Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions - Archive
  something strange with WinALDL MAT sensor readings

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


something strange with WinALDL MAT sensor readings by fierosound
Started on: 05-11-2009 01:50 PM
Replies: 10
Last post by: fierosound on 05-12-2009 04:07 PM
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15217
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 287
Rate this member

Report this Post05-11-2009 01:50 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundDirect Link to This Post
I'm running an 85 ECM in my 87 GT because I wanted the knock sensor capability.

I'm trying to track down an annoying hesitation when the throttle is pressed that I've had for some time (just lived with it). I connected WinALDL to check out the sensors with engine normal running temp at idle.

If I set Win ALDL to the 7170 ECM (stock 87), the MAT reads 64C (about 150F) which I would say is normal considering engine bay heat of an idling motionless car. The temp started at room temp and rose to that as the engine heated up as expected.

But when I change WinALDL's configuration to 85 2.8 ECM (what I actually have in the car), the MAT reads -5.0C (about 22F) which is WAY off.

Why the difference?? According to rockauto.com the same sensor was used with both ECMs. The 87 ECM seems to indicate the sensor is OK, while the 85 ECM seems to say there's something wrong there.

ALL I can think of is maybe the ECM pinout is different. On the 87's 7170 ECM the MAT is connected to A11. Can someone please verify that the 85 ECM is the same? Any ideas?

Thanks in advance.

------------------

World of Wheels Winners
My 3.4L S/C 87 GT
& My SD4 Indy

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Patrick
Member
Posts: 38394
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 465
Rate this member

Report this Post05-11-2009 01:55 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickSend a Private Message to PatrickDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierosound:

If I set Win ALDL to the 7170 ECM (stock 87), the MAT reads 64C (about 150F)...

But when I change WinALDL's configuration to 85 2.8 ECM (what I actually have in the car), the MAT reads -5.0C (about 22F)...



You live in Calgary. From what I've heard, those wild temperature swings sound about normal.
IP: Logged
blakrw
Member
Posts: 15
From: Florida
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-11-2009 02:50 PM Click Here to See the Profile for blakrwSend a Private Message to blakrwDirect Link to This Post
Not sure if this will help but my 88 service manual "A11". Also, I founf thr following information tha t may help;
-------------
ENGINE CONTROL MODULE


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Fiero Engine Control Module (ECM) was used in several GM cars besides the Fiero but the PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory) chip within the ECM is unique to the Fiero. If an ECM is salvaged from another vehicle and installed in a Fiero, be sure to install the correct Fiero PROM. The PROM is unique for each engine/transmission combination. A PROM from a Fiero V-6 with manual transmission will not work in a Fiero V-6 with automatic transmission. Also, a PROM may not swap between years even if the engine/transmission combination is the same.

The cars below have ECMs that will swap into the Fiero.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'84 2.5L
Pontiac 2000 '84 1.8L w/o turbocharger
Pontiac 6000 '84 2.5L
Camaro '84 2.5L
Chevy Celebrity '84 2.5L
Buick Century '84 2.5L
Olds Ciera '84 2.5L
Chevy Citation '83 2.5L auto trans, 2.39 axle, ident #1226156
Chevy Citation '84 2.5L
Firebird '84 2.5L
Olds Firenza '84 2.5L
Olds Omega '83 2.5L auto trans, 2.39 axle, ident #1226156
Olds Omega '84 2.5L
Pontiac Phoenix '83 2.5L auto trans, 2.39 axle, ident #1226156
Pontiac Phoenix '84 2.5L
Buick Skyhawk '84 1.8L w/o turbocharger
Buick Skylark '84 2.5L


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'85-86 2.5L
Pontiac 6000 '85-86 2.5L
Pontiac Astro '85-86 2.5L
Blazer S10/GM Jimmy S15 '85-86 2.5L
Olds Calais '85-86 2.5L
Camaro '85-86 2.5L
Chevy Celebrity '85-86 2.5L
Buick Century '85-86 2.5L
Olds Ciera '85-86 2.5L
Chevy Citation '85 2.5L
Olds Cutlass '86 2.5L
Firebird '85-86 2.5L
Olds Firenza '85-86 1.8L
Pontiac Grand Am '85-86 2.5L
S10/S15/GM Sonoma '85-86 2.5L
Pontiac Safari '85-86 2.5L
Buick Skyhawk '85-86 1.8L w/o turbocharger
Buick Skylark '85-86 2.5L
Buick Somerset '85-86 2.5L
Pontiac Sunbird '85-86 1.8L w/o turbocharger


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'87-88 2.5L: ECM has identification #1227748
Pontiac 6000 '87-91 2.5L
Chevrolet Beretta '87-91 2.2L
Olds Calais '87-91 2.5L
Cavalier '90-91 2.2L
Chevy Celebrity '87-90 2.5L
Buick Century '87-92 2.5L
Chevy Forward Control '89 gasoline
Chevy Pickup '89 gasoline
Chevy Van '89 gasoline
Olds Ciera '87-92 2.5L
Chevy Corsica '90-91 2.2L
Olds Firenza '87-88 2.0L overhead cam
GMC Forward Control '89 gasoline
GMC Pickup '89 gasoline
GMC Van '89 gasoline
Pontiac Grand Am '87-91 2.5L
Buick Skyhawk '87 2.0L w/o turbocharger
Buick Skyhawk '88 overhead cam
Buick Skylark '87-91 2.5L
Buick Somerset '87 2.5L
Chevy Suburban '89 gasoline
Pontiac Sunbird '87-90 2.0L w/o turbocharger
Pontiac Sunbird '91 2.0L
Pontiac Tempest '90-91 2.2L


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'85 2.8L: This ECM is unique to the 1985 Fiero.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'86-88 2.8L: This ECM is unique to the 1986-88 Fiero.
IP: Logged
TK
Member
Posts: 10013
From:
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 200
Rate this member

Report this Post05-11-2009 03:31 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TKSend a Private Message to TKDirect Link to This Post
2.8L ECM is the 12276870 or 7707 used in the MAF 2.8L engines (Camaro, FB, FWD cars in 85/86.)

Same ECM hardware but difference embedded program code and thus different ALDL data stream. The 6869 and 7170 used in the Fiero is the same stream but different from the 6870. The 6869/7170 stream is unique to those.

[This message has been edited by TK (edited 05-11-2009).]

IP: Logged
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15217
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 287
Rate this member

Report this Post05-11-2009 05:07 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by TK:

2.8L ECM is the 12276870 or 7707 used in the MAF 2.8L engines (Camaro, FB, FWD cars in 85/86.)

Same ECM hardware but difference embedded program code and thus different ALDL data stream. The 6869 and 7170 used in the Fiero is the same stream but different from the 6870. The 6869/7170 stream is unique to those.



Thanks TK. Could you tell me why Advance shows 88.58 degrees at idle ?? Shouldn't this be the 10 degrees that the timing is set at?

[This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 05-11-2009).]

IP: Logged
Blacktree
Member
Posts: 20770
From: Central Florida
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (12)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 350
Rate this member

Report this Post05-11-2009 06:26 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BlacktreeClick Here to visit Blacktree's HomePageSend a Private Message to BlacktreeDirect Link to This Post
The timing advance that the ECM uses is different from the timing advance that you set with the distributer. The distributer sets the "base timing advance" (which doesn't change), and the ECM also adjusts the timing advance on the fly. So, for example, if you have the distributer set for 10° BTDC, and the ECM commands 20° BTDC, the total timing advance will be 30° BTDC.

Although, 80° BTDC seems pretty excessive.
IP: Logged
tjm4fun
Member
Posts: 3781
From: Long Island, NY USA
Registered: Feb 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 141
Rate this member

Report this Post05-11-2009 08:43 PM Click Here to See the Profile for tjm4funSend a Private Message to tjm4funDirect Link to This Post
If you are showing an 80 advance at idle, then I have to suspect that you have an issue with your aldl setup. there is no way that there will EVER be 80 degrees of advance.
you have to verify that your setup is correct, and that your ecm is really whaqt you think it is. then go from there.
IP: Logged
Dodgerunner
Member
Posts: 9687
From: Lincoln, Nebraska
Registered: Sep 2004


Feedback score:    (61)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 323
Rate this member

Report this Post05-11-2009 10:40 PM Click Here to See the Profile for DodgerunnerClick Here to visit Dodgerunner's HomePageSend a Private Message to DodgerunnerDirect Link to This Post
Yes the advance on the 85 ecm (and probably all Fiero 2.9's) usually runs 18-30+ but 80 is way off.
IP: Logged
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15217
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 287
Rate this member

Report this Post05-12-2009 12:50 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by tjm4fun:

If you are showing an 80 advance at idle, then I have to suspect that you have an issue with your aldl setup. there is no way that there will EVER be 80 degrees of advance.

.


It only shows 80+ degrees at idle. When the throttle is blipped or held down, it then shows values more in line with what it should be in the 24-30 degree range.
IP: Logged
Blacktree
Member
Posts: 20770
From: Central Florida
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (12)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 350
Rate this member

Report this Post05-12-2009 01:39 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BlacktreeClick Here to visit Blacktree's HomePageSend a Private Message to BlacktreeDirect Link to This Post
Since WinALDL gives correct readings when you use the '87 V6 setting, just go with that. It doesn't really matter what ECM your computer thinks it's connecting to, as long as you get accurate data.
IP: Logged
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15217
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 287
Rate this member

Report this Post05-12-2009 04:07 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Blacktree:

Since WinALDL gives correct readings when you use the '87 V6 setting, just go with that.



Thanks to TK's explanation I'm going with that. Everything looks good from the sensors according to the Scan Chart in the Helm's manual.

I know my timing is correct, so I'm still curious as to why WinALDL reports my Advance so weirdly at idle. It looks fine at off idle RPMs.

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock