Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Politics & Religion
  For A Better America (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version

This topic is 3 pages long:  1   2   3 
Previous Page | Next Page
next newest topic | next oldest topic
For A Better America by cliffw
Started on: 06-20-2013 11:04 AM
Replies: 93 (2354 views)
Last post by: cliffw on 10-25-2024 06:55 PM
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2014 11:06 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Reference sake.

 
quote
Originally posted by Rallaster:
There are actually several states like that.

Here's the 2012 election map by state:
CLICK FOR FULL SIZE


Now here's the same map broken down by county:
CLICK FOR FULL SIZE

IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post02-06-2014 11:06 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Three branches of government.
The Department of Justice should be taken out from under the influence of the Executive Branch. It should be under the influence of the Judicial Branch.
IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post02-06-2014 03:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

Three branches of government.
The Department of Justice should be taken out from under the influence of the Executive Branch. It should be under the influence of the Judicial Branch.


I can see keeping the DoJ separate from the Judicial Branch (although removing it from the Executive Branch isn't a bad idea).
The Judicial Branch is the court system for adjudicating cases.
The DoJ is tasked with enforcement and bringing defendants to trial.
I think it's a good idea to keep those two roles separated.
IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post05-21-2014 10:52 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Due to ineptitude in numerous federal agencies, and the lack of accountability, I propose that the heads of the agencies be made accountable to Congress. It is fine that they serve at the pleasure of the President and he can zhit can anyone at will. However, Congress approves them and should be able to disapprove of them with good cause.
IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post07-23-2014 08:21 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Fundraiser in Chief.

Mental note.
Bump.
IP: Logged
Cheever3000
Member
Posts: 12400
From: The Man from Tallahassee
Registered: Aug 2001


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 178
Rate this member

Report this Post07-23-2014 08:26 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Cheever3000Send a Private Message to Cheever3000Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
For a year or two, I've been pondering the notion of having a separate branch for Finance. ALL spending has to be approved by this branch.

Just a thought.
IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post11-04-2014 05:21 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by MadMark:

Voter fraud. We know it happens. We know it is mostly done by Democrats. We also know that it helps to swing the elections, but after the election there is no recourse even if it is proven. That in itself is a crime. If someone is elected by fraud there ought to be a way to rectify the fraud or elections mean nothing.

Anyone who is caught participating in election fraud should be sent to jail for a long time. They should also be legally prevented from voting in the future. They should also be legally prevented from even being near or participating in any way in voting.

The very nature of this crime is an attack on our country and our constitution.

IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post03-31-2015 10:31 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
All executive department regulations are treated with the power of Executive orders.
Null and void unless re-authorized.

Ruck these unelected law makers.
IP: Logged
rogergarrison
Member
Posts: 49601
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 551
Rate this member

Report this Post04-01-2015 11:13 AM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Formula88:


They certainly do. We need a government that has some kind of checks and balances built in to help prevent any one person or group from having too much power.


Im with you. Those WERE built in when the country was founded and worked pretty well for a few hundred years. It dont work so well...like now...when the one in power ignores and disregards anything he dont like.

IP: Logged
rogergarrison
Member
Posts: 49601
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 551
Rate this member

Report this Post04-01-2015 05:33 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

rogergarrison

49601 posts
Member since Apr 99
 
quote
Originally posted by Formula88:


It's the Republican's fault. If there's enough support for a GOP or bipartisan bill that the administration doesn't want, that leaves him no choice but to refuse to allow it to come up for a vote.
Otherwise, Obama could be put in the position of having to sign or veto a bill he doesn't like. The GOP minority in the Senate is forcing Reed to do this.



Im confused Formula 88.....

"The One Hundred Fourteenth United States Congress is the current meeting of the legislative branch of the United States federal government, composed of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. It is scheduled to meet in Washington, D.C. from January 3, 2015 to January 3, 2017, during the final two years of Barack Obama's presidency. The 2014 elections gave the Republicans control of the Senate (and control of both houses of Congress) for the first time since the 109th Congress. With 247 seats in the House of Representatives and 54 seats in the Senate, this Congress began with the largest Republican majority since the 71st Congress of 1929–1931. "

IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post08-08-2015 12:00 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
BUMP

Election related, and to keep out of the archives.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post08-10-2016 12:25 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by cliffw:
Reference sake.


Same. To save from archives.

I have something to say. You won't have to question what I have to say, I will make it clear.

What do you have to say? My thread topic is geared towards the electoral process.

not to lose the thought that media should be held accountable. no more "in the tank" media. election equal representation laws need to be applied to media.

IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post08-10-2016 12:29 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

cliffw

36740 posts
Member since Jun 2003
Is it my fault ?
That page 1 is stretched ?

