Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions - Archive
  Is 210HP possible on a 3.4l Pushrod? (Page 2)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version

This topic is 2 pages long:  1   2 
Previous Page | Next Page
Is 210HP possible on a 3.4l Pushrod? by MadDanceSkillz
Started on: 02-02-2010 02:53 PM
Replies: 67
Last post by: Justinbart on 02-07-2010 11:43 AM
pmbrunelle
Member
Posts: 4617
From: Grand-Mère, Québec
Registered: Sep 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 63
Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2010 07:08 PM Click Here to See the Profile for pmbrunelleSend a Private Message to pmbrunelleDirect Link to This Post
If we're going to be bench racing, at least compare the trap speed rather than E.T.

This is a better indicator of the car, and less affected by driver skill, etc...

[This message has been edited by pmbrunelle (edited 02-03-2010).]

IP: Logged
rogergarrison
Member
Posts: 49601
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 551
Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2010 07:43 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonDirect Link to This Post
Like I said, I totally agree. There are way too many variables to let a computer tell you how fast a car is. Simply changing drivers in the same exact car can be a second or two difference. Ive had 2 brand new cars I bought together with consecutive VIN numbers myself, that were identical, even to color and interior. One was fast as hell, other was a total dog. Both brand new. How would a computer explain that. ?
IP: Logged
TopNotch
Member
Posts: 3537
From: Lawrenceville, GA USA
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 60
Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2010 08:11 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TopNotchClick Here to visit TopNotch's HomePageSend a Private Message to TopNotchDirect Link to This Post
I wonder what ever happened to the "bow tie block" V6? That was a racing version of the 60 degree V6 that GM Performance used to make. It was based on the original 2.8, but was made of aluminum with iron inserts for the cylinders, and had a better oiling system. It was strong, and you could make big power with it. It was, to the 60 degree V6, what the Super Duty 4 was to the Iron Duke.
Edit: See page 2 of this.

[This message has been edited by TopNotch (edited 02-03-2010).]

IP: Logged
timgray
Member
Posts: 2461
From: Muskegon,MI,USA
Registered: Jul 2006


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 59
Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2010 08:33 PM Click Here to See the Profile for timgrayClick Here to visit timgray's HomePageSend a Private Message to timgrayDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by MadDanceSkillz:... according to some 210 is not possible on a 3.4l without even more extensive modification than the one I have does.


People say you cant because they dont want you to, or they want you to fail.

Over 210 is certianly possible on the engine, Someone here is producing nutty high numbers with a turbo on a 2.8 a far weaker engine block than the 3.4...

There is a theoretical limit to the displacement as to the HP Normally aspirated on gasoline, I am sure you dont have every bit of HP out of that engine yet, you could deck the block and raise compression more to get more HP out of it as well.

[This message has been edited by timgray (edited 02-03-2010).]

IP: Logged
MadDanceSkillz
Member
Posts: 2591
From: Indiana
Registered: Jan 2009


Feedback score:    (27)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 88
Rate this member

Report this Post02-03-2010 09:32 PM Click Here to See the Profile for MadDanceSkillzSend a Private Message to MadDanceSkillzDirect Link to This Post
Looks like the 3 people who PM'd me telling me to stop posting fake numbers were wrong.

As for running low 13's, I say again...

A stock 3800 Series II N/A swap has power almost identical to the one my engine puts out with a similar powerband, and they simply don't run low 13's. before anyone gets pissed, note I said stock.
IP: Logged
Oreif
Member
Posts: 16460
From: Schaumburg, IL
Registered: Jan 2000


Feedback score:    (19)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 442
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 06:20 AM Click Here to See the Profile for OreifClick Here to visit Oreif's HomePageSend a Private Message to OreifDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by MadDanceSkillz:

Looks like the 3 people who PM'd me telling me to stop posting fake numbers were wrong.

As for running low 13's, I say again...

A stock 3800 Series II N/A swap has power almost identical to the one my engine puts out with a similar powerband, and they simply don't run low 13's. before anyone gets pissed, note I said stock.


Actually the 3800 N/A horsepower rating is at the crankshaft not the rear-wheels. The chassis dyno gives you what you have at the rear wheels. So your engine actually has a little more power than the stock 3800 N/A series II engine.

Don't worry about darkhorizon's "low 13's" statements. Everyone knows he is wrong.
IP: Logged
TopNotch
Member
Posts: 3537
From: Lawrenceville, GA USA
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 60
Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 01:32 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TopNotchClick Here to visit TopNotch's HomePageSend a Private Message to TopNotchDirect Link to This Post
60 Degree V6 Power Manual
Right click on the above link and select "Save Link As" or "Save Target As". This is a large file (30 MB), so it will take a while to download. It is an old manual on how to build up the 60 degree V6 engine. It is based on the 2.8, but just about everything applies to newer versions also.
IP: Logged
msweldon
Member
Posts: 671
From: Georgia
Registered: Sep 2000


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-04-2010 02:18 PM Click Here to See the Profile for msweldonSend a Private Message to msweldonDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Oreif:

Way back in the day 1FST2M6 dyno'd his car around 270 rwhp (2.8L with NOS) and ran a 12.9 second run.



I'm not trying to rat Travis (1FST2M6) out, as I really don't think he cares at this point and I don't like the disemination of non-facts but his 12.9sec run was with a 3.4 already installed when he bought the car and restored it, not a 2.8, dyno tuned properly nevertheless on a dynojet by one of the best tuners in the business, but a 2.8 regardless. It sure made for embarrasing moments at the strip and from light to light...

Why is everyone arguing over this? OREIF hit the high 190's whp years ago with a carbed 3.4...look at the archives. So yes, maybe you could make > 210 whp by following a setup very similar to OREIF with some additional work to it like the S10 truck drivers.

stock DOHC fieros, 180-190 whp are only in the high 13's until they start modifying the intake manifold and adding cams, like fieromadman, and that drops them into the mid-13s.

[This message has been edited by msweldon (edited 02-04-2010).]

IP: Logged
DefEddie
Member
Posts: 1252
From: SALLISAW,OK
Registered: Jul 2009


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 05:47 AM Click Here to See the Profile for DefEddieSend a Private Message to DefEddieDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by TopNotch:

60 Degree V6 Power Manual
Right click on the above link and select "Save Link As" or "Save Target As". This is a large file (30 MB), so it will take a while to download. It is an old manual on how to build up the 60 degree V6 engine. It is based on the 2.8, but just about everything applies to newer versions also.



downloaded program opens with a corruption error in adobe.
Is there another place to download it from?
IP: Logged
carbon
Member
Posts: 4767
From: Eagan, MN
Registered: Apr 2004


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 132
Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 07:21 AM Click Here to See the Profile for carbonSend a Private Message to carbonDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by DefEddie:
downloaded program opens with a corruption error in adobe.
Is there another place to download it from?


Yup, Acrobat throws up an "Insufficient data for an image." error... odd. I just downloaded it the other day and it worked.

Edit: I got it somewhere else... Fiero Thomas has manuals that can be downloaded here. http://www.fieronews.net/fusion/downloads.php

[This message has been edited by carbon (edited 02-05-2010).]

IP: Logged
TopNotch
Member
Posts: 3537
From: Lawrenceville, GA USA
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 60
Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 09:35 AM Click Here to See the Profile for TopNotchClick Here to visit TopNotch's HomePageSend a Private Message to TopNotchDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by TopNotch:

60 Degree V6 Power Manual
Right click on the above link and select "Save Link As" or "Save Target As". This is a large file (30 MB), so it will take a while to download. It is an old manual on how to build up the 60 degree V6 engine. It is based on the 2.8, but just about everything applies to newer versions also.


Uploaded again using a different FTP client. It should be OK now.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Tharimust
Member
Posts: 88
From: Lac du bonnet, mb, Canada
Registered: May 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 01:47 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TharimustSend a Private Message to TharimustDirect Link to This Post
"sorry to jack" What do you guys think a v8 with 330whp on the 4t65e-hd would do with sticky tires? just curious.
IP: Logged
Justinbart
Member
Posts: 3259
From: Flint, MI
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 119
Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 01:50 PM Click Here to See the Profile for JustinbartSend a Private Message to JustinbartDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Tharimust:

"sorry to jack" What do you guys think a v8 with 330whp on the 4t65e-hd would do with sticky tires? just curious.


13.8@96mph

------------------
Turbo 3800 E85 getrag 5spd spec3
11.74@123@ 16:1afr :-O

IP: Logged
lou_dias
Member
Posts: 5381
From: Warwick, RI
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 67
Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 02:21 PM Click Here to See the Profile for lou_diasSend a Private Message to lou_diasDirect Link to This Post
I did 187 rwhp and 249 ft*lbs with no tune using fiero heads and intake a a roller cam block with no tuning...

I have yet to dyno the car with the Trueleo intake and '7730 conversion as I'm still trying to resolve a code 33 and 15...

https://www.fiero.nl/forum/F...2/HTML/075502-3.html

...that and I've snapped an axle twice along with a wheel bearing once in the only 2 clutch dumps I've done and both on the circle track...

[This message has been edited by lou_dias (edited 02-05-2010).]

IP: Logged
Oreif
Member
Posts: 16460
From: Schaumburg, IL
Registered: Jan 2000


Feedback score:    (19)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 442
Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 03:35 PM Click Here to See the Profile for OreifClick Here to visit Oreif's HomePageSend a Private Message to OreifDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Justinbart:


13.8@96mph



I don't think so.

My V-8 with 309 rwhp with a 4-spd manual runs 12.3 @ 111mph

330rwhp with the 4-spd auto should still be at least a low 12 second car.

[This message has been edited by Oreif (edited 02-05-2010).]

IP: Logged
FFIEROFRED
Member
Posts: 751
From: GULFPORT, MS
Registered: May 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 04:34 PM Click Here to See the Profile for FFIEROFREDSend a Private Message to FFIEROFREDDirect Link to This Post
dyno runs. The numbers you get from a dyno are only relitive to your car, on that day, on that dyno.
what is important is the power curve. and the a/f ratioes.
my v8 car has a junky 1983 ( never had the heads off) crossfire 305. 175 big HP in 83. car has a 4t60 with a 2.84 rear gear. it is raced right at 3150 pounds. on street tires, no burn out, letting the trans do the shifting. I run bracket racing. Last wed night I made 5 runs before we got rained out. 60 ft / ET........2.05/14.74, 2.07/14.69, 2.06/14.67, 2.07/14.66 and 2.07/14.65. all made in 33 minets. Most of the mph were at 92 mph. when I bought the z/28 that this engine came out of it made more power, but that was 19 years ago. Run the numbers in your hp caculaters. See what you get. This engine ran 16.4 in the z/28, before the son wrecked it. When he ran it I was in the other lane wuppin him my 3800 II fiero.

and for the guy that never ran before, leave on the last yellow.
IP: Logged
Lilchief
Member
Posts: 1755
From: Vevay,Indiana
Registered: Feb 2004


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 05:39 PM Click Here to See the Profile for LilchiefSend a Private Message to LilchiefDirect Link to This Post
I ran the numbers and came up with 197 WHP ,14.67 ET, 92.8 MPH, Weight 3150 lbs
http://www.race-cars.net/ca...s/et_calculator.html

------------------

85 GT 3.4
14.9 @ 90 1.9 60' Old TH125/3.06
Unknown New 4T60/3.42

IP: Logged
pmbrunelle
Member
Posts: 4617
From: Grand-Mère, Québec
Registered: Sep 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 63
Rate this member

Report this Post02-05-2010 06:10 PM Click Here to See the Profile for pmbrunelleSend a Private Message to pmbrunelleDirect Link to This Post
Those calculators are garbage.

When I had a stock 85 GT manual, I ran a 16.1 @ 84.2 1/4 mile.

Don't stock Fieros put about 115 hp to the ground?

IP: Logged
PR0X
Member
Posts: 133
From: Winnipeg
Registered: Jan 2010


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-06-2010 12:28 AM Click Here to See the Profile for PR0XSend a Private Message to PR0XDirect Link to This Post
Run a 50 shot of nos. its cheap. and those motors eat nos like its fruitloops
IP: Logged
DefEddie
Member
Posts: 1252
From: SALLISAW,OK
Registered: Jul 2009


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-06-2010 06:58 AM Click Here to See the Profile for DefEddieSend a Private Message to DefEddieDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by PR0X:

Run a 50 shot of nos. its cheap. and those motors eat nos like its fruitloops


nos is a manufacturer,it won't fit in a fiero motor.
You mean N20,nitrous.

sorry,one of those things that drive me nutz.
IP: Logged
PR0X
Member
Posts: 133
From: Winnipeg
Registered: Jan 2010


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-06-2010 10:52 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PR0XSend a Private Message to PR0XDirect Link to This Post
i guess so :P. yea run nitrous. It will make you happy. If you want 240 Rwhp you need 296 crank horse power. thats how much i made at 2900 rpm on my motor according to my dyno. lol
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
darkhorizon
Member
Posts: 12279
From: Flint Michigan
Registered: Jan 2006


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 451
Rate this member

Report this Post02-06-2010 11:33 PM Click Here to See the Profile for darkhorizonSend a Private Message to darkhorizonDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Oreif:


You are way incorrect or have no clue what you are talking about.

200 rwhp will give you a high 13 second run in a Fiero.

Whoever "Justin" is lied to you. He has to be near 300 rwhp to run a low 12 run if he is driving a Fiero.

Way back in the day 1FST2M6 dyno'd his car around 270 rwhp (2.8L with NOS) and ran a 12.9 second run.

Sorry but there is no way a 2700-2800 lbs vehicle is going to run a low 13 second run with 200 rwhp. Not unless it can somehow break the laws of physics.

EDIT: I am not saying you didn't run those times, I am saying that the amout of rwhp is more than you think if you ran those times.



I built nearly everything horsepower related on justins car... It was a SC 3800 with nearly nothing done, and a crap 60ft... No way in hell it was making more than 300 crank horsepower with just a pulley swap, 280 would be a realistic number. There is no doubt that it ran what it ran, I was there racing him (along with other forum members). Remember these came with 240hp stock.....

Unless I am a magical tuning god, then then there is something wrong with the math on your end. The exhaust setup, and intake setup was not really ideal, and the motor had 150k+ on it..... There was well less than $250 invested into the entire powerplant of that setup. Car was full weight, 86GT, with bald street tires.

N/A 3800's in fieros are quite easily into the high 13 low 14 bracket depending on transmission setup, so I dont really get why it is so hard to believe a car with a ton more power than a n/a 3800, and just a smidge less than a SC cant run low 13s at 100+mph
IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2010 12:10 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by DefEddie:


nos is a manufacturer,it won't fit in a fiero motor.
You mean N20,nitrous.

sorry,one of those things that drive me nutz.


Well, if you're going to the trouble to correct somone - get it right yourself. N2O. (That's the letter "O" - not a zero.)
IP: Logged
Justinbart
Member
Posts: 3259
From: Flint, MI
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 119
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2010 02:16 AM Click Here to See the Profile for JustinbartSend a Private Message to JustinbartDirect Link to This Post
<------ driver mod > all
IP: Logged
engine man
Member
Posts: 5311
From: Morriston FL
Registered: Mar 2006


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2010 03:58 AM Click Here to See the Profile for engine manSend a Private Message to engine manDirect Link to This Post
the Chevy power book said that the 2.8 HO head ported will flow enough to make 270 HP so the 3.4 would make the same power just at a lower rpm but it would have more torque. HP is made with cylinder haed flow mostly there are some othere factors but every thing can be perfect and if the heads dont flow you wont have good HP .

[This message has been edited by engine man (edited 02-07-2010).]

IP: Logged
Oreif
Member
Posts: 16460
From: Schaumburg, IL
Registered: Jan 2000


Feedback score:    (19)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 442
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2010 08:22 AM Click Here to See the Profile for OreifClick Here to visit Oreif's HomePageSend a Private Message to OreifDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by darkhorizon:


I built nearly everything horsepower related on justins car... It was a SC 3800 with nearly nothing done, and a crap 60ft... No way in hell it was making more than 300 crank horsepower with just a pulley swap, 280 would be a realistic number. There is no doubt that it ran what it ran, I was there racing him (along with other forum members). Remember these came with 240hp stock.....

Unless I am a magical tuning god, then then there is something wrong with the math on your end. The exhaust setup, and intake setup was not really ideal, and the motor had 150k+ on it..... There was well less than $250 invested into the entire powerplant of that setup. Car was full weight, 86GT, with bald street tires.

N/A 3800's in fieros are quite easily into the high 13 low 14 bracket depending on transmission setup, so I dont really get why it is so hard to believe a car with a ton more power than a n/a 3800, and just a smidge less than a SC cant run low 13s at 100+mph


I think you have your numbers mixed up. My math isn't wrong and neither is the numerous Fiero's that have actual ran down the 1/4 mile.
Look at the quarter mile lists on here:
Stock 3800SC's are running low/mid 13's
3800SC's with pulley changes and tuning are all running in the low 13's/high 12's.
Many of the 3800SC's running in the low 12's have a lot more mods and intercoolers.
A 3800 N/A has 200hp at the crank and they run mid/high 14's.
3.4DOHC engines have 215 crank hp and run low/mid 14's
The 3.4L engines I built were both built up from the block up and both were dyno'd.
230hp crank hp and ran in the high 13's/low 14's

Now tell us again how YOU added a pulley and some tuning on your friends car and he then pulled a low 12-second run??????
280 crank will not run 12.3, I think you mean he ran a 13.2.

This isn't "bench racing" just look at the numerous examples of the many cars on the 1/4 mile list.
These are actual cars running down the 1/4 mile with their particular set-up.
While the list does not show dyno'd horsepower, With the numerous examples of particular engines you can estimate the amount of modifications/horsepower required to go a certain time down the quarter mile.

1/4 mile lists:
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/A...090907-1-034445.html
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum1/HTML/070670.html
IP: Logged
darkhorizon
Member
Posts: 12279
From: Flint Michigan
Registered: Jan 2006


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 451
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2010 11:09 AM Click Here to See the Profile for darkhorizonSend a Private Message to darkhorizonDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Oreif:
Stock 3800SC's are running low/mid 13's
3800SC's with pulley changes and tuning are all running in the low 13's/high 12's.
Many of the 3800SC's running in the low 12's have a lot more mods and intercoolers.
A 3800 N/A has 200hp at the crank and they run mid/high 14's.
3.4DOHC engines have 215 crank hp and run low/mid 14's
The 3.4L engines I built were both built up from the block up and both were dyno'd.
230hp crank hp and ran in the high 13's/low 14's


Where is the disagreement here?

Stock auto 3800SC makes 190whp, typical WHP for my mildly modded 12.8 second automatic car is around 220-225... in a manual maybe 205-210 stock and 240-250 modded, right where we are at here (as we just put down 210whp with a manual). Low 13s line up just fine if you ask me... I know the trap speeds would.

[The 3.4L engines I built were both built up from the block up and both were dyno'd.
230hp crank hp and ran in the high 13's/low 14's[/quote]

And if someone claimed to make 210whp, which is more than 230 crank hp, then why would it be unheard of to run low 13's, or at least mid 13s with 100+ traps?
IP: Logged
Justinbart
Member
Posts: 3259
From: Flint, MI
Registered: Sep 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 119
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2010 11:43 AM Click Here to See the Profile for JustinbartSend a Private Message to JustinbartDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Now tell us again how YOU added a pulley and some tuning on your friends car and he then pulled a low 12-second run??????
280 crank will not run 12.3, I think you mean he ran a 13.2.


I never ran a "low 12" I ran 12.6@109 with just a 3.4 pulley on the 4spd. Goodyear triple treads
I changed to a 5spd added rockers, 3.2 pulley, race gas, and could only manage a 12.5@110.5 Bald Goodyear triple treads
-add 100 shot of nitrous and I went 11.97@120 on BFG drag radials

------------------
Turbo 3800 E85 5spd spec3
11.74@123@16:1afr :-o

[This message has been edited by Justinbart (edited 02-07-2010).]

IP: Logged
Previous Page | Next Page

This topic is 2 pages long:  1   2 


All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock