sorry but only the delusional claim to stop the gov-man from anything you gun will not save you they have and will use air support they have trained snipers who can hit a dime a mile away you get your buddys in the mix they are dead hold out too long and armored vehicles are used your keep and bear only gets you dead times millions of god of guns nuts only gets ever more dead kids not a bit more freedom or rights just fear
you really think the guys down under are worse off for totally giving up on guns a few years ago no commie take over there but a good example sure there will be hidden guns but they do not have daily mass killings we do thanks directly to people like you gun nut
sorry but only the delusional claim to stop the gov-man from anything you gun will not save you they have and will use air support they have trained snipers who can hit a dime a mile away you get your buddys in the mix they are dead hold out too long and armored vehicles are used your keep and bear only gets you dead times millions of god of guns nuts only gets ever more dead kids not a bit more freedom or rights just fear
you really think the guys down under are worse off for totally giving up on guns a few years ago no commie take over there but a good example sure there will be hidden guns but they do not have daily mass killings we do thanks directly to people like you gun nut
Do not underestimate the militia. ESPECIALLY when the U.S. government is pussifying the military like they are.
sorry but only the delusional claim to stop the gov-man from anything you gun will not save you they have and will use air support they have trained snipers who can hit a dime a mile away you get your buddys in the mix they are dead hold out too long and armored vehicles are used your keep and bear only gets you dead times millions of god of guns nuts only gets ever more dead kids not a bit more freedom or rights just fear
you really think the guys down under are worse off for totally giving up on guns a few years ago no commie take over there but a good example sure there will be hidden guns but they do not have daily mass killings we do thanks directly to people like you gun nut
you really think the guys down under are worse off for totally giving up on guns a few years ago no commie take over there but a good example sure there will be hidden guns but they do not have daily mass killings we do thanks directly to people like you gun nut
You are not looking at the whole picture, it is not just guns but the mentality, training and generally society.
Look at Scandinavia, high number of gun ownership, yet firearm violence is very low.
Putting all the blame on guns and banning them is not going to solve the root of the issue. The way society treats their follow man is the problem and until those issues are dealt with there will always be someone out there looking to kill someone.
Banning guns is also not the answer, our idiot government is already trying to do that and it hasn't stopped illegal guns from flooding the market. There are all kinds of news stories with the cops seizing illegal guns from gang members/drug dealers/etc. Laws do not stop them. All mass shootings in Canada were done with either illegally obtained guns or by someone who was banned from owning guns.
Another way to look at it is: cocaine has been illegal for how long? Yet it still is a problem and people have no issues with getting it - how is banning guns going to solve the problem? People that want a gun will still get one.
what is the sale status now in your ''no where north'' of guns
do you still have no wait instant AR-15 sales no check age limit only
or does a rule or two exist ?
as I understand australia has banned most people from having most guns and far fewer kids die as a result
our nut govinator just passed open carry and we have twice a day I-95 shoot outs now I see the increase gun nut shootings as rhonda satans fault the god of guns wants prey
Originally posted by ray b: our nut govinator just passed open carry and we have twice a day I-95 shoot outs now I see the increase gun nut shootings as rhonda satans fault the god of guns wants prey
With the smallest amount of luck those gun-fights are taking out a good number of rights-takers !!!!
General Lee? Oh that guy. One of those long dead Confederate generals and such.
It's not been such a stellar week for the Confederacy fetishists. The third largest U.S. military base, long known as "Fort Hood", was officially renamed just a couple of days ago. Now it's "Fort Cavazos." Doesn't roll off the tongue as easily, but there we have it. It's named for the late Richard Edward Cavazos, a Texas native—Fort Cavazos, nee Hood, a part of Texas—was the Army's first four-star general of Hispanic heritage, having served in the Vietnam era, and before that, in the Korean conflict.
"Class dismissed."
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 05-11-2023).]
Leftists are anxious to erase all history of their real insurrection.
you spin so hard but get all the facts wrong
the demo's of 1860 were con's one and all no leftist was a slave owner THE SLAVERS THEY WERE THE CON'S all the revolting REBELS WERE CON'S
THE DAMMYANKYREPUBLICANS WERE THE LIBERALS
YOU FAIL BASIC HISTORY AND LIE TO MEMBERS FAR TOO MUCH HERE
i DO NOT LIKE bs ALT-HISTORY of the Gop esp as told by the racist neo-nazi wing who blame others for the deals and deeds of their side and never admit the TRUTH
the demo's of 1860 were con's one and all no leftist was a slave owner THE SLAVERS THEY WERE THE CON'S all the revolting REBELS WERE CON'S
THE DAMMYANKYREPUBLICANS WERE THE LIBERALS
YOU FAIL BASIC HISTORY AND LIE TO MEMBERS FAR TOO MUCH HERE
i DO NOT LIKE bs ALT-HISTORY of the Gop esp as told by the racist neo-nazi wing who blame others for the deals and deeds of their side and never admit the TRUTH
The Confederacy staged an insurrection, the real thing, not a costume party. They tried to violently overthrow the US government. They were slave owners. They believed in a stratified society and did not respect basic human rights. They were the rebels, the Left.
The Union sought to conserve the Republic and the Constitution. They believed that all men were created equal and were endowed by God with certain unalienable rights. They were the conservatives, the Right.
Before you open your mouth, make sure you know what happened in 1789.
I am a conservative. I am loyal to the Republic and the Constitution. Those things place me firmly on the Right. I do not support the Leftist occupation of my government. It is an abomination, an usurpation of all that made America the greatest, most prosperous nation the world has ever known.
Conservatism, in its original sense, has no specific ideological content at all, since everything depends on what one is trying to conserve. In the last days of the Soviet Union, those who were trying to preserve the existing Communist regime were rightly referred to as “conservatives,” though what they were trying to conserve had nothing in common with what was advocated by Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek or William F. Buckley in the United States, much less Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, a leading conservative in the Vatican who subsequently became Pope. Specific individuals with the “conservative” label have specific ideological positions, but there is no commonality of specifics among “conservatives” in different venues.
quote
Originally posted by williegoat: I am a conservative. I am loyal to the Republic and the Constitution. Those things place me firmly on the Right. I do not support the Leftist occupation of my government. It is an abomination, an usurpation of all that made America the greatest, most prosperous nation the world has ever known.
Willie, you and I will never see that war from the same perspective !!
1st, the Confederacy DID NOT, in any way, shape, or form, try to overthrow the US. They were a break-away state. A case of "Eff you, we are separating and outa here. Guck yer union of states and taxation and stuff it where the sun dont shine". Separatists. Balkanizers. The Union were the aggressors in the wrong. The modern comparison would be the guy who kills his wife because she wants a divorce to save himself the alimony payments. Or maybe chains her to the bed so can keep stealing her SS check. Economics and nothing more.
And second, slavery had nothing to do with it until 2 1/2 years after it started. It was all economic/taxation. Emancipation was nothing more than a shot at crippling the Confederate economy. There were slave owners, neutrals, and underground railroaders on both sides.
In modern times the separatists in Alberta would be considered confederates. People fighting to keep what is theirs and their own right to self-determination.
[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 05-12-2023).]
the demo's of 1860 were con's one and all no leftist was a slave owner THE SLAVERS THEY WERE THE CON'S all the revolting REBELS WERE CON'S
THE DAMMYANKYREPUBLICANS WERE THE LIBERALS
YOU FAIL BASIC HISTORY AND LIE TO MEMBERS FAR TOO MUCH HERE
i DO NOT LIKE bs ALT-HISTORY of the Gop esp as told by the racist neo-nazi wing who blame others for the deals and deeds of their side and never admit the TRUTH
yes the history of the con's is a sad sorry tale of losing over and over
the slave owning con's do not want to admit they were racists
so try to claim the demo's did it all alone mostly true but omits the fact that all the con's then WERE DEMO'S AND ONLY AFTER NIXON DID THE SOUTHERN DEMO SWAP TO THE Gop IN MASS
ONLY AFTER CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS DID THE Gop RAISE ITS UGLY HEAD IN DIXIE
it is a case of the past Gop ideas and ideals were dropped for racist votes and the Gop became the party of NO
the trump cult has taken the race and hate and SUPERCHARGED THEM so like so much else about that cult they can't admit TRUTH SO THEY HATE IT
Originally posted by ray b: "the trump cult has taken the race and hate and SUPERCHARGED THEM."
So not true. You libtards push that sh!t down our throats and expect stuff like this to happen. Well, its NOT happening the way you want so you find these "martyrs" that make it look like it is happening. The ultimate delusion! Trump has nothing to do with it unless he is the reason you choose to push the insanity.
So not true. You libtards push that sh!t down our throats and expect stuff like this to happen. Well, its NOT happening the way you want so you find these "martyrs" that make it look like it is happening. The ultimate delusion! Trump has nothing to do with it unless he is the reason you choose to push the insanity.
Willie, you and I will never see that war from the same perspective !!
1st, the Confederacy DID NOT, in any way, shape, or form, try to overthrow the US. They were a break-away state. A case of "Eff you, we are separating and outa here. Guck yer union of states and taxation and stuff it where the sun dont shine". Separatists. Balkanizers. The Union were the aggressors in the wrong. The modern comparison would be the guy who kills his wife because she wants a divorce to save himself the alimony payments. Or maybe chains her to the bed so can keep stealing her SS check. Economics and nothing more.
And second, slavery had nothing to do with it until 2 1/2 years after it started. It was all economic/taxation. Emancipation was nothing more than a shot at crippling the Confederate economy. There were slave owners, neutrals, and underground railroaders on both sides.
In modern times the separatists in Alberta would be considered confederates. People fighting to keep what is theirs and their own right to self-determination.
again you need to read the statements each state made to explain and justify their rebellion all sited slaves in writing as THE REASON FOR REBELLION ALL OF THEM AS OFFICIAL STATE REASONS FOR THEIR ACTIONS