[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 08-10-2016).]

IP: Logged
williegoat
Member
Posts: 20783
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 106
Rate this member

Report this Post08-10-2016 12:53 PM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageSend a Private Message to williegoatEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I agree that the news media are a big part of the problem, but laws that say they must or must not do one thing or another set a dangerous precedent. In my opinion, that would be censorship.

Instead, it is up to us to hold the media accountable. When we read a story, whether or not we agree with it, we have a responsibility to check the source. See who the major contributors are and what their background is. See who owns them. See if others are reporting the same thing, independently.

You may deride me as a “conspiracy theorist”, but it seems like a small, increasingly corrupt group group is pulling the strings. We are not free.

We are in this predicament because despite the whining of some, life has become very easy for most. We would rather be spoon fed, because whatever happens, we still get Pokemon and the Olympics, bread and circuses.

IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69816
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post08-10-2016 01:56 PM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Instead, it is up to us to hold the media accountable. When we read a story, whether or not we agree with it, we have a responsibility to check the source. See who the major contributors are and what their background is. See who owns them. See if others are reporting the same thing, independently.


Here--in OT? That's talk right there. Often, I think people just see a clickbait headline, obediently copy the following article without even reading beyond the opening sentence and post it in the blind.
morons abound
IP: Logged
E.Furgal
Member
Posts: 11708
From: LAND OF CONFUSION
Registered: Mar 2012


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 278
User Banned

Report this Post08-10-2016 04:02 PM Click Here to See the Profile for E.FurgalSend a Private Message to E.FurgalEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:


Here--in OT? That's talk right there. Often, I think people just see a clickbait headline, obediently copy the following article without even reading beyond the opening sentence and post it in the blind.
morons abound


How many election cycles have boomers been voting, and have had the majority of the population. in raw numbers. yet we still have the government we do.. in d.c.
you are right MORONS ABOUND..
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69816
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post08-10-2016 05:14 PM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
The oldest BBs (1946-1946) have been voting since approx 1964.
The youngest since 1982.

The oldest X gen (1965-1984) have been voting since 1983.
The youngest of this group have been voting since 2002.

The oldest Y gen (1975-2005) have been voting since 1993.
The youngest of this demographic will not be able to vote until 2023. (some states allow voting at age 17 1/2 I believe)
(this group is generally regarded as a 'made up' group and widely overlaps the Millennials. It is said to run from being born 1975-2005)

The oldest of the millennials (1982-2004) have been voting since 2000.
The youngest of the millennials will not be able to vote until 2022.

Any given generation tends to vote according to the issues and circumstances that exist in their own time frame, not according to how an unknown generation's issues may or may not unfold. Thus it has been, since the beginning of time.
How were we to know that a generation would someday be born that wanted more city park space upon which to play PokemonGo with their new iPhones, free college, free houses, free electricity, and a free stipend upon which to live?

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 08-10-2016).]

IP: Logged
williegoat
Member
Posts: 20783
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 106
Rate this member

Report this Post08-10-2016 05:30 PM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageSend a Private Message to williegoatEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
^^^^^ OK, that's great! I'm stealing that....^^^^^
IP: Logged
olejoedad
Member
Posts: 19087
From: Clarendon Twp., MI
Registered: May 2004


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 206
Rate this member

Report this Post08-11-2016 11:59 PM Click Here to See the Profile for olejoedadSend a Private Message to olejoedadEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Cheever3000:

For a year or two, I've been pondering the notion of having a separate branch for Finance. ALL spending has to be approved by this branch.

Just a thought.


It's called the House of Representatives.......

IP: Logged
E.Furgal
Member
Posts: 11708
From: LAND OF CONFUSION
Registered: Mar 2012


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 278
User Banned

Report this Post08-12-2016 05:18 AM Click Here to See the Profile for E.FurgalSend a Private Message to E.FurgalEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:






How about boomers, set the government controls to "autopilot" and didn't give a rats ass what was going on,, until they got real close to retirement age,, then started ***** 'n about the government we have..
Maybe if they didn't set it on autopilot for decades. we would not be in this mess..
but carry on about the youth, they might be championing the wrong causes, but at least they are involved..
now they just might not be championing those causes, and thinking if we didn't have the media that we do.. that no one put their foot down about for decades.. or the turning the school system into a liberal think tank..
I can't blame people younger than I for what they believe/think as they been taught it.. in school and told it by the media..
My generation is just as at fault for the auto pilot issue,, as very few have bothered to be involved, now, and even less were with in their late teens to late 30's..
But we didn't get this government and the countries problems overnight..
Way to many only think they need to walk into a booth and vote, as their "investment" of time into the countries issues...
We the people , governed by the people, only works when we the people pay attention to the we the people government.. Sadly..many don't and never will..
but right here right now. boomers are ***** 'n about every generation younger than them.. guess what... you built that..
the schools, the government, the way they are. the younger generations, as they had parents, and were not hatched.. so, how did they get this way if they had parents that showed them the importance of being involved in the countries issues, and government .. local and national..
oh, that's right they didn't as they set it on auto pilot.. and all I've ever heard out of a boomers mouth is "you can't fight city hall" translation {I'm not going to care because it's not worth my time}
They watched the news media slowly become state run and owned media.. and sat on their duff's..
same with the school system..
Then wonders how the younger generations can think the way they do..
I wonder how boomers can't see the reasons..

The photo is funny tho..
Sorry.. people were wearing plaid shirts, before/way before grunge made the look their own..

IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post12-13-2017 01:50 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
bump
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post07-29-2020 08:28 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Freedom of Speech should be freedom of speech !

If I have to rent to a minority, if I have to serve a minority, if I have to bake a wedding cake for a queer, how come can anyone, any company, limit my freedom of speech ?
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69816
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post07-29-2020 10:03 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

Freedom of Speech should be freedom of speech !

If I have to rent to a minority, if I have to serve a minority, if I have to bake a wedding cake for a queer, how come can anyone, any company, limit my freedom of speech ?


You evidently don't understand what "freedom of speech" (or any other freedom) actually means. There are many things that are 'legal' to do, but many of those come with a heavy price in society, and the freedom to voice our personal opinions is certainly one of them

Despite the common misconception that the First Amendment prohibits anyone from limiting free speech, the text of the amendment prohibits only the federal government, the states and local governments from doing so.


IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2020 02:19 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:
You evidently don't understand what "freedom of speech" (or any other freedom) actually means.

Despite the common misconception that the First Amendment prohibits anyone from limiting free speech, the text of the amendment prohibits only the federal government, the states and local governments from doing so.


I do understand what freedom of speech actually means. It is an inalienable right. If we, any public entity, can be forced to comply with the American Disabilities Act, Freedom Of Speech should be inalienable.
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69816
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2020 03:16 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by cliffw:


I do understand what freedom of speech actually means. It is an inalienable right. If we, any public entity, can be forced to comply with the American Disabilities Act, Freedom Of Speech should be inalienable.

You can't even make up your own mind,..much less postulate what Scotus might rule on your supposition. Do you intend to argue both sides of the coin in front of that bench??

Which is it? Inalienable .........or........"should be inalienable"?
Hint....Wrong, on both accounts.
IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post07-31-2020 07:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

You can't even make up your own mind,.
Which is it? Inalienable .........or........"should be inalienable"?
Hint....Wrong, on both accounts.


It is inalienable and should be inalienable.
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69816
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post07-31-2020 11:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Based upon..?
Your word?

I suspect, you don't understand the context of 'free speech' that is normally discussed in this country.
IP: Logged
Jake_Dragon
Member
Posts: 32870
From: USA
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 403
Rate this member

Report this Post07-31-2020 12:17 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Jake_DragonSend a Private Message to Jake_DragonEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
It all depends on your perspective

The degenerates that were sent to war in the past are gone.
Who is going to fight for this better america?
IP: Logged
82-T/A [At Work]
Member
Posts: 24108
From: Florida USA
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 200
Rate this member

Report this Post07-31-2020 08:37 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 82-T/A [At Work]Send a Private Message to 82-T/A [At Work]Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:


You evidently don't understand what "freedom of speech" (or any other freedom) actually means. There are many things that are 'legal' to do, but many of those come with a heavy price in society, and the freedom to voice our personal opinions is certainly one of them

Despite the common misconception that the First Amendment prohibits anyone from limiting free speech, the text of the amendment prohibits only the federal government, the states and local governments from doing so.




I was about to flip my **** there for a minute because I misread this. But I see that you're saying that companies do not have to abide by first amendment rights... yes, correct... I concur. Unfortunately, Facebook, Twitter, etc... are allowed to completely limit free speech and only allow what they want to allow.

Incidentally, had the FCC been allowed to pass Net Neutrality, it would have permitted the Government to regulate everything on the internet within the US space. I'm obviously totally against Net Neutrality because it's horrible. It's essentially as if the Democrats created a bill called the "Save Babies Act" and all it was was a funding bill for Planned Parenthood. Net Neutrality did very little from what the crazy left thought it would. What it did do was give the FCC the right to regulate the Internet... and under those circumstances, the Federal Government would be able to regulate Twitter and Facebook.

Still wouldn't support it though... Freedom of Speech has to sides... other people have the same freedoms.

IP: Logged
Boondawg
Member
Posts: 38235
From: Displaced Alaskan
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
User Banned

Report this Post07-31-2020 10:23 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BoondawgSend a Private Message to BoondawgEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by cliffw:
Not just you Boondawg, everybody, ... call your legislators, mail them also, email them, do it regularly. Be the squeaky wheel, make them listen. Demand a reply.


From what I've witnessed here*, destruction is more important than construction.

I thought all that stuff I RED (I spelled it that way because Is-land...) about Humans were just kinda' "worst-or-best-case-scenarios".
I didn't know we are susceptible to actually pretending to not see stuff!

Some people have to pull a lever to be heard.
Some have to burn-down a Taco-stand...

Everything is relative.

* I don't mean to imply that this place is some kind of extra-evil, just commenting on the shocking realization of the accumulation of reality of a "babe" out of the Alaskan woods...sue me, I didn't realize humans were so complicated.

[This message has been edited by Boondawg (edited 07-31-2020).]

IP: Logged
82-T/A [At Work]
Member
Posts: 24108
From: Florida USA
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 200
Rate this member

Report this Post07-31-2020 10:33 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 82-T/A [At Work]Send a Private Message to 82-T/A [At Work]Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Boondawg:

From what I've witnessed here*, destruction is more important than construction.


Nice! This is the first time I’ve seen you use then and than correctly. Progress...
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post07-31-2020 11:49 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Boondawg:
From what I've witnessed here*, destruction is more important than construction.


What did you see when you visited the riots ?

 
quote
Originally posted by Boondawg:
... I didn't realize humans were so complicated.


The Alaskan woods are not ?

IP: Logged
Boondawg
Member
Posts: 38235
From: Displaced Alaskan
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
User Banned

Report this Post07-31-2020 11:59 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BoondawgSend a Private Message to BoondawgEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:


Nice! This is the first time I’ve seen you use then and than correctly. Progress...


Thank you.
It's incredibly important to me that you think so.

Just like most of the other personnel stuff about me you seem to have a problem with.
Unfortunately (I imagine) for you, I remain unconcerned.

Grow up.
IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post08-01-2020 12:04 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Boondawg:
Just like most of the other personnel stuff about me you seem to have a problem with.
Unfortunately (I imagine) for you, I remain unconcerned.


You showed him, .
IP: Logged
Boondawg
Member
Posts: 38235
From: Displaced Alaskan
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
User Banned

Report this Post08-01-2020 12:18 AM Click Here to See the Profile for BoondawgSend a Private Message to BoondawgEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by cliffw:
What did you see when you visited the riots?


I didn't "visit the riots".
I did see the protesters, though, intermingled with nare-do-wells sowing their own personal/professional seeds of destruction.

But I'm sure that doesn't quite fit the narrative.

TO BE CLEAR: I'm against the destruction people or property in any form.
So much so, that against my better judgment (to frigging burn it to the ground) I understand why Auschwitz–Birkenau still stands.

People are incredibly stupid.
Agreed?
IP: Logged
cliffw
Member
Posts: 36740
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 294
Rate this member

Report this Post08-01-2020 01:28 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Boondawg:
People are incredibly stupid.
Agreed?


Not if you ask them.
IP: Logged
Boondawg
Member
Posts: 38235
From: Displaced Alaskan
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
User Banned

Report this Post08-01-2020 01:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for BoondawgSend a Private Message to BoondawgEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by cliffw:


Not if you ask them.


Who you calling stupid!
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69816
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post08-01-2020 03:02 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Jake_Dragon:

It all depends on your perspective

The degenerates that were sent to war in the past are gone.


Not all of us.....my oath had no conditions attached, I don't get to pick and choose whether to continue serving my nation or not or where at, and it dang sure didn't come with an expiration date.

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 08-01-2020).]

IP: Logged
Jake_Dragon
Member
Posts: 32870
From: USA
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 403
Rate this member

Report this Post08-01-2020 12:36 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Jake_DragonSend a Private Message to Jake_DragonEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:


Not all of us.....my oath had no conditions attached, I don't get to pick and choose whether to continue serving my nation or not or where at, and it dang sure didn't come with an expiration date.



You know damn well what I am talking about, how bad does it have to get to send us old ****ing guys into war?
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69816
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post08-01-2020 01:58 PM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I've been tamed some Jake, but I can can get wild again..tho probably not physically for a long haul.

1. Keep your honor clean.
2. See something..say something.
3. See sig
4. My life and property is no more valuable than anyone else's.

------------------
Nec cupias, nec metuas

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 08-01-2020).]

IP: Logged
Previous Page | Next Page

This topic is 3 pages long:  1   2   3 
next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock