Had a wierd thought. I was reading about doing a turbo 2.8, and it mentioned something about how if you have 50 Lbs (more like 42-47) of fuel pressure at WOT, if you had 10 lbs of boost, you'd have a net of 40 lbs of effective fuel pressure (50 PSI - 10 psi of boost pushing back).
It said WOT for a reason though. The fuel pressure drops when manifold vacuum is high (idle). The stock fuel pressure regulator as I understand it uses a diaphram that's connected to the spring keeping the valve controlling fuel pressure shut. When vacuum is high, the vacuum pulls on the diaphram, which counteracts the force of the spring, allowing the valve to open with less pressure than normal. When vacuum is low (WOT) the fuel pressure increases, as the full force of the spring closing the reg valve is unopposed.
So my question is this - when pressure goes higher than atmospheric (boost), does having "negative vacuum" assist the spring, increasing the fuel pressure higher than it ordinarily would go as well? The obvious question, is can you use a fuel pressure regulator (modified or otherwise) as a rising rate fuel pressure regulator for boosted applications? Does it already perform this function to an extent? If it does, then perhaps the need to increase fuel pressure to overcome the boost may not be nessicary (bigger injectors would still be needed, of course). This might end up being an interesting idea for turbo and blower people out there.
------------------
Chris
Blue 1987 GT Getrag 5 speed, 1" lowering springs, 225 50R16 rims and tires, Fiero Store 9 3/4" HD clutch
Silver 1986 2m4 THM 125c automatic
Black 1985 2m4 SE Isuzu 5 speed (no paperwork)