New Meth Just for kids (Page 23/25)
Patrick JUN 02, 06:09 PM

Does it come with a throne?
84Bill JUN 02, 06:13 PM

quote
Originally posted by Patrick:
Gokart, thanks for the info.



Yes, he is a worthey advasary. I found myself firmly in his sights. Fortunatly Kings have cat like reflexes. I am a King you know.


quote

Keep in mind though that I had originally asked only because it was stated by Bill to never question the "King".



You tempt a fate worse than death... What I can hurl at you is akin to a mirror and one most feard will be revealed.

I see you are wise enough to remain out of reach and that is worthey of a Kings keen vision. However, Sir Gokart also lay in wait. You are again wise to ally yourself with his wisdom. He seems a trite Kinght and worthey of Kingship as dispursed by his use of verbiage.

I take my leave and leave you both as you were.. Good day.
84Bill JUN 02, 06:15 PM

quote
Originally posted by Patrick:
Does it come with a throne?



Yes, and your own domain in which to rule.
Patrick JUN 02, 06:19 PM

Geez, I dunno... It's going to take an awfully large shipping container.
84Bill JUN 02, 06:23 PM

quote
Originally posted by Patrick:
Geez, I dunno... It's going to take an awfully large shipping container.



But Sir.. you already have it.

All you need to do is put it on and defend your doamin from intruders, rule with an iron fist, kill and exploit your peons for your benefit or mere ammusement. It is good to be the King, as you know... I am one... a King.

Thats is the job of a King and I being a King know these rather trivial details.
FierociousGT JUN 02, 09:20 PM
This is some funny Sh*t....
84Bill JUN 02, 11:28 PM
aph•o•rism
n.
A tersely phrased statement of a truth or opinion; an adage.
A brief statement of a principle
84Bill JUN 02, 11:30 PM
aph•o•rist
–noun
a person who makes or uses aphorisms
84Bill JUN 02, 11:46 PM

quote
Originally posted by Gokart Mozart:
Care should be taken not to confound aphorisms with axioms. Aphorisms come into being as the result of experience. This is also often the case with axioms (see axiomatization; Euclidean geometry), but due to their apparent certainty, axioms are then regarded as assertions not requiring proof, and used as the starting point for further deductive reasoning. Aphorisms have been especially used in dealing with subjects such as art, agriculture, medicine, jurisprudence and politics, to which little methodical or scientific treatment was applied at the time.

An axiom is any starting assumption from which other statements are logically derived. It can be a sentence, a proposition, a statement or a rule that forms the basis of a formal system. Unlike theorems, axioms cannot be derived by principles of deduction nor demonstrable by formal proofs—simply because they are starting assumptions—there is nothing else they logically follow from (otherwise they would be called theorems). In many contexts, "axiom," "postulate," and "assumption" are used interchangeably.
As seen from definition, an axiom is not necessarily a self-evident truth, but rather a formal logical expression used in a deduction to yield further results. To axiomatize a system of knowledge is to show that some of its claims can be derived from a small, well-understood set of sentences. This does not imply that they could have been known independently; and there are typically multiple ways to axiomatize a given system of knowledge (such as arithmetic). Mathematics distinguishes two types of axioms: logical axioms and non-logical axioms.




You seem to be describing a deixis
The function of pointing or specifying from the perspective of a participant in an act of speech or writing; aspects of a communication whose interpretation depends on knowledge of the context in which the communication occurs.

The reason I seem to lack logic is becasue of a lack of understanding of the starting point of the reader or the subject. They cant get out of their skin due to staunch beliefs and are inflexable and believe it or not very fragile.

I get quite a few assults because the reader is frustrated by what I am writing becasue they can not experience it and instead want me to change my mind. Generally that is futile and I realize it is for me to change theirs as well so I DEFEND my position.

The arguments against me (that challange my "logic") change but my points never do. I am fixed focus, fixed point. It is black, not white.

This is root genis
She lost her son and used her sons name to further her cause.

These are the branches
MADD
Cindy
Hezbolah
IRA

The cause is the same. Vilify something or someone and remove it.

It took 5 posts to get Mr. Lobe to the root constituents of my argument.

The arguments I make do not need logic to understand becasue they are opinions based on facts as I know them.
There is nothing to discuss except when I'm reqired to justify my opinions, then the morass begins.
I dont need to justify anything to anyone except myself. One can take it ot leave it. If one wants to argue it is certin death by exhaustion.

So yes you are right Gokart I dont use logic.

Soldiers fight for freedom and rights
A soldiers mom exerts her rights and uses her sons name who died in the war she wants to end.


It's already a circular logic right off the bat!
Loopti loop!

So one must adopt A point of reference or opinion. No matter where one starts the argument with me one will always end up right back where they began. Only tired.

I am a King because I said so and what I say is irrefutable truth even if only to me, the King because that’s what I am. My peons know this as fact because I kill them if they oppose me or defile my most humble domain with insults or ignorance of my decree. That’s what Kings do to maintain order in their domain and that is what I do... as King..

[This message has been edited by 84Bill (edited 06-03-2007).]

greengoblin0129 JUN 05, 10:40 PM