 
     |
| Nasty guys on the forum (Page 12/19) |
|
Mastermind
|
AUG 17, 01:17 AM
|
|
Nice car C.K. but that 4.5 is still in the caddy not a Fiero. That does make a difference no?
|
|
|
|
California Kid
|
AUG 17, 01:24 AM
|
|
Well for me personally, I prefer it in the Caddy, sucks gas like a pig (17 - 18 mpg), now the Fiero with 400 hp gets a 22 avg. (and I've always got my foot in it) !  As I said above, whatever floats your boat. Just don't try to cram your ideas down someone's throat, as it just may not be their idea of the best swap for their dream car. [This message has been edited by California Kid (edited 08-17-2004).]
|
|
|
|
Scott-Wa
|
AUG 17, 01:51 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by Cliff Pennock:
They are the husbands that would tell their pregnant wifes they look fat.
|
|
Damnit, she trapped me... "Honey, do I look fat?"
I tried running but slipped on the cocobutter. ;-)
|
|
|
|
ZeroC
|
AUG 17, 02:14 AM
|
|
|
Ding Ding ALLLLLL ABOARD Next Stop Trash Can
------------------
"This car is so good looking its almost indecent. - AutoWeek on the new 1986 GT"
Zeros Home Page
MSN Messanger tylercaddick@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
The Punisher
|
AUG 17, 02:41 AM
|
|
 ------------------
JM / SH
Opinions are like ‘The Punisher” everyone has one ™ Pick up the BONE PHONE Fred Flintstone, and give George Jetson a call. Get with the times and get DSL or cable, something...
|
|
|
|
Cliff Pennock
|
AUG 17, 04:27 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by Fiero5: If you could delete a flamers post in your thread that doesn't do anything for the continuity, direction and spirit of the thread then it would certainly make the forum even that much better.This would however probably render the rating system almost useless then which is probably why Cliff is apparently so against it. |
|
No, I'm against it because it's a really bad idea. Giving the topic starter the ability to censor out posts he doesn't like? Bad, bad idea. And I really shouldn't have to explain why it's a bad idea because it's so glaringly obvious. And thinking it would render the rating system useless is, well, preposterous.
|
|
|
|
Cliff Pennock
|
AUG 17, 04:33 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by The Punisher: |
|
From all the stupid pics you usually post, I actually like this one! 
|
|
|
|
Cliff Pennock
|
AUG 17, 04:37 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by Mastermind: In theory the rating should be perfect. You're rated by your peers right? Nope!!! I've been wrongfully convicted and strung up by a SBC lynch mob carefully orchestrated and headed by a tag team of SBC owners. All because I championed the 4.9 and called out the ring leader on his incivility and constant use of personal insults in his post. |
|
All I see is the rating system doing its job perfectly.
|
|
|
|
donk316
|
AUG 17, 05:07 AM
|
|
| quote | | Originally posted by Cliff Pennock:
All I see is the rating system doing its job perfectly.
|
|
Roughly translated into Donk-nese. No one likes you. Piss off.
|
|
|
|
HIOSILVER!
|
AUG 17, 06:24 AM
|
|
Wait wait let me guess!!!!
Because as soon as someone posted in a thread that wasnt liked/pointing out wrong info/etc and the thread starter deleted it someone would start a thread bashing the other thread right? That was my first thought.
Do I get a cookie?Dang Im hungry. Anyone got the oreos handy?.
HIOSILVER
| quote | | Originally posted by Cliff Pennock:
No, I'm against it because it's a really bad idea. Giving the topic starter the ability to censor out posts he doesn't like? Bad, bad idea. And I really shouldn't have to explain why it's a bad idea because it's so glaringly obvious. And thinking it would render the rating system useless is, well, preposterous.
|
|
|
|
|
