Originally posted by dobey: It wasn't an attack on Parliament. It was an attack on a bridge, which happens to be near parliament.
The information provided by me was up to date at post. Sorry if your news outlets cannot get it right.
It was not an attack on a bridge BTW. It was a terrorist attack on human beings that took the life of four innocents, and injured twenty plus others. Again, keep up.
quote
Originally posted by dobey: Where are all the threads condemning the constant terror attacks by white conservative men, then? Hmm?
You may have to wait a while. It does not seem to be as often as folks following the call to allah. Just facts man. Keep up, and please stop your racism towards white people. We are not appreciative of your obvious hatred.
quote
Originally posted by dobey: No details on the attacker at all, but MEM goes straight to Muslim immigrant territory with his post. Why is that?
I would say due to the style in which these attacks are taking place. It suggests muslim.
quote
Originally posted by dobey: Yeah, damn right I'm calling his hate speech what it is. All he does on this forum is spew his hatred of others.
Thing is though, we really do not like you. At all even.
quote
Originally posted by dobey: And no, MEM, you hatemongering moron, liberals do not want terrorist attacks in their countries. Not by Muslims, nor by whites.
I'm thinking vehicles need to be banned from all bridges.....................
Then, we won't need those big structures and can have only bridges for folks to walk on.
Wait, one can still use a pressure cooker to kill and maim pedestrians.
Knives, let's ban knives...... Fertilizer and diesel fuel also.
Hmmmm........ We do seem to have a problem. Well, most assuredly, it's the weapon of choice that needs to be blamed.
------------------ Ron
Isn't it strange that after a bombing, everyone blames the bomber, his upbringing, his environment, his culture, his mental state but … after a shooting, the problem is the gun....
The next thing you know, they'll be using motorized vehicles to mow down pedestrians. Wait, that's already happening. OK, ban vehicles......
If you wish to upset a Conservative, lie to him. If you wish to upset a Liberal, tell him the truth.
Originally posted by dobey: It wasn't an attack on Parliament. It was an attack on a bridge, which happens to be near parliament.
Oh ye of little intellect AND great Ignorance, stupidity should hurt, not be funny. Why would one perpetrate an attack on a bridge ? What did the bridge do ?
If you had half a brain, or even half a brain cell, you would realize a bridge is a soft target. If you had a whole brain cell you would realize that it was an attack on a country (which is helping Muslim immigrants) or the western way of life including freedom of religion.
Originally posted by cliffw: Oh ye of little intellect AND great Ignorance, stupidity should hurt, not be funny. Why would one perpetrate an attack on a bridge ? What did the bridge do ?
If you had half a brain, or even half a brain cell, you would realize a bridge is a soft target. If you had a whole brain cell you would realize that it was an attack on a country (which is helping Muslim immigrants) or the western way of life including freedom of religion.
Do you think the attack occurred in the bridge then?
If you had half a brain, or even half a brain cell, you would realize a bridge is a location and Parliament is an imaginary construct. Random citizens are a "soft target." He didn't drive into the Palace to run down the MPs.
Where was your outrage when the conservative extremist shot and stabbed an MP last year? That was an attack on Parliament; killing an MP. Oh right, he was white and a conservative, so it was totes OK. Just like the white guy that stabbed a random black guy yesterday on the street in NYC. Where is your outrage against that? Oh right, it's only attacks on the western way of life including freedom of religion when "Muslims" do it.
... Just like the white guy that stabbed a random black guy yesterday on the street in NYC. Where is your outrage against that? Oh right, it's only attacks on the western way of life including freedom of religion when "Muslims" do it.
Yeah, by the reports thus far, it sounds as if "the white guy" is off his rocker, and should be locked up forever. I will let the courts decide, but if found guilty he should be immediately placed into general population.
And, what is an acceptable amount of time for us "white guys" to reply to news such as this? You avoid my questions, and would appreciate an answer so that we can move forward in this conversation. Thank you.
Originally posted by Tony Kania: Yeah, by the reports thus far, it sounds as if "the white guy" is off his rocker, and should be locked up forever. I will let the courts decide, but if found guilty he should be immediately placed into general population.
