Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions - Archive
  2.2/2.4Eco hybrid?

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


2.2/2.4Eco hybrid? by BabyVet
Started on: 10-27-2008 05:22 PM
Replies: 11
Last post by: Fosgatecavy98 on 10-31-2008 02:24 PM
BabyVet
Member
Posts: 1173
From: Kansas City, Kansas
Registered: May 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-27-2008 05:22 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BabyVetSend a Private Message to BabyVetDirect Link to This Post
Ok so some of use know that you can put a 2.3 head on a 2.4 block and it will make somewhere aroud 200hp (flywheel hp)

so i was wondering if you can take a 2.2 eco head and put on the 2.4 eco block?
what kinda hp's are we looking at?
What would compression be like?
driveable?
easy or not?
possible or not?
anynone done it yet???????

------------------
BabyVet

http://s298.photobucket.com...all/BabyVet%20Build/

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
KurtAKX
Member
Posts: 4008
From: West Bloomfield, MI
Registered: Feb 2002


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 128
Rate this member

Report this Post10-27-2008 05:37 PM Click Here to See the Profile for KurtAKXSend a Private Message to KurtAKXDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by BabyVet:

Ok so some of use know that you can put a 2.3 head on a 2.4 block and it will make somewhere aroud 200hp (flywheel hp)

so i was wondering if you can take a 2.2 eco head and put on the 2.4 eco block?
what kinda hp's are we looking at?
What would compression be like?
driveable?
easy or not?
possible or not?
anynone done it yet???????




Its probably easier than doing the Q4 head on the TC block. That's not a straightforward swap, btw. Nor is the 2.6 hybrid with the 2.4 crank in the 2.3 block. It requires crank machining.

At any rate, you'd see a loss going to the 2.2 head. the 2.4 head contains VVT goodies that the 2.2 head does not. The only reason the 2.3 head thing works is that the 2.3 head carries much bigger cams and has bigger ports.

Not so in the case of the 2.2 vs 2.4 Ecotecs.

[This message has been edited by KurtAKX (edited 10-27-2008).]

IP: Logged
BabyVet
Member
Posts: 1173
From: Kansas City, Kansas
Registered: May 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-27-2008 06:39 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BabyVetSend a Private Message to BabyVetDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by KurtAKX:
Its probably easier than doing the Q4 head on the TC block. That's not a straightforward swap, btw. Nor is the 2.6 hybrid with the 2.4 crank in the 2.3 block. It requires crank machining.

At any rate, you'd see a loss going to the 2.2 head. the 2.4 head contains VVT goodies that the 2.2 head does not. The only reason the 2.3 head thing works is that the 2.3 head carries much bigger cams and has bigger ports.

Not so in the case of the 2.2 vs 2.4 Ecotecs.




understood what you mean
IP: Logged
Fosgatecavy98
Member
Posts: 2969
From:
Registered: Jul 2005


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-27-2008 09:44 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Fosgatecavy98Send a Private Message to Fosgatecavy98Direct Link to This Post
Hopefully it can be done


My ecotec "hybrid" L61/LE5 (aka 2.2L head and 2.4L bottom end) has been running since early this summer.

I dont look at it as a "loss" of power, since I considered adding the .2L of displacement to the 2.2 lol. But Megasquirt, and a few bolt-ons bring it back up to power. Getting rid of the LE5 head and VVT allow much more upgrades to the valvetrain also.
IP: Logged
BabyVet
Member
Posts: 1173
From: Kansas City, Kansas
Registered: May 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-27-2008 11:22 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BabyVetSend a Private Message to BabyVetDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Fosgatecavy98:

Hopefully it can be done


My ecotec "hybrid" L61/LE5 (aka 2.2L head and 2.4L bottom end) has been running since early this summer.

I dont look at it as a "loss" of power, since I considered adding the .2L of displacement to the 2.2 lol. But Megasquirt, and a few bolt-ons bring it back up to power. Getting rid of the LE5 head and VVT allow much more upgrades to the valvetrain also.



can you give more info pics vids? how does it run?
IP: Logged
Fosgatecavy98
Member
Posts: 2969
From:
Registered: Jul 2005


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-28-2008 11:02 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Fosgatecavy98Send a Private Message to Fosgatecavy98Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by BabyVet:
can you give more info pics vids? how does it run?


Just a few days ago I got it going good, I had issues with AFR and the coils. From the outside it looks JUST like a L61. I had to convert to the L61 coolant tubing, that runs around the tranny and exhaust side of the engine because it was in the way of the adapter plate and I also removed the oil cooler because of the lack of room. I also had to change to the L61 oil pan as the LE5 pan I had was cut in the bottom.

It seems to run identical to the L61 I had in it last year, but I never got a chance to tune it because of the weather . I will be converting it over to E85 over the winter. I assume it should hit close to 200hp0 once I get it tuned correctly and a few other problems sorted out, and with cams and a some valvetrain work should be able to nail the 240-250 range.
IP: Logged
BabyVet
Member
Posts: 1173
From: Kansas City, Kansas
Registered: May 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-28-2008 11:58 AM Click Here to See the Profile for BabyVetSend a Private Message to BabyVetDirect Link to This Post
you HAVE to show pics. What type of car do you have? So do you have aftermarket anything or is it just the
head swap? Do you know what kinda compression your looking at? could you boost on that head swap w/o changing compression?
IP: Logged
Fosgatecavy98
Member
Posts: 2969
From:
Registered: Jul 2005


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-28-2008 02:24 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Fosgatecavy98Send a Private Message to Fosgatecavy98Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by BabyVet:

you HAVE to show pics. What type of car do you have? So do you have aftermarket anything or is it just the
head swap? Do you know what kinda compression your looking at? could you boost on that head swap w/o changing compression?


Its a fiero lol. I have a tsudo 4-2-1 header, custom drivetrain using a Quad 2.3L fidanza flywheel, ceramic 9 5/8ths clutch, custom CIA style intake, LSJ injectors, and tuning. The LE5 pistons are relived for the valves, stock form it runs 10.4:1, using the L61 head it creates quench pads that I believe may bump the compression up a bit higher as well. You COULD boost it, as the L61 can be boosted up to the 280hp range at which point the rods become a issue, the LE5 rods are stronger so It should be able to go a bit higher than that.

I have pictures over on ecotecforum.com, look up "EcotecFiero"
IP: Logged
niemann99
Member
Posts: 258
From: Seattle, WA USA
Registered: Dec 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-28-2008 09:10 PM Click Here to See the Profile for niemann99Send a Private Message to niemann99Direct Link to This Post
So, you're saying that a Quad 4 flywheel will bolt to the ecotec, no mods required?
IP: Logged
Fosgatecavy98
Member
Posts: 2969
From:
Registered: Jul 2005


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-29-2008 12:35 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Fosgatecavy98Send a Private Message to Fosgatecavy98Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by niemann99:

So, you're saying that a Quad 4 flywheel will bolt to the ecotec, no mods required?


No it needs quiet a bit of modification done to the flywheel to work.

If you cannot do the machining yourself, it would be much easier to do the ecotec transmission to it.
IP: Logged
BabyVet
Member
Posts: 1173
From: Kansas City, Kansas
Registered: May 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-30-2008 08:40 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BabyVetSend a Private Message to BabyVetDirect Link to This Post
so why would you use the Q4 tranny instead of the eco tranny?

sorry coun't see your pics got a myspace?

[This message has been edited by BabyVet (edited 10-30-2008).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Fosgatecavy98
Member
Posts: 2969
From:
Registered: Jul 2005


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-31-2008 02:24 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Fosgatecavy98Send a Private Message to Fosgatecavy98Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by BabyVet:

so why would you use the Q4 tranny instead of the eco tranny?

sorry coun't see your pics got a myspace?



Myspace is /Fosgatecavy98, I dont have much on their tho I'll post a few here.


I used the MT2 Isuzi 5spd. 1. I got a auto ecotec tranny with my motor, 2. the gearing is slightly higher than the ecotec trans. This + a higher RPM band allows me to run 1st gear to about 45mph, 2nd to 70, 3rd 95mph, the stock ecotec wants you to shift around 85 in 3rd.
IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock