 
     |
| Snopes gets Snoped (Page 3/5) |
|
fierobear
|
JAN 06, 03:50 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Toddster:
It is amazing to me that a legitimate thread about the failure of Snopes to accurately investigate facts (which can NOT be argued and yet somehow IS) can degrade into a mire of personal BS in just 17 posts. Gotta be a record. |
|
Not surprising at all. That is what the people that we fight against DO when they have no logical argument. They just lash out. Very typical of liberals.
|
|
|
|
mptighe
|
JAN 06, 03:52 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by fierobear:
Not surprising at all. That is what the people that we fight against DO when they have no logical argument. They just lash out. Very typical of liberals. |
|
Thanks for proving my point.
|
|
|
|
Toddster
|
JAN 06, 04:06 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by mptighe:
Something that happens this regularly, especially when you're a common denominator, amazes you? |
|
Thanks for proving mine 
The irony...it BURNS!!!!
|
|
|
Patrick
|
JAN 06, 04:08 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Toddster:
Show your proof or shut up.
|
|
Same old nonsense.
This forum was a whole lot more pleasant when you were away for a spell there trying to patch up your "private" life.
|
|
|
|
mptighe
|
JAN 06, 04:15 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Toddster:
Thanks for proving mine
The irony...it BURNS!!!! |
|
Given the difference between our comprehension levels, I can imagine you would think my words somehow make your words more valid. I can assure you that my comment, if read correctly, would not serve for your purposes.
|
|
|
Boondawg
|
JAN 06, 04:27 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by fierobear:
You can post all the cute and trite pictures you want. If you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything.
|
|
Are you ok?
You preach on trite, then post "If you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything".
You're fighting with yourself.....
I can also help you with that tired old "stand for nothing" trick you and others here pull out as some kind of backwards last-ditch defense when cornered by your own words, as that false concept has been put to rest once and for all in another thread:
| quote | Originally posted by Boondawg:
Oh, and P.S.
Just to end that silly notion that I don't stand for or defend anything, this should squash that; I will NEVER let anyone tell me who I am.
That should end that.
|
|
http://www.fiero.nl/forum/F...6/HTML/098237-5.html[This message has been edited by Boondawg (edited 01-06-2013).]
|
|
|
1988holleyformula
|
JAN 06, 04:44 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Fats:
Note to self: If not winning an argument bring up someone you also don't get along with that has nothing to do with current conversation, and compare the person your losing to to them.
I think I got this,
Brad |
|
Marvin was losing to you?
He posts this:
| quote | Originally posted by Marvin McInnis:
Reading comprehension time: "The content" of the sign is what "didn't meet State Farm's corporate policy." See the snopes.com page for pictures of the sign in question. It was State Farm's policy and State Farm's decision.
|
|
and Toddster responds with:
| quote | Originally posted by Toddster:
Uhh, No. AGAIN, read the section you just quoted from your own links. According to State Farm they requested the sign be removed because of a policy against endorsing candidates. They even point to similar signs removed that endorsed other candidates. Comprendo? It is a company policy.
|
|
I'm wasn't sure what the argument was anymore at that point... 
Doesn't really matter now though...
|
|
|
|
fogglethorpe
|
JAN 07, 01:22 AM
|
|
I think I can settle this argument..
If it's on the internet, it has to be true.
|
|
|
|
Blacktree
|
JAN 07, 01:27 AM
|
|
|
|
Wolfhound
|
JAN 07, 05:27 AM
|
|
What would republican political spinners have against Snopes?
Surely they verify all the info they send out as spam.
It couldn't possibly br the old "hit dog hollers" thing.
|
|
|
