Pennock's Fiero Forum
  General Fiero Chat - Archive
  Pushrod 3.4 Track times

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


Pushrod 3.4 Track times by Santa Cruzer
Started on: 02-11-2003 09:44 AM
Replies: 12
Last post by: fierosound on 02-13-2003 07:33 PM
Santa Cruzer
Member
Posts: 1335
From: Brampton Ontario
Registered: Jul 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 83
Rate this member

Report this Post02-11-2003 09:44 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Santa CruzerSend a Private Message to Santa CruzerDirect Link to This Post
Can you post your track times auto and manual please.

Thanks

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Rare87GT
Member
Posts: 5044
From: Wichita, KS USA
Registered: Oct 2001


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 173
Rate this member

Report this Post02-11-2003 10:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Rare87GTSend a Private Message to Rare87GTDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Santa Cruzer:

Can you post your track times auto and manual please.

Thanks


Track times= not good

3.4L Formula 5spd Getrag with a few mods went 15.56 at 84mph. On the dyno got 140 hp and 192 ft/lbs of torque at the wheels. The car will be getting a test intake in a few weeks to see what kind of gains we can get and this time it will be dynoed and tested!

My 87GT with a 5spd getrag 2.8L stock went 15.57 at 87mph go figure. Im still interested in what the intake brings to the 3.4L, hopefully some life to the darn thing at higher rpms.

Amir

------------------

Maroon 1987 GT 5 spd: 2.8L
Ferrari Red 1988 Formula 5 spd: 3.4L

My Website: http://www.members.cox.net/rare88/

IP: Logged
Coop88
Member
Posts: 393
From: Highlands Ranch CO USA
Registered: May 2000


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-11-2003 01:25 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Coop88Send a Private Message to Coop88Direct Link to This Post
15.662 @ 85.3 mph. 3.4 w/Getrag 5spd, ported exhaust manifolds, high flow cat.

That was with a broken front tranny mount and a bad dogbone, if that matters. In fact, I think the first launch is what killed the tranny mount, with the bad dog bone of course.

I always wondered what turbo 3.4s run, I've seen estimates and some horsepower numbers, but no track times that I can recall. If that's getting off topic, nevermind.

IP: Logged
Neal
Member
Posts: 1247
From: Calgary AB, Canada
Registered: Jun 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-11-2003 03:29 PM Click Here to See the Profile for NealClick Here to visit Neal's HomePageSend a Private Message to NealDirect Link to This Post
15.59 @ 87.74mph
getrag 5speed, and a few goodies on the motor. ive done a few more mods since then, and once i get a custom chip id like to see a 14.99.

------------------

3.4L 87GT

IP: Logged
kslish
Member
Posts: 1475
From: Womelsdorf, PA
Registered: Apr 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-11-2003 04:34 PM Click Here to See the Profile for kslishSend a Private Message to kslishDirect Link to This Post
I witnessed (since I was in a car behind her in the staging area) Jen (Fierochic88) run a 15 flat (I forget the speed) in her '85 GT 3.4 w/4-spd stick. That was last fall at Maple Grove Raceway.

Looks like the extra shift with you guys running the 5-spd Getrag might be slowing you down in the qtr. mile.

Ken S.

IP: Logged
Jncomutt
Member
Posts: 8899
From: Charlotte, NC
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 221
Rate this member

Report this Post02-11-2003 04:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for JncomuttSend a Private Message to JncomuttDirect Link to This Post
I know Amir has headers, borla, etc, on his car...

Just wanted to lay it out that Jenn has a cam. For comparison sakes along with the 4spd. Well in anycase, she'll prob. be by to post.

Keep impressing me guys, I'm considerin a 3.4 due to the ease of swap. True, they're only turning 15s, and yes, my 2.8 ran 14s many times, but as far as turbo goes, I think a nicely boosted 3.4 will put out a bit more than a boosted 2.8.

------------------

19 Year Old Fierophile.
R.I.P.--1986 GT Daily Driver, 4:10s, NX 50 Shot, Borla exhaust, ported manifolds, more goodies
--1986 SE V6, Mostly stock W/Integrated rockers and COMING SOON: Intercooled Turbo!!! (possibly)
--1984 SE 4.9, IMSA spoiler, Duel exhuast, GT rear bumper, Konis, drop spindles, Rear adjustable perch, Poly total kit, Poly cradle bushings, Big front bar, Added rear bar, 11.25" brakes on all corners w/SS hoses, Fancy wheels wrapped w/soft rubber, and much much more.

[This message has been edited by Jncomutt (edited 02-11-2003).]

IP: Logged
KissMySSFiero
Member
Posts: 5541
From: Tarpon Springs, FL USA
Registered: Nov 2000


Feedback score:    (18)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 111
Rate this member

Report this Post02-11-2003 06:41 PM Click Here to See the Profile for KissMySSFieroSend a Private Message to KissMySSFieroDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Jncomutt:


Keep impressing me guys, I'm considerin a 3.4 due to the ease of swap.

Maybe its just me, but I'm not at all impressed by a 15.5 My formula ran a 15.7 - 15.9 all day long with 160k on the clock. I know the history of my car back to 30k miles. It still has the same Timing chain it did when purchased at 30k miles in 92. theres too many people running mid 15's on the stock 2.8 to consider that impressive. just my $.02

------------------
88 Yellow FORMULA
SSFiero@Aol.com

IP: Logged
Santa Cruzer
Member
Posts: 1335
From: Brampton Ontario
Registered: Jul 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 83
Rate this member

Report this Post02-11-2003 07:08 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Santa CruzerSend a Private Message to Santa CruzerDirect Link to This Post
Is it possible the 2.8 heads and intake are makeing the 3.4 loose hp? Maybe the ECM even?
IP: Logged
kslish
Member
Posts: 1475
From: Womelsdorf, PA
Registered: Apr 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-11-2003 07:22 PM Click Here to See the Profile for kslishSend a Private Message to kslishDirect Link to This Post
Heads for the production iron head 2.8L and 3.4L are identical. It's most likely the Fiero intake manifold design and ECM still running a 2.8L fuel map that limits the upper end HP. There are various opinions on that matter though.

And yea John, Jen is running a cam but I recall it's nothing real radical in profile.

The unavailabilty of economical lower compression dished pistons (other than the stock flat tops) drowned my 3.4L dreams. Can get a decent set of 8.5:1 compression dished hypereutectic pistons for the 3.1L bore fairly cheap. Yea I know I can go custom forged, yadda yadda yadda but I want something I can actually afford rather than something I can only dream about to go with my turbo, so a 2.8 to 3.1L rebuild it will be eventually.

Ken S.
'87 GT turbo
'87 GT stock
'86 SC 4 banger with all the Holley goodies

IP: Logged
LoW_KeY
Member
Posts: 8081
From: Hastings, MI
Registered: Oct 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 150
Rate this member

Report this Post02-12-2003 06:13 AM Click Here to See the Profile for LoW_KeYSend a Private Message to LoW_KeYDirect Link to This Post
14.9@92 probably could have managed a tad bit lower 14.5-14.7 but goofed my launches. Yes thats with a 5spd.

[This message has been edited by LoW_KeY (edited 02-12-2003).]

IP: Logged
Fierochic88
Member
Posts: 4962
From: Staunton, VA
Registered: May 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 153
Rate this member

Report this Post02-12-2003 05:33 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Fierochic88Send a Private Message to Fierochic88Direct Link to This Post
I ran a 15 flat on a track that had not so great traction, so I would bet a fairly large sum of money that I could probably beat that and break into the 14's. I believe my top speed was around 89-90 miles per hour. While my 3.4 has some mods, there is nothing major done to it at this point. The cam mod is only slight and I doubt it gives me an entire 1/2 second. For the ease and inexpense of the swap, I would recommend it to anyone.

Jen

------------------


IM Username: FieroChic88
Silver 1988 GT
Silver 1986 2m4
Cobalt Blue 85 GT 3.4

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Joe Torma
Member
Posts: 3485
From: Hillsborough, NJ USA
Registered: Jul 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 129
Rate this member

Report this Post02-12-2003 06:31 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Joe TormaClick Here to visit Joe Torma's HomePageSend a Private Message to Joe TormaDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Santa Cruzer:Is it possible the 2.8 heads and intake are makeing the 3.4 loose hp? Maybe the ECM even?

Thats apparently what the problem is...you really need 20%+ more air for the 20% more displacement.

I have the GenIII 3400 FWD and it should be in the high 13s since it ran a 14.37(g-tech) and took 1+ second to get into 2nd gear. (kinda bench racing...but it's the truth)

IP: Logged
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15141
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 286
Rate this member

Report this Post02-13-2003 07:33 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundDirect Link to This Post
15.2 @ 89 - that was before I had Wester's Garage ( www.ecmprogrammer.com ) burn a chip. My car runs stronger now, but still "runs out of breath" above 4700rpm

------------------

1987 GT - 2 Award 2002 WoW Winner &
Multiple IASCA Stereo Award Winner

IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery | Ogre's Cave
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock