Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T
  Are we becoming an oligarchy? (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version

This topic is 2 pages long:  1   2 
Previous Page | Next Page
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Are we becoming an oligarchy? by Csjag
Started on: 10-14-2015 09:13 AM
Replies: 59 (593 views)
Last post by: 2.5 on 11-17-2015 01:18 PM
tbone42
Member
Posts: 8480
From:
Registered: Apr 2010


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 128
Rate this member

Report this Post11-16-2015 12:58 PM Click Here to See the Profile for tbone42Send a Private Message to tbone42Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


An then you had folks like Scott Walker, who are so genuine they cant get nominated.


Maybe Scotty should stop trying to get bills passed where he can't be investigated any more for ethics violations and more people would like and trust him.
IP: Logged
tbone42
Member
Posts: 8480
From:
Registered: Apr 2010


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 128
Rate this member

Report this Post11-16-2015 01:05 PM Click Here to See the Profile for tbone42Send a Private Message to tbone42Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

tbone42

8480 posts
Member since Apr 2010
During the Civil War, Lincoln and several of his cabinet members would be petitioned to support business interests in the lobby of the Willard hotel in Washington. That's where the term Lobbyist comes from. Since that point forward, businesses and now corporations have had increasing influence and power in the realm of politics. You or I may believe we voted in someone who will work for us, but likely they already work for a business interest as well. The fact that we have a representative government, and not too many referendums hit the ballot that voters get to sound off on, then that is the US moving further away from citizens being involved in government and instead ceding power to business.

I believe every day more power is in the hands of corporations and less in the hands of we the people is the road to becoming a more pure and recognizable oligarchy, and it has been happening slowly for 150 years. Corporations are making the rules for us, politicians listen, follow through with their wishes, and enjoy their political donations.

Corporate interests control the direction of this country more and more every day.

[This message has been edited by tbone42 (edited 11-16-2015).]

IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43225
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post11-16-2015 01:32 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by tbone42:

trust .


I doubt anyone trusts any of the nominees, and really they shouldnt.
IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43225
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post11-16-2015 01:35 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

2.5

43225 posts
Member since May 2007
 
quote
Originally posted by tbone42:

..Lobbyist ..



Like I said, fix it with this: Fixed amt campaign "financing", each one gets the same amount cap, no gifts.

IP: Logged
tbone42
Member
Posts: 8480
From:
Registered: Apr 2010


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 128
Rate this member

Report this Post11-16-2015 03:56 PM Click Here to See the Profile for tbone42Send a Private Message to tbone42Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


Like I said, fix it with this: Fixed amt campaign "financing", each one gets the same amount cap, no gifts.


Yeah it would break my heart if corporations could no longer make ANY campaign contributions. Actually, that should be the law.
IP: Logged
tbone42
Member
Posts: 8480
From:
Registered: Apr 2010


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 128
Rate this member

Report this Post11-16-2015 03:57 PM Click Here to See the Profile for tbone42Send a Private Message to tbone42Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

tbone42

8480 posts
Member since Apr 2010
 
quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


I doubt anyone trusts any of the nominees, and really they shouldnt.


A sentiment I can get behind, but my point was Walker is being a bad boy in public and his bill to block ethic investigations (of which he has already had 2..) stinks that much more.

[This message has been edited by tbone42 (edited 11-16-2015).]

IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69674
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post11-16-2015 04:03 PM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by tbone42:


Yeah it would break my heart if corporations could no longer make ANY campaign contributions. Actually, that should be the law.

Not, according to the Supreme Court. It's a 1st Amendment issue.

IP: Logged
tbone42
Member
Posts: 8480
From:
Registered: Apr 2010


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 128
Rate this member

Report this Post11-16-2015 04:12 PM Click Here to See the Profile for tbone42Send a Private Message to tbone42Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

Not, according to the Supreme Court. It's a 1st Amendment issue.


Yeah, screw those people, too.
IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43225
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post11-16-2015 05:20 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

Not, according to the Supreme Court. It's a 1st Amendment issue.


Think its justified?
IP: Logged
Blacktree
Member
Posts: 20770
From: Central Florida
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (12)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 350
Rate this member

Report this Post11-16-2015 08:14 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BlacktreeClick Here to visit Blacktree's HomePageSend a Private Message to BlacktreeEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
IMO, corporations shouldn't have any constitutional rights. They aren't real people; they're legal constructs.
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69674
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post11-17-2015 12:47 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


Think its justified?

Depends---are we talking about Koch Industries or are we talking about Soros Fund Management.?


IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
mental floss
Member
Posts: 362
From: CSA
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post11-17-2015 06:04 AM Click Here to See the Profile for mental flossSend a Private Message to mental flossEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Either way, look at what 1 despot like Soros can do to the world. The Koch brothers are just two people and look at their influence. And Dennis 6 wants you to believe that they can't have any influence because they're only one or a few people. Soros is the same religious/ethnic lineage as Barbara Lerner Spectre discussed in the French terrorism thread. For that matter, I believe the Kochs probably are too. Patterns mean something, whether it's Bloomberg, Feinstein, Boxer, Waxman, Wasserman-Shultz, Adelson, Rangle or any of the similar ideologies from the same type of people.

Edit to add: I tend to lean to the Kochs ideology, but items like them politically lobbying for legislation against individuals going solar for power are Draconian.

[This message has been edited by mental floss (edited 11-17-2015).]

IP: Logged
E.Furgal
Member
Posts: 11708
From: LAND OF CONFUSION
Registered: Mar 2012


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 278
User Banned

Report this Post11-17-2015 08:42 AM Click Here to See the Profile for E.FurgalSend a Private Message to E.FurgalEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by tbone42:


Yeah it would break my heart if corporations could no longer make ANY campaign contributions. Actually, that should be the law.


NO, it should not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
what should happen is it be a no strings attached campaign contributions.. OH WAIT THEY ARE the problem isn't the corporations donating, it's the people that are running,, when they get in, the don't have to do anything for any person or company that donated campaign contributions..
They CHOOSE TO!!!!!!!!!!!!..

The real problem is we the people.. for the most part we as a group don't give a fly'n fluck what goes on in Washington.. other than read about it and bitsh . If the rep's were not working for the people and only doing work for corporations,, the gays, the greenies, the minority's, etc would also get blown off,, they don't why,, because the are organized, they spend time writing their reps. calling them, stopping by their office..
most of the rest of us, sit back and look at sports stats.
most could not list (without looking it up) what is on the docket for today in the house and senate.. THAT IS THE PROBLEM
Your rep's don't have a crystal ball, they can't know what issue's you think need going over, if you can't be bothered to write them, or stop by or call..
If, half that complained about the way the US of A is circling the drain, and how those in d.c. are lemmies.. got involved in knowing what is going on, and contacting their rep.s with 1/5th of the effort they put into knowing the sports stats, or who screwed who in Hollywood.. we not be complaining as much..
just because you voted for your rep. you can't put it on auto pilot and hope they do what you think they should...
the squeaky wheel gets the oil.. those that stay quiet tend to not be heard..
IP: Logged
mental floss
Member
Posts: 362
From: CSA
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post11-17-2015 08:58 AM Click Here to See the Profile for mental flossSend a Private Message to mental flossEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
The US has been ruled by corporations for over a century. The Fed Reserve dictates policy as do it's sister central banks around the world.
Corporations are now people, completing the noose.
Loik at all the welfare recipients we complain about. All that money goes to corporations. Obama phones, utilities, medical, prescriptions, free school lunch. Corporations LOVE welfare programs. Government pays timely and well.
IP: Logged
mental floss
Member
Posts: 362
From: CSA
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post11-17-2015 09:30 AM Click Here to See the Profile for mental flossSend a Private Message to mental flossEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

mental floss

362 posts
Member since Aug 2014

The people who get in are those ALLOWED in. The staffers control everything internal once someone's elected. Those elected are forced to work in the system that ia controlled by two facets: the donors who make and break them, and the lifeling unelected party staffers who distribute the donor funds and divvy out leadership roles.

If you don't conform, you get no money, get blacklisted, get no committee roles and the money/staffers back a better monkey in the next cycle.
We the people are NO competition for the corporate and government masters controlling this game.


 
quote
Originally posted by E.Furgal:
NO, it should not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
what should happen is it be a no strings attached campaign contributions.. OH WAIT THEY ARE the problem isn't the corporations donating, it's the people that are running,, when they get in, the don't have to do anything for any person or company that donated campaign contributions..
They CHOOSE TO!!!!!!!!!!!!..

The real problem is we the people.. for the most part we as a group don't give a fly'n fluck what goes on in Washington.. other than read about it and bitsh . If the rep's were not working for the people and only doing work for corporations,, the gays, the greenies, the minority's, etc would also get blown off,, they don't why,, because the are organized, they spend time writing their reps. calling them, stopping by their office..
most of the rest of us, sit back and look at sports stats.
most could not list (without looking it up) what is on the docket for today in the house and senate.. THAT IS THE PROBLEM
Your rep's don't have a crystal ball, they can't know what issue's you think need going over, if you can't be bothered to write them, or stop by or call..
If, half that complained about the way the US of A is circling the drain, and how those in d.c. are lemmies.. got involved in knowing what is going on, and contacting their rep.s with 1/5th of the effort they put into knowing the sports stats, or who screwed who in Hollywood.. we not be complaining as much..
just because you voted for your rep. you can't put it on auto pilot and hope they do what you think they should...
the squeaky wheel gets the oil.. those that stay quiet tend to not be heard..


IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43225
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post11-17-2015 09:50 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by E.Furgal:
the problem isn't the corporations donating, it's the people that are running,, when they get in, the don't have to do anything for any person or company that donated campaign contributions..
They CHOOSE TO!!!!!!!!!!!!..

The real problem is we the people.. for the most part we as a group don't give a fly'n fluck what goes on in Washington.. other than read about it and bitsh . If the rep's were not working for the people and only doing work for corporations,, the gays, the greenies, the minority's, etc would also get blown off,, they don't why,, because the are organized, they spend time writing their reps. calling them, stopping by their office..
most of the rest of us, sit back and look at sports stats.

...you can't put it on auto pilot and hope they do what you think they should...
the squeaky wheel gets the oil.. those that stay quiet tend to not be heard..


I agree with your points, including clueless coasting citizens. The main problem is corruption, politicians being bought, follow the money. How do you put an end to the corruption? It shouldnt be about money or favors to decision makers at all, only about voice and we all should have one. Maybe reigning it all in to nil $ is a good place to start.

To me corporations are employers and they have their employees as part of their interests which are jobs for thise employees, so it gets tricky saying people arent part of corporations, as some say.

[This message has been edited by 2.5 (edited 11-17-2015).]

IP: Logged
E.Furgal
Member
Posts: 11708
From: LAND OF CONFUSION
Registered: Mar 2012


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 278
User Banned

Report this Post11-17-2015 10:53 AM Click Here to See the Profile for E.FurgalSend a Private Message to E.FurgalEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


I agree with your points, including clueless coasting citizens. The main problem is corruption, politicians being bought, follow the money. How do you put an end to the corruption? It shouldnt be about money or favors to decision makers at all, only about voice and we all should have one. Maybe reigning it all in to nil $ is a good place to start.

To me corporations are employers and they have their employees as part of their interests which are jobs for thise employees, so it gets tricky saying people arent part of corporations, as some say.



no, reigning in the $ won't do crap, as they'll get around that with a loop hole,
I, in my last post, said how to reign it in..
if those that the rep. was representing held their feet to the fire, instead of putting it on auto pilot until the next voting cycle, it do 1000x more, but we the people are we the lazy people
THAT is the problem..
Even a thief when he knows he is being watched is a good boy..
watch your rep like a hawk and always forcing them to explain their actions, and they will be the good boy,, not the corrupt thief

IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43225
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post11-17-2015 10:57 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by E.Furgal:

if those that the rep. was representing held their feet to the fire, instead of putting it on auto pilot until the next voting cycle, it do 1000x more, but we the people are we the lazy people
THAT is the problem..



So, if that is all we will try and fix, the only thing that will motivate that is hard times. Hard times get offset by paying the poor with other peoples money. Vicious circle. Follow the money.
IP: Logged
E.Furgal
Member
Posts: 11708
From: LAND OF CONFUSION
Registered: Mar 2012


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 278
User Banned

Report this Post11-17-2015 12:00 PM Click Here to See the Profile for E.FurgalSend a Private Message to E.FurgalEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


So, if that is all we will try and fix, the only thing that will motivate that is hard times. .

It that is truly true.. then we are done for.. as we the people will have earned the end of the US of A..

When the founding fathers wrote The iconic words on paper We the people they assumed the people would be involved and invest the energy needed..

we the people , government by the people for the people.. that only works when those "people" bother to be involved


IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43225
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post11-17-2015 01:18 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by E.Furgal:

It that is truly true.. then we are done for.. as we the people will have earned the end of the US of A..

When the founding fathers wrote The iconic words on paper We the people they assumed the people would be involved and invest the energy needed..

we the people , government by the people for the people.. that only works when those "people" bother to be involved



The people have to be moral as well.

George Washington, " Religion and morality are the essential pillars of civil society."

Gouverneur Morris, Penman and Signer of the Constitution. "[F]or avoiding the extremes of despotism or anarchy . . . the only ground of hope must be on the morals of the people. I believe that religion is the only solid base of morals and that morals are the only possible support of free governments."

IP: Logged
Previous Page | Next Page

This topic is 2 pages long:  1   2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery | Ogre's Cave
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock