Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T
  Seems like a big big waste of $$$. US Mil equip in Afghanistan to be disposed of.

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


next newest topic | next oldest topic
Seems like a big big waste of $$$. US Mil equip in Afghanistan to be disposed of. by maryjane
Started on: 06-05-2014 09:36 AM
Replies: 33 (422 views)
Last post by: avengador1 on 06-07-2014 07:05 PM
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69909
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 09:36 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
http://www.usnews.com/news/...-scrapped?int=9aca08

About half of the U.S. military vehicles still in Afghanistan – worth billions of dollars – aren’t coming home, and instead will be destroyed or otherwise disposed of by 2016, officials say. An even higher percentage of the rest of the remaining equipment also will be scrapped or left behind.
continue at the link.......
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
2.5
Member
Posts: 43235
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 09:44 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I dont like it much either.
Some will be given away?
Boy those seem like they would be fun to own.
IP: Logged
dsnover
Member
Posts: 1668
From: Cherryville, PA USA
Registered: Apr 2006


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 09:45 AM Click Here to See the Profile for dsnoverSend a Private Message to dsnoverEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
So sad. Especially since there's so many police departments looking to militarize.

(that was sarcasm...sort of)

I sort-of get it, though, when the cost to transport exceeds the value of the equipment. We dumped all kinds of stuff after WWII. I recently was watching footage of WWII fighters being shoved off carrier decks into the ocean. Good planes, too, not just non-functioning hulks. Of course, we cherish those planes now, since there are so few left.

Who knows? Maybe in 50 years those vehicles will be worth something.

I'll end with this:

http://auctionsamerica.com/...ew.cfm?SaleCode=LC14

-Darryl
IP: Logged
jaskispyder
Member
Posts: 21510
From: Northern MI
Registered: Jun 2002


Feedback score:    (22)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 205
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 09:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for jaskispyderSend a Private Message to jaskispyderEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
From what I gathered, these items may not be worth bringing back. I guess we could bring them home and resell them, but is there a market for them? Would that end up costing more? I say we use them for target practice on the way out


 
quote


There is roughly $36 billion of U.S. military equipment currently in Afghanistan, which in its used state is now worth about $8 billion. Of that, only $3 billion to $4 billion worth will be shipped out of the country, largely by air, and on to foreign ports for the return journey home. The rest will be destroyed, given away or perhaps sold.

The total cost for moving all the equipment is as much as $6 billion.

“A lot of the cargo will come out and be reset to be used by the Department of Defense,” says Army Col. Glenn Baca, operations chief for the Military's Surface Deployment Distribution Command. Some of the equipment will return to military depot yards to be refurbished and redistributed to Army or Marine Corps units. “Then there is some equipment that is in excess to the U.S. Department of Defense’s needs.”

Those supplies, vehicles or pieces of gear are either worn out or technologically outdated.

IP: Logged
dsnover
Member
Posts: 1668
From: Cherryville, PA USA
Registered: Apr 2006


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 09:47 AM Click Here to See the Profile for dsnoverSend a Private Message to dsnoverEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 2.5:

I dont like it much either.
Some will be given away?
[B[Boy those seem like they would be fun to own.[/B]


One of the problems with some of this stuff is the extremely expensive maintenance. Relatively low-volume production = high prices for otherwise routine maintenance.
IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member
Posts: 20794
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 305
User Banned

Report this Post06-05-2014 09:52 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I recently watched something that shows how American military property is sold off and eventually lands in the hands of the taliban. But I am sure that a few members here will let us know that the taliban is just using them for planters, school yard equipment, or trips to the local poppy fields.
IP: Logged
aceman
Member
Posts: 4899
From: Brooklyn Center, MN
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 203
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 10:00 AM Click Here to See the Profile for acemanSend a Private Message to acemanEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
It's going to cost $6 billion (Per the article) to bring $8 billion in equipment home.

