Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions - Archive
  Learned something new: Theres a difference between 85-86 and 87-88 2.8 dampers

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


Learned something new: Theres a difference between 85-86 and 87-88 2.8 dampers by Alibi
Started on: 11-10-2009 03:45 PM
Replies: 16
Last post by: Alibi on 11-18-2009 02:41 PM
Alibi
Member
Posts: 2199
From: Tulsa OK
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 03:45 PM Click Here to See the Profile for AlibiSend a Private Message to AlibiDirect Link to This Post
I just thought I'd throw this out there since I didn't see anything about it in search.

I bought a basketcase 86 GT about 8 months ago that needed a new block. I got a known good block from an '88 which I knew was internally balanced vs. the 86's externally balanced. So, I got an 88 flywheel to go with the 88 block and I thought all was good as nobody said anything about needing a different damper in any threads I posted during my build.

Fast forward to now where I'm looking at getting a new damper from http://www.damperdoctor.com where they list two dampers for the 2.8. I thought all the dampers were the same so I emailed them and here is their reply:

"YES WE CAN SEND EITHER ONE. THERE IS A DIFFRENCE

INTERNALLY BALANCED DOES NOT HAVE A LUMP OF WEIGHT ON THE BACK OF THE BALANCER

EXTERNALLY BALANCED HAS A LUMP OF WEIGHT ON ONE OF THE FOUR PRONGS. IN THE BACK OF BALANCER.
BOTH ARE SAME PRICE."

So... that means I've been running my 88 motor with an 86 damper and when I replace it, I need to get the 88 balancer to match the motor and the flywheel. Would this mismatch of balancers have caused me any drivability issues? My fuel economy sucks at the moment but I had attributed that to possibly having the timing off due to the rubber on the damper going bad.

On a side note, does anyone have a link to a good thread that shows how to replace the damper while still in the car?
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
TopNotch
Member
Posts: 3537
From: Lawrenceville, GA USA
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 60
Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 04:00 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TopNotchClick Here to visit TopNotch's HomePageSend a Private Message to TopNotchDirect Link to This Post
The wrong damper will cause excessive vibration, which you should be able to feel. And it could damage your crank bearings.
If you drop the rear of your cradle, you should be able to change it with the engine in the car.
IP: Logged
Alibi
Member
Posts: 2199
From: Tulsa OK
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 04:16 PM Click Here to See the Profile for AlibiSend a Private Message to AlibiDirect Link to This Post
Well, its been in there about 3000 miles so I hope thats not enough to mess anything up.
IP: Logged
TK
Member
Posts: 10013
From:
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 200
Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 04:25 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TKSend a Private Message to TKDirect Link to This Post
That's interesting. The Pontiac 22P book shows the same V6 balancer for 85-88. 14102508. Group 0.000 Page 0-17.

They show the crank being different but both the flywheel and balancer are the same part number for 85-88. Something is amiss here.

Edit:

Well in Group 0.659 Page 0-18 they show:
85-86 Damper, Tors 10032616
87-88 Damper, Tors 10044956

But they show the Flywheel as being different only in 88.

The Fiero Store shows the same balancer for 85-88 : 65401

Autozone shows:
85-87 DA1733 or DA1731
88 DA1732

From Fiero Sails:
Harmonic Balancer, 2.8L, '85-87 Dorman 594-013
Harmonic Balancer, 2.8L, '88 Dorman 594-008

And these:

From Auto Zone for Fiero V6 (in 2002):
Pioneer DA-1731 (replaces OE# 14083394) 73.99
Pioneer DA-1733 (replaces OE# 14085401) 67.99


Hmmmm.......

[This message has been edited by TK (edited 11-10-2009).]

IP: Logged
Alibi
Member
Posts: 2199
From: Tulsa OK
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 04:54 PM Click Here to See the Profile for AlibiSend a Private Message to AlibiDirect Link to This Post
Its weird, eh? When I was looking into getting parts for the 88 motor all I ever heard was to swap the flywheel and everything else would bolt up fine. Seems there is a discrepancy in dampers though so I figure I'll go ahead and order the 88 damper just to be on the safe side.
IP: Logged
TK
Member
Posts: 10013
From:
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 200
Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 05:17 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TKSend a Private Message to TKDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Alibi:

Its weird, eh? When I was looking into getting parts for the 88 motor all I ever heard was to swap the flywheel and everything else would bolt up fine. Seems there is a discrepancy in dampers though so I figure I'll go ahead and order the 88 damper just to be on the safe side.


I went out to the shed and looked at my original 86 balancer and there is no sign of any weight. Now the holes might be drilled different but that could be true just to get a balancer balanced.

I have a 3.1L D engine so I am using the 88 flywheel and the balancer listed for 88.

I know some people on here dug into this before and maybe they can shed some light on all of these numbers. I would assume the old Fiero numbers are out of production so these Am parts will be different numbers.

Terry

[This message has been edited by TK (edited 11-10-2009).]

IP: Logged
fierogt28
Member
Posts: 2938
From: New-Brunswick, Canada.
Registered: Feb 2005


Feedback score:    (14)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 06:25 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierogt28Send a Private Message to fierogt28Direct Link to This Post
Guys, beware that the fiero store's listed balancer is a GM balancer, but not a fiero specific part. It will fit and work the same as the original fiero balancer, the only difference is you need to punch a groove for timing at exactly the same spot of your old balancer. The balancer they sell works / installs the same, just isn't fiero original unit. Matter of fact is the fiero balancer is discontinued, and no longer available...

------------------
fierogt28

88 GT, loaded, 5-speed

IP: Logged
Alibi
Member
Posts: 2199
From: Tulsa OK
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 06:49 PM Click Here to See the Profile for AlibiSend a Private Message to AlibiDirect Link to This Post
The DamperDoctor part is a rebuilt Fiero damper that has the correct orientation of the timing marks. That and the fact that its cheaper than the FieroStore damper is why I'm getting one from DD.

FS wants $97 plus shipping where DD wants $70 plus shipping.

I've done a bit more reading through searching old posts and it seems that some people say they are all the same and other says that 88 is different.
IP: Logged
fyrebird68
Member
Posts: 725
From: Cincinnati, OH
Registered: Jul 2008


Feedback score:    (17)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 06:49 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fyrebird68Send a Private Message to fyrebird68Direct Link to This Post
Oh, man, I am in the middle of a 3.4 swap.

Do I need to replace my 86 2.8 balancer with an '88 or not? Need a definitive answer!


IP: Logged
Alibi
Member
Posts: 2199
From: Tulsa OK
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 06:55 PM Click Here to See the Profile for AlibiSend a Private Message to AlibiDirect Link to This Post
From what I'm reading, a 3.4 is internally balanced and would need an 88 balancer from an internally balanced 2.8.

Here is a picture of the externally balanced damper carried by DD that they sent me when I first asked them what the difference is. The lump above the keyway is not present on dampers for internally balanced dampers.

IP: Logged
katatak
Member
Posts: 7136
From: Omaha, NE USA
Registered: Apr 2008


Feedback score:    (8)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 82
Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 08:12 PM Click Here to See the Profile for katatakSend a Private Message to katatakDirect Link to This Post
I have used the Damper Doctor's rebuilt dampers before - quality product. Sorry - I can't shed any light on the difference between internally and externally balanced motors. I would think that there should be a difference given the internal balance should require a neutrally balanced flexplate/flywheel and damper.

I had to replace a front seal on my 86 after I installed the new motor. I just pulled the two rear cradle bolts and the inner fender well and lowered the cradle about 2 or 3 inches. It was easy after that.






Here's the old next to the rebuilt damper: Note the difference in timing marks. The old one had spun!

[This message has been edited by katatak (edited 11-10-2009).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Alibi
Member
Posts: 2199
From: Tulsa OK
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-10-2009 09:00 PM Click Here to See the Profile for AlibiSend a Private Message to AlibiDirect Link to This Post
Thanks for the pictures! I'm afraid that the two portions on mine has slipped as well and as such the timing isn't adjusted right. It takes a bit to start it and once it runs the idle seems to hunt a little and the car runs rich.

What did you do to get the balancer back on? The original bolt for mine broke in the crank and I had to have it millled out. The shop that did it put in a helicoil, which I doubt is a good place to use to pull the balancer back on with.
IP: Logged
fyrebird68
Member
Posts: 725
From: Cincinnati, OH
Registered: Jul 2008


Feedback score:    (17)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-11-2009 08:53 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fyrebird68Send a Private Message to fyrebird68Direct Link to This Post
My balancer off my 86GT does NOT have the bump in it as shown in alibi's pic.
______________

This thread (about a year old) discusses this topic in depth, but with differing opinions as well:

https://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/091691.html

IP: Logged
Alibi
Member
Posts: 2199
From: Tulsa OK
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-11-2009 12:49 PM Click Here to See the Profile for AlibiSend a Private Message to AlibiDirect Link to This Post
Has your 86 ever been worked on though? Maybe its not the original part?

In any case, I don't think there is a clear answer to this but from what I've gathered, I think its good to stay on the safe side and use different dampers for the difference in the way the engines are balanced. I just find it weird that there is just so much discrepancy on this.
IP: Logged
fyrebird68
Member
Posts: 725
From: Cincinnati, OH
Registered: Jul 2008


Feedback score:    (17)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-18-2009 11:48 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fyrebird68Send a Private Message to fyrebird68Direct Link to This Post
New information -

I was reading an article (pamphlet) on the 60 degree V6. Don't remember where it's from, but I located it via this thread:

"3.4 Pushrod swap - lots of pics". the thread is located here:
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/F.../HTML/000026-14.html

Anyway, I clipped a piece of a page out that talks about harmonic balancers and externally vs internally balanced flywheels (I made it big so its readable ) Note the paragrpah in the right column:



This explains the discrpeancies we've been discussing. It doesn't matter whether the harmonic balancer is neutral or not. The quote is "ALL V6/60 torsional dampers are neutral balanced and may be used with either internally or externally balanced crankshafts." Note also in the left picture the damper has the little extra square of metal, but the writer refers to it as "neutral balanced torsional damper".

How 'bout them apples?

[This message has been edited by fyrebird68 (edited 11-18-2009).]

IP: Logged
ALJR
Member
Posts: 3765
From: Massachusetts
Registered: Jul 2009


Feedback score:    (18)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-18-2009 12:47 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ALJRSend a Private Message to ALJRDirect Link to This Post
Maybe that extra bit of metal is there to compensate for the metal removed from the keyway; on that style dampner at least...

[This message has been edited by ALJR (edited 11-18-2009).]

IP: Logged
Alibi
Member
Posts: 2199
From: Tulsa OK
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-18-2009 02:41 PM Click Here to See the Profile for AlibiSend a Private Message to AlibiDirect Link to This Post
The extra metal on the shaft (the woodruff key) would make up the slot cut into the damper so that little extra blob of metal doesn't do anything to the key.

Um.... yeah. Confusing issue. I still haven't recieved my new damper yet but I imagine it should be in soon. I'd like to get it swaped out this weekend if I go down to Tulsa to steal my dad's garage.
IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery | Ogre's Cave
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock