Somebody call a doctor...I'm dying laughing! (Page 37/40)
84Bill JUL 19, 02:45 PM

quote
Originally posted by fierobear:

Because you're full of crap.


Just an opinion you have of me, you are entitled but I suggest you keep it to yourself in the future.

I have an opinion about you too.... Would you like me to share it with everyone?

Very well.
You never fail to amaze me at how immature you are. You continue your pestering even thought I smack the crap out of you. This only proves that you are an arrogant, thickheaded child who does not know when to quit being a pest.

And in case you havent noticed, I said that about you a long time ago and you continue to prove what I said in another thread several months ago.

"If you want my attention I will give it to you"


quote
Originally posted by fierobear:
MrIncoherent calling me immature? Again, you're full of crap.

Well said, Mr Incoherent, assinine, foolish and felble minded imature child. You fail yo realize your attacks are meaninless to me YET you continue to barf them out at me AS IF I really care.


quote
Originally posted by fierobear:
Back off...or WHAT?

Duhhhhh.... Now you are playing hard to get.. Not today little one, I'm very busy.
Maybe later I'll play with you.



quote
Originally posted by fierobear:
Are you clairvoyant? My father is dead.

Yes, I am.
I am many things that YOU are too foolish, stupid and arrogant to understand. So instead of trying to make sense of me, you do what typical IDIOTS do. You discredit and call me many names.

Thanks for noticing.

[This message has been edited by 84Bill (edited 07-19-2004).]

Fastback 86 JUL 19, 02:54 PM

quote
Originally posted by 84Bill:

Let me spell it out.

Intentured "servents" were SLAVES
Intentured "servitude" is SLAVERY

ser·vi·tude ( P ) Pronunciation Key (sūrv-td, -tyd)
n.
1.
a) A state of subjection to an owner or master.
b) Lack of personal freedom, as to act as one chooses.
2. Forced labor imposed as a punishment for crime: penal servitude in labor camps.
3. Law. A right that grants use of another's property.

slave ( P ) Pronunciation Key (slv)
n.
1. One bound in servitude as the property of a person or household.
2. One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence: “I was still the slave of education and prejudice” (Edward Gibbon).
3. One who works extremely hard.
4. A machine or component controlled by another machine or component.

Get over it Fastback 86, you got owned and you look like an idiot.


NO, let ME spell it out for YOU, you ignorant, arrogant simpleton.

YOU SAID: Big companies that have people sign contracts to work for them in return for the company providing training and schooling is "indentured slavery."

I SAID: No Bill, that's wrong. Its NOT Unconstituntional, illegal, or anything else. Its a system that works quite well and makes a lot of business sense, and that the term is "Indentured Servitude", not "Indentured Slavery."

TUGBOAT SAID: "Indentured Servitude" and "Indentured Slavery" are more or less the same thing.

I SAID: Ok Tugboat, you are right. I made a mistake.

YOU SAID: We owned you! YAY!

I SAID: No Bill, your original point that I was correcting is STILL WRONG. I made a mistake about a side point and Tugboat corrected it.

YOU SAID: I'm going to conveniently ignore that and pretend like I was in on it with Tugboat to prove you wrong, even though you and Tugboat were only debating terminology, not application of terms. But since I'm wrong, I don't want to address that. I'll just revel in the fact that Fastback 86, who usually does his homework and shoots my ignorant opinions down, made a mistake and try to steal the glory for that.

You "owned" nothing. Tugboat "owned" nothing. He corrected my mistake and you tried to take some credit for it. In fact, I believe I just "owned" you again like I always do with facts and logic.

Stop trying to steal the spotlight, Bill. You're STILL WRONG.

84Bill JUL 19, 03:37 PM

quote
Originally posted by Fastback 86:


NO, let ME spell it out for YOU, you ignorant, arrogant simpleton.

YOU SAID: Big companies that have people sign contracts to work for them in return for the company providing training and schooling is "indentured slavery."

I SAID: No Bill, that's wrong. Its NOT Unconstituntional, illegal, or anything else. Its a system that works quite well and makes a lot of business sense, and that the term is "Indentured Servitude", not "Indentured Slavery."

TUGBOAT SAID: "Indentured Servitude" and "Indentured Slavery" are more or less the same thing.

I SAID: Ok Tugboat, you are right. I made a mistake.

YOU SAID: We owned you! YAY!

I SAID: No Bill, your original point that I was correcting is STILL WRONG. I made a mistake about a side point and Tugboat corrected it.

YOU SAID: I'm going to conveniently ignore that and pretend like I was in on it with Tugboat to prove you wrong, even though you and Tugboat were only debating terminology, not application of terms. But since I'm wrong, I don't want to address that. I'll just revel in the fact that Fastback 86, who usually does his homework and shoots my ignorant opinions down, made a mistake and try to steal the glory for that.

You "owned" nothing. Tugboat "owned" nothing. He corrected my mistake and you tried to take some credit for it. In fact, I believe I just "owned" you again like I always do with facts and logic.

Stop trying to steal the spotlight, Bill. You're STILL WRONG.


So are you still trying to say that CONTRACTUAL SLAVERY is Constitutional?

quote
Amendment XIII of the Constitution of the United States of America
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.


Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.


It would appear that IF I signed a contract INDENTURING myself and then chose to BREAK said contract on the GROUNDS that I was mislead and feel that I have become a SLAVE to said contract, that the CONTRACT OF INDENTUREMENT would be abolished without any recourse or further INDENTUREMENT.

HENCE
un-CONSTITUTIONAL contract. Indentured Servitude / Indentured Slavery or any contrace signed to that effect.


OWNAGE!!

[This message has been edited by 84Bill (edited 07-19-2004).]

fierobear JUL 19, 04:40 PM
HOLY CRAP! I found 84Bill's life story on the net!

Click here

84Bill JUL 19, 05:18 PM

quote
Originally posted by fierobear:

HOLY CRAP! I found 84Bill's life story on the net!

Click here


LOL
Cute..

DEAR GA HOD!!!
It's fierobear!!!

[This message has been edited by 84Bill (edited 07-19-2004).]

fierobear JUL 19, 05:30 PM

quote
Originally posted by 84Bill:


LOL
Cute..

DEAR GA HOD!!!
It's fierobear!!!


Hah! Not very original, I've used that one before.

Steve Normington JUL 19, 05:44 PM

quote
Originally posted by 84Bill:


It would appear that IF I signed a contract INDENTURING myself and then chose to BREAK said contract on the GROUNDS that I was mislead and feel that I have become a SLAVE to said contract, that the CONTRACT OF INDENTUREMENT would be abolished without any recourse or further INDENTUREMENT.

HENCE
un-CONSTITUTIONAL contract. Indentured Servitude / Indentured Slavery or any contrace signed to that effect.


OWNAGE!!


Bill, it says involuntary servitude. If you signed a contract, that makes it voluntary servitude. And since slavery requires the slave to be owned as property, then the example of having to work off a loan can't be slavery. So the contract you theoretically signed is voluntary servitude.

84Bill JUL 19, 06:11 PM

quote
Originally posted by fierobear:


Hah! Not very original, I've used that one before.


And you still are.

84Bill JUL 19, 06:13 PM

quote
Originally posted by Steve Normington:


Bill, it says involuntary servitude. If you signed a contract, that makes it voluntary servitude. .



Are you freaking DENSE?

SERVITUDE / SLAVERY IS UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Fastback 86 JUL 19, 10:16 PM

quote
Originally posted by 84Bill:



Are you freaking DENSE?

SERVITUDE / SLAVERY IS UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.


Are YOU freaking dense? If you sign a contract, which must, by law include all the details of the deal, it is VOLUNTARY and CONSTITUTIONAL.

IF, and ONLY IF, the contract is legally misleading, false, incomplete, or Unconstitutional/unlawful then you would be correct. HOWEVER, the fact that these programs/contracts exist in HUGE numbers today and are entered into by people everyday should give you SOME KIND OF LITTLE CLUE that THEY ARE NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Its NOT Servitude/Slavery. That hasn't existed for 150-200 years (depending on whether you're talking about servitude or slavery).

Like I said before, if you're too stupid or lazy to actually read the contract and enter it in full knowledge of whats expected of you, thats YOUR PROBLEM. Just because you're a voluntarily uninformed IDIOT does not make the contract Unconstitutional.

Tugboat agress with that last point, if you go back and find the post that started the whole servitude versus slavery discussion. Oops! No ownage for you!

Freakin' A Bill! Do I have to hit you over the head and read my posts to you myself before you're going to get it?