Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions - Archive
  How much spark advance on premium?

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


How much spark advance on premium? by masospaghetti
Started on: 10-17-2011 09:30 PM
Replies: 15
Last post by: sardonyx247 on 10-18-2011 06:57 PM
masospaghetti
Member
Posts: 2477
From: Charlotte, NC USA
Registered: Dec 2009


Feedback score:    (10)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-17-2011 09:30 PM Click Here to See the Profile for masospaghettiSend a Private Message to masospaghettiDirect Link to This Post
So baseline is 10 degrees BTDC. Can this be advanced at all on 87 octane? How much can it be advanced on 93 octane? And how much increase in power / fuel economy can be expected from the change?

Thanks all, 86 GT.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
lateFormula
Member
Posts: 1048
From: Detroit Rock City
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-17-2011 10:45 PM Click Here to See the Profile for lateFormulaSend a Private Message to lateFormulaDirect Link to This Post
I've been wondering that for a few years now. Not just for my Fiero, but for just about any car with a distributor. Current generation ignition systems that employ a knock sensor are able to provide the most ignition advance within their programming.

I wouldn't expect that you can advance the timing a whole lot more, probably less than four degrees at most. I have wanted to test this on an engine dyno to see what can be done. I believe that the end results would be a marginal increase in fuel economy (1-2 MPG), and possibly a more responsive throttle - the engine would rev a bit quicker.

[This message has been edited by lateFormula (edited 10-17-2011).]

IP: Logged
Patrick
Member
Posts: 38569
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 465
Rate this member

Report this Post10-17-2011 11:00 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickSend a Private Message to PatrickDirect Link to This Post

Unless you also plan on increasing the compression ratio of your engine, using anything other than Regular gas is a complete waste of money with the stock 2.8 or duke.

However, that doesn't negate you from experimenting with the ignition timing. I've advanced the timing on both my '86 GT and '84 duke. Makes for slightly better gas mileage and performance, but also makes for a "dirtier" running engine.
IP: Logged
masospaghetti
Member
Posts: 2477
From: Charlotte, NC USA
Registered: Dec 2009


Feedback score:    (10)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-17-2011 11:42 PM Click Here to See the Profile for masospaghettiSend a Private Message to masospaghettiDirect Link to This Post
Patrick: A complete waste, by that you mean the added spark advance gains you nothing?
IP: Logged
sardonyx247
Member
Posts: 5032
From: Nevada, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score:    (88)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 219
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 12:23 AM Click Here to See the Profile for sardonyx247Click Here to visit sardonyx247's HomePageSend a Private Message to sardonyx247Direct Link to This Post
a waste means, run the oct rating just above where pinging stops. Higher octane is less flamable, so to speak.
You would have to test advanced timing, vs octane, vs price difference.
IP: Logged
theogre
Member
Posts: 32520
From: USA
Registered: Mar 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 572
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 01:32 AM Click Here to See the Profile for theogreClick Here to visit theogre's HomePageSend a Private Message to theogreDirect Link to This Post
Advance base timing then ECM just retard it back.
Too much base timing them ECM in hosed but doesn't trip a error code... Because there Isn't one...
DTC 42 usually means ignition module or wires between module and ECM is bad.

Base timing affects engine starting.

------------------
Dr. Ian Malcolm: Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.
(Jurassic Park)


The Ogre's Fiero Cave (It's also at the top and bottom of every forum page...)

IP: Logged
fierogt28
Member
Posts: 2962
From: New-Brunswick, Canada.
Registered: Feb 2005


Feedback score:    (14)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 02:22 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fierogt28Send a Private Message to fierogt28Direct Link to This Post
On a stock 2.8, having the car in diagnostic mode (A&B terminals on the ALCL link jumped), setting between 10* & 12* is fine.

2 months ago I re-built my distributor and re-timed my engine and set it at 12*. I'm quite happy.
IP: Logged
Bloozberry
Member
Posts: 7760
From:
Registered: Jan 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 311
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 08:01 AM Click Here to See the Profile for BloozberrySend a Private Message to BloozberryDirect Link to This Post
Higher octane fuel isn't a total waste on an engine with carbon built up on the piston tops and cylinder tops (basically every engine that hasn't been rebuilt). The added octane lowers the likelihood of pre-detonation and pinging due to hot spots and/or increased compression due to the lower volume at TDC.

Also, in Canada it isn't a "complete waste" for another reason (although the benefits are marginal). The higher the octane rating, the more detergent additives there are which keep your injectors running more evenly.
IP: Logged
theogre
Member
Posts: 32520
From: USA
Registered: Mar 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 572
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 09:43 AM Click Here to See the Profile for theogreClick Here to visit theogre's HomePageSend a Private Message to theogreDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Bloozberry:

Also, in Canada it isn't a "complete waste" for another reason (although the benefits are marginal). The higher the octane rating, the more detergent additives there are which keep your injectors running more evenly.


Like in US, May depend on which brand... Some use better detergent in all grades, others only on higher grades. Here Chevron/Texaco uses Techron® in all grades but in Canada? Not sure... FAQ page is hosed... Web site for canada look like all grades meet Top Tier spec, which may means all grades gets Techron. http://www.chevron.com/prod...usttech/toptier.aspx

imperialoil.ca (Esso/exxon) says

Esso gasolines also help keep your engine clean while you drive
All Esso gasolines include cleaning agents in their formulations. Routine use of Esso gasoline should help keep fuel injectors and intake valves clean, and reduce future engine problems.

TOP TIER
All grades of Esso branded retail gasolines meet TOP TIER Detergent Gasoline Standards.

What is "Top Tier?" see www.toptiergas.com
IP: Logged
rogergarrison
Member
Posts: 49601
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 551
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 03:38 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonDirect Link to This Post
Just use the regular it was designed for at a stock advance. You CAN advance it far enough it wont turn over with the starter. Your not going to gain anything by using premium in a stock engine...except depletely funds faster. I ran 110 octane aviation gas in my racecar locally. Timing was way above stock and the gas cost almost double. Of course it was far from a stock motor too. Id never have done either to run it on the street.
IP: Logged
Patrick
Member
Posts: 38569
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 465
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 03:56 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickSend a Private Message to PatrickDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Bloozberry:

Higher octane fuel isn't a total waste on an engine with carbon built up on the piston tops and cylinder tops (basically every engine that hasn't been rebuilt). The added octane lowers the likelihood of pre-detonation and pinging due to hot spots and/or increased compression due to the lower volume at TDC.



Blooze, I would've agreed with you 30 years ago, but is carbon build-up anywhere near as much of a problem now with computerized fuel injection as it was in the "old days" with carburators and no computerized monitoring/fuel adjustments?

Engines in this day and age shouldn't be running rich, and therefore they shouldn't be building up a lot of crap in their combustion chambers.

 
quote
Originally posted by Bloozberry:

Also, in Canada it isn't a "complete waste" for another reason (although the benefits are marginal). The higher the octane rating, the more detergent additives there are which keep your injectors running more evenly.



With all due respect, I've heard that's total bunk. The oil companies would like us to believe that, just so those of us who only require Regular gas waste our money on their higher priced fuel.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Bloozberry
Member
Posts: 7760
From:
Registered: Jan 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 311
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 04:55 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BloozberrySend a Private Message to BloozberryDirect Link to This Post
The carbon isn't from running rich so much as it is from burning oil due to poor valve stem sealing, especially on tired engines, so yes... it is still a problem. As for the hype about detergents, your guess is as good as mine about the truth behind the added detergents... all I know is what the gas companies tell us. I also clarified my statement by saying it was a marginal benefit at best.
IP: Logged
Joseph Upson
Member
Posts: 4951
From:
Registered: Jan 2002


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 88
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 05:27 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Joseph UpsonSend a Private Message to Joseph UpsonDirect Link to This Post
If it's a stock 2.8L don't waste your money, advancing timing beyond stock may or may not provide more benefit and it's limited at that. There is a point where additional timing advance does not cause detonation or provide any performance increase whatsoever under those circumstances. The best way to determine the benefit is on the dyno as has already been mentioned. The closer to top dead center that combustion takes place the more load your rod bearings are likely to be subjected to and most of us know they wear out fast enough without help. If you must, 89 octane and 2 additional degrees is about as premium as you should go. No matter how much timing you add it will not change the fact that you are still igniting the same compression ratio which dictates the octane requirement.
IP: Logged
Patrick
Member
Posts: 38569
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 465
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 06:06 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickSend a Private Message to PatrickDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by masospaghetti:

Patrick: A complete waste, by that you mean the added spark advance gains you nothing?



That's not what I said.

 
quote
Originally posted by Patrick:

I've advanced the timing on both my '86 GT and '84 duke. Makes for slightly better gas mileage and performance, but also makes for a "dirtier" running engine.



Masospaghetti, using anything other than Regular gas is what I considered "a complete waste" (of money).

 
quote
Originally posted by Patrick:

Unless you also plan on increasing the compression ratio of your engine, using anything other than Regular gas is a complete waste of money with the stock 2.8 or duke.

IP: Logged
Patrick
Member
Posts: 38569
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 465
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 06:10 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickSend a Private Message to PatrickDirect Link to This Post

Patrick

38569 posts
Member since Apr 99
 
quote
Originally posted by Bloozberry:

The carbon isn't from running rich so much as it is from burning oil due to poor valve stem sealing, especially on tired engines, so yes... it is still a problem.



My Fieros would never puff blue.

IP: Logged
sardonyx247
Member
Posts: 5032
From: Nevada, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score:    (88)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 219
Rate this member

Report this Post10-18-2011 06:57 PM Click Here to See the Profile for sardonyx247Click Here to visit sardonyx247's HomePageSend a Private Message to sardonyx247Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by theogre:

Advance base timing then ECM just retard it back.


Wrong, there is no knock sensor on a stock 2.8 so the ECM will NOT retard it back.
The ECM does not "know" what you set it to, it assumes it is set to match the constant set in the code.
If base timing is set wrong, it will be that many degrees off through out the whole code.


An example where advanced timing is used for more power is the "hypertech" chip, it bumps up timing, up to about 6 degrees, BUT only at high rpm and under WOT.
BTW that is all the hypertech chip does, nothing else. (I looked over the code.)


Higher octane is good for higher compression, and/or boost.

------------------
"DRIVE IT LIKE A FIERO"
'84 Fiero, engine to be determined
'87Blue GT 3.4L Swap Completed!!!!!!!! Boosted!!!!!!!
^^^^ Now in the Construction Zone^^^^
Las Vegas Fiero Club Parts/Sales/Service/Club
Fiero Road Club Of Northern Nevada

IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock