idea. Delivered.
The incredible thing is that he's done this despite strong opposition from both parties, from the media, and from people on the public dole.
Democrats have promised these things for decades, but failed to deliver. Now that someone is delivering on the failed promises of the democratic party, they're fully against it--maybe because it shows that they are either liars or incompetent. To prove their character, how many democrats that swore they'd leave the US if Trump were elected kept their word?
Meanwhile, Trump is being harpooned for doing pre-election for what was OK for clinton IN THE OVAL OFFICE! A bit of a double standard.
Now Democrats are saying that any President could have done these things, and/or The good things done were only done because President Obama got everything ready for it. (Basically the Lefties have a jar they can't open, they hand it to the Right who open it right up.. At which the Lefties quip "We loosened it for you.")
is another one of the young leftist Dopes At Snopes that has already been proven many times to be a LIAR just like you Ronald.
