When ratings plummet (Page 5/9)
Fieros_Forever OCT 25, 11:27 PM

Remember, Rumor:

No matter how bad it gets:

It could always be worse:


-FF
1986 Fiero 2M6

LZeitgeist OCT 25, 11:37 PM

quote
Originally posted by FieroRumor:
It's ok, I have found a solution...

I no longer care.
-FieroRumor


Same here. If Cliff doesn't care about solving problems around here, I don't care either.

I'm Back OCT 25, 11:45 PM

quote
Originally posted by fogglethorpe:


I do not rate people according to their opinions. I rate them according to how they express them. Persistently nasty people or those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake always get negatives from me.

Rumor, I rated you green a long time ago, because your posts are clever and often hilarious, and you seem very good natured.

Those in the red? You are just a few, and you know who you are...


"I do not rate people according to their opinions. I rate them according to how they express them. Persistently nasty people or those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake always get negatives from me."

FROM THE TRASHCAN:

http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum8/HTML/000042.html

The Part II to that thread also - don't feel like researching it.

These were nothing but controversial. So maybe that explains your 50/50 rating - other people use the same criterion for establishing their vote.

I'm Back OCT 25, 11:48 PM

quote
Originally posted by LZeitgeist:


Same here. If Cliff doesn't care about solving problems around here, I don't care either.



You're such a battered soul

LZeitgeist OCT 25, 11:57 PM
F uc k you, Ed.
LoW_KeY OCT 25, 11:59 PM
can't be loved by everyone, oh well.
LZeitgeist OCT 26, 12:10 AM
BTW, Ed - don't bother sending me any more abusive PM's - you (and your buddy CertifiedMechanic) have been blocked, just like I had to block your e-mail back when you were still EdsB52, for sending abusive e-mails back then.
fogglethorpe OCT 26, 12:13 AM

quote
Originally posted by I'm Back:
"I do not rate people according to their opinions. I rate them according to how they express them. Persistently nasty people or those who intentionally create controversy for controversy's sake always get negatives from me."

FROM THE TRASHCAN:

http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum8/HTML/000042.html

The Part II to that thread also - don't feel like researching it.

These were nothing but controversial. So maybe that explains your 50/50 rating - other people use the same criterion for establishing their vote.


Ed, there are two major differences between us...

First, I just write what I think. If it makes people mad, I have no control over that. But, making people mad is not my goal. You, however, get off on creating controversy with your sub-stupid, vitriolic inanities.

Second, I don't give a shlt what my ratings bar does. You, however, after tangling with an intellectual superior and having a steaming plate of your ass handed to you with all the trimmings, and your ratings bar dipping perilously closer to "good riddance Ed", drop out of sight for a while to lick your wounds.


------------------

Veritas

[This message has been edited by fogglethorpe (edited 10-26-2004).]

I'm Back OCT 26, 12:40 AM

quote
Originally posted by LZeitgeist:

BTW, Ed - don't bother sending me any more abusive PM's - you (and your buddy CertifiedMechanic) have been blocked, just like I had to block your e-mail back when you were still EdsB52, for sending abusive e-mails back then.


What a loser, LZNazi, I haven't corresponded with you for over a year. Such a victim. See, this is how the mob attempts to materialize their propaganda.

I'm Back OCT 26, 12:41 AM

quote
Originally posted by LZeitgeist:

F uc k you, Ed.


Sooooo creative! And you post that follows this one tries to argue what a victim you are? Geeez, you're joke of a Nazi.