Levi's sports white knots in support of gay marriage (Page 24/31)
Phranc JUN 03, 10:47 PM

quote
Originally posted by madcurl:


Well, who was he and what is his name? Did you report this to the authorities?



You remind me of the Cris Rock video that was posted recently. You lie and make things up and use dishonest tactics because you were outsmarted. I wonder what category your actions would put you? Some thing tells me it isn't in the black man territory.
madcurl JUN 03, 11:42 PM

quote
Originally posted by Phranc:


You remind me of the Cris Rock video that was posted recently. You lie and make things up and use dishonest tactics because you were outsmarted. I wonder what category your actions would put you? Some thing tells me it isn't in the black man territory.



Ah... that Chris Rock. Type-o there.


Let's recap some of your dishonest tactics,... shall we.



quote
Originally posted by Phranc:


The God of the bible said nothing. There is no god to quote. There is only what some men claim a non-existent god said.




This was on the first page were Phranc rambling began. Notice there's nothing to support his statement.


quote
Originally posted by Phranc:


There is no god of man to love me. Gods aren't real.



Here we see Phranc cries for help. Notice, "no god of love to love me."


quote
Originally posted by Phranc:

Satan? You mean the imaginary enemy of your imaginary friend. Why would I accept Jesus? He is just a dead man. Why would I want eternal life? I don't need false promises to make me feel special and give me a false hope that there is something after you die.



Phranc is reaching out for questions, but like a child whose fighting sleep Phranc refuses.

Yes, this is key board analysis of Phranc, but like they say, "if the Levi sport pants fit.... then one should wear them." j/k
Phranc JUN 04, 12:00 AM

quote
Originally posted by madcurl:

This was on the first page were Phranc rambling began. Notice there's nothing to support his statement.


Nothing except the total lack of a god saying anything. Hardly dishonest. But we already determined you aren't that bright and don't have the upper level thinking skills it would take.

quote
Here we see Phranc cries for help. Notice, "no god of love to love me."

Misquoting me. Thanks for being dishonest yet again. And pointing out there is no god isn't a cry for help.


quote
Phranc is reaching out for questions, but like a child whose fighting sleep Phranc refuses.

Yes, this is key board analysis of Phranc, but like they say, "if the Levi sport pants fit.... then one should wear them." j/k

It's amusing that I hold honesty to a higher regard then the christian does. It isn't very christian to lie much less lie time and again. And Thank you for living down to stereotypes. Dishonest and uneducated.
madcurl JUN 04, 12:45 AM



quote
Originally posted by Phranc:

Nothing except the total lack of a god Phranc saying anything.



There, I fixed it for you.
madcurl JUN 04, 01:17 AM

quote
Originally posted by Phranc:
It's amusing that I hold honesty to a higher regard then the christian does. It isn't very christian to lie much less lie time and again. And Thank you for living down to stereotypes. Dishonest and uneducated.



What's truly amazing is that (you) choose to associate with those (you) consider uneducated, idiots, brainwashed, stereotyped, and lost on a forum whose members have 25-year old cars. One would think with your vast cranial knowledge and haughtiness (you'd) be hob nob ing with the elite members of society, but yet (you're) here.

To take it one step further one would conclude a person like (you) biblical knowledge (reading the bible twice, workings as a alter boy for many years ,) you'd move on, right? However, (you're) history dictates you can't.

Now that's truly freaking amazing! We got Carl Sagan on board,.... who would've thought.

[This message has been edited by madcurl (edited 06-04-2009).]

Slayre JUN 04, 06:31 AM

quote
Originally posted by Phranc:


Yes, you have a book of mostly fiction and I have historical facts and science to back me up. I see christians don't understand that and have pointed out why several times. And that why is generational brainwashing. And the programming is deeply ingrained.



You've prooved nothing phranc. Really,let it go, nothing more to say here, its o.k.

frontal lobe JUN 04, 09:30 AM

quote
Originally posted by avengador1:


So it seems she was indeed a lifelong virgin.




This is really a flawed premise from the inception.

Think about it. Is there a compelling reason for Mary to need to be a virgin before and until she had Jesus? Yes.
Is there a compelling reason for Mary to need to be a virgin AFTER that? No. Mission accomplished.
In fact, I'm pretty sure if you asked her husband, there was a pretty compelling reason NOT to remain a virgin. Goodness. They were MARRIED. 1st Corinthians 7:3 and 7:5:

3Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.

5Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again

They did not have sex for a time because God wanted them not to. Then if she didn't have sex with him after, she would have been a cheat (defraud ye not).


There is nothing SPECIAL about being a virgin forever. Lots of women have done that throughout history. Born. Never had sex with a man. Died. So to be "ever virgin"? So what? To be a virgin before having a child...THAT was what was special AND NECESSARY.


Matthew 13: 55

Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?

56And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things?

The context is CLEARLY one of a specific PHYSICAL FAMILY here, and not brethren in the sense of spiritual christian brothers.