Now, once that equipment makes it home, it needs to be gone through to bring it up to 10/20 maintenance standards (10/20 is Army jargon for everything is working for the operator to use) How many man hours and $$$ are going to be spent buying parts to bring this equipment to perfect standards? I watched Dept of the Army Civilian mechanics get a very comfortable standard of living with overtime after Desert Storm/
IP: Logged
heybjorn
Member
Posts: 10079
From: pace fl
Registered: Apr 2007


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 97
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 10:06 AM Click Here to See the Profile for heybjornSend a Private Message to heybjornEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
What? What? You are suggesting this stuff may be used for nefarious purposes? I am shocked, shocked, I tell you!
IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43235
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 10:09 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by dsnover:

So sad. Especially since there's so many police departments looking to militarize.

-Darryl


Way to look on the bright side
Theres the plus side to not bringing them back
IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43235
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 10:10 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

2.5

43235 posts
Member since May 2007
 
quote
Originally posted by Tony Kania:

I recently watched something that shows how American military property is sold off and eventually lands in the hands of the taliban. But I am sure that a few members here will let us know that the taliban is just using them for planters, school yard equipment, or trips to the local poppy fields.


I tend to agree, if its left there it should be destroyed.

IP: Logged
Tstang429
Member
Posts: 1850
From: Parma, oh
Registered: Jun 2008


Feedback score:    (8)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 02:03 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tstang429Send a Private Message to Tstang429Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
This is nothing new. My grandfather told us stories at the end of wwii that his whole platoon was ordered to drive the tanks off the cliffs into the oceans. It was to much money to bring the thanks home.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
newf
Member
Posts: 8704
From: Canada
Registered: Sep 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 116
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 02:10 PM Click Here to See the Profile for newfSend a Private Message to newfEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Tstang429:

This is nothing new. My grandfather told us stories at the end of wwii that his whole platoon was ordered to drive the tanks off the cliffs into the oceans. It was to much money to bring the thanks home.


Yup, there are plenty of stories of buried U.S. equipment here.

I'm surprised they don't just give it to whatever Government is in charge like is usually done. Though I suppose the Milittary industrial complex does not need used equipment out there, think of the money that can be spent to make new stuff to give away.

[This message has been edited by newf (edited 06-05-2014).]

IP: Logged
newf
Member
Posts: 8704
From: Canada
Registered: Sep 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 116
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 02:15 PM Click Here to See the Profile for newfSend a Private Message to newfEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

newf

8704 posts
Member since Sep 2006
 
quote
Originally posted by Tony Kania:

I recently watched something that shows how American military property is sold off and eventually lands in the hands of the taliban. But I am sure that a few members here will let us know that the taliban is just using them for planters, school yard equipment, or trips to the local poppy fields.


Did the Taliban already use all the weapons the U.S. Government supplied before? I guess they were good back then.
IP: Logged
Red88FF
Member
Posts: 7793
From: PNW
Registered: Jan 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 130
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 02:24 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Red88FFSend a Private Message to Red88FFEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by jaskispyder:

I guess we could bring them home and resell them, but is there a market for them? Would that end up costing more? I say we use them for target practice on the way out




I like it, target practice!

I would think they could get them back here and use or sell them but maybe they want to buy more.

Hows about Obama could hire Bergdahl as a sales rep and sell them directly to the Taliban and skip the charade ........................badabing.............

[This message has been edited by Red88FF (edited 06-05-2014).]

IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member
Posts: 20794
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 305
User Banned

Report this Post06-05-2014 02:36 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by newf:


Did the Taliban already use all the weapons the U.S. Government supplied before? I guess they were good back then.


It may be too much sun yesterday, but I am confused as to what you are pertaining to?
IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 03:52 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
You're missing the big picture. We get to equip the enemy AND spend another $36 Billion to replace the equipment. Win-win!
IP: Logged
Pyrthian
Member
Posts: 29569
From: Detroit, MI
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 03:58 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PyrthianSend a Private Message to PyrthianEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
a fine way to top off the colossal waste of money, time, lives & resources.
IP: Logged
82-T/A [At Work]
Member
Posts: 24484
From: Florida USA
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 200
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 04:41 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 82-T/A [At Work]Send a Private Message to 82-T/A [At Work]Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

http://www.usnews.com/news/...-scrapped?int=9aca08

About half of the U.S. military vehicles still in Afghanistan – worth billions of dollars – aren’t coming home, and instead will be destroyed or otherwise disposed of by 2016, officials say. An even higher percentage of the rest of the remaining equipment also will be scrapped or left behind.
continue at the link.......



