 
     |
| Lopsided chops? (Page 94/103) |
|
Hulki U. My-BFF
|
NOV 04, 07:41 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by DIY_Stu:
Hulki what's funny is I DIDN'T DRAW THOSE LINES! Someone else did. to prove a point. Your buddy keeps posting that pic thinking it's proof. NOW you add to it to show that the tires show in the photo at different heights. Seeing you show the right tire being BELOW the line WOULDN'T that mean that the BODY WOULD ALSO BE LOW ON THAT SIDE? Instead it shows to be HIGH and the roof is LOW. You git yer edumakaton frum de saym skool dat cali did? |
|
Uh, Stu, the picture you posted shows air between the roof and intersection of lines on the right side. And I showed the right tire sits lower on the picture than the left. Don't you think that may explain the air between the roof and intersecting lines? Or ar u jusd a litel slo laik ur ARE..F..TEE buddyz?
|
|
|
|
DIY_Stu
|
NOV 04, 07:44 PM
|
|
|
then why is the body sitting above it's reference line on that side.
|
|
|
|
Hulki U. My-BFF
|
NOV 04, 07:50 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by DIY_Stu:
then why is the body sitting above it's reference line on that side. |
|
Again, this was done in MS Paint. How do you know that Y1 and Y2 are equal length lines?
|
|
|
|
DIY_Stu
|
NOV 04, 08:01 PM
|
|
Because if you look that the photo has CAD points and was done by a respected employee of NASA. So tell him he sucks at mspaint.
| quote | Originally posted by jscott1:
This shot may not be perfect, but I broke out the ruler and the stinger is dead on... I don't see the problem.
|
|
But I guess for the paying customer it's Close to a Knats Ass.[This message has been edited by DIY_Stu (edited 11-04-2008).]
|
|
|
|
Hulki U. My-BFF
|
NOV 04, 08:15 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by DIY_Stu:
Because if you look that the photo has CAD points and was done by a respected employee of NASA. So tell him he sucks at mspaint.
But I guess for the paying customer it's Close to a Knats Ass.
|
|
Well if CAD it indeed is, then your "respected employee of NASA" is the idiot. Why would he even try to reference off of such a shltty photo. The least he could have done was rotate the image so that it was at least straight. But hey, people that clean the sh1tters at NASA are still well-respected employees of NASA, and they might even be able to plot a little in AutoCad.
|
|
|
|
DIY_Stu
|
NOV 04, 08:57 PM
|
|
Not sure you really want to insult JScott.
Want to tell me that I cannot see straight about the other photo? Or is the Engine in that pic lopsided and you can see it too.
|
|
|
|
Hulki U. My-BFF
|
NOV 04, 09:17 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by DIY_Stu:
Not sure you really want to insult JScott.
Want to tell me that I cannot see straight about the other photo? Or is the Engine in that pic lopsided and you can see it too. |
|
Hey, I'm man enough to agree with you that something isn't right judging from that photo. It is NOTICEABLE. But come on, even you have to agree that the other photo is not cut and dry. It would take real measurements to prove anything on that car.
|
|
|
|
Hulki U. My-BFF
|
NOV 04, 09:22 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by DIY_Stu:
Not sure you really want to insult JScott.
Want to tell me that I cannot see straight about the other photo? Or is the Engine in that pic lopsided and you can see it too. |
|
Insult JScott? Nope. But maybe you shouldn't use his drawing for your proof especially when he says this about that photo:
| quote | | I can't see any photographic evidence from the photos that we have to work with. |
|
|
|
|
|
DIY_Stu
|
NOV 04, 10:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Emc209i
|
NOV 04, 10:19 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Hulki U. My-BFF:
Insult JScott? Nope. |
|
| quote | Originally posted by Hulki U. My-BFF:
Well if CAD it indeed is, then your "respected employee of NASA" is the idiot. |
|
[This message has been edited by Emc209i (edited 11-04-2008).]
|
|
|
