 
     |
| The economy, is it good or bad. (Page 128/181) |
|
84Bill
|
JAN 06, 09:13 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Phranc:
You already did that for me bill. Remember 7/10 are down. Down != negative. The growth is still there just less then before. You'd know that if you knew what you were talking about and understood what you were reading ( if you even read them) in your links. |
|
Plain English.. 7 of 10 are down. The "indicators" are projections on economic growth.
Though there may be "growth" as you put it but those projections or "indicators" of growth are DOWN from their expectations.. 7 of 10 to be exact.
The indicators / projections were DOWN, they fell SHORT, OFF. the mark. If the indicators were used for the purposes of showing growth by virtue of the fact that there is some they would not be very reliable indicators of PROJECTED economic growth and prosperity.
|
|
|
|
IEatRice
|
JAN 06, 09:14 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 84Bill:
I want you to post the leading economic indicators that are showing growth. |
|
If I borrowed a billion dollars a day from the Federal Reserve and communist governments like China, my finances would be in good shape too. But as Dr. Paul says, there's a day when the bill is going to be due.
|
|
|
|
84Bill
|
JAN 06, 09:16 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Formula88:
More welfare. |
|
I suppose that could be another one but hey man, whatever it takes to have people put money into circulation and keep them happy. Works for me.
|
|
|
|
Phranc
|
JAN 06, 09:19 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 84Bill:
Plain English.. 7 of 10 are down. The "indicators" are projections on economic growth.
Though there may be "growth" as you put it but those projections or "indicators" of growth are DOWN from their expectations.. 7 of 10 to be exact.
The indicators / projections were DOWN, they fell SHORT, OFF. the mark. If the indicators were used for the purposes of showing growth by virtue of the fact that there is some they would not be very reliable indicators of PROJECTED economic growth and prosperity.
|
|
Down != negative. You are to stupid to understand bill. Less growth then before is still growth. And as I said leading indicators are showing growth. You are just to stupid to understand what your reading.
So to recap for the idiot:
down != negative.
Growth = positive
indicators are showing growth
|
|
|
|
84Bill
|
JAN 06, 09:24 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by IEatRice:
If I borrowed a billion dollars a day from the Federal Reserve and communist governments like China, my finances would be in good shape too. But as Dr. Paul says, there's a day when the bill is going to be due. |
|
Well you me and Dr. Paul seem to be on the same page with regard to that. What most of the lemmings dont understand is this country is broke and ass hole deep in debt to the tune of TRILLIONS of dollars and with the dollar devaluing against other currencies and at the rate congress is spending money on credit.... Wholee effing crap man! 
Someone with some balls needs to step up and take charge. I like the way Dr. Paul is doing it. Gods honest truth. He is probably the only politician I have ever had the desire to meet.
Good man, OUTSTANDING ideas based on SOLID principals.... sniff sniff.. Smells like fresh air to me. 
|
|
|
|
84Bill
|
JAN 06, 09:36 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Phranc:
Down != negative. You are to stupid to understand bill. Less growth then before is still growth. And as I said leading indicators are showing growth. You are just to stupid to understand what your reading.
So to recap for the idiot:
down != negative.
Growth = positive
indicators are showing growth |
|
Again ass face...
The indicators are not showing the "projected growth" and for those in the know that means the INDICATORS ARE DOWN... 7 of 10 to be exact.
I dont give a dam that you show growth when that growth was not where it should have been. I was handed a report that said we should be here and you hand me one a month later that is lower..... and try to tell me it is growth?  Nice try.. and you're fired Phranc. I need another CFO.  [This message has been edited by 84Bill (edited 01-06-2008).]
|
|
|
|
Formula88
|
JAN 06, 09:46 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 84Bill:
I suppose that could be another one but hey man, whatever it takes to have people put money into circulation and keep them happy. Works for me. |
|
| quote | Originally posted by 84Bill:
You pay check comes from taxes therefore you dont pay taxes on your dole, you merely play a income tax shell game.
Face the facts space.
Your salary drains more from the coffers than 168 family's on welfare annually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
84Bill
|
JAN 06, 09:47 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by aceman:
Don't bother trying to make him understand it, Phranc. When I tried using a 3.5% raise last year and only getting a 3% RAISE this year, he started insulting me about working for the government by serving in the Army. |
|
Those who cant make in in society usually do turn the the government for support. You are nothing more than a dishonorable douche bag not even worthy of addressing me directly let alone in the third person. You are truly a disgrace to the uniform. I dont think I need to back that up with proof of your total lack of respect of some of the citizens who pay you your bloated salary but I edited this post to clarify my opinion of you.[This message has been edited by 84Bill (edited 01-06-2008).]
|
|
|
|
84Bill
|
JAN 06, 09:55 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Formula88:
|
|
And your point is?
My point was that if you fired one fat ass worthless POS disgrace to the uniform you could feed 168 family's for 1 year.
Then again I suppose you could just tell them to shut up and eat cake.[This message has been edited by 84Bill (edited 01-07-2008).]
|
|
|
|
Phranc
|
JAN 06, 09:56 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 84Bill:
Again ass face...
The indicators are not showing the "projected growth" and for those in the know that means the INDICATORS ARE DOWN... 7 of 10 to be exact.
I dont give a dam that you show growth when that growth was not where it should have been. I was handed a report that said we should be here and you hand me one a month later that is lower..... and try to tell me it is growth? Nice try.. and you're fired Phranc. I need another CFO.
|
|
In the know? You don't know what you're talking about. Down isn't negative. its just less growth then before which is still growth. And growth that isn't negative is positive. As I said leading indicators show positive growth. Calling me assface doesn't make you anymore right. You are still an idiot and wrong and ignorant of what you thing you know what your talking about.
|
|
|