Lots of times PHYSICAL families go together to weddings like in John 2.

12After this he went down to Capernaum, he, and his mother, and his brethren, and his disciples: and they continued there not many days.

Brethren would be synonymous with disciples if it was spiritually related, and would be redundant. This is physical.


Regarding turning over care of his mother to John instead of his brothers as would usually happen, that isn't a proof that they weren't his brothers. I have 3 kids. If my wife and I die, my kids are NOT going to live with my brother or 3 sisters. I have hand selected a non-related couple who I trust will care for them in a way like I would want, and not like my own brother and sisters would.

So the BIG deal is whether Mary was a virgin BEFORE Jesus was born. What happened after is interesting, but not a critical doctrine of belief. But there is no reason Mary needed to stay a virgin AFTER she did the job God chose for her as there is nothing special about being a life long virgin. She wasn't. And her husband was very glad about that.


avengador1 JUN 04, 11:08 AM
I copied this again for you to read. Look above for more examples.

quote
in biblical terms, "brother", "sister", and "brethren" can mean close relatives, kinsmen, or even close friends


Aren't we all brothers and sisters in the eyes of the Lord? One doesn't need to be a blood relative.

If you want a real answer to this question, ask your priest, and let us know what his answer is on the question of Mary's virginity.

Here is a quote from www.catholic.com


quote
Mary: Ever Virgin


Most Protestants claim that Mary bore children other than Jesus. To support their claim, these Protestants refer to the biblical passages which mention the "brethren of the Lord." As explained in the Catholic Answers tract Brethren of the Lord, neither the Gospel accounts nor the early Christians attest to the notion that Mary bore other children besides Jesus. The faithful knew, through the witness of Scripture and Tradition, that Jesus was Mary’s only child and that she remained a lifelong virgin.

An important historical document which supports the teaching of Mary’s perpetual virginity is the Protoevangelium of James, which was written probably less than sixty years after the conclusion of Mary’s earthly life (around A.D. 120), when memories of her life were still vivid in the minds of many.

According to the world-renowned patristics scholar, Johannes Quasten: "The principal aim of the whole writing [Protoevangelium of James] is to prove the perpetual and inviolate virginity of Mary before, in, and after the birth of Christ" (Patrology, 1:120–1).



As for Joseph not getting any.

quote
according to the Protoevangelium, Joseph, an elderly widower who already had children, was chosen to be her spouse. (This would also explain why Joseph was apparently dead by the time of Jesus’ adult ministry, since he does not appear during it in the gospels,


This explains why Jesus had brothers and sisters too, they were from Joseph's previous marriage. They aren't "blood" relatives.

quote
"The Book [the Protoevangelium] of James [records] that the brethren of Jesus were sons of Joseph by a former wife, whom he married before Mary. Now those who say so wish to preserve the honor of Mary in virginity to the end, so that body of hers which was appointed to minister to the Word . . . might not know intercourse with a man after the Holy Spirit came into her and the power from on high overshadowed her. And I think it in harmony with reason that Jesus was the firstfruit among men of the purity which consists in [perpetual] chastity, and Mary was among women. For it were not pious to ascribe to any other than to her the firstfruit of virginity" (Commentary on Matthew 2:17 [A.D. 248]).




http://www.catholic.com/lib...Mary_Ever_Virgin.asp

Like I said above, ask your priest if you have any doubts. They enjoy these type of conversations.

[This message has been edited by avengador1 (edited 06-04-2009).]

Phranc JUN 04, 11:32 AM

quote
Originally posted by madcurl:

There, I fixed it for you.



No you didn't fix it. Why don't quote where god said something and instead of "fixing" it prove me wrong. It's because you can't. But don't let the truth get in your way.
Phranc JUN 04, 11:39 AM

quote
Originally posted by madcurl:


What's truly amazing is that (you) choose to associate with those (you) consider uneducated, idiots, brainwashed, stereotyped, and lost on a forum whose members have 25-year old cars. One would think with your vast cranial knowledge and haughtiness (you'd) be hob nob ing with the elite members of society, but yet (you're) here.

To take it one step further one would conclude a person like (you) biblical knowledge (reading the bible twice, workings as a alter boy for many years ,) you'd move on, right? However, (you're) history dictates you can't.

Now that's truly freaking amazing! We got Carl Sagan on board,.... who would've thought.




Again with the reading the bible twice. It's bad enough but then you go and repeat a lie again even after you've been called out on that lie. But you are just a niger so you can't help it. To quote Dre quoting some one else. "I'll stop calling you nigers when you start acting like black man." A niger like you lies when confronted with his lack of education. But you don't really care that you are dishonest niger. If you did you would have stopped intentionally lying a few pages ago. But you keep reinforcing those stereotypes and make sure after you do it you ***** and moan about them and how unfair they are.

Just to recap it's not your colour that makes you a niger it is the actions you willing take.