Really?

Define : MINE, STING, SYMBOL, LEVEL

Since Todd scampered off, I think I'll play with this.

While it's true you can not enslave another mans mind the way you can enslave his body. You can however enslave his mind with thoughts that will over time become the man and he will remit to your will no matter how wrong it may seem. Hitler was a mastermind at it.

Do you know why "subliminal messages" are illegal to use in TV ads?

Thank you Bill, you JUST proved my point.

1) I really don't give a flying fark what your problem is. Your mindless drivel hidden in ellusive and useless metaphors is of no concern to me. If you want to address what I have written, do so in a manner that will allow me to rebut you should I disagree. Shutting me up because I can't figure out what the hell your babbling about and being right are NOT the same thing.

2) Mindless banter. Thats rich. I do believe the pot just tried to call the kettle black. You are the undisputed King of Mindless Banter in the OT. Ask anyone. What I find truely amusing is the fact that I just broke down the entire situation to a laymans level in a logical and rational manner so that you may better see the error of your perceptions and this is what I get. You're just going to ignore it because it all makes perfect sense and blows your whiney, "I'm always right and screw everyone else," what can the world do for me ignorant opinion on something you obviously haven't researched totally out of the water.

As for you sig, that got a laugh. I broke my entire point down to where a 5 year old could understand it while you sat back and ignored it, and I'm the one spinning off my axis? Is there no bounds to your ego?

Maybe if you'd actually read my post, particularly the second to last paragraph where I pointed out that no one has ever brought any kind of private or class action lawsuit against companies using this system, you wouldn't have made such a blatantly ignorant and opinionated post. Just cause its your opinion doesn't mean Jack. It especially does NOT mean that its right.

Again, your sig is laughable. You of all people should take it to heart. You say to beware of single mindedness. Dare I cry hypocrisy? You absolutely refuse to even consider any side of a debate than your own. You ignore posts that reduce your point to shambles. And you have the gall to warn us against single mindedness? Appalling. To throw in another point, have you ever learned anything about effectively debating? To make an effective debate, you MUST consider and research the other persons point and bring forth an informed counter point. Failure to do so ensures failure to win the debate, and blatently ignoring it just makes you look like a self-righteous fool.

No, what we have here is one argumentative fool with an ignorant, self righteous opinion he thinks is gold, too much time on his hands, and a bug up his @$$ about the Government he blames for his inability to get the cushy job he thinks he deserves to be handed on a silver platter.

Yes, Bill, thats it. We can enslave your mind. Subliminal messages are telling you to sit here and argue an invaild opinion over the internet with people who obviously know what they're talking about. Its all mind control. Oh wait, not its not! Its an easy out for people who don't want to take responsibility for the fact that they're either too lazy or stupid to make themselves informed and independant thinkers!

Not in this case. If you were to use only the word 'servitude,' then that would be correct. It is defined as Slavery. In this case, we are talking about 'Indentured Servitude.

As defined by Webster's Encyclopedic Unabriged Dictionary of the English Language:

"Indentured Servant:" A person who came to America and was placed under contract to work for another over a period of time, usually seven years, esp, during the 17th to 19th centuries. Generally, indentured servants included redemptioners, victims of religious persecution, persons kidnapped for the purpose, convicts, and paupers. [1665 - 75]

"Slave:" A person who is the property of and wholly subject to another.

I almost forgot. There you go using Hitlers name again. Anyone who knows how you act can see its another indirect way of indicating that people who do not agree with you are Nazis.

Well Bill, did you EVER stop to THINK for 1 measly second that maybe, just MAYBE there are Jewish people on this board??? And maybe, just MAYBE they might get seriously offended by your casusal use of the name Hitler and the term Nazi??? Or are you only thinking about Bill again?

Well when taking inot considerationg that Todd has displayed nothing but contempt for me then yes, I may have gone just a tad bit overboard. Concidering that I don't have much of a drop before I hit the ground (unlike toad on his stool) I can say you are probably right.

However, I was wrong only once before and since I'm never wrong I know I was wrong to think I was wrong.

Did I know there were Jewish people on this board? Judging by my accepto meter yes, I'd say there were a few Jewish people on this board. A bunch of jackasses too but sure I agree there are all kinds of people on this board.

But my main goal is to annoy the arrogant not Jewish people or Christians or Blacks or anyone with anything remotly like a heart for the aforementioned people.

I'm sure most Americans (Jewish, Black and a few others like Polish) are offended by Nazis and Hitler. Personally I hate Hitler, he cause this present day mess. So I am in agreement with Jewish people regarding hitler as a pig. However that does not mean that the people I just mentioned are IMMUNE to the seductive call to feel their race or small exclusivly select group as a supirior race.

If that is the case well.. We are going to have a serious problem and I have no problem standing my ground.

And I hate people to shout down at me from up on high as if THEY are the only ones being annoied by punks on pedestals shouting rubbish down to those the feel they can intimidate.