In moves of incredible stupidity and utterly meaningless virtue signaling:










.

This charade is moronic on numerous levels, not the least of which is long established International Law

Specifically: Article 1 of the 1933 Montevideo Convention (later adopted in full by the UN)

Sorry Leftoids I'm not going to spoon feed you this one, you likely couldn't "grok" it anyway.

As for the intellectually capable and curious, (NOT Leftoids), you should be able to quickly sort this one out.

Yes, I'm lookin' at you Todd
(and a few others of course)

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 07-31-2025).]

From the river to the sea,

Palestine will never be.

quote Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention (1933) states that the state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; (d) capacity to enter into relations with other states. 2 This article outlines the essential criteria for statehood under international law. For further details, you can refer to the full text of the convention here. 1

Had to google this, honestly had no idea. Admittedly, I don't understand how Canadian Leadership can justify this but maybe one of our Canadian members will enlighten us.

Rams

There are indigenous tribes that have land disputes with the Canadian government. I wonder how Canada would like it if other countries around the world starting recognizing that all of Canada actually belongs to the native tribes.

Canada, France, and the UK should consider that all of the Arab neighbors do not want the Palistines either.