Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T - Archive
  Supercharger on a Sostice

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


Supercharger on a Sostice by Cadillac Jack
Started on: 02-03-2010 07:24 PM
Replies: 25
Last post by: blackrams on 02-15-2010 12:02 PM
Cadillac Jack
Member
Posts: 1165
From: Jacksonville, IL, USA
Registered: May 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2010 07:24 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Cadillac JackSend a Private Message to Cadillac JackDirect Link to This Post
I'm thinking of installing a series I supercharger on my Solstice 2.4. What do you think?
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
$Rich$
Member
Posts: 14575
From: Sioux Falls SD
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score:    (20)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 398
Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2010 07:26 PM Click Here to See the Profile for $Rich$Send a Private Message to $Rich$Direct Link to This Post
save your time and effort?
IP: Logged
82-T/A [At Work]
Member
Posts: 25077
From: Florida USA
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 201
Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2010 07:32 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 82-T/A [At Work]Send a Private Message to 82-T/A [At Work]Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Cadillac Jack:

I'm thinking of installing a series I supercharger on my Solstice 2.4. What do you think?



A Pontiac Solstice 2.4 NA is highly bottlenecked. I had a 2006 Solstice that I sold last year. Most people with the combination I had would run 14s all day long. I had the Clear Image ceramic coated shorty header, the Clear Image high-flow catalytic converter, acold air intake, and a few other odds and ends. The differnece in performance was night and day. My car would break the tires in the shift from 1st to 2nd and 2nd to 3rd even.

The great thing about the Super Charger is that you could effectively keep that excellent exhaust configuration (high flow exhaust) and still have the forced induction. I was going to do this too, but ultimately decided to get something more practical and totally paid off.

You should go to http://www.SolsticeForums.com if you're not already on there.

The SuperCharger kit they offered made it quicker than the GXP turbo version.

------------------
Todd,
2008 Jeep Patriot Limited 4x2
2002 Ford Explorer Sport 2dr 4x2
2002 Ford Crown Victoria LX
1987 Pontiac Fiero SE / V6
1973 Volkswagen Type-2 Transporter

IP: Logged
Cadillac Jack
Member
Posts: 1165
From: Jacksonville, IL, USA
Registered: May 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2010 07:41 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Cadillac JackSend a Private Message to Cadillac JackDirect Link to This Post
Thanks! I have a black 2006. I will check out the sostice forum.
 
quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
A Pontiac Solstice 2.4 NA is highly bottlenecked. I had a 2006 Solstice that I sold last year. Most people with the combination I had would run 14s all day long. I had the Clear Image ceramic coated shorty header, the Clear Image high-flow catalytic converter, acold air intake, and a few other odds and ends. The differnece in performance was night and day. My car would break the tires in the shift from 1st to 2nd and 2nd to 3rd even.

The great thing about the Super Charger is that you could effectively keep that excellent exhaust configuration (high flow exhaust) and still have the forced induction. I was going to do this too, but ultimately decided to get something more practical and totally paid off.

You should go to http://www.SolsticeForums.com if you're not already on there.

The SuperCharger kit they offered made it quicker than the GXP turbo version.



IP: Logged
82-T/A [At Work]
Member
Posts: 25077
From: Florida USA
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 201
Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2010 07:43 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 82-T/A [At Work]Send a Private Message to 82-T/A [At Work]Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Cadillac Jack:

Thanks! I have a black 2006. I will check out the sostice forum.

Actually, there are two... and they both share nearly identical domain names.


THIS is the one you want: http://www.solsticeforum.com/

NOT the one with the S on the end of forum.

------------------
Todd,
2008 Jeep Patriot Limited 4x2
2002 Ford Explorer Sport 2dr 4x2
2002 Ford Crown Victoria LX
1987 Pontiac Fiero SE / V6
1973 Volkswagen Type-2 Transporter

IP: Logged
frontal lobe
Member
Posts: 9042
From: brookfield,wisconsin
Registered: Dec 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 166
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 09:35 AM Click Here to See the Profile for frontal lobeSend a Private Message to frontal lobeDirect Link to This Post
I think that would be awesome. I wouldn't see why the engine wouldn't hold up to it since there is a turbo version of the engine.

I have no idea how much it would cost, and how difficult it would be to put on.

But resultant power to weight ratio would be great!
IP: Logged
blackrams
Member
Posts: 32824
From: Covington, TN, USA
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 230
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 09:58 AM Click Here to See the Profile for blackramsSend a Private Message to blackramsDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Cadillac Jack:

I'm thinking of installing a series I supercharger on my Solstice 2.4. What do you think?


IF you have the funds, then have fun. I love those cars. Wish I could get one.

Ron
IP: Logged
ARFiero
Member
Posts: 1262
From: Savannah, GA
Registered: May 2008


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 01:12 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ARFieroSend a Private Message to ARFieroDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by frontal lobe:

I think that would be awesome. I wouldn't see why the engine wouldn't hold up to it since there is a turbo version of the engine.

I have no idea how much it would cost, and how difficult it would be to put on.

But resultant power to weight ratio would be great!


The difference is that the standard Solstice runs the 2.4 liter Ecotec and the GXP runs the completely different 2.0 Turbo Ecotec. The turbo 2.0 has direct injection and is built to handle the extra boost were as the 2.4 isn't built for it. The 2.4 has standard F.I. and a pretty high compression ratio (the 2.0 is high as well but the direct injection cools the cylinder to help avoid detonation). Just wanted to state the difference between the two.

Shelby
IP: Logged
blackrams
Member
Posts: 32824
From: Covington, TN, USA
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 230
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 01:20 PM Click Here to See the Profile for blackramsSend a Private Message to blackramsDirect Link to This Post
Well, let's go for the whole deal, how about a V8 conversion? Personally, I'd choose the LS4 for your ride, but that's just me.
I believe you can supercharge it also.

Ron
IP: Logged
82-T/A [At Work]
Member
Posts: 25077
From: Florida USA
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 201
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 01:23 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 82-T/A [At Work]Send a Private Message to 82-T/A [At Work]Direct Link to This Post
There are already two companies that I know of that offer complete SuperCharger kits. It's a VERY easy install as I researched this myself when I had my own Solstice. Ultimately the child took priority so I sold my Solstice... but the two kits being offered were product specific designs and outperformed the Turbo vehicles. Since the 2.4 is already a larger motor with considerably more torque than the 2.0 naturally aspirated would be, it only takes a few PSI to quickly match the power of the Turbo GXP.

If you don't want to sell your Solstice and trade it in for a GXP, then $2,500 is a small price to pay for slightle better than GXP power.


 
quote
Originally posted by blackrams:

Well, let's go for the whole deal, how about a V8 conversion? Personally, I'd choose the LS4 for your ride, but that's just me.
I believe you can supercharge it also.

Ron



Hah, it eventually gets to the point where the performance of the engine exceeds the capability of the platform. The Solstice has a steel space frame much like that of the Fiero so it's VERY solid (hydroformed steel framing). But, the company called Mallet installed a 427 LS motor in the Solstice and it became almost uncontrollable since the car was so light. Basically 2,800 pounds max with 550+ horsepower.

With a supercharger on that, you'd be looking at 640-650 horsepower... the car would be pretty much uncontrollable at wide open throttle.
------------------
Todd,
2008 Jeep Patriot Limited 4x2
2002 Ford Explorer Sport 2dr 4x2
2002 Ford Crown Victoria LX
1987 Pontiac Fiero SE / V6
1973 Volkswagen Type-2 Transporter

[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 02-04-2010).]

IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 02:40 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
Archie found out the limitations of the Solstice platform when he did his V8 conversion. Traction with any high power engine is a problem since there's no weight on the rear wheels.

That's one of the big advantages of the current Vette platform with the rear mounted transaxle - better weight distribution and it gets some of the weight on the rear wheels. (huge rear meats help, too)

How wide can you go on rubber in the Solstice rear fenders? At what point does the rear axle or transmission become the drivetrain fuse?
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
82-T/A [At Work]
Member
Posts: 25077
From: Florida USA
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 201
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 02:57 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 82-T/A [At Work]Send a Private Message to 82-T/A [At Work]Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Formula88:

Archie found out the limitations of the Solstice platform when he did his V8 conversion. Traction with any high power engine is a problem since there's no weight on the rear wheels.

That's one of the big advantages of the current Vette platform with the rear mounted transaxle - better weight distribution and it gets some of the weight on the rear wheels. (huge rear meats help, too)

How wide can you go on rubber in the Solstice rear fenders? At what point does the rear axle or transmission become the drivetrain fuse?


Well, on the Solstice there is a "torque tube" of sorts. I didn't really spend a lot of time down there, but from what I did see... it has a huge frame / bar that directly connects the tail-shaft of the transmission with the rear differential to prevent it from rotating. It doesn't appear to be any kind of a torque tube like my old Porsche 944 had.

The rear tires on the Solstice are pretty huge. They are easily wider than the ones that were on the 4th generation TransAm. I don't have any numbers, but they're pretty massive. They look almost like steam rollers.

------------------
Todd,
2008 Jeep Patriot Limited 4x2
2002 Ford Explorer Sport 2dr 4x2
2002 Ford Crown Victoria LX
1987 Pontiac Fiero SE / V6
1973 Volkswagen Type-2 Transporter

IP: Logged
blackrams
Member
Posts: 32824
From: Covington, TN, USA
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 230
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 03:06 PM Click Here to See the Profile for blackramsSend a Private Message to blackramsDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:

Hah, it eventually gets to the point where the performance of the engine exceeds the capability of the platform. The Solstice has a steel space frame much like that of the Fiero so it's VERY solid (hydroformed steel framing). But, the company called Mallet installed a 427 LS motor in the Solstice and it became almost uncontrollable since the car was so light. Basically 2,800 pounds max with 550+ horsepower.

With a supercharger on that, you'd be looking at 640-650 horsepower... the car would be pretty much uncontrollable at wide open throttle.


Well sure but, I and no one else I know runs around at WOT all the time, if ever. In addition, I didn't suggest a 427 LS but, your points are well taken. A car like that should not be in the hands of a less mature adult with no driving skills. But, it would still be fun.

Ron
IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 03:11 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:

The rear tires on the Solstice are pretty huge. They are easily wider than the ones that were on the 4th generation TransAm. I don't have any numbers, but they're pretty massive. They look almost like steam rollers.


I think you mean they are easily the same width or narrower than a 4th gen TA.

Solstice uses 245/45-18 tires.
4th Gen TA uses 245/50-16 tires base. 275/40-17 with WS6.


IP: Logged
82-T/A [At Work]
Member
Posts: 25077
From: Florida USA
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 201
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 03:12 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 82-T/A [At Work]Send a Private Message to 82-T/A [At Work]Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by blackrams:


Well sure but, I and no one else I know runs around at WOT all the time, if ever. In addition, I didn't suggest a 427 LS but, your points are well taken. A car like that should not be in the hands of a less mature adult with no driving skills. But, it would still be fun.

Ron



Well, that is true. I obviously have nothing to do with the Mallett 427, but from what I understood... WOT at any speed, and in any gear except 4th or 5th would basically cause the tires to break loose. It effectively made the additional ~150 horsepower basically totally unusable. So I think it was more of a question of waste than cost. Although safety is obviously a concern too. With a standard 6 liter, or even an LS1, the engine had adequate power to do pretty much everything, but the chassis could still control it unless you WANTED to be out of control. In the case of the 427, even 3/4 throttle would send the car sideways.

------------------
Todd,
2008 Jeep Patriot Limited 4x2
2002 Ford Explorer Sport 2dr 4x2
2002 Ford Crown Victoria LX
1987 Pontiac Fiero SE / V6
1973 Volkswagen Type-2 Transporter

IP: Logged
madcurl
Member
Posts: 21401
From: In a Van down by the Kern River
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 314
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 03:40 PM Click Here to See the Profile for madcurlSend a Private Message to madcurlDirect Link to This Post
Steam Rollers.

------------------



"Friends don't let their friends drive stock."

IP: Logged
frontal lobe
Member
Posts: 9042
From: brookfield,wisconsin
Registered: Dec 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 166
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 03:43 PM Click Here to See the Profile for frontal lobeSend a Private Message to frontal lobeDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by ARFiero:


The difference is that the standard Solstice runs the 2.4 liter Ecotec and the GXP runs the completely different 2.0 Turbo Ecotec. The turbo 2.0 has direct injection and is built to handle the extra boost were as the 2.4 isn't built for it. The 2.4 has standard F.I. and a pretty high compression ratio (the 2.0 is high as well but the direct injection cools the cylinder to help avoid detonation). Just wanted to state the difference between the two.

Shelby


Whoa. Big difference, then. Thanks for pointing that out.

IP: Logged
Fformula88
Member
Posts: 7891
From: Buffalo, NY
Registered: Mar 2000


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 116
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 04:53 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Fformula88Send a Private Message to Fformula88Direct Link to This Post
I personally think your better off with a Vette than converting a Solstice to V8. A V8 Solstice is a nice talking point of course, for a unique and fast one of a kind car. However, from a performance and practicality standpoint a Vette is just a better option. Especially for someome who is going to pay mallett to install the V8 in a Solstice.

That said, there are some hurtles to a V8 install too. It is a tight squeeze in the Sol's engine bay. Some installs actually cut out part of a structural support member to get the engine in (to the horror of law suit conscious GM!). Others cause manifolds to run very close to other heat sensitive equipment which may have shorter service lives because of it.

I think the two stock engines are really good building blocks in that car. Unlike the Fiero's stock engines, the ecotecs can produce a lot more power. As was mentioned, they are different motors. Similar architecture, but different. The LNF turbo engine is beefier in stock form, but the 2.4's seem to hold up well to more power too.

I say stick with the 2.4 and start doing things to it to free up breathing, and maybe go the S/C route! It will really liven up that car!
IP: Logged
normsf
Member
Posts: 1682
From: mishawaka, In
Registered: Oct 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 57
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 05:48 PM Click Here to See the Profile for normsfClick Here to visit normsf's HomePageSend a Private Message to normsfDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by madcurl:

Steam Rollers.





Wow nice picture, could that be Falcons car? I see it has our fenders and rear facia. Thanks Norm
IP: Logged
Falcon Fiero
Member
Posts: 2780
From: Colorado
Registered: Jun 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 67
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 08:47 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Falcon FieroSend a Private Message to Falcon FieroDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by normsf:


Wow nice picture, could that be Falcons car? I see it has our fenders and rear facia. Thanks Norm



Norm,

Yes its mine. Weather has been so bad (snow on my street still) I have not had a chance to get the car out much to take good pictures of your fenders...thanks a LOT for painting the insert red...it looks awesome. Ill definitely post on the SOL forum when I can get a sunny dry day.

Unfortunately those wheels rub on the top part of the fender which is really unfortunate because the looks great (inserts have been painted red...no black like pictured).

You know the Solstice body better than anyone. What do you think I could do to get them to fit?

------------------

IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 09:20 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
How about a turbo?
http://www.turbosystem.com/..._Folder/Solstice.htm

 
quote

Factory 2.4L Engine - 177 HP (at crank) - 150 HP (at rear wheels)

Hahn Racecraft Stage 2 - 284 HP (at crank) - 242 HP (at rear wheels) with 8 lbs. boost

Hahn Racecraft Stage 3 - 354 HP (at crank) - 301 HP (at rear wheels) with 13 lbs.boost

Hahn Racecraft Stage 4 - 447 HP (at crank) - 380 HP (at rear wheels) with 21 lbs.boost
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
darkhorizon
Member
Posts: 12279
From: Flint Michigan
Registered: Jan 2006


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 451
Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 09:44 AM Click Here to See the Profile for darkhorizonSend a Private Message to darkhorizonDirect Link to This Post
I tuned a supercharged one a few years back... It was a fun car, worked fairly well and was reliable.

I would rock it... It WAS easily faster than most of the turbo versions, but I have a feeling that now with some tuning you could easily make the turbo cars faster. Back then the turbo cars were really limited with tuning options.
IP: Logged
Cadillac Jack
Member
Posts: 1165
From: Jacksonville, IL, USA
Registered: May 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-14-2010 02:47 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Cadillac JackSend a Private Message to Cadillac JackDirect Link to This Post
I'm tracking but I don't have the 20,000 to 30,000 required. I own a supercharger already. Also i don't want to screw up the balance. the thing is amazing in curves!
 
quote
Originally posted by blackrams:

Well, let's go for the whole deal, how about a V8 conversion? Personally, I'd choose the LS4 for your ride, but that's just me.
I believe you can supercharge it also.

Ron


IP: Logged
turboguy327
Member
Posts: 1692
From: Webster, NY USA
Registered: Feb 2007


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 174
Rate this member

Report this Post02-14-2010 10:09 PM Click Here to See the Profile for turboguy327Send a Private Message to turboguy327Direct Link to This Post
At least get a decent looking car to play with.
IP: Logged
normsf
Member
Posts: 1682
From: mishawaka, In
Registered: Oct 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 57
Rate this member

Report this Post02-15-2010 12:19 AM Click Here to See the Profile for normsfClick Here to visit normsf's HomePageSend a Private Message to normsfDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by turboguy327:

At least get a decent looking car to play with.


Hello GM brought a car that has beat all in its class among the Mazda Mx5, Porsche Boxer to name a few while maintaining a style of comfort that our GM Fiero will never achieve, yet you in your judgement of Automotive Design disparage another bold and innovative work of art from Pontiac. At least its not a Aztek.

[This message has been edited by normsf (edited 02-15-2010).]

IP: Logged
blackrams
Member
Posts: 32824
From: Covington, TN, USA
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 230
Rate this member

Report this Post02-15-2010 12:02 PM Click Here to See the Profile for blackramsSend a Private Message to blackramsDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Cadillac Jack:

I'm tracking but I don't have the 20,000 to 30,000 required. I own a supercharger already. Also i don't want to screw up the balance. the thing is amazing in curves!


I can relate to the money issue. Damn lottery isn't paying off.

Regardless, what's the decision? Inquiring minds want to know.

Ron
IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock