

 |
| Who else got an abusive e-mail from bookster? (Page 7/20) |
|
Electrathon
|
OCT 07, 12:08 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by Cliff Pennock: I know it's getting old, but I will say it again. PFF is mostly a self-moderating forum. That means it's your responsibility too to keep this place clean. There are over 10,000 members. PFF is being visited by more than 1000 unique visitors each and every day. At any given day, around 500 members post a message. Yet there's only ONE member that regularly warns me when he sees a thread (or member) getting out of hand.
It's like when an accident happens and none of the bystanders can be bothered to call 911, but everybody complains why it takes so long for the police and paramedics to get there. |
|
Cliff, I think part of the problem is how at least I and possibly others understand "self moderating forum". Personally I would take that to mean leave you out of it and whatever happens, happens. There are a few rules that you have set up that are regularly ignored, there is nothing that any of us can do to enforce the rules. It is impossible for us to be the police. You are the only person here that has the authority to enforce anything. The few times someone has stood up to the trolls they get blasted with posts telling them to shut up and mind their own business (generally with language that also breaks the rules). In your example of the people all watching the accident and no one calling 911 (do you have 911 there too? I guess I always thought that was a US thing) if they were self policing they would have helped out at the accident, not stood back and called the police. Do you want us to tell you? I would have thought that you would be getting hundreds of email a day just about the few people on here that are causing trouble. Self policing would mean to me to NOT be telling you, but for us to handle it without you. I have an idea, possibly you will like it. You are currently only banning people that are mass voted against. All they really need is a few troll buddies to give a few +'s and they get to stay. There seems to be a problem if you want the quality of the forum to stay high. If everyone was a troll then everyone would have a great rating and there would be nothing but bickering and swearing at each other. How about if you gave people that caused trouble (like posting pornographic images and such) a mark against them. To many marks in a period of time and they get to harass other forums for a while. Then there would be two systems in place. The rating bar and a demerit system. Heck, I'll bet Archie would even run it for you. LOL
|
|
|
Lex
|
OCT 07, 12:35 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by California Kid: Let's see, what do all these guys have in common ? : Black88GT Bookster donk316 fieroz34tdc greg Howard_Sacks Lex Mastermind MstangsBware The Punisher Bad Boys of the Forum ! |
|
Thank you for compiling this list. I am going to give each of those guys a PLUS! [This message has been edited by Lex (edited 10-07-2004).]
|
|
|
fierobear
|
OCT 07, 12:37 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by Lex: Thank you for compiling this list. I am going to give each of those guys a PLUS!
|
|
Why am I not surprised?
|
|
|
Lex
|
OCT 07, 12:39 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by fierobear: Why am I not surprised?
|
|
You not the most popular member on the forum either pal.....
|
|
|
timwdegner
|
OCT 07, 12:45 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by CTFieroGT87: I know I'll get a negative or two, but I feel pretty much the same way. The Punisher has actually said a few relevant items during his time here, but overall (like 99%) he's acted like a jerk to everyone. I'm pretty much sick of seeing that. Punisher, you might know somethings, but honestly, you're a POS. |
|
LMAO, that's just plain funny. *chuckle* Welcome, everyone, to a fine display of human nature. Thumbs up to all of you out there representing. Moving right along to threads that matter....
|
|
|
fierobear
|
OCT 07, 01:16 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by Lex: You not the most popular member on the forum either pal.....
|
|
Me, most popular? No. That being said, compare our ratings meters. I don't need to say another word.
|
|
|
Cliff Pennock
|
OCT 07, 04:52 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by Archie: Ok. I had thought from posts that you had made several months ago that you were confident that your systems would/could catch virtualy every booted member that wanted to get back on with a new name. |
|
Yes it does, but the problem is that it's not 100% fool proof.
| quote | | I didn't realize that you wanted/needed help from the rest of us. Besides before reading your reponse I would have guessed that you were getting numerous EMails about virtually every big & small problem. |
|
I do get tons and tons of email and PM, but 99.99% of them are about lost passwords, questions about the Fiero, virus-mails, and the "thank you for signing up at our great pron site"-mails.
| quote | | I still don't understand completely why, when you know the damage these guys are doing, you don't just remove them. |
|
There are several reasons why. The first and foremost reason is because I really want PFF to be as self-moderating as possible. Heck, that's the reason I started PFF in the first place because I thought the email lists were over-moderated. But to protect the hard work I've put into this place, I've setup a few simple forum rules. Grossly violating those rules is the only reason I will ban someone without looking at someone's ratingsbar.
| quote | | We vote them off, they beg you to get back on with promises to behave |
|
Ok, I have to be really honest here. This one sentence makes me realize something I never even thought of before. I put a rating system in place so the members themselves can vote someone off, yet I make it my own decision to let someone back on. That ain't right. That ain't right at all. It would only be fair that - if the decision to boot someone is in the hands of the members - the decision to let someone back on should be in the hands of the members too. Hmmm, need to think about that one - what the best way is to implement such a thing.
| quote | | as soon as you let them back on they start badmouthing & abusing you. Like a Preacher, you refuse to raise your hand, you'll let them destroy the home you've built because you want to be the nice guy. |
|
No, I don't want to be the nice guy. I just refuse to ban people for personal reasons. Yes, this is my home but I didn't build it for myself or my personal satisfaction...
| quote | | Would you rather be a leader or a martyr? |
|
Neither.
| quote | | I'm sure other people on here feel the same way I do, but like me they've been slow to speak up out of respect for you. |
|
Respect is fine, but you are not being disrespectful if you show your concerns through email or PM. And that's all I'm asking.
|
|
|
California Kid
|
OCT 07, 06:19 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by Lex: Thank you for compiling this list. I am going to give each of those guys a PLUS!
|
|
My guess is that you already rated them a plus, because you think just like them, and frankly that isn't saying to much.
|
|
|
MstangsBware
|
OCT 07, 06:30 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by California Kid: Let's see, what do all these guys have in common ? : Black88GT Bookster donk316 fieroz34tdc greg Howard_Sacks Lex Mastermind MstangsBware The Punisher Bad Boys of the Forum ! |
|
LOL-- I really dont see how I fit into this group, being that I have only posted my opinion in very few threads. I am mainly on the Forum to sale parts that I have compiled and come across to ppl in need of them(which I sale cheaper than you can find else where). I would say, if I asked everyone that I have sold parts to give me a plus, then I would be well into the green. But I am not all about the rating system, being that it is corrupt and can be played in such a way to ban members that are not liked by others because of there opinions and thoughts. Yes, I agree some ppl on the list are trolls and take over every thread but I myself have posted in only a few threads expressing my opinion and then taking the quotes I recieve back and turning them into a flaming party. But with me only stating my opinion(which I always have proof to back it up), thats just a right that I have with this being a public forum. The quotes I recieve back have been alot harsher than the opinions I have given. The rating system only works for ppl that do not express there opinions in fear of getting a negative or for well known vendors who get back from other Forum members wether that member even has a clue about whats going on. People on the Forum tend to lean toward the words of whatever side has the most going for them, basically saying, well if he is giving that member a negative or feels that way about the subject at hand, then I should too. Once again this is how I veiw the whole rating system and how it works, but again this is my own personal opinion. I have talked to several ppl in chat that have bashed me in a thread and they never knew who I was. You can ask the ones that do know me from chat, that I am just a person with an opinion that is not scared to express it. So with that being said, either one of two things will happen, either my rating will go up or down, but for me either way is fine. [This message has been edited by MstangsBware (edited 10-07-2004).]
|
|
|
linenoise
|
OCT 07, 07:24 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by MstangsBware: LOL-- I really dont see how I fit into this group, being that I have only posted my opinion in very few threads. I am mainly on the Forum to sale parts that I have compiled and come across to ppl in need of them(which I sale cheaper than you can find else where). I would say, if I asked everyone that I have sold parts to give me a plus, then I would be well into the green. But I am not all about the rating system, being that it is corrupt and can be played in such a way to ban members that are not liked by others because of there opinions and thoughts. Yes, I agree some ppl on the list are trolls and take over every thread but I myself have posted in only a few threads expressing my opinion and then taking the quotes I recieve back and turning them into a flaming party. But with me only stating my opinion(which I always have proof to back it up), thats just a right that I have with this being a public forum. The quotes I recieve back have been alot harsher than the opinions I have given. The rating system only works for ppl that do not express there opinions in fear of getting a negative or for well known vendors who get back from other Forum members wether that member even has a clue about whats going on. People on the Forum tend to lean toward the words of whatever side has the most going for them, basically saying, well if he is giving that member a negative or feels that way about the subject at hand, then I should too. Once again this is how I veiw the whole rating system and how it works, but again this is my own personal opinion. I have talked to several ppl in chat that have bashed me in a thread and they never knew who I was. You can ask the ones that do know me from chat, that I am just a person with an opinion that is not scared to express it. So with that being said, either one of two things will happen, either my rating will go up or down, but for me either way is fine.
|
|
Well from the color of you ratings bar I would guess that whne you speak your mind you don't do it in sucha way as to repect the other users feelings.
|
|

 |
|