And, what is an acceptable amount of time for us "white guys" to reply to news such as this? You avoid my questions, and would appreciate an answer so that we can move forward in this conversation. Thank you.
Well you love to blame the "muslims" before there is any evidence whatsoever. Why not assume some white guy did it instead?
You are so worried about a type of terrorism that is so rare, and ignore the extremely common terrorists who afflict the US every day with their attacks. If you're so afraid of terrorism reaching our shores, don't worry, there is plenty of terrorism here already, US born and bred. It is average looking white guys you should be afraid of, judging from the statistics.
I'm thinking vehicles need to be banned from all bridges.....................
Then, we won't need those big structures and can have only bridges for folks to walk on.
Wait, one can still use a pressure cooker to kill and maim pedestrians.
Knives, let's ban knives...... Fertilizer and diesel fuel also.
Hmmmm........ We do seem to have a problem. Well, most assuredly, it's the weapon of choice that needs to be blamed.
Seriously? No one is coming for your guns but seeing as you bring it up I would be willing to wager that if this latest nut were more prepared he could have caused much more damage in terms of casualties etc. This on the other hand looks like another example of a poorly thought out attack by a radicalized loser, the whole lone wolf type scenario that the intelligence community are always telling us about . I for one am glad he did not have easier access to such things or the smarts/means to make or buy anything more deadly than his vehicle and a knife.
Seriously? No one is coming for your guns but seeing as you bring it up I would be willing to wager that if this latest nut were more prepared he could have caused much more damage in terms of casualties etc. This on the other hand looks like another example of a poorly thought out attack by a radicalized loser, the whole lone wolf type scenario that the intelligence community are always telling us about . I for one am glad he did not have easier access to such things or the smarts/means to make or buy anything more deadly than his vehicle and a knife.
newf, Ironically, I don't even own a gun. Not even a BB gun or air rifle. So, I'm not very concerned about anyone coming to get my guns. But, I am concerned for American Constitutional Rights.
No doubt, it was a poorly planned attack, he could have caused a bunch more casualties had he planned and executed it correctly. I also give thanks that his attack did not achieve a greater goal. I mourn for those souls lost to such a stupid and needless action. While the attacker most assuredly deserved to die, I somewhat wish they had caught him alive to get information before he was executed, hopefully that execution being done with a similar vehicle running over him as he did to others.
quote
Originally posted by newf:
Bad news for the haters racists and bigots...U.K. attacker was British-born.
I'm curious, what difference does his birth country make? Terrorism is, terrorism.
------------------ Ron
Isn't it strange that after a bombing, everyone blames the bomber, his upbringing, his environment, his culture, his mental state but … after a shooting, the problem is the gun....
The next thing you know, they'll be using motorized vehicles to mow down pedestrians. Wait, that's already happening. OK, ban vehicles......
If you wish to upset a Conservative, lie to him. If you wish to upset a Liberal, tell him the truth.
[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 03-23-2017).]
newf, Ironically, I don't even own a gun. Not even a BB gun or air rifle. So, I'm not very concerned about anyone coming to get my guns. But, I am concerned for American Constitutional Rights.
No doubt, it was a poorly planned attack, he could have cause a bunch more casualties had he planned and executed it correctly. I also give thanks that his attack did not achieve a greater goal. I mourn for those souls lost to such a stupid and needless action. While the attacker most assuredly deserved to die, I somewhat wish they had caught him alive to get information before he was executed, hopefully that execution being done with a similar vehicle running over him as he did to others. I'm curious, what difference does his birth country make? Terrorism is, terrorism.
I agree with most of that. Sorry I did assume you owned guns and I support your constitutional ability to own them however I do think that more limitations and restrictions could be enforced but that is a discussion for another thread.
quote
Originally posted by blackrams:
I'm curious, what difference does his birth country make? Terrorism is, terrorism.
Check the thread title and the many posts in other threads regarding immigrants. Especially the non-Caucasian ones.
[This message has been edited by newf (edited 03-23-2017).]
"White (Not Hispanic or Latino) - A person having origins in any of the original people of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. Black or African American (Not Hispanic or Latino) - A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa."
Originally posted by olejoedad: Interestingly.....
"White (Not Hispanic or Latino) - A person having origins in any of the original people of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. Black or African American (Not Hispanic or Latino) - A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa."
I agree with most of that. Sorry I did assume you owned guns and I support your constitutional ability to own them however I do think that more limitations and restrictions could be enforced but that is a discussion for another thread.
No problem with the assumption. I can fully understand that. But, the whole point is, I still own a pressure cooker, a couple of big trucks and trailer, I do keep gas, diesel fuel and fertilizer on hand. I can't even begin to say how many things I could make a deadly weapon of mass destruction from that I keep in my home, garage or shop. The whole point is, it's not the tool you use, it's the person using it.
Just think about what a person can do with a small amount of explosive gas (propane lighter gas) available from thousands of sources, a bucket of nails or pennies or anything else and a pressurized container. I don't need a gun to be an effective terrorist. But, a gun might stop or slow down that specific terrorist while he tries to do his/her thing. Yeah, I know........... Way too many different things that could be planned and or executed but, I will not let anyone take my right to defend myself, my family and whoever else from me. Want to make me a criminal, take away my right to defend myself.
------------------ Ron
Isn't it strange that after a bombing, everyone blames the bomber, his upbringing, his environment, his culture, his mental state but … after a shooting, the problem is the gun....
The next thing you know, they'll be using motorized vehicles to mow down pedestrians. Wait, that's already happening. OK, ban vehicles......
If you wish to upset a Conservative, lie to him. If you wish to upset a Liberal, tell him the truth.
Check the thread title and the many posts in other threads regarding immigrants. Especially the non-Caucasian ones.
You still aint getting it, leftie
Its NOT about skin color, its about the entitled, demanding, aggressive ATTITUDE. THAT'S what makes them unwelcome in my life, NOT the skin....which is EXACTLY the same reason feminists arent welcome. Its got nothing to do with being female, and everything to do with their attitude that THEY are in charge. (they can go be in charge elsewhere, because I wont put up with it)
Jeeze you guys got thick skulls when it comes to getting a concept thru.
Originally posted by MidEngineManiac: You still aint getting it, leftie
Its NOT about skin color, its about the entitled, demanding, aggressive ATTITUDE. THAT'S what makes them unwelcome in my life, NOT the skin....which is EXACTLY the same reason feminists arent welcome. Its got nothing to do with being female, and everything to do with their attitude that THEY are in charge. (they can go be in charge elsewhere, because I wont put up with it)
Jeeze you guys got thick skulls when it comes to getting a concept thru.
Funny, that's just how I feel about you. Your entitled, demanding, aggressive ATTITUDE. That's the problem.
Its NOT about skin color, its about the entitled, demanding, aggressive ATTITUDE. THAT'S what makes them unwelcome in my life, NOT the skin....which is EXACTLY the same reason feminists arent welcome. Its got nothing to do with being female, and everything to do with their attitude that THEY are in charge. (they can go be in charge elsewhere, because I wont put up with it)
Jeeze you guys got thick skulls when it comes to getting a concept thru.
It's not about skin colour but Muslims are the ones you constantly ***** about?
So are all Muslims and all feminists entitled demanding and have attitudes that are aggressive?
You are the one often calling for not letting any Muslims in or bombing all of them.
I suspect you choose to speak in generalizations like you do and act like a curmudgeon because you think it's popular and accepted on here as "cool". I would suggest if you chose to be less fearful and filled with hate you would find yourself happier and with more substantive friends. Just my opinion I'm as full of **** as the next guy.
Starting in 2006 I began having 15-20 daily interactions with "persons from that part of the globe" and by 2009 my answer was "OH HELL NO"
As to getting rid of the muz. NOBODY forces a belief system or religion up MY azz. If it was any other group using force and violence to try and enforce thiers, they would get the same responce... Except there arent. Mosloms are the ONLY ones running around killing, raping, pilaging, blowing stuff up and NOW with M-103 trying to silence criticism.