Hey, your quote was this:

"I do not rate people according to their opinions. I rate them according to how they express them. Persistently nasty people or those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake always get negatives from me."

"...those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake..."

So what is this?

http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum8/HTML/000042.html
"If you read this, and are pissed off at me because I “offended” you, and you think you have a right to not be offended, and you think I care if I offended you, you’re a deluded, pompous turd."

Bonding material?

You're a hypocrite. Is this not controversial?

"First, I just write what I think. If it makes people mad, I have no control over that."

Why not just drop the "N" bomb and shrug your shoulders when people are offended? This is a lame rationalization for saying you have immunity for being controversial, but others must adhere to rules of such controversy. Conclusion: You're lame .

"But, making people mad is not my goal."

Well, I'm not mad, but being a hypocritical azz is what you do best.

"You, however, get off on creating controversy with your sub-stupid, vitriolic inanities."

And, "You're an Idiot, Part 1" is an intellectual masterpiece? You, sir, are a jackoff.

"Second, I don't give a shlt what my ratings bar does."

And this, unfortunately is where we meet eye-to-eye.

"You, however, after tangling with an intellectual superior and having a steaming plate of your ass handed to you with all the trimmings, and your ratings bar dipping perilously closer to "good riddance Ed", drop out of sight for a while to lick your wounds."

Who dropped out of sight when? Ass handed to me....... BAhahahaha. With threads like, "You're an Idiot, Part 1" I'm not real worried about you winning the Purlitzer Prize. Maybe the the Beavis and Butthead award for idiocy. I have found other boards to converse and am transitioning that way, as I have informed many PFFers, so your mono-hate style of pecking order will be free of me just after the election, or possibly re-appointment depending upon how it goes this time.

Most people had a sense of humor about that. Ed took it personally. Go figure.

Ed plays the race card again, without any provocation.

This thread has been eating Ed alive since I posted it months ago. I know this, because he keeps bringing it up. Perhaps he sees a bit of himself in it?

Bill, I really prefer the emotional irrational abrasive Bill to this.This just doesn't seem right.

Interesting... I have to agree with Ed on the "Your an idiot if" being controversial. However, IMHO it is a masterpiece at the same time. About the only thing that was "over the top" was the involvement of family members. Other than that it was a very thought provoking thread and I liked it. I still think you owe fog an apology for the mother slander but hey man.. fuggit. I would also like to apologize to you Ed for busting your ballz, it wasn't my place to do so. What was between you and fog should have stayed between you and fog because my opinion don't mean crap...

WTF man... since when have I been removed from your christmas list, not that I give two craps about christmas or lists but I like the way you cut cross grain.... it's refreshing.

Funny thing is, foggle cuts cross grain sometimes too. Oddly it's more acceptable for some reason, people find it more "thought provoking" and not just provoking.

Woah, farting diamonds at hypersonic velocities? Sounds like fun for you, but very dangerous for others in the room.

Do you think you could be arrested for "using deadly flatulence"?

Hardly a thread goes by without I'm Dumb accusing someone of being a Nazi.

Yeah... I know exactly what you mean.