Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions - Archive
  1988 alignment and torque specifications

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


1988 alignment and torque specifications by whereatt
Started on: 11-26-2007 11:44 PM
Replies: 21
Last post by: theogre on 11-13-2011 12:18 AM
whereatt
Member
Posts: 293
From: Indy
Registered: Dec 2006


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-26-2007 11:44 PM Click Here to See the Profile for whereattSend a Private Message to whereattDirect Link to This Post














Torque settings for ’88 Fiero suspension:

upper front shock mounting bolts==20lbs
lower front shock mounting bolts==51lbs
stabilizer bar bushing clamp mounting bolts==15lbs
stabilizer bar link bolt==12lbs
upper front ball joint mounting bolts==28lbs
upper control arm ball joint to knuckle castellated nut==35lbs
upper control arm to cross member pivot bolt==66lbs
lower control arm to cross member pivot bolt nut==52lbs
lower control arm ball joint to knuckle castellated nut==55lbs
rear strut dampener to knuckle mounting bolt nuts==140lbs
rear strut dampener upper mounting bolts==18lbs
rear lower ball joint mounting bolt nuts==13lbs
rear lower ball joint stud clamp bolt nut==37lbs
rear lower control arm pivot bolts==66lbs
rear hub and bearing bolts==62lbs
rear hub and bearing assembly hub nut== intial==74lbs==final==200lbs
rear hub and bearing shield mounting bolts==55 to 70lbs
rear toe link rod nut==30 to 39lbs
wheel lug nuts==steel==80lbs==aluminum==100lbs
caliper mounting bolts==74lbs
steering wheel to shaft nut ==30lbs
outer tie rod to steering knuckle nut ==29lbs
inner tie rod to outer tie rod jam nut==50lbs
steering dampener to rack and pinion assembly nuts==32lbs
shock dampener to boot support nut==35lbs
front brake splash shield to steering knuckle bolt==7lbs
steering dampener mounting nuts==32lbs
flexible coupling pinch bolt==46lbs
rack and pinion steering assembly mounting bolts==21lbs
cross member brace bolts==20lbs

Revisions to the 88:

brake hose fitting bolt at caliper==33lbs
caliper bridge bolts==74lbs
bleeder valve--116 inches-lbs
parking brake lever to actuator screw nut==35lbs
upper control arm to cross member bolt==52lbs
lower control arm to cross member nut==37lbs (plus an additional 3/4 turn)
upper ball joint stud nut==30-40lbs
lower ball joint stud nut==26lbs (plus additional 1/2 turn)
tie rod to steering knuckle nut==15lbs (plus aditional 1/2 turn)
shock absorber upper retaining nut==8lbs
shock absorber lower retaining bolts==20lbs
stabilizer bar bushing clamp bolts==20lbs
stabilizer bar link nuts==12lbs

The torque specs came from //www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/081655.html
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Fierobsessed
Member
Posts: 4782
From: Las Vegas, NV
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 147
Rate this member

Report this Post11-27-2007 01:04 AM Click Here to See the Profile for FierobsessedSend a Private Message to FierobsessedDirect Link to This Post
Fine, you talked me into giving you a plus.
IP: Logged
whereatt
Member
Posts: 293
From: Indy
Registered: Dec 2006


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-27-2007 03:35 PM Click Here to See the Profile for whereattSend a Private Message to whereattDirect Link to This Post
Thanks, I hope this helps people out. I know I've searched for this in the past but couldn't find anything.
IP: Logged
whereatt
Member
Posts: 293
From: Indy
Registered: Dec 2006


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post12-04-2007 10:13 PM Click Here to See the Profile for whereattSend a Private Message to whereattDirect Link to This Post
Trying to keep this on top!
IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post12-04-2007 10:22 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
Notice the typo in the Rear Camber Service Setting. It should be -1.0°, not -10°

Also, make sure the alignment shop uses the correct settings. GT and Formulas also have Manual Steering, so it's quite common to get the coupe's 3° caster setting. I've had that happen to my Formula.
IP: Logged
TG oreiF 8891
Member
Posts: 776
From: Cleveland, Ohio; USA
Registered: Aug 2004


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-13-2008 02:53 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TG oreiF 8891Send a Private Message to TG oreiF 8891Direct Link to This Post
Bump to bookmark and to ask...
Since they canned the power steering, shouldn't all the 88's get the "coupe" or manual steering settings?

------------------
1988 Fiero GT
Custom Corvette / MR2 electro-hydraulic power steering
17" rims covering up 11.25" rotors with Cadillac Calipers & drop spindles
Cleveland Fiero Club

IP: Logged
Oreif
Member
Posts: 16460
From: Schaumburg, IL
Registered: Jan 2000


Feedback score:    (19)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 442
Rate this member

Report this Post02-20-2009 07:06 AM Click Here to See the Profile for OreifClick Here to visit Oreif's HomePageSend a Private Message to OreifDirect Link to This Post
Here are the specs for the 1988 Fiero's

Factory specified alignment settings for 88 model (from the 1988 MVMA Specifications)
Front camber +0.0 degrees
Front caster +3.0 degrees
Front toe +0.15 degrees (this is approximately equivalent to 1/16inch toe-in)
Rear camber -1.0 degrees
Rear toe +0.15 degrees (this is approximately equivalent to 1/16inch toe-in)

BUT There is a GM tecjnical service bulletin that changes the specs.

1988 revised alignment specs listed in TSB # 88-3-11
Changes Front Caster from 3.0 to 5.0 degrees for GT and Formula.
Front toe from .15 to .3 degrees and Rear toe to .5 degrees.
Adds front and rear cross car camber to be within .75 degrees, Front cross caster must be within .75 degrees.
Tie rod boot must not be twisted and must be seated in the tie rod groove.
Vehicle must be jounced three times before checking alignment to eliminate false geometry readings.

(posted from work which blocks pics from photobucket, so if this is a repeat of above I apologize.)

[This message has been edited by Oreif (edited 02-20-2009).]

IP: Logged
Robert 2
Member
Posts: 2401
From: St Hubert Quebec Canada
Registered: Jan 2006


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-20-2009 08:03 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Robert 2Send a Private Message to Robert 2Direct Link to This Post
Very good
IP: Logged
fierogt28
Member
Posts: 2937
From: New-Brunswick, Canada.
Registered: Feb 2005


Feedback score:    (14)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-20-2009 12:21 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierogt28Send a Private Message to fierogt28Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Formula88:

Notice the typo in the Rear Camber Service Setting. It should be -1.0�, not -10�

Also, make sure the alignment shop uses the correct settings. GT and Formulas also have Manual Steering, so it's quite common to get the coupe's 3� caster setting. I've had that happen to my Formula.


Does the coupe's caster settings on a GT or Formula change much or noticable??

Let me know...thanks.

------------------
fierogt28

88 GT, loaded, 5-speed

IP: Logged
Oreif
Member
Posts: 16460
From: Schaumburg, IL
Registered: Jan 2000


Feedback score:    (19)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 442
Rate this member

Report this Post02-20-2009 01:31 PM Click Here to See the Profile for OreifClick Here to visit Oreif's HomePageSend a Private Message to OreifDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierogt28:


Does the coupe's caster settings on a GT or Formula change much or noticable??

Let me know...thanks.



The other difference between the coupe and the GT/Formula is the GT/Formula's use the 15" wheels with different offsets (between front and rear wheels) while the coupe's still use the same offset on all four of the 14" wheels.

[This message has been edited by Oreif (edited 02-20-2009).]

IP: Logged
mrfiero
Member
Posts: 8996
From: Colorful Colorado
Registered: Mar 99


Feedback score:    (91)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 149
Rate this member

Report this Post02-20-2009 02:42 PM Click Here to See the Profile for mrfieroSend a Private Message to mrfieroDirect Link to This Post
The real key is the jouncing of the suspension 3 times. I can't tell you how many times I've gotten an alignment over the years where they neglected to do this. As soon as I drove away and the suspension settled, it was out of whack.

I just went through an alignment nightmare myself with my modified '88 coupe. The kid doing the alignment was completely clueless on how to adjust the upper control arms. The pics of the control arms explaining how to adjust the camber & caster would have been very uselful!

Also, giving him the proper torque values for the upper ontrol arm bolts would have probably helped too. Twice they aligned it and both times as soon as I drove away both control arms shifted and the alignment was screwed up because he failed to torque the bolts! I can't imagine spending 2+ hours aligning a car (they spent a total of 13 hours over the course of 3 days and still never got it right) only to mess everything up by not tightening down the bolts. Stupid.


Sorry for the rant.....it just seems like nobody can align an '88 Fiero worth a damn.

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Fieroseverywhere
Member
Posts: 4242
From: Gresham, Oregon USA
Registered: Mar 2006


Feedback score:    (14)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 89
Rate this member

Report this Post02-20-2009 11:45 PM Click Here to See the Profile for FieroseverywhereSend a Private Message to FieroseverywhereDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by mrfiero:

Sorry for the rant.....it just seems like nobody can align an '88 Fiero worth a damn.



You think thats tough? Try explaining to an allignment shop that you have an 85 Fiero front suspension and 88 rear. Not to mention that my suspensioin is not exactly stock on either end. You can practically see their head explode. They just don't know what to do if their computer cant tell them what to set everything to. Cracks me up every time. At this point I just bring them a list and have them set it to my settings. It's really the only way.
IP: Logged
fierobill
Member
Posts: 114
From: Panama City, FL
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-11-2009 09:52 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierobillSend a Private Message to fierobillDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Oreif:

Here are the specs for the 1988 Fiero's

Factory specified alignment settings for 88 model (from the 1988 MVMA Specifications)
Front camber +0.0 degrees
Front caster +3.0 degrees
Front toe +0.15 degrees (this is approximately equivalent to 1/16inch toe-in)
Rear camber -1.0 degrees
Rear toe +0.15 degrees (this is approximately equivalent to 1/16inch toe-in)

BUT There is a GM tecjnical service bulletin that changes the specs.

1988 revised alignment specs listed in TSB # 88-3-11
Changes Front Caster from 3.0 to 5.0 degrees for GT and Formula.
Front toe from .15 to .3 degrees and Rear toe to .5 degrees.
Adds front and rear cross car camber to be within .75 degrees, Front cross caster must be within .75 degrees.
Tie rod boot must not be twisted and must be seated in the tie rod groove.
Vehicle must be jounced three times before checking alignment to eliminate false geometry readings.

(posted from work which blocks pics from photobucket, so if this is a repeat of above I apologize.)



IP: Logged
Marvin McInnis
Member
Posts: 11599
From: ~ Kansas City, USA
Registered: Apr 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 227
Rate this member

Report this Post10-02-2009 02:27 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Marvin McInnisClick Here to visit Marvin McInnis's HomePageSend a Private Message to Marvin McInnisDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Oreif:

There is a GM tecjnical service bulletin that changes the specs.

1988 revised alignment specs listed in TSB # 88-3-11
Changes Front Caster from 3.0 to 5.0 degrees for GT and Formula.
Front toe from .15 to .3 degrees and Rear toe to .5 degrees.
Adds front and rear cross car camber to be within .75 degrees, Front cross caster must be within .75 degrees.
Tie rod boot must not be twisted and must be seated in the tie rod groove.
Vehicle must be jounced three times before checking alignment to eliminate false geometry readings.



Thanks for posting this info, but the rear toe spec you reported (highlighted above) is wrong. The correct toe specs are 0.3 degrees total in the front, and 0.15 degrees per side (0.3 degrees total) in the rear. Here is a true copy of the original TSB:



I have also posted the correct information in this thread.

[This message has been edited by Marvin McInnis (edited 10-02-2009).]

IP: Logged
crazyd
Member
Posts: 2011
From: Washington
Registered: Feb 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 140
Rate this member

Report this Post10-02-2009 03:39 PM Click Here to See the Profile for crazydClick Here to visit crazyd's HomePageSend a Private Message to crazydDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by mrfiero:

Also, giving him the proper torque values for the upper ontrol arm bolts would have probably helped too. Twice they aligned it and both times as soon as I drove away both control arms shifted and the alignment was screwed up because he failed to torque the bolts! I can't imagine spending 2+ hours aligning a car (they spent a total of 13 hours over the course of 3 days and still never got it right) only to mess everything up by not tightening down the bolts. Stupid. Sorry for the rant.....it just seems like nobody can align an '88 Fiero worth a damn.


Been there, and feel your pain. It's usually at least a weekend I have to devote to it if I have to get mine aligned. I would rather replace the engine than have to get an '88 aligned. Between the UCA bolt shaft torque, the complexity of the camber and caster interactions, and the lack of accurate specs in the alignment computers it's a nightmare I would rather avoid. Speaking of which, those UCA torque values listed above, if I'm reading them right, can't be correct. 52lbs?! Not even TWICE that much is enough! It takes somewhere in the neighborhood of 130 ft-lbs on the UCA shaft bolts to keep them from popping loose as soon as you drive off the rack.
IP: Logged
Marvin McInnis
Member
Posts: 11599
From: ~ Kansas City, USA
Registered: Apr 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 227
Rate this member

Report this Post11-13-2009 10:01 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Marvin McInnisClick Here to visit Marvin McInnis's HomePageSend a Private Message to Marvin McInnisDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by crazyd:

... those UCA torque values listed above, if I'm reading them right, can't be correct. 52lbs?! Not even TWICE that much is enough! It takes somewhere in the neighborhood of 130 ft-lbs on the UCA shaft bolts to keep them from popping loose as soon as you drive off the rack.



From the GM/Helm factory service manual: "Final torque to the U.C.A. shaft bolts 70 N*m (52 lb. ft.) + 1/4 turn (90o)." The "+ 1/4 turn (90o)" part is very important, to preload the bolts. From personal experience, I agree that even 52 ft-lb + 1/4 turn is barely sufficient.

[This message has been edited by Marvin McInnis (edited 11-13-2009).]

IP: Logged
madcurl
Member
Posts: 21401
From: In a Van down by the Kern River
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 314
Rate this member

Report this Post05-22-2010 01:04 PM Click Here to See the Profile for madcurlSend a Private Message to madcurlDirect Link to This Post
Saved as "favorites."
IP: Logged
fierogt28
Member
Posts: 2937
From: New-Brunswick, Canada.
Registered: Feb 2005


Feedback score:    (14)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-22-2010 11:09 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierogt28Send a Private Message to fierogt28Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by crazyd:


Been there, and feel your pain. It's usually at least a weekend I have to devote to it if I have to get mine aligned. I would rather replace the engine than have to get an '88 aligned. Between the UCA bolt shaft torque, the complexity of the camber and caster interactions, and the lack of accurate specs in the alignment computers it's a nightmare I would rather avoid. Speaking of which, those UCA torque values listed above, if I'm reading them right, can't be correct. 52lbs?! Not even TWICE that much is enough! It takes somewhere in the neighborhood of 130 ft-lbs on the UCA shaft bolts to keep them from popping loose as soon as you drive off the rack.


Don't feel alone on this...I think of it too. 52 ft/ Lbs doesn't seem much to me, especially for suspension set-up on a car. Yes there is the 1/4 turn more but that may come to a total of 60-ft / Lbs...about...

Even just 52 ft / Lbs is not even in the range an engine head bolt is torqued. They require 65-75 ft/ Lbs...just to give an idea.

BTW, always tell the service advisor or mechanic to tighten them to spec or else your no going to pay for the alignment. Or tell them clearly that if the car's alignment comes off because of a loose UCA on 88s, their going to have to do the job again. If you tell them and they don't listen, at least you have a word to go by. Your the customer and your in control. Show them that your not going to leave unless those bolts are torque properly. Your the one paying, so don't be affaid.

------------------
fierogt28

88 GT, loaded, 5-speed

IP: Logged
Black Lotus
Member
Posts: 340
From: Washington State USA
Registered: Jan 2010


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-23-2010 12:50 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Black LotusSend a Private Message to Black LotusDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierogt28:


Does the coupe's caster settings on a GT or Formula change much or noticable??

Let me know...thanks.


Yes, I thought going from 5* to 3* was the single best suspension mod I made on the Formula in my quest to make it feel like a proper sports car---at 5* caster, I thought the car was a hopeless turd.
The goal was to make the steering as light and as nimble feeling as possible without it being squirrelly on the straights, and to lighten up the steering while cornering.
With the 205 50s, then 195 60s tires on the front, the stability is right on the edge of being comfortable on the highway, and the road feedback thru the wheel is quite good.
If you are running non-stock rims with different offsets and / or wide. wide tires on the front, I wouldn't do it.
The secret is fresh suspension, stockish width tires, and as little weight up front as possible.
If you don't like it, you can always go back to the 5*.
P.S.
---- my Fiero is officially gone as of today. Now I'll have to make do with two Loti.
Cheers.

IP: Logged
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15141
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 286
Rate this member

Report this Post05-23-2010 01:02 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by whereatt:

... I know I've searched for this in the past but couldn't find anything.



... or people could just download the 88 Service Manual http://www.fieronews.net/fusion/downloads.php

------------------
My World of Wheels Winners (Click on links below)

3.4L Supercharged 87 GT and Super Duty 4 Indy #163

[This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 05-23-2010).]

IP: Logged
madcurl
Member
Posts: 21401
From: In a Van down by the Kern River
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 314
Rate this member

Report this Post11-13-2011 12:14 AM Click Here to See the Profile for madcurlSend a Private Message to madcurlDirect Link to This Post
Bump.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
theogre
Member
Posts: 32180
From: USA
Registered: Mar 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 567
Rate this member

Report this Post11-13-2011 12:18 AM Click Here to See the Profile for theogreClick Here to visit theogre's HomePageSend a Private Message to theogreDirect Link to This Post
see my cave, alignment specifications in suspension section.
PDF has specifications and TSBs.

------------------
Dr. Ian Malcolm: Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.
(Jurassic Park)


The Ogre's Fiero Cave (It's also at the top and bottom of every forum page...)

[This message has been edited by theogre (edited 11-13-2011).]

IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery | Ogre's Cave
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock