

 |
| If noone els will represent V8's I will (1/4 timeslip)!!!!! (Page 33/41) |
|
California Kid
|
SEP 28, 01:23 AM
|
|
| | | quote | | Originally posted by Nachtzehrer6: Regardless of if he regrets it or not....1)You mention he DOES NOT LACK MONEY. Check 2) He had several Porsche's. Check 3) He had a C5. check 4) He had a Fiero that was set to be the bestest car in the world. check
And when he ran out of room, he sold which car?  Oh, that's right you said the Fiero....hmmmm  BAN ME BABY  |
|
Forgot to add the main reason he sold it, his new wife and step daughter didn't want him racing a crazy fast car anymore!
|
|
|
Nachtzehrer6
|
SEP 28, 02:36 AM
|
|
| | | quote | | Originally posted by California Kid: Forgot to add the main reason he sold it, his new wife and step daughter didn't want him racing a crazy fast car anymore! |
|
Ohhhhhhhh! I see gotcha. I knew there would be a new main reason. Crazy fast huh? Your car runs 12.2 in 1/4 thats awesome, but uh did he have to sell his C5 too? Keep those main reasons coming! [This message has been edited by Nachtzehrer6 (edited 09-28-2003).]
|
|
|
Nachtzehrer6
|
SEP 28, 02:49 AM
|
|
Cali Kid, I am going to cut my crap for just a sec and be serious. Your car is an inspriation as to what the Fiero can become. I used your car in an example not because I wanted to put it down, but because I consider it to be "ultimate fiero" as far as performance goes.(Ski and Kameo get the ultimate fiero in the looks dept). Anways, my problem is that somr people have a poor grasp of reality. The 2.8 is a comparable car to the 944 in a straight line, and the 88's ARE comparable in the curves. BUT here we have a guy saying a duke is comparable to the 8v 944 I could give a crap less if it for fun. I get sick of hearing what a "beast" it is. CrazyDave was right when he said that people need to quit throwing that term around. If it's the "average joe" duke then it's about a 90hp car. The Kia Rio puts out 104hp....See where this is going?\m/ \m/ You know what to do.... [This message has been edited by Nachtzehrer6 (edited 09-28-2003).] [This message has been edited by Nachtzehrer6 (edited 09-28-2003).]
|
|
|
California Kid
|
SEP 28, 10:26 AM
|
|
|
My post's lacked the humor due to written word, had we talked it person it would have been a very fun conversation. Just a little friendly jousting between members, no offense taken. Agree that there are members here that think they got the neatest thing since sliced bread and will exaggarate some times. I just don't take those claims serious at all, many times they are beaming with pride of their car, and get a little carried away. I doubt the Porsche Racer still has the C5, and by the way the Fiero 350/400 would smoke it. He bought it new, but it's probably got a ton of miles on it by now. Haven't swapped notes with him in just about a year, when we do, it only about the Fiero, but I'm sure he's driving something cool! I do appreciate the compliments you wrote on my car, Thank You! Just goes to show that even some good stuff can come out of the Trash Can.  Tom
|
|
|
Fiero5
|
SEP 28, 02:42 PM
|
|
Ok, so the Fiero is a 2V and the Porsche is an 8V. But the Fieros intake valve is much bigger than the exhaust, and the Porsche intakes though it has more they are however much smaller. The Porsche is also a much heavier vehicle at around 3600lbs compared to the Fiero at around 2700lbs. Bottom line is that it's two different ways of doing the same thing. So, whats your point?  ....and if you don't like people posting their sigs, too bad  ------------------ Now over 450!! pics of our fleet of Pontiac excitement: http://www.cardomain.com/id/fiero5
|
|
|
Nachtzehrer6
|
SEP 28, 02:49 PM
|
|
| | | quote | | Originally posted by Fiero5: Ok, so the Fiero is a 2V and the Porsche is an 8V. But the Fieros intake valve is much bigger than the exhaust, and the Porsche intakes though it has more they are however much smaller. The Porsche is also a much heavier vehicle at around 3600lbs compared to the Fiero at around 2700lbs. Bottom line is that it's two different ways of doing the same thing. So, whats your point?  ....and if you don't like people posting their sigs, too bad  |
|
It's still a slower car.....And It wasnt that you posted your sig.....Think about it....I edited MY post......Get it yet?...Oh gawd your not the sharpest tool in the shed are you? I Quoted your sig in mypost by mistake, and had to take it out.....There I spelled it out for you. Now Apologize for jumping to conclusions. \m/ \m/
|
|
|
Nachtzehrer6
|
SEP 28, 02:53 PM
|
|
| | | quote | | Originally posted by Fiero5: Ok, so the Fiero is a 2V and the Porsche is an 8V. But the Fieros intake valve is much bigger than the exhaust, and the Porsche intakes though it has more they are however much smaller. The Porsche is also a much heavier vehicle at around 3600lbs compared to the Fiero at around 2700lbs. Bottom line is that it's two different ways of doing the same thing. So, whats your point?  ....and if you don't like people posting their sigs, too bad  |
|
SIGH, once again you don't know what the fug your taling about. 1984 944 curb weight: 2,778 A far cry from 3600lbs. But keep pulling this crap outa your @$$ and expecting people to believe it.
|
|
|
Fiero5
|
SEP 28, 08:46 PM
|
|
Dude, I pulled the weight and other info off the web. As for pulling crap out of someones a$$, talk about calling the kettle  Look at your ratings bar and get a clue their tool-less dim bulb. Sheesh, what a dufus 
|
|
|
Savagery
|
SEP 28, 11:35 PM
|
|
|
|
Porvette
|
SEP 28, 11:40 PM
|
|
| | | quote | | Originally posted by Fiero5: Dude, I pulled the weight and other info off the web. As for pulling crap out of someones a$$, talk about calling the kettle  Look at your ratings bar and get a clue their tool-less dim bulb. Sheesh, what a dufus  |
|
Fiero5; could you please give me the web page you pulled the 944 clocking in at 3600 lbs? This would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance 
|
|

 |
|