Landscaper Under Fire for Refusing to Work for Gays (Page 48/65)
84Bill NOV 14, 03:00 AM

quote
Originally posted by Falcon4:
And people are not born gay.



How do you know?
-----------------
Denial is disbelief in the existence or reality of something.
JohnnyK NOV 14, 03:01 AM

quote
Originally posted by 84Bill:


How do you know?
-----------------
Denial is disbelief in the existence or reality of something.



Because he doesn't know any of them well....
84Bill NOV 14, 03:02 AM

quote
Originally posted by JohnnyK:
Because he doesn't know any of them well....



Ohhh I get it.. De nile.. It's French like the pizza


Ohh bad news Johnny... You posted after Momar laid out his "line of death" at the top of his page... sorry like me, boon rayb and partick you are going to have to die now.. We are all trolls and flamebaiters which seems alot worse because according to isthiswhereiputmyusername we are just flamers..


quote
Originally posted by Falcon4:
And so begins the [-]'ing...

[This message has been edited by 84Bill (edited 11-14-2006).]

Patrick NOV 14, 03:22 AM

quote
Originally posted by Falcon4:

And though I couldn't find a girlfriend to save my life (not that I'm looking anyway), I'm not gay either. I fit somewhere in between...




So you're bi-sexual?

Sorry, but you probably won't be able to get your grass cut by those landscapers either.
Falcon4 NOV 14, 03:25 AM
Did I imply that?

I wouldn't want those losers to cut my lawn anyway... religious kooks are almost as bad as gays. *shudder*
Patrick NOV 14, 03:31 AM

quote
Originally posted by Falcon4:

Did I imply that?




You tell us. It was your words I quoted.
Falcon4 NOV 14, 03:47 AM
Wow, I never would have thought.
Red88FF NOV 14, 03:49 AM

quote
Originally posted by Formula88:

It's not so much that I find it offensive as ignorant and incorrect. I look forward to reading your source, but I don't think I'd take the work of the New Yorker over that of the AMA Journal.



I still hold that I will do what is in the best interest of the kids and it is MY JOB to try and protect them from harm. As you will see below I was a ways off on the figure but the premise for my decision is quite true.

Here are a couple of links, Frankly I found at least a few that say the opposite of what I said but it is in the wording, yes there are more hetero molestations than homo, but that is deceiving. The conclusion I draw is that liars figure and figures lie. It seems to be agenda driven. I will look at some point for the penitentiary figures because I believe them to be a more accurate accounting.
By the way the AMA is a corrupt money and power driven entity that has been hiding facts and stifling health remedies and medical practice methods since it's inception! I would not believe them about much of anything.

Religious site, but that does not mean the figures are wrong. Also not the estimation of gay males in the population at just 1 to 2%
http://www.lifeandlibertyministries.com/archives/000269.php


Again though hetero number are higher you must take into account the % of the population and numbers become staggering as a statistic.
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_SPECRPT_foster-parent-molestation.html

from PDF at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/saycrle.pdf
So, lets look at what we have: 19.2 % is definitely heterosexual molestation and 6.3% is definitely homosexual molestation. This equals a ratio of 3:1 (=19.2/6.3) which means that 1 out of 4 (25%) of molestations are by homosexuals and 75% by heterosexuals. The ratio of heterosexuals to homosexuals in the population at large varies greatly from country to country and from one era of human civilization to the next. But the statistical database was from 1991 through 1996 in 12 states of the US, During this time it has been suggested that 2-3% of the population was homosexual. If we use an average of 2.5% we find that 25% of all child molestations were committed by the 2.5 % of the population who are homosexuals. This is an overrepresentation of a factor of 10.

In other words: by using this methodology we find that a homosexual person is 10 times as likely as a heterosexual person to be a child molester.


Again I think the prison records may yield a higher number and am not sure why I can't find them.
I am too tired to look anymore and frankly have lost interest in this topic after coming back home and finding 6 more pages to read from when I left. I will grant you that 200 times as likely is way off,,,,,, I may have been quite wrong on this but that is what I remembered. 10 times as likely should still get your attention though.


quote
Originally posted by Formula88:
Do you think I would be right or wrong if I said, "I don't think it's wise to let black people near children. They are a bajillion times more likely to be cannibals."



Hehehe that is ridiculous, but point taken. heh



quote
Originally posted by Formula88:
Like I said, I'm not trying to change your opinion, just correct what appear to be incorrect assumptions and statistics.



My assumptions are not wrong just the figures I used. I will add that it is unfortunate for the non molesting homo's, like any group that is brought down to the lowest common denominator as far as calculating a risk, but hey the price of being wrong is too high for me and at least ten times more likely should not be ignored, and what are they really out other than a baby sitting job? huh?

By the way, the highest figure I saw as a % of the population being gay men was 2.5% so how about chastising these boobs that kept saying 8 to 10%? as ignorant and incorrect?

And hey Falcon, I think it was you who used these stats first, how about a link? or do I just get a (-) for posting again.
Falcon4 NOV 14, 03:53 AM

quote
And hey Falcon, I think it was you who used these stats first


I'd prefer you quote me first...
Patrick NOV 14, 03:55 AM

quote
Originally posted by Falcon4:

I never would have thought.




That was painfully apparent throughout this entire thread.