I will get to Shepard Smith in a moment, but first up (unless you skip ahead), the Fig'ster himself... former FBI Assistant Director for Counterintelligence, Frank Figliuzzi. MSNBC's Chris Hayes has the emcee duties. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...ture=youtu.be&t=1097"Fox News’ Shep Smith Methodically Debunks Uranium One Conspiracy Theories"
Media Watch; November 14, 2017.
YouTube video segment is 6+ minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnsAZzsdI1UPrint hounds and the textually oriented (do you text?) may prefer this online writeup by Brandon Carter, for The Hill.
hehill.com/homenews/media/360371-fox-news-shepard-smith-hits-trump-for-inaccurate-claims-on-uranium-one-deal
So, TWO assertions that Shepard Smith leaves open. He does not claim substantiation for either of these assertions.
ONE
The former U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, did not represent the U.S. State Department during the proceedings that approved the transaction that is at the heart of the Uranium One non-scandal: the acquisition of a 20 percent financial interest in Uranium One by Rosatom, the Russian state-owned atomic energy corporation. The U.S. State Department was represented by Jose W. Fernando, who was the Assistant U.S. Secretary of State. Mr Fernandez said that Ms Clinton did not involve herself in any way during these proceedings.
TWO
Shepard Smith talks about Frank Giustra. He says the same as what has already been reported by CBC Radio-Canada as recently as October 24:
| quote | Frank Giustra, the Vancouver-based mining executive who donated $31 million to Clinton Foundation initiatives around the world and pledged millions more, said in a statement at the time "there is not one shred of evidence" that any of the events were connected. Giustra pointed to the fact he sold his stake in Uranium One three years before the Russia deal, and about 18 months before [Hillary] Clinton became [U.S. Secretary of State.] |
|
http://www.cbc.ca/news/worl...ussia-deal-1.4369171Going back to the Fig'ster (Frank Figliuzzi, speaking to MSNBC's Chris Hayes) leaves me with the strong impression that the FBI had already verified both of these assertions as far back as 2015, when (according to Mr Figliuzzi) the FBI investigated some of the issues that were being talked about (and written about), in connection with the Clinton Foundation.
I'm sure that if anyone is actually reading here, they already have no doubt that I
could continue in this same way. I will not so continue. I will offer a prediction worthy of the great Carnac himself: There isn't going to be a Special Counsel investigation to reexamine anything having to do with the Uranium One Corporation.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 11-15-2017).]