Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions - Archive
  would 18 inch wheels work on a fiero

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


would 18 inch wheels work on a fiero by SinCityfiero
Started on: 05-01-2009 03:27 PM
Replies: 38
Last post by: FieroBobo on 05-05-2009 11:16 PM
SinCityfiero
Member
Posts: 44
From: Las Vegas
Registered: Jan 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-01-2009 03:27 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SinCityfieroSend a Private Message to SinCityfieroDirect Link to This Post
i know if i get some coil overs i could get 18 inch by 8 wheels to fit on my fiero , but would i be able to make a u turn ok or would i have to go with 18 by 8 in the back and 17 by 7 in the front
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Austrian Import
Member
Posts: 3919
From: Monterey, CA
Registered: Feb 2007


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-01-2009 05:25 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Austrian ImportSend a Private Message to Austrian ImportDirect Link to This Post
With the right offset. (+35 for pre '88's) they fit all the way around. Check the search and the archives for more info.
in many cases no coilovers necesary.
IP: Logged
Jncomutt
Member
Posts: 8914
From: Charlotte, NC
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 221
Rate this member

Report this Post05-01-2009 09:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for JncomuttSend a Private Message to JncomuttDirect Link to This Post
"You'll crack your A-pillars"

(someone back me up)

beep
IP: Logged
jscott1
Member
Posts: 21676
From: Houston, TX , USA
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (15)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 415
Rate this member

Report this Post05-01-2009 10:51 PM Click Here to See the Profile for jscott1Send a Private Message to jscott1Direct Link to This Post
Why not instead put 19" and 20" on bone stock suspension??

IP: Logged
Arns85GT
Member
Posts: 11159
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 202
Rate this member

Report this Post05-01-2009 11:16 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Arns85GTSend a Private Message to Arns85GTDirect Link to This Post
The issue isn't whether they'll fit. It is more how they'll affect handling and power.

If you have the v6 you will notice a sharp loss of torque. Here is the reason. On the stock 14" wheel the circumference is about 71"

If you go to a 18 x 45 tire, your circumference goes up to 78". You need an 18 x 30 tire to get the same 71" circumference.

Most affordable tires are not in the 30 range so you would likely end up with 45's or even 50's. That is a 10% effective increase in your gear ratio at the road.

So, bigger wheels need bigger horsepower. Hope this helps.

Arn
IP: Logged
jscott1
Member
Posts: 21676
From: Houston, TX , USA
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (15)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 415
Rate this member

Report this Post05-01-2009 11:35 PM Click Here to See the Profile for jscott1Send a Private Message to jscott1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Arns85GT:

If you have the v6 you will notice a sharp loss of torque. Here is the reason. On the stock 14" wheel the circumference is about 71"

If you go to a 18 x 45 tire, your circumference goes up to 78". You need an 18 x 30 tire to get the same 71" circumference.
Arn


in theory yes... in reality uh no.

Stock diameter is actually closer to 25 inches

You can't physically mount anything over 28 inches and anything over 27.5" will rub.

a 30 series isn't going to cost that much more...in fact I doubt they make tires with high aspect ratios over 16 inches except for truck tires.

In other words drop the aspect ratio down to keep the same diameter/circumference and you'll be fine.

[This message has been edited by jscott1 (edited 05-01-2009).]

IP: Logged
Arns85GT
Member
Posts: 11159
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 202
Rate this member

Report this Post05-02-2009 12:47 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Arns85GTSend a Private Message to Arns85GTDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by jscott1:


in theory yes... in reality uh no.

Stock diameter is actually closer to 25 inches

You can't physically mount anything over 28 inches and anything over 27.5" will rub.

a 30 series isn't going to cost that much more...in fact I doubt they make tires with high aspect ratios over 16 inches except for truck tires.

In other words drop the aspect ratio down to keep the same diameter/circumference and you'll be fine.



I wasn't talking diameter, I was talking circumference. If you are running a 300 hp Fiero you will not notice a larger circumference except with a bit more traction out of the hole. If you are running a 140 hp Fiero, that 10% increase in gearing at the road surface will show up alot. It is gear ratio I'm talking not fender well clearance.

On cost let's talk about the Fusion ZRi.

the 195/50R15 is worth about $62 USD. The smallest ratio they have on Tirerack for instance in the same tire in 18" is 35. The cost is $154.

You can call me cheap if you like, but the spread between a 15" tire and the 18" tire, tire for tire, gives my pocket book that "where did it go?" feeling.

Arn
IP: Logged
jscott1
Member
Posts: 21676
From: Houston, TX , USA
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (15)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 415
Rate this member

Report this Post05-02-2009 02:23 AM Click Here to See the Profile for jscott1Send a Private Message to jscott1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Arns85GT:


I wasn't talking diameter, I was talking circumference


Arn


Yeah, but the two are related by a constant...you might have heard about it (Pi)

Circumference equals 3.141592654 x Diameter

You are talking theory and ignoring the facts...the size tires you are talking about don't exist and they wouldn't fit even if they did exist.

Try fitting a 10% bigger Diameter, (okay circumference it doesn't matter) on a Fiero without lifting it up like a 4 x 4 It's not going to happen.

There are about a million threads in the archive about tire size. The golden rule is to keep the outer dimensions as close as possible to stock and all is good. That's why I'm rolling 265/35-20s and they fit just fine.

{Edited for math error}

[This message has been edited by jscott1 (edited 05-05-2009).]

IP: Logged
sjmaye
Member
Posts: 2468
From: Hendersonville, TN USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-02-2009 03:08 AM Click Here to See the Profile for sjmayeSend a Private Message to sjmayeDirect Link to This Post
18" on a Fiero? All day long. These are a +38 offset. No rubbing at all with the 1988. Same wheels and tires on the 1987 has a tiny rub at full turn. Not bad at all.

[This message has been edited by sjmaye (edited 05-02-2009).]

IP: Logged
Erik
Member
Posts: 5627
From: Des Moines, Iowa
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 168
Rate this member

Report this Post05-02-2009 04:28 AM Click Here to See the Profile for ErikSend a Private Message to ErikDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by jscott1:

Why not instead put 19" and 20" on bone stock suspension??



Who's car is that and what are the specs of the wheels and car??
IP: Logged
87BEEGT
Member
Posts: 91
From: Tennessee
Registered: Jun 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-02-2009 04:30 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 87BEEGTSend a Private Message to 87BEEGTDirect Link to This Post
87 GT w/ 17's and mine have a slight rub at full turn....but its lowered 2'' in front and 1 3/4'' in back....just my .02
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
m0sh_man
Member
Posts: 8460
From: south charleston WV 25309
Registered: Feb 2002


Feedback score:    (23)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 163
Rate this member

Report this Post05-02-2009 08:40 AM Click Here to See the Profile for m0sh_manSend a Private Message to m0sh_manDirect Link to This Post
im running 235/50/18's on the rear and 225/45/18's on the front of a bone stock suspensioned 88, with a high output quad4 4cyl engine.

i have to say off the line torque sucks and im not sure if its the engine or the tires, but i dont burn the tires shifting to 2nd and third with the 18's and i did with stock 15s

matthew
IP: Logged
jscott1
Member
Posts: 21676
From: Houston, TX , USA
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (15)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 415
Rate this member

Report this Post05-03-2009 03:37 AM Click Here to See the Profile for jscott1Send a Private Message to jscott1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Erik:


Who's car is that and what are the specs of the wheels and car??


That's my car, and it's running 265/35-20 on 8.5" x 20" wheels in the rear and 235/35-19 on 8" x 19" wheels on the front. Suspension is bone stock 88 suspension.
IP: Logged
JumpStart
Member
Posts: 1412
From: Central Florida
Registered: Sep 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-03-2009 06:36 AM Click Here to See the Profile for JumpStartSend a Private Message to JumpStartDirect Link to This Post
My opinion.... run 18's on the rear and 17's in the front.

Steve
IP: Logged
SinCityfiero
Member
Posts: 44
From: Las Vegas
Registered: Jan 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 02:24 AM Click Here to See the Profile for SinCityfieroSend a Private Message to SinCityfieroDirect Link to This Post
wow thanks guys for all the info. i think i will go 18 all around on my 88 gt. i like the look of the exel ennio in the hyper black color

IP: Logged
GTCONVERSION
Member
Posts: 304
From: chester,va
Registered: Aug 2007


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 07:56 AM Click Here to See the Profile for GTCONVERSIONSend a Private Message to GTCONVERSIONDirect Link to This Post
I just did 18x8 with out coilovers,The reason im going to do the coilovers is to lower the car some. offset is a 38mm

IP: Logged
War Hammer
Member
Posts: 377
From: Myrtle Beach, SC USA
Registered: Jan 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 08:59 AM Click Here to See the Profile for War HammerSend a Private Message to War HammerDirect Link to This Post
Hi,

War Hammer has 18"s on it. No coilovers or anything.

Paul

------------------
1988 Fiero
3800SC Series 1 w/5spd
Lowering Springs
18's w/Pirellis
Corvette Dash Mod

1985 GT
1986 Notchie
1987 Notchie

IP: Logged
Austrian Import
Member
Posts: 3919
From: Monterey, CA
Registered: Feb 2007


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 02:35 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Austrian ImportSend a Private Message to Austrian ImportDirect Link to This Post
Weird... I asked the same question over a year ago, and everybody was happy about installing 18" rims.
Now the consensus is, they don't work, or make the car slower. What a difference a year makes.
I should go dig in the archive and see what other diverging opinions I'll find.

Also interesting that back then for 'pre 88's +35 seemed to be the preferred offset (to save wheel bearings, since it's near stock), and now it's +38.

is a speedo reduction gear available, that'll bring the speedo to read correctly again (with the right amount of teeth)? If so, where do I get it?
IP: Logged
aeffertz
Member
Posts: 798
From: Ladysmith, WI
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (6)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 02:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for aeffertzSend a Private Message to aeffertzDirect Link to This Post
I suppose I should chime in with my question.
I have a 1985 Notchie, and plan on putting 19's in the back, and 18's in the front. What kind of wheel spacers will I need/where do I get them? Will I need coilover? What else should I know about this?
Thanks.
IP: Logged
jscott1
Member
Posts: 21676
From: Houston, TX , USA
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (15)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 415
Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 02:57 PM Click Here to See the Profile for jscott1Send a Private Message to jscott1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by aeffertz:

I suppose I should chime in with my question.

I have a 1985 Notchie, and plan on putting 19's in the back, and 18's in the front. What kind of wheel spacers will I need/where do I get them? Will I need coilover? What else should I know about this?
Thanks.


Your question is way too non-specific. I've said it at least three times that you can go with a 19 inch or even 20 inch wheel and not significantly increase the size of the tire/wheel assembly in which case it will mount on bone stock suspension.

Here's my suggestion.

a) determine the wheel design you like

b) determine what sizes the wheels come in, (18s and 19)

c) see if they come in the proper offsets to not stick out or hit the strut tower

d) compare overall diameter to stock based on commonly available tire sizes

e) if you can't get within 2% of stock go back to step a) and start over

[This message has been edited by jscott1 (edited 05-04-2009).]

IP: Logged
aeffertz
Member
Posts: 798
From: Ladysmith, WI
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (6)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 03:10 PM Click Here to See the Profile for aeffertzSend a Private Message to aeffertzDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by jscott1:
Your question is way too non-specific. I've said it at least three times that you can go with a 19 inch or even 20 inch wheel and not significantly increase the size of the tire/wheel assembly in which case it will mount on bone stock suspension.


The front wheels are 18x8

The rear wheels are 19x11

Rear tire size is 315-25ZR-19

Front tire size is 235/35/18
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
jscott1
Member
Posts: 21676
From: Houston, TX , USA
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (15)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 415
Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 03:16 PM Click Here to See the Profile for jscott1Send a Private Message to jscott1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by aeffertz:


The front wheels are 18x8

The rear wheels are 19x11

Rear tire size is 315-25ZR-19

Front tire size is 235/35/18


Okay that's specific. The Rears are going to be challenging. To figure how much backspace you need try this calculator

http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculator.asp
IP: Logged
aeffertz
Member
Posts: 798
From: Ladysmith, WI
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (6)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 03:24 PM Click Here to See the Profile for aeffertzSend a Private Message to aeffertzDirect Link to This Post
Alright, I punched all that into the calculator. The difference is 4.17%. That's too much of a difference, so what would I change to make it better? You said something about backspace--what's that?
IP: Logged
madcurl
Member
Posts: 21401
From: In a Van down by the Kern River
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 314
Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 04:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for madcurlSend a Private Message to madcurlDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by SinCityfiero:

Would I be able to make a uturn okay or would I have to go with 18 by 8 in the back and 17 by 7 in the front


Many Fiero owners are using 17/18, 18/18, 18/19, and 18/20 combinations without any issues with turning. You need to make sure of the off-set and max front tires. Check out the "show me your rims" thread for examples. WARNING: Going beyond what has proven to work will result in a big headache and lost of revenue.

------------------



"I drive modified Fieros- anything less would be uncivilized."

IP: Logged
madcurl
Member
Posts: 21401
From: In a Van down by the Kern River
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 314
Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 04:34 PM Click Here to See the Profile for madcurlSend a Private Message to madcurlDirect Link to This Post

madcurl

21401 posts
Member since Jul 2003
 
quote
Originally posted by SinCityfiero:

wow thanks guys for all the info. i think i will go 18 all around on my 88 gt. i like the look of the exel ennio in the hyper black color


Since you have a 1988 Fiero--- try and stagger the rim off-set (you won't be able to rotate your tires). A 38-40mm up front and 35mm for rear rims. The "key" is too have the front tires stucked in while the rears are flush with the lip of the fender. Some dealers do not allow you to mix your sets.
IP: Logged
madcurl
Member
Posts: 21401
From: In a Van down by the Kern River
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 314
Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 04:39 PM Click Here to See the Profile for madcurlSend a Private Message to madcurlDirect Link to This Post

madcurl

21401 posts
Member since Jul 2003
 
quote
Originally posted by aeffertz:

The rear wheels are 19x11 & the Rear tire size is 315-25ZR-19



That rear combination (in any size over a 9" width) will not work on a non- wide body. At best, you can squeeze a 9.5" rear using a 275/30/19 using a custom made 3-piece rim.

Example: non wide body 1987 Fiero;









As you can see, a 11" rim will not fit (unless you want it sticking out on the sides).

[This message has been edited by madcurl (edited 05-04-2009).]

IP: Logged
whodeanie
Member
Posts: 3819
From: woodstock,Ga.,USA
Registered: Jan 2008


Feedback score:    (14)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 120
Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 05:00 PM Click Here to See the Profile for whodeanieClick Here to visit whodeanie's HomePageSend a Private Message to whodeanieDirect Link to This Post
my 19, 20 set from BonSpeed are lighter than the stock set.
front wheel on the scale

rear wheel on the scale OOPS! wrong pic. the rear was 28.8 lbs.

and mounted on the car

[This message has been edited by whodeanie (edited 05-04-2009).]

IP: Logged
jscott1
Member
Posts: 21676
From: Houston, TX , USA
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (15)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 415
Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 09:06 PM Click Here to See the Profile for jscott1Send a Private Message to jscott1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by aeffertz:

Alright, I punched all that into the calculator. The difference is 4.17%. That's too much of a difference, so what would I change to make it better? You said something about backspace--what's that?


Backspace is the distance between the mounting surface and the back edge of the wheel. Too much backspace and the wheel is going to hit the struts. To push the wheel away from the strut you need negative offset. This is difficult to find wheels like that in 5 x 100 mm, which is why you see all the Custom HRE wheels.
IP: Logged
aeffertz
Member
Posts: 798
From: Ladysmith, WI
Registered: Feb 2009


Feedback score:    (6)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 11:11 PM Click Here to See the Profile for aeffertzSend a Private Message to aeffertzDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by madcurl:


That rear combination (in any size over a 9" width) will not work on a non- wide body.


Right. That's why I'm ordering the V8 Archie notchie wide body kit.
IP: Logged
madcurl
Member
Posts: 21401
From: In a Van down by the Kern River
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 314
Rate this member

Report this Post05-04-2009 11:59 PM Click Here to See the Profile for madcurlSend a Private Message to madcurlDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by aeffertz:


Right. That's why I'm ordering the V8 Archie notchie wide body kit.


I'm sorry if I over looked that point in the begining of the thread or title.

IMO it is best then to;

a. buy the Mad-Arch kit first.
b. buy the rims second (ask those who have the kit and the same year Fiero)
c. Mold the kit around the rims (provided you have upgraded your suspension).
IP: Logged
FieroWannaBe
Member
Posts: 2301
From: USA
Registered: Oct 2004


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-05-2009 12:15 AM Click Here to See the Profile for FieroWannaBeSend a Private Message to FieroWannaBeDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by jscott1:


Yeah, but the two are related by a constant...you might have heard about it (Pi)

Circumference equals 3.141592654 x Diameter squared divided by 4

You are talking theory and ignoring the facts...the size tires you are talking about don't exist and they wouldn't fit even if they did exist.

Try fitting a 10% bigger Diameter, (okay circumference it doesn't matter) on a Fiero without lifting it up like a 4 x 4 It's not going to happen.

There are about a million threads in the archive about tire size. The golden rule is to keep the outer dimensions as close as possible to stock and all is good. That's why I'm rolling 265/35-20s and they fit just fine.


pi*d^2/4=area not circumference.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
blkpearl
Member
Posts: 367
From: SanDog,CA,US
Registered: Oct 2004


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-05-2009 12:16 AM Click Here to See the Profile for blkpearlClick Here to visit blkpearl's HomePageSend a Private Message to blkpearlDirect Link to This Post
Are the stock 88 Rims really weigh more than 25 lbs? I thought they weighed 19 lbs or something like that.
IP: Logged
jscott1
Member
Posts: 21676
From: Houston, TX , USA
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (15)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 415
Rate this member

Report this Post05-05-2009 10:42 AM Click Here to See the Profile for jscott1Send a Private Message to jscott1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by FieroWannaBe:


pi*d^2/4=area not circumference.

Oops you got me on that one... I meant 2* Pi * R an even easier formula

IP: Logged
BillS
Member
Posts: 660
From:
Registered: Apr 2000


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-05-2009 10:51 AM Click Here to See the Profile for BillSSend a Private Message to BillSDirect Link to This Post
Am I the only one that thinks that the little rubber band appearance tires not only look silly, but also ruin the ride quality of the car.

I know, I know, the whole industry (or what's left of it) is going that way, but it isn't a performance driven trend it is all for appearance.

Is everyone else driven by looks, and doesn't care about ride quaity?? Believe me, running around in the equivalent of an ox cart with solid tires (in terms of compliance) gets old real fast, no matter how many bystanders may be looking (or laughing) at your really kool rims.

We did this sort of conversion on a MB and while the new rubber compounds do stick better than old and it handled well, it was a pain (literally) to drive for long.
IP: Logged
whodeanie
Member
Posts: 3819
From: woodstock,Ga.,USA
Registered: Jan 2008


Feedback score:    (14)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 120
Rate this member

Report this Post05-05-2009 10:57 AM Click Here to See the Profile for whodeanieClick Here to visit whodeanie's HomePageSend a Private Message to whodeanieDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by blkpearl:

Are the stock 88 Rims really weigh more than 25 lbs? I thought they weighed 19 lbs or something like that.


the wheels that were on my car when I bought it were way heaver that the new wheels but they were not the stock ones.
I will have to look into the weight of a stock wheel.
if you are going to do a widebody kit you will want to use at least a 10" wide wheel on the rear. Curly anothers have used wider than thatup to I think 12" wide.
my car is an 88 and this is what I used front 19 x 9 with 245 x 40 x 19 tires and stock offset for the rear 20 x 10 wheels with 285 x 30 x 20 tires with a 38mm offset in the wheels
this fit just inside the lip of the widebody the way I wanted some others want them to stick out a little or flush.
measure 2 times order once. if you want to get a price for some wheels from BonSpeed PM me and I will give you a quote I am a dealer for them.
just let me know what size.
D.


IP: Logged
Brastic
Member
Posts: 492
From: Fremont, CA
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-05-2009 01:07 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BrasticClick Here to visit Brastic's HomePageSend a Private Message to BrasticDirect Link to This Post
When I replaced my stock 88GT rims with 18" rims, I weighed both of them. I only weighed the wheels with the tires on them as I did not care to much about just the rim. The difference in the diameter in the rear did not scare me at all. I know that the torque would go down a little. The bigger killer is the moments of inertia change. By moving more of the weight of the wheel to the outer edge, the wheel becomes more like a ring which takes more to move.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...f_moments_of_inertia

Stock 88 GT front with 205/60-15: 43lbs
Stock 88 Gt rear with 215/60-15: 43lbs

HR 18" front with 225/40-18: 46lbs
HR 18" rear with 255/40-18: 51lbs

The best advice I ever received about getting wide rear wheels is to build the wide body first, then measure for the rims.

A little more can be found on my web page:
http://brastic.com/fiero/wheels.html
IP: Logged
Bozzie
Member
Posts: 1188
From: Plainville,Ct. U.S.A
Registered: Oct 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-05-2009 01:20 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BozzieSend a Private Message to BozzieDirect Link to This Post
Sure !! 18x8 front and 18x9 rear, no problems

http://i252.photobucket.com...bozziec/fiero002.jpg
IP: Logged
30+mpg
Member
Posts: 4061
From: Russellville, AR
Registered: Feb 2002


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 97
Rate this member

Report this Post05-05-2009 06:10 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 30+mpgSend a Private Message to 30+mpgDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
jscott1:Oops you got me on that one... I meant 2* Pi * R an even easier formula



Easiest is Pi x D
IP: Logged
FieroBobo
Member
Posts: 683
From: Verona, NJ
Registered: Mar 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-05-2009 11:16 PM Click Here to See the Profile for FieroBoboSend a Private Message to FieroBoboDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by blkpearl:
Are the stock 88 Rims really weigh more than 25 lbs? I thought they weighed 19 lbs or something like that.


You are correct, the stock 88 Fiero rims do not weigh 25 lbs, they weigh 18lbs each. I checked, (weighed them on a bathroom scale), last year.

For the record:
1988 Fiero GT Stock
. . front Wheel 15x6 18 lb.
. . rear Wheel 15x7 18 lb.
Tire: Goodyear Eagle GT + IIs
. . front 205/60-HR15 20 lb.
. . rear 215/60-HR15 21 lb.

Front Wheel + tire 18 + 20 = 38 lb.
Rear Wheel + tire 18 + 21 = 39 lb.

~Bob

------------------
"Its nice to be important.
Its more important to be nice."

IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock