Landscaper Under Fire for Refusing to Work for Gays (Page 19/65)
Patrick's Dad NOV 12, 10:43 PM

quote
Originally posted by larryemory:


You are joking-aren't you? Surely you're not that naive? In case you're serious. These perverts are real and they're trying to get their nefarious activities legalized.



From 2002: http://www.massnews.com/2002_editions/03_Mar/21402lib.htm

Excerpt:


quote
In the early days of “gay liberation”, 1972, a National Coalition of Gay Organizations adopted a “Gay Rights Platform”. This list of demands included one to repeal all laws governing the age of sexual consent – a matter of some obvious concern to pederasts. “Homosexuality is no sicker than heterosexuality,” proclaimed the Third Number of the NAMBLA Journal, “What is sick is society’s efforts to supress [sic] and persecute it.”

In those days, every type of sexual activity was considered equally deserving of “liberation”. As pederast theoretician David Thorstad proclaimed it in the pages of Boston’s Gay Community News in January, 1979: “We should present ourselves not merely as defenders of our own personal rights to privacy and sexual expression, but as the champions of the right of all persons – regardless of age – to engage in the sexuality of their choice. We must recognize homosexual behavior for what it is – a natural potential of the human animal.”



Also, the murder and sodomization (in that order) of ten year old Jeffrey Curley of Cambridge, MA (From karisable.com):


quote
Jeffrey Curley, 10, - Oct. 10, 1997 Cambridge, MA -- Salvatore Sicari and Charles Jaynes lured Curley into Jaynes' Cadillac with the promise of $50 and a bicycle. The men made sexual advances, then suffocated him. Sicari was found guilty of 1st-degree murder and kidnapping. Jaynes and Sicari are serving life sentences. January 2001, Robert and Barbara Curley filed a $200 million wrongful death lawsuit against North American Man Boy Love Association -- an organization that defends pedophiles. The lawsuit claims NAMBLA encourage the "illegal rape of young male children," which led to the murder of Jeffrey.
NEPTUNE NOV 12, 11:43 PM
I can't believe this STUPID ARGUMENT has gone on for 5 pages.(again)
Don't you busybodies have anything better to do than to worry/argue about what somebody you don't even know does in their own bedroom?????
Get a life of your own, dudes.

(and NAMBLA has nothing to do with gay marriage. DUH.)

[This message has been edited by NEPTUNE (edited 11-12-2006).]

84Bill NOV 13, 12:24 AM
Hey.. Ive seen the trailer for Broke Back Mountain.. I know what them gays look like. Thems some boy rapers.. anyone got a rope?
88GTNeverfinished NOV 13, 12:45 AM
It really amazes me what people get their underwear in a bunch over.

The homos are taking over! Protect your kids or they too will become homos! It's all about exposure! If you see or have contact with a homo you risk to become one yourself!

Homos are the vampires of the 21st century! We're doomed!

idiots.
Red88FF NOV 13, 01:01 AM

quote
Originally posted by edhering:

(Don't believe me? Think I'm a bigot? Do a little research. Find out how many pedophiles are homosexuals versus how many are straight, particularly in terms of percentage of parent population. Find out how much of the "gay lifestyle" revolves around promiscuous and frequently anonymous sex. HIV became an "epidemic" in the 1980s because of such practices.)


Ed


Worth a repeat! The figure is something like 200 times more likely to molest than a hetro. It's simple math.
That said by no means does that mean that gays are ALL going to engage in that type of behavior, It is just a bajillion times more likely.
I know some gay folks that are pretty decent people but I can't help but think that if they think a gay act is ok what the hell else is going to be ok with them.

Would I allow a gay to baby sit my grandchild? nooop, not a chance in hell. Would I do a remodel job build a house or sell a hovercraft to a gay couple? you bet.

Do what ever you like with your life and with whomever you like (within the law)! just do not think you have a right to MAKE me except it either, then we would have a problem. That is not hate, just indifference until it effects me or our community.

Frankly I thought the email was honest and polite, the gays just did not like what it said, most likely caused by their low self esteem,, which is obviously the basis for the gay pride movement.
Falcon4 NOV 13, 01:20 AM

quote
most likely caused by their low self esteem,, which is obviously the basis for the gay pride movement.



Ahh, there are the words I was looking for earlier.

Now what of that platypus?
madcurl NOV 13, 02:12 AM
I once took a date to see the Golded Gate bridge from undereneath while tied was out. Too my surprise, I didn't know that Breaker's beach was thriving with naked men running on the beach like it was some type of "10" movie. The girl I was with didn't have an issue with it until she saw two guys having oral sex. At that point, I was ready to go. After all, I was the only black guy on the beach wearing leather (coat). Heck, I know when it's time to go...I've seen the Village people, hehe.

At dinner, we had a few chuckles and out of the conversation was this. "If the beach was filled with naked women running everywhere having wanton sex.....the city would shut it down cause there be nobody at work."
JohnnyK NOV 13, 02:20 AM

quote
Originally posted by Red88FF:

Would I allow a gay to baby sit my grandchild? nooop, not a chance in hell.
just do not think you have a right to MAKE me except it either, then we would have a problem. That is not hate, just indifference until it effects me or our community.



Uhh, thats not indifference.. Far from it.. Thats sheer sickening ignorance.
Patrick NOV 13, 02:30 AM

I don’t especially like flamboyant homosexuals, but then again, I don’t especially like flamboyant heterosexuals either. Overly macho guys and brainless bimbos can fall into either category.

I’ve just read the entire five pages of this thread, and I’ve got to say that some of the comments expressed here make me want to puke more than the thought of what gay men might do with each other in the privacy of their own bedrooms.

Initially I was going to quote a few posts and point out the nonsense which was being perpetrated, but as the number of ignorant comments piled up the less I wanted to waste time on them all.

Makes me wonder what some of you guys are the most afraid of - homosexuals, or your own suppressed, latent homosexual desires?
fierofetish NOV 13, 03:47 AM
PHOBIA:
–noun:
a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it.

As usual, the English language, and our use of it, lets us down again.
Phobia is as described above.But, when does 'irrational' have any validity? I presume when a majority consider the phobia to be unfounded.
Now, suppose there are,for example, 10% of the population who are MALE gays.And suppose that 35% of the MALE population consider homosexuality to be acceptable.(I quote MALE gays and population in bold type, because females are not threatened in any way by Gay men, and so therefore their opinions are irrelevant).And I have used rather inflated numbers here to emphasise the point. In my experience, a greater majority of my friends, and acquaintances, more than 65%,dislike homosexuality . Perhaps they are my friends BY that rational? I don't know...
Therefore, one can assume that more than 50% of straight males find homosexuality disturbing, distasteful, or downright objectionable, even perverted.It then becomes apparent that these feelings of disgust, aversion and horror are NOT irrational at all, because a majority of the Male population feel the same way. So forget phobia..it is not, by its own definition, a term that can be applied here.It is NOT irrational AT ALL..only in the eyes of those who seek to condone, or justify homosexuality.
Now, some people STILL consider it a viable term for this HUMAN, and therefore NATURAL( ie instilled in one's being from birth by NATURE, to protect the species) dislike etc ceases to be a phobia, and becomes second nature.Now, apply the statistics in reverse: Something which is indulged in a by a small (minority) amount of MALE humans, suddenly becomes a perversion.(perversion: conduct, attitude or demeanour indulged in by a MINORITY, and contrary to accepted standards of behaviour, as judged by the MAJORITY).
Does being afraid of spiders mean you are scared you will turn into one? Or fear of the thunder and lightning mean you are frightened of becoming a storm?Scared of snakes? Think you might BECOME one if you come into contact with one?Dislike alcoholics, because you might become one? Abhor drug abusers, for fear you might become hooked? No. That is the reality of fear, revulsion or abhorrence.It is something instilled in NORMAL creatures to protect them from something which is not good, HEALTHY , or acceptable.
The comment at the end of the last post by Patrick is SO ridiculous, it doesn't bear arguing about.It is a trite, non-substantiated adage that was seized upon in ignorance by pro-gay lobbyists, and perpetuated by people who don't even attempt to prove, or justify the insinuation behind it.A normal, balanced human male would have NO fear of being contaminated, or converted to the source of their dislike.And NO chance of becoming Gay by association.
I believe that there are many homosexual men, who choose this lifestyle, and never ever try to justify their feelings, because it is good enough for them, and don't need endorsement from others. They keep it to themselves, and show decorum and respect. I know several couples like this, and it is only apparent that they are gay, because they live together, and are constant companions. I don't hate them.I don't like the implications that MIGHT be there regarding their sex life, but they DON'T boast about it, or flaunt it, or DEMAND my approval.They are loyal, and faithful to each other.
On the other hand, seeing the overtly Gay males, flaunting their sexuality (or lack of it, in my opinion), screaming about it at the top of their voices, and dressing in salacious attire, make me SICK. In fact, I believe the majority of these types are pseudo gays, seeking some form of publicity, and wishing to be antagonistic toward straight males in general. THESE are the culprits, for bringing condemnation on ALL homosexuals, by their sickening behaviour.They are not 'real' homosexuals.They are not real people at all. they create, and indulge, in a fantasy World, which causes strife and unrest, and does a disservice to those homosexuals who ARE genuinely attracted to the same sex.The Boy Georges of this World should be shunned,and openly denigrated by us ALL, straight or Gay. THEN maybe there might be a more forgiving attitude amongst straight people toward Gays.
Nick

[This message has been edited by fierofetish (edited 11-13-2006).]