Two things:

1 - The cost to bring it home far exceeds the cost of junking it and selling the scrap locally.
2 - The risk of it falling into the wrong hands and militarizing the potential enemy would undue so much of the money already spent.


I hate it too... it kills me, but there's very little you can do about it, financially... it makes sense.

What I would say though is... hey... it's already there. Let's try to sell it for pennies on the dollar to Israel or any other country near-by that is willing to pay for the gas and / or transport to take it off our hands. Doing so though, would require more planning and stuff, and they probably just want to get rid of it.
IP: Logged
Red88FF
Member
Posts: 7793
From: PNW
Registered: Jan 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 130
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 05:08 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Red88FFSend a Private Message to Red88FFEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:

Doing so though, would require more planning and stuff, and they probably just want to get rid of it.




I might too if it wasn't my money.

I don't know how the numbers actually would work out, but I am sure they could make them look however needed. It just stinks somehow. And, what about the Afghan allied forces we have been working with and training? Best leave them with nothing since the betting will start soon on how long it is till they fall.
IP: Logged
rinselberg
Member
Posts: 16118
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 147
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 05:14 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageSend a Private Message to rinselbergEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
It could be that the equipment that is slated for dismantling and destruction is not stuff that the Afghan National Army has been trained to use, and they do not have the resources or support structure (like the number of skilled mechanics) to maintain it.

But I have not looked into this personally. I have higher priority "beats" to keep on top of, here.

IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43235
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 05:19 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
But I have not looked into this personally. I have higher priority "beats" to keep on top of, here.





IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Tony Kania
Member
Posts: 20794
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 305
User Banned

Report this Post06-05-2014 05:23 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

It could be that the equipment that is slated for dismantling and destruction is not stuff that the Afghan National Army has been trained to use, and they do not have the resources or support structure (like the number of skilled mechanics) to maintain it.

But I have not looked into this personally. I have higher priority "beats" to keep on top of, here.



They can build guns in caves. Don't think that they cannot operate, or maintain this equipment to at least some degree of lethality.
IP: Logged
heybjorn
Member
Posts: 10079
From: pace fl
Registered: Apr 2007


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 97
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 05:27 PM Click Here to See the Profile for heybjornSend a Private Message to heybjornEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Some Degree of Lethality.

All woman band, isn't it?
IP: Logged
82-T/A [At Work]
Member
Posts: 24484
From: Florida USA
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 200
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 05:50 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 82-T/A [At Work]Send a Private Message to 82-T/A [At Work]Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

It could be that the equipment that is slated for dismantling and destruction is not stuff that the Afghan National Army has been trained to use, and they do not have the resources or support structure (like the number of skilled mechanics) to maintain it.

But I have not looked into this personally. I have higher priority "beats" to keep on top of, here.




They're MWRAPs, Humvees, etc... even buildings (mobile and fixed).

IP: Logged
pokeyfiero
Member
Posts: 16203
From: Free America!
Registered: Dec 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 309
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 05:55 PM Click Here to See the Profile for pokeyfieroClick Here to visit pokeyfiero's HomePageSend a Private Message to pokeyfieroEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Any territory we occupy by force should never be given back.
IP: Logged
fierofool
Member
Posts: 12934
From: Auburn, Georgia USA
Registered: Jan 2002


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 154
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 05:58 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierofoolClick Here to visit fierofool's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierofoolEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Stuff brought back, along with the men and women returning, could be placed along the Mexican Border. No additional expenditures to buy new equipment and there would be ample manpower. Anything left behind should have the same key parts removed that the piece would be rendered inoperative and incapable of supplying salvage parts to put other vehicles of that type operational. That is, unless Afghanistan has required that we leave the equipment there as part of the agreement to let us pull out.
IP: Logged
Marvin McInnis
Member
Posts: 11599
From: ~ Kansas City, USA
Registered: Apr 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 227
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 07:12 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Marvin McInnisClick Here to visit Marvin McInnis's HomePageSend a Private Message to Marvin McInnisEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by pokeyfiero:

Any territory we occupy by force should never be given back.



At what cost?
IP: Logged
FriendGregory
Member
Posts: 4833
From: Palo Alto, CA, USA
Registered: Jan 2004


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 07:18 PM Click Here to See the Profile for FriendGregorySend a Private Message to FriendGregoryEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I remember reading so many popular mechanics with ads for left over WW2 military equipment. The thing is, we paid for it once, we should have a chance to use it ourselves for a piece of the action. I knew of a lot guys that made weapons into plows. Big trucks turned into boom trucks, jeeps into post hole diggers heck there were tons of bolt on accessories for the jeep. M1 Garand and M1 carbine became the basis for marksman ROTC programs. I think that it is more than a California thing that you have to be a licensed service to have an armored vehicle and may be the cause of not bringing back the newer Humvee.
IP: Logged
Jonesy
Member
Posts: 4694
From: Bama
Registered: Oct 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 104
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 07:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for JonesySend a Private Message to JonesyEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Tony Kania:


It may be too much sun yesterday, but I am confused as to what you are pertaining to?


We (the United States) supported the Taliban and gave them weapons during their war with Russia.

[This message has been edited by Jonesy (edited 06-05-2014).]

IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member
Posts: 20794
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 305
User Banned

Report this Post06-05-2014 08:13 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Jonesy:


We (the United States) supported the Taliban and gave them weapons during their war with Russia.



I kind of thought that, but did not want to jump to conclusions.

Our leaders have a strong history of being idiots. Could I do better? Eh, it is not my area of expertise.
IP: Logged
pokeyfiero
Member
Posts: 16203
From: Free America!
Registered: Dec 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 309
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 09:12 PM Click Here to See the Profile for pokeyfieroClick Here to visit pokeyfiero's HomePageSend a Private Message to pokeyfieroEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Marvin McInnis:


At what cost?


At all cost. Won't be so quik to take a place over if it ain't worth **** .


IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
spark1
Member
Posts: 11159
From: Benton County, OR
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 175
Rate this member

Report this Post06-05-2014 10:51 PM Click Here to See the Profile for spark1Send a Private Message to spark1Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
When the U.S. was still testing nukes underground, miles of cable was laid to various sensors and monitoring equipment. Following each test the cable was left in place because of the assumption that recovery would cost more than the salvage value. Some wise soul bid on the abandoned cable and became very rich.

[This message has been edited by spark1 (edited 06-05-2014).]

IP: Logged
rogergarrison
Member
Posts: 49601
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 551
Rate this member

Report this Post06-06-2014 02:55 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by FriendGregory:

I remember reading so many popular mechanics with ads for left over WW2 military equipment. The thing is, we paid for it once, we should have a chance to use it ourselves for a piece of the action. I knew of a lot guys that made weapons into plows. Big trucks turned into boom trucks, jeeps into post hole diggers heck there were tons of bolt on accessories for the jeep. M1 Garand and M1 carbine became the basis for marksman ROTC programs. I think that it is more than a California thing that you have to be a licensed service to have an armored vehicle and may be the cause of not bringing back the newer Humvee.


Theres a guy a few miles from me that has an acreage of used military vehicles. Hes got big artillery, anti aircraft guns, half tracks, trucks, jeeps, armored cars and tanks. Most are in complete operating condition except for weapons. The government had to put a stop on people buying Chinese Migs on the open market sold as is. You pretty much bought a crate with a complete fuselage, and another that had wings and tails. Some were showing up in US ports bought by US citizens even with ammunition in them. You just put the wings and tails back on, had it FAA inspected, gas it up and it was ready to fly. Now, if they have any left, guns and missile mounts have to be removed or rendered worthless.

Mig 15s, Mig 21s
http://www.globalplanesearc...r=1&lsl=4&hsl=7&rs=0

[This message has been edited by rogergarrison (edited 06-06-2014).]

IP: Logged
avengador1
Member
Posts: 35468
From: Orlando, Florida
Registered: Oct 2001


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 571
Rate this member

Report this Post06-07-2014 07:05 PM Click Here to See the Profile for avengador1Send a Private Message to avengador1Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
IP: Logged

next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock