I think the top speed for a V6 Fiero is 135. I have had mine to about 125 or so.
I had a 4 cylinder in my Fiero and I got it going 80 going downhill away from the rotation of the earth, strong tail wind and 60 psi in the tires . OK maybe it's not that bad.
I've had mine up to 90mph once. I was driving with very fast traffic on I-70 in the center lane and my exit for 675 was coming up. I don't drive very fast around here, always cars around. I know scca does his racing bit though.
IP: Logged
08:02 PM
Shiner Member
Posts: 899 From: Riegelsville, PA, USA Registered: May 99
My '84 SC auto topped out around 100, I estimate (85mph speedo is a ***** ...) I had my '87 GT cruising down the road at 100-110 for a few miles, and that sucker had PLENTY of go left at that speed. I never tried a top speed run.
The top speed of the V6 has been quoted by a number of magazines as the lowest 118 (Motor Trend) to 128 mph (Auto Week). The 4 cyl topped out at 105.
I found out, after I got my hooker tri-Y headers and took off the cat on my 87 4 cyl, that if you go fast enough and the speedo needle hits 0 again - it goes beserk! (Vegas trip when I was young and immortal)
Source: Fiero by Gary Witzenburg.
[This message has been edited by WKDFIRO (edited 01-25-2000).]
IP: Logged
10:14 PM
86SE Member
Posts: 956 From: Omaha, NE, USA Registered: Jan 2000
When a car reaches redline, magazines usually count the speed at redline its top speed, but I suppose if you push the engine to 7000 RPM you might get 140-145 outta it!!, haha I should try it
Dang, I thought that my 84 SE would go past 85 MPH? Weird. On the way home from when we bought it we were doing like 75 easy. i mean, most cars go 75 easy. So 4 cyl's only go around 105 mph, we could of passed one up in our '89 Trans Am 305 easily. We were crusing at 105 mph across a bridge, it was fun!
IP: Logged
11:00 PM
cobra427 Member
Posts: 207 From: Cape Cod, Ma. Registered: Dec 1999
Here are some interesting figures. If you have the M17 Getrag 4-speed with the 3.65 final drive and your engine could pull 5500 RPM in 4th gear, these would be your results: 1000 RPM....24.31 MPH 1500 RPM....36.46 MPH 2000 RPM....48.62 MPH 2500 RPM....60.77 MPH 3000 RPM....72.93 MPH 3500 RPM....85.08 MPH 4000 RPM....97.23 MPH 4500 RPM....109.39 MPH 5000 RPM....121.54 MPH 5500 RPM....133.70 MPH What will you get at 6000 RPM???? 145.86 MPH. A 5-speed (3.61) would of course be a little higher. How do you keep it on the ground at that speed tho???
[This message has been edited by cobra427 (edited 01-26-2000).]
IP: Logged
11:54 PM
doughboySE Member
Posts: 282 From: ontario/canada Registered: Jan 99
hehehehehe anyone ever done 40-50 km per hour in 3rd man i love that sound when the exhaust rumbles especially down town with buildings on both sides can you tell i dont drive fast that much
IP: Logged
11:58 PM
Jan 26th, 2000
WKDFIRO Member
Posts: 1637 From: Cerritos, California, USA Registered: Nov 1999
Most of the car magazines that I have read seem to beleive that since it isn't their car they usually go until it won't go no more (top gear is usually an overdrive that won't get to redline) or it hits the rev limiter. I don't think the red line stops most of these guys...
I know that my 5 speed 4 cyl would not go past 4700 rpm in 5th gear no matter how I had the pedal down to the floor.
I couldn't do that to my V6. I built that engine, it would kill me to blow up almost a years worth of work on the engine alone.
[This message has been edited by WKDFIRO (edited 01-26-2000).]
IP: Logged
12:05 AM
862M4inCA Member
Posts: 1133 From: Bakersfield, CA Registered: Dec 1999
I've had my 4 cyl. 5 sp. up to just around 95 (speedo was pointing straight down, but confirmed) while racing against my sister and still had about half the pedel left to go. Would have tried faster, but she had a hard time keeping up with me there. Love to see how fast I can really take it sometime.
On the Highway next to my friend Driving the Alfa 164L, @ 6000rpm in 4th at 143mph (Alfa Speedo reading) On the Dynojet at the shop not wind resistance or rolling resistant 156mph @ 6000rpm. 86 SE V6 4spd.
Wind resistance is the killer, not RPM. I opened my big mouth on a thread about this a couple of months ago ... blah, blah, calculate, blah, blah, easy, blah, blah. let me know... you get the picture. I still haven't gotten around to doing the calculations yet. I can tell you from memory that wind resistance is a killer. The equation uses velocity^2. Assuming that there isn't any wind you could go 10-15 mph faster than when there isn't. I will try to revisit my calculations. Perhaps we can chug through these together .If I remember correctly there are about 30-40 separate calculations involved before you get an accurate # back out. Then again, you could just produce a quick estimate in a few seconds too. Anyone interested?
Will, That is with a stock 2.5 and 5 sp. I've done nothing to the car since I purchased it in april of last year aside from a new clutch and cylinder head. As I recall, I was at about 3000 RPM when my speedo was pointing straight down. Again I only have my sisters verification for the 95 MPH reading. I have however been wanting to pick up a 120 MPH speedo to verify this info, and a nice long street to see what this 2.5 is capable of.
IP: Logged
06:19 PM
CUTTER Member
Posts: 324 From: Adamstown, PA, USA Registered: Aug 99
I agree with Will. Top speed is the point where you're car doesn't have enough power to overcome the wind resistance. I'm sure if you cleaned your car up good, took off anything that cause turbulance you could eke out a few more mph's..
IP: Logged
02:07 AM
WKDFIRO Member
Posts: 1637 From: Cerritos, California, USA Registered: Nov 1999
Phil, I inadvertantly did that but I found out a funny thing...
When you suck the doors off a CHP on the freeway doing around 110 (I hadn't done my 120 speedo mod yet)radar can't lock on you fast enough. I had gotten out of the gas by the time he caught up with me. I am so surprised that I wasn't kissing my hood with my hands behind my back. The cop said that his radar couldn't lock on fast enough but he did have to go to 105 just to start to catch up...he asked me how fast I was going. I looked down at my speedo and looked back up at him and squeaked "80?" I know if I had said, "I don't know" than he would have given me whatever number he wanted. He put 80++ on my ticket and told me that he would be there if I fought the ticket.
I ate the $247 fine knowing that it should have been MUCH worse.....
Ah....the days when I was Young and Immortal....
[This message has been edited by WKDFIRO (edited 01-28-2000).]
this wind resistence you guys are talking of... i am a college student and had physic's last semester... and what if you had a "tail wind" (one blowing the same direction your are going), according to my studies, that would make your go faster.... hmmm... but i cant remember the equation... so dont ask i guess thats why i made a "C" in the class..
chris
IP: Logged
12:34 PM
PFF
System Bot
Jan 31st, 2000
WGraffiKs Member
Posts: 75 From: Granada Hills, CA (USA) Registered: Sep 1999
Yes, Chris, a tail wind effectively subtracts from wind resistance from the front. So if you had a tail wind of, say...125mph, and your Fiero could go 125 with no wind, College physics says that you can now go 250MPH!!! Which is great until the wind shifts 90 degrees, and blows you laterally into the next state! Usually happens just as you suck the doors off of a CHP cruiser, too. ;}
IP: Logged
09:37 PM
Feb 1st, 2000
Phaeton Member
Posts: 1437 From: Interior Alaska Registered: Dec 1999
I did the radar trick with my foot all the way into it..127 mph. The officer did not congratulate me for having fine auto ?!? and no license for ninety days was the judge's opinion!! That was stock 2.8, flat road and about 40 degrees f.