| quote | Originally posted by Raydar:
No argument on that point. But the emissions requirements are the big thing, as far as I'm concerned.
Cars can still comply with the regs and not be fugly. The Challenger and Camaro looking like "pillboxes" is still overkill on the part of the manufacturers. (Ever since the Camaro was re-introduced in 2009(?) I have always described it as looking like a cartoon of itself.) The Mustang isn't built to those extremes. Neither is the new Charger, or any number of imports. (Other than being an unreliable POS, at this point, I think the new Charger is just gorgeous - albeit huge.) I'm not saying that sedans are going to make a "comeback", but the emissions deck was kind of stacked against smaller vehicles.
|
|
Yeah, the Mustang... I have to say, is an engineering marvel. I say that because, the ability for them to get it to look like that, while meeting the current regulations was nearly impossible. Not sure I like the totally new redesign (still bad-ass though), but I think I like the one that was around 2019. It's such a damn good looking car. But the way they did it is by raising the belt line, while simultaneously lowering the roof line. It manages to maintain the look of the classic Mustangs, but also meets the 60/40 rule.
They really need to take a hatchet to NHTSA regulations... there's so much of the "You will do exactly X," rather than saying, "Meet X safety requirement." And this is always something I've been annoyed with.
It's pervasive too with the EPA... things like Throttle By Wire. Yeah, they do have some benefits... e.g., traction control and cruise control are merely lines of software now (integrated into the ABS system), rather than separate modules... this is only possible with Throttle By Wire... but it was implemented to save money... and also pushed by the insurance lobby because they can limit the damage caused to the car by people abusing it (allows manufacturers to have a higher warranty period).
I generally approve of some things, like... fuel evaporative canisters (improves start-up, etc.), etc... but things like EGR (which most cars don't have anymore), and multiple catalytic converters (pre and aft cats) don't make a lot of sense... and I'm going to be glad to see those go. I think we need cats, but a car only really needs one, or one per side when it's dual exhuast. Just a lot of totally unnecessary stuff.
There's so much forced crap in our cars, that it increases the cost, increases the weight, and reduces efficiency.