Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions - Archive
  283/302 crank...is there a difference?

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


283/302 crank...is there a difference? by Philphine
Started on: 06-23-2001 04:39 PM
Replies: 9
Last post by: Will on 06-24-2001 09:44 PM
Philphine
Member
Posts: 6136
From: louisville,ky. usa
Registered: Feb 2000


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 54
Rate this member

Report this Post06-23-2001 04:39 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PhilphineSend a Private Message to PhilphineDirect Link to This Post

if they're both small journal, late 60's cranks is there any thing to distinguish them besides saying this is from a 302?

i got the block i mentioned a while back off ebay (local seller so i could pick it up and got it relatively cheap) yesterday but i haven't got any checks done on it yet. looking through the local swap paper i saw a 302 crank, balanced and called about it.

he wanted $350 for it. i told him that was beyond me. i admitted that up front, but he asked what i was hoping to pay. i had been seeing cranks go on ebay for about $100 but they were 283 cranks, i told him that. "well there's a big difference bettween those cranks, plus this ones balanced". i said i thought 302 were 327's with 283 cranks in them. at that point, i was trying to get information, but i guess he thought i was trying to talk him down (no, i don't think i've got enough silver on my tounge to get a price dropped from $350 to $100). he got mad and hung up.

i'm in no real hurry. especially since i still need to have the block checked. i'm thinking in terms of the engine and my chop top being two compleatly different projects that might become one project later. so tell me, what should i be looking for if i'm thinking 302 (or should i be thinking 302? i like the lower touque/high rev idea)?

------------------
Phil T

'87 coupe (feral)
'84 indy
'84 coupe (cheap thrill)
'84 chop top (project. or at least an interesting collection of parts)

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
lowCG
Member
Posts: 1510
From: seattle,WA U.S.A.
Registered: Jun 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-23-2001 06:38 PM Click Here to See the Profile for lowCGSend a Private Message to lowCGDirect Link to This Post
The journal diameter is larger on the later DZ cranks,283 should work,but would require a thicker main bearing,and I don't know where one would find that.
IP: Logged
84 2in1
Member
Posts: 77
From: Manchester,Tn
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-23-2001 07:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 84 2in1Send a Private Message to 84 2in1Direct Link to This Post
here is the story on the 302 Chevy. The only way you could get a 302 Chevy is to buy a '67 thru '69 camaro RPO code Z28. 68 and 69 had the large Journal cranks. The 67 had the small journal crank. Yes the 302 is the 327 (4" bore) with the 283 crank (3" stroke). The only thing to look for is a Forged steel crank with a 3"stroke, then get the thing balanced for the larger pistons.
IP: Logged
Pontiaddict
Member
Posts: 2038
From:
Registered: May 2000


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-24-2001 02:37 AM Click Here to See the Profile for PontiaddictSend a Private Message to PontiaddictDirect Link to This Post
Yeah, what 84 2in1 said. I'd have the crank balanced to your new pistons and rods etc. regardless of the crank you get.
IP: Logged
Will
Member
Posts: 14278
From: Where you least expect me
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 237
Rate this member

Report this Post06-24-2001 06:47 PM Click Here to See the Profile for WillSend a Private Message to WillDirect Link to This Post
There were large journal and small journal 302's. A large journal crank would be worth what your seller is asking. A small journal crank is not worth that (it's just a 283 crank).

One option of which you may not be aware is that you can turn an LT1 into a 302. There was a 4.3 litre version of the LT1, called the L99, used in Caprices through 94(?). It uses a 3" stroke and 5.940 rods. If you use the L99 crank and rods with LT1 block and pistons, you will have an LT1 302.

[This message has been edited by Will (edited 06-24-2001).]

IP: Logged
Will
Member
Posts: 14278
From: Where you least expect me
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 237
Rate this member

Report this Post06-24-2001 06:49 PM Click Here to See the Profile for WillSend a Private Message to WillDirect Link to This Post

Will

14278 posts
Member since Jun 2000
There were large journal and small journal 302's. A large journal crank would be worth what your seller is asking. A small journal crank is not worth that (it's just a 283 crank).

One option of which you may not be aware is that you can turn an LT1 into a 302. There was a 4.3 litre version of the LT1, called the L99, used in Caprices through 94(?). It uses a 3" stroke and 5.940 rods. If you use the L99 crank and rods with LT1 block and pistons, you will have an LT1 302. Of course, the L99 crank is cast, not forged, and the L99 rods are powdered metal, not forged.

[This message has been edited by Will (edited 06-24-2001).]

[This message has been edited by Will (edited 06-24-2001).]

IP: Logged
Wannabe
Member
Posts: 542
From:
Registered: May 2000


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-24-2001 07:24 PM Click Here to See the Profile for WannabeSend a Private Message to WannabeDirect Link to This Post
Doh! Now THAT would be very cool!
IP: Logged
84 2in1
Member
Posts: 77
From: Manchester,Tn
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-24-2001 07:53 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 84 2in1Send a Private Message to 84 2in1Direct Link to This Post
If I'm not mistaken the L99 was a 3.10 stroke,BUT I could be wrong!-B-
IP: Logged
Will
Member
Posts: 14278
From: Where you least expect me
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 237
Rate this member

Report this Post06-24-2001 09:36 PM Click Here to See the Profile for WillSend a Private Message to WillDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 84 2in1:
If I'm not mistaken the L99 was a 3.10 stroke,BUT I could be wrong!-B-

The L99 has a 3.000" stroke.

The 262(?) had a 3.100" stroke, but that was a 1 or 2 year only engine in the 70's sometime.

IP: Logged
Will
Member
Posts: 14278
From: Where you least expect me
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 237
Rate this member

Report this Post06-24-2001 09:44 PM Click Here to See the Profile for WillSend a Private Message to WillDirect Link to This Post

Will

14278 posts
Member since Jun 2000
I misspoke myself in a couple of my previous posts:

If you put together a 302 with LT1 pistons and L99 crank and rods the compression ratio will be about 7.5:1. If you want to go FI, that's fine, but for those who don't a better choice would be 11:1 350 pistons, which will give about 9.5:1 in a 302 (assuming 64cc LT1 heads).

Don't forget that a 302 has a very favorable rod/stroke ratio, thus you could probably run 10.5:1 compression on 87 octane.

The L99 was '94 to '96 Caprices only as the base engine.

All 283's were small journal. There were both large and small journal 302's and 327's. You can get spacer bearings to use a small journal crank in a large journal block. You could conceivably use a 283 crank in any 4" bore block, and many, many 283 cranks were forged.

[This message has been edited by Will (edited 06-24-2001).]

IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock