Pennock's Fiero Forum
  General Fiero Chat - Archive
  3400 dohc vs 3.4 pr

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


3400 dohc vs 3.4 pr by Hockaday
Started on: 07-29-2010 11:15 PM
Replies: 31
Last post by: qwikgta on 07-31-2010 12:29 AM
Hockaday
Member
Posts: 2165
From: Clifton Park, New York, The States.
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-29-2010 11:15 PM Click Here to See the Profile for HockadaySend a Private Message to HockadayDirect Link to This Post
im looking at my future swap...I was settled on the 3.4 pr due to its relative ease. But my eye has been wandering towards the dohc...my question to you is this...( yes I have searched ) what more is there involved with swapping in the dohc 3400 to a 86 notchback with the izuzu 5 speed and no options. I plan to put a turbo on either one i swap in.

Either will be rather temporary ( not sure how long it'll be temporary but in the future i plan to do a northstar swap )

Any info etc will be greatly appreciated thank you.

------------------
Cliff's 610th Positive Feedback Giver.
#12 NYFOC Member
In recent times, the custom aftermarket car/automobile roadwheel has become a status symbol. These wheels are often incorrectly referred to as "rims". The term "rim" is incorrect because the rim is only the outer portion of a wheel (where the tire is mounted

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
fieroguy123
Member
Posts: 1523
From: Indianapolis
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 62
Rate this member

Report this Post07-29-2010 11:59 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fieroguy123Send a Private Message to fieroguy123Direct Link to This Post
First of all, you're going to blow that isuzu in half with either engine. So get a getrag. Second of all, you're going to blow that isuzu into 800 pieces with a turbo 3400. So get a getrag.
IP: Logged
HausFiero
Member
Posts: 353
From: MO
Registered: Jun 2010


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 12:23 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HausFieroSend a Private Message to HausFieroDirect Link to This Post
Look up 3.4 dohc fiero swap on google...

But id say don't do the 3.4 dohc swap if ur planning on it being temporary fo the n*

if that's the case I'd just do the 3.4 pr then, seeing as how u don't have to change anything with wiring or mounting. Just a hole drilled to relocate start and the fiero 2.8 accesories switched over. Easier, less money, yet still a nice little up in horsepower and torque.

Adding a turbo will cost some money tho. I wouldn't do it personally if u plan on trashing it for a n* anyway
IP: Logged
HausFiero
Member
Posts: 353
From: MO
Registered: Jun 2010


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 12:25 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HausFieroSend a Private Message to HausFieroDirect Link to This Post

HausFiero

353 posts
Member since Jun 2010
Double post...

[This message has been edited by HausFiero (edited 07-30-2010).]

IP: Logged
Hockaday
Member
Posts: 2165
From: Clifton Park, New York, The States.
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 12:26 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HockadaySend a Private Message to HockadayDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by HausFiero:

Look up 3.4 dohc fiero swap on google...

But id say don't do the 3.4 dohc swap if ur planning on it being temporary fo the n*

if that's the case I'd just do the 3.4 pr then, seeing as how u don't have to change anything with wiring or mounting. Just a hole drilled to relocate start and the fiero 2.8 accesories switched over. Easier, less money, yet still a nice little up in horsepower and torque.

Adding a turbo will cost some money tho. I wouldn't do it personally if u plan on trashing it for a n* anyway


exactly what i needed thank you. I have the turbo already which is why I would like to put it on.
IP: Logged
HausFiero
Member
Posts: 353
From: MO
Registered: Jun 2010


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 12:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HausFieroSend a Private Message to HausFieroDirect Link to This Post
Np, good luck with whichever u choose.

I was also tryin to decide between the 3.4 pr and dohc, and I would also turbo whichever one I chose. I haven't 100% decides but leaning toward the dohc because of the much much much higher potential, because for me it will be a permanent swap. The maitenence for the dohc seems like it might be a little irritating (timing belt).

But ya like I said the pr might be better for u tho because it will just be a quick an dirty temporary swap
IP: Logged
Blacktree
Member
Posts: 20770
From: Central Florida
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (12)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 350
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 01:00 AM Click Here to See the Profile for BlacktreeClick Here to visit Blacktree's HomePageSend a Private Message to BlacktreeDirect Link to This Post
With a later model 3400 / 3500 V6, you get power similar to the 3.4TDC without the extra ~75lb bolted to the top of the engine... and no timing belt to snap. Just a thought.
IP: Logged
Hockaday
Member
Posts: 2165
From: Clifton Park, New York, The States.
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 01:01 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HockadaySend a Private Message to HockadayDirect Link to This Post
yes i agree, plus even w/o the turbo it will have more torque and same hp as my 300zx did..and it weighed more...so i'll be happy no matter what.
IP: Logged
HausFiero
Member
Posts: 353
From: MO
Registered: Jun 2010


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 01:07 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HausFieroSend a Private Message to HausFieroDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Blacktree:

With a later model 3400 / 3500 V6, you get power similar to the 3.4TDC without the extra ~75lb bolted to the top of the engine... and no timing belt to snap. Just a thought.


I haven't ever seen anyone make as much hp outta a 3400 or 3500 as a 3.4 dohc. 400-450 hp isn't farfetched for a turbo 3.4 dohc
IP: Logged
Hockaday
Member
Posts: 2165
From: Clifton Park, New York, The States.
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 01:07 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HockadaySend a Private Message to HockadayDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Blacktree:

With a later model 3400 / 3500 V6, you get power similar to the 3.4TDC without the extra ~75lb bolted to the top of the engine... and no timing belt to snap. Just a thought.


hrmmm...not as easy install as the camaro 3.4 is it? ( then again you might be talking about same engine lol )
IP: Logged
HausFiero
Member
Posts: 353
From: MO
Registered: Jun 2010


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 01:11 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HausFieroSend a Private Message to HausFieroDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Hockaday:


hrmmm...not as easy install as the camaro 3.4 is it? ( then again you might be talking about same engine lol )


Not sure on specifics on this one cuz I was never real interested in this one but it's harder than the camarobird 3.4, but easier than the 3.4 dohc
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
pontiackid86
Member
Posts: 19632
From: Kingwood Texas..... Yall
Registered: Sep 2008


Feedback score:    (12)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 344
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 01:45 AM Click Here to See the Profile for pontiackid86Send a Private Message to pontiackid86Direct Link to This Post
If you have a duke right now its not use in rewiring the car for the 3.4 push rod just to get an extra 20 HP over the rest of is 2.8 guys.
IP: Logged
Hockaday
Member
Posts: 2165
From: Clifton Park, New York, The States.
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 01:53 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HockadaySend a Private Message to HockadayDirect Link to This Post
i would think it'd have more torque, and 2.8 is 120ish, 3.4 is 160
IP: Logged
Darth Fiero
Member
Posts: 5922
From: Waterloo, Indiana
Registered: Oct 2002


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 361
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 02:59 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Darth FieroClick Here to visit Darth Fiero's HomePageSend a Private Message to Darth FieroDirect Link to This Post
Just to clarify engine terms so we are all talking about the same thing:

The "3.4 pushrod" generally refers to the iron-head 3.4 pushrod V6 used in the 93-95 Camaros and Firebirds (aka: 3.4 OHV).

The 3.4 TDC / DOHC (NOT 3400 DOHC) is the 4-cam V6 monster used in 1991-97 Luminas, Cutlass Supremes, Grand Prix's, and Monte Carlos. I have a detailed page-by-page swap posted here: http://www.gmtuners.com/Cus....4DOHCFiero/swap.htm

The 3400 is the aluminum head, roller cam, 3.4L displacement pushrod V6 that GM first came out with in 1996-up vehicles and was primarily used in minivans as well as some other cars. Makes more power than the 3.4 iron-head but less than the 3.4 DOHC.

-ryan

------------------
7+ years on this same swap -- NO engine or transmission failures...

Custom GM OBD1 & OBD2 Tuning | Engine Conversions & more | www.gmtuners.com

IP: Logged
unboundmo
Member
Posts: 2242
From: California
Registered: Sep 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 03:08 AM Click Here to See the Profile for unboundmoSend a Private Message to unboundmoDirect Link to This Post
The 3.4L p/r from the 93-95 camaro/firebird has 160hp with 205 torque
IP: Logged
carbon
Member
Posts: 4767
From: Eagan, MN
Registered: Apr 2004


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 132
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 07:34 AM Click Here to See the Profile for carbonSend a Private Message to carbonDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Darth Fiero:

Just to clarify engine terms so we are all talking about the same thing:

The "3.4 pushrod" generally refers to the iron-head 3.4 pushrod V6 used in the 93-95 Camaros and Firebirds (aka: 3.4 OHV).

The 3.4 TDC / DOHC (NOT 3400 DOHC) is the 4-cam V6 monster used in 1991-97 Luminas, Cutlass Supremes, Grand Prix's, and Monte Carlos. I have a detailed page-by-page swap posted here: http://www.gmtuners.com/Cus....4DOHCFiero/swap.htm

The 3400 is the aluminum head, roller cam, 3.4L displacement pushrod V6 that GM first came out with in 1996-up vehicles and was primarily used in minivans as well as some other cars. Makes more power than the 3.4 iron-head but less than the 3.4 DOHC.

-ryan



THANK YOU! I know it's stupid... but little things like that make me want to pull my hair out.(what little there is left)
IP: Logged
Hockaday
Member
Posts: 2165
From: Clifton Park, New York, The States.
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 09:02 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HockadaySend a Private Message to HockadayDirect Link to This Post
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/106879.html great info about the 3500 n such
IP: Logged
Hockaday
Member
Posts: 2165
From: Clifton Park, New York, The States.
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 09:08 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HockadaySend a Private Message to HockadayDirect Link to This Post

Hockaday

2165 posts
Member since Sep 2009
yes and his write up should be the standard to all write ups,

jap engines are easier to tell apart lol
IP: Logged
qwikgta
Member
Posts: 4670
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score:    (21)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 84
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 09:51 AM Click Here to See the Profile for qwikgtaSend a Private Message to qwikgtaDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fieroguy123:

First of all, you're going to blow that isuzu in half with either engine. So get a getrag. Second of all, you're going to blow that isuzu into 800 pieces with a turbo 3400. So get a getrag.


Really, because I have not. My Isuzu had 69K on it when I attached it to my 96 DOHC and its fine. and yes I do "get on it". What proof do you have that it will blow up?

use the search and type "3.4 DOHC" you will find a bunch of my questions during my swap.

Bottom-line. These two motors are at different ends of the spectrum. What kind of driving do you plan to do with it when you’re done?

If you take a stock 3.4PR, drill the holes for the starter, do all the other things needed to fit the motor in, you end up with a 160hp motor. It will take some cash and time.

If you install the 3.4 DOHC you will end up with a 215+ HP motor that screams up to 7200rpm and sound awesome. YES, it is more work, and more cash, but in the end, of the two (3.4 pr and 3.4 DOHC) the DOHC motor may be better for you needs. Installing the DOHC motor is easy, the block is the same (external) as the 2.8L V6, so hooking it up to the trans and using the stock V6 motor mounts/trans mounts is a breeze. Yes you have to do some cutting, the pass side hood hinge and maybe your dogbone mount (some do, some don't) but other than that its easy. Wiring can be a challenge, but I did it so anyone can.

Of the two, the 3.4 PR is an easier swap, as a lot of the 2.8L parts will work, but you will still have some issues with wiring and the ECM. You will also have these issues with the 3.4 DOHC swap. You will have to figure out the exhaust and play around with fuel lines, and hoses and such.

Both swaps have +/- and both will cost you some $$$ and time. Its up to you what you want in the end.


Rob

.

------------------


88 Coupe, CJB T-TOP, 1996 3.4 DOHC and a GT clip

IP: Logged
FieroReinke
Member
Posts: 1065
From: St James, MO
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 01:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for FieroReinkeSend a Private Message to FieroReinkeDirect Link to This Post
If you want the northstar, then wait for the northstar. All the money and time you put into the 3.4 swap, either one, will be wasted. Just save the money and build a better northstar swapped car.
IP: Logged
Dennis LaGrua
Member
Posts: 15762
From: Hillsborough, NJ U.S.A.
Registered: May 2000


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 328
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 02:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Dennis LaGruaSend a Private Message to Dennis LaGruaDirect Link to This Post
A 3.4L DOHC engine will bolt right in (with very minimal mods) The N* is a ton of work to swap in. With a turbo and a 3.4L DOHC or TDC engine you can make lots of horsepower but I am not sure how reliability will factor in with the boosting and the 2 bolt mains. The 3.4L TDC is a very tight fit around the massive 4 valve heads and good plumbing skills are required to get a turbo properly positioned . The 3.4TDC is also the heaviest V6 that weighs in at around 492.5 lbs.

------------------
" THE BLACK PARALYZER" -87GT 3800SC Series III engine, 3.4" Pulley, N* TB, LS1 MAF, Flotech Exhaust Autolite 104's Custom CAI 4T65eHD w. custom axles, HP Tuners VCM Suite.
"THE COLUSSUS"
87GT - ALL OUT 3.4L Turbocharged engine, Garrett Hybrid Turbo, MSD ign., modified TH125H
" ON THE LOOSE WITHOUT THE JUICE "

[This message has been edited by Dennis LaGrua (edited 07-30-2010).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Doug85GT
Member
Posts: 9831
From: Sacramento CA USA
Registered: May 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 123
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 03:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Doug85GTSend a Private Message to Doug85GTDirect Link to This Post
Why do a "temporary" engine swap? While you are driving your 3.4 DOHC or 3.4 PR car and you are gathering parts of the N* swap, you can also buy another Fiero to do the N* swap in. After the N* swap you will have two engine swapped Fieros and you can keep both or sell one.

I just don't see why you would go through all the trouble of an engine swap just to rip it all out and do another one.
IP: Logged
Doug85GT
Member
Posts: 9831
From: Sacramento CA USA
Registered: May 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 123
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 03:50 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Doug85GTSend a Private Message to Doug85GTDirect Link to This Post

Doug85GT

9831 posts
Member since May 2003
 
quote
Originally posted by Dennis LaGrua:

A 3.4L DOHC engine will bolt right in (with very minimal mods) The N* is a ton of work to swap in. With a turbo and a 3.4L DOHC or TDC engine you can make lots of horsepower but I am not sure how reliability will factor in with the boosting and the 2 bolt mains. The 3.4L TDC is a very tight fit around the massive 4 valve heads and good plumbing skills are required to get a turbo properly positioned . The 3.4TDC is also the heaviest V6 that weighs in at around 592.5 lbs.




Wow! That engine gets heavier every time I look. When I had one shipped to me by R&L shippers, it was weighed as 480# shrink wrapped, strapped to a pallet on top of a tire.
IP: Logged
Hockaday
Member
Posts: 2165
From: Clifton Park, New York, The States.
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 04:40 PM Click Here to See the Profile for HockadaySend a Private Message to HockadayDirect Link to This Post
because a duke fiero is slower then a mini van...northstar will be years down the road i figure. since im working on my trans am w/e i can...plus college is comeing up and jobs are impossible to find...but i might just do a northstar swap right away and drive my Zed. not really sure.
IP: Logged
Erik
Member
Posts: 5625
From: Des Moines, Iowa
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 168
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 05:19 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ErikSend a Private Message to ErikDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Dennis LaGrua:
The 3.4TDC is also the heaviest V6 that weighs in at around 592.5 lbs.



Dennis, it would be better if you kept quiet about something you know nothing about

I have repeatedly corrected you in regards to the weight of the 3.4 TDC yet you continually lie about the weight.
It weighs 465 lbs dressed.
IP: Logged
Erik
Member
Posts: 5625
From: Des Moines, Iowa
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 168
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 05:22 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ErikSend a Private Message to ErikDirect Link to This Post

Erik

5625 posts
Member since Jul 2002
 
quote
Originally posted by Doug85GT:
Wow! That engine gets heavier every time I look. When I had one shipped to me by R&L shippers, it was weighed as 480# shrink wrapped, strapped to a pallet on top of a tire.


Its all in Dennis mind

Mine weighs 465 lbs dressed
IP: Logged
Erik
Member
Posts: 5625
From: Des Moines, Iowa
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 168
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 05:25 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ErikSend a Private Message to ErikDirect Link to This Post

Erik

5625 posts
Member since Jul 2002
Also the 3.4 DOHC block is robust and 2 bolt mains are no problem handling a turbo ..if you want an increase in reliablity use main studs.
IP: Logged
Dennis LaGrua
Member
Posts: 15762
From: Hillsborough, NJ U.S.A.
Registered: May 2000


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 328
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 06:21 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Dennis LaGruaSend a Private Message to Dennis LaGruaDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Doug85GT:
Wow! That engine gets heavier every time I look. When I had one shipped to me by R&L shippers, it was weighed as 480# shrink wrapped, strapped to a pallet on top of a tire.


Weight corrected. The engine weighs 492.5 lbs. When you add the weight of the flywheel you'll be close to your figure. Still the heaviest of the V6 engines though.

------------------
" THE BLACK PARALYZER" -87GT 3800SC Series III engine, 3.4" Pulley, N* TB, LS1 MAF, Flotech Exhaust Autolite 104's Custom CAI 4T65eHD w. custom axles, HP Tuners VCM Suite.
"THE COLUSSUS"
87GT - ALL OUT 3.4L Turbocharged engine, Garrett Hybrid Turbo, MSD ign., modified TH125H
" ON THE LOOSE WITHOUT THE JUICE "

IP: Logged
Erik
Member
Posts: 5625
From: Des Moines, Iowa
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 168
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 06:44 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ErikSend a Private Message to ErikDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Dennis LaGrua:


Weight corrected. The engine weighs 492.5 lbs. When you add the weight of the flywheel you'll be close to your figure. Still the heaviest of the V6 engines though.


wrong again ..the weight is 465 lbs dressed including a 12 lb flywheel and ..its very close to the weight of a 3800 SC
IP: Logged
ltlfrari
Member
Posts: 5356
From: Wake Forest,NC,USA
Registered: Jan 2002


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 127
Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 11:02 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ltlfrariClick Here to visit ltlfrari's HomePageSend a Private Message to ltlfrariDirect Link to This Post
I never had a problem with the DOHC and a suzzy 5 speed tranny. Mind you I didn't do scream the engine and drop the clutch starts either. As for the weight, I never really noticed the extra weight back there.
You do have to cut the bottom of the passenger side deck lid mount though to clear the cam cog cover on the front bank.

For a temporary swap I wouldn't do it. Too much work to just throw it away later. I think a pr motor would be a better option if you are going to replace it later anyway.

Lots of info on my site, link in sig below.

------------------
Dave

www.ltlfrari.com

IP: Logged
Hockaday
Member
Posts: 2165
From: Clifton Park, New York, The States.
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-30-2010 11:15 PM Click Here to See the Profile for HockadaySend a Private Message to HockadayDirect Link to This Post
fantastic write up...i think you're right...a bit much work it seems for it not to be a permanant engine.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
qwikgta
Member
Posts: 4670
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score:    (21)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 84
Rate this member

Report this Post07-31-2010 12:29 AM Click Here to See the Profile for qwikgtaSend a Private Message to qwikgtaDirect Link to This Post
I think after we do a swap, its easy. I know that I could do another DOHC swap in a "virgin" fiero in a few months, but I have already done it, so I know all of the issues. I went from a 2.5 tech IV to the DOHC, so i noticed the power over the weight. Honestly, I don't even notice the motor weight. I have lowered the suspension, put on tight springs/shocks, added swaybars and POLY on all four corners, so when I finally got the swap done, and took it for a drive it was a totally differant car.

We can't tell you what to do, but you can learn from our mistakes. If I could do it all over again, and it was 6 years ago, id be dropping in an LS2/3 with a 6 speed. Yes, way more money, but after driving my 05 GTO for the last 4 years, I really want a LS motor in my car.

SO, I totally understand doing a swap, and doing another one soon after. If I had problems with this swap id be looking at upgrading now, but because it drives so well, im going to drive it for a few years.

Good luck

RJ
IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock