 
     |
| New Meth Just for kids (Page 11/25) |
|
84Bill
|
MAY 24, 11:56 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Pyrthian:
so, sex should be illegal?
no one wants kids to have sex, right?
personal use & preying on kids are 2 different things.
but, if you must - hide behind the children....
|
|
Puff puff... pass.  [This message has been edited by 84Bill (edited 05-25-2007).]
|
|
|
|
Pyrthian
|
MAY 25, 08:37 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Fastback 86:
You'll never get it, will you, Bill? It doesn't matter whether you like it, agree with it, personally voted for it, or feel above it, the law in this country says that what you're doing is illegal. Possesing, distributing or using controlled substances is illegal, and you've openly admitted to 2 of those. No one cares about your self-righteous, self-aggrandizing, self-absorbed whining about being persecuted. You're breaking the law thats on the books and you know damn well that you're doing it. No amount of ranting about your personal interpretation (with no legal background to support it) of the law is going to change it. Either do something proactive about it, or be the mature adult you claim to be and stop whining. |
|
everyone breaks the law. everyone. you included. does not matter how fine you try and and slice it. and legal & illegal is in no way is the same as right & wrong. just because someone who thinks they are more important than you says it to be so - does not make it so. your statement is the "baaaah" of the sheeople. to "moooo" of the herd.
|
|
|
|
Pyrthian
|
MAY 25, 08:38 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 84Bill:
Puff puff... pass.
|
|
I like how the "soldier of law" is the one with the AK.....
|
|
|
|
Phranc
|
MAY 25, 10:47 AM
|
|
|
84Bill shouldn't these kids be "free" to take kiddy meth? If its good for the dumbass its good for everyone right? Its all about freedom to put what you want in your body right? Dont you oh grerat guru of freedom think kids should have freedoms too? Or do kids not have rights and freedoms?
|
|
|
|
Red88FF
|
MAY 25, 11:11 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by jstntlvr:
Just make the drugs legal and tax the **** out of them just like tobacco and booz. Not only will we save billions from not fighting a pointless drug war we will make a ton more revenue from the taxes. Let us not forget the large amount of prison space we will free up takes care of prison overcrowding. sounds like legalizing drugs will do allot to help society |
|
Bingo!
Unfortunately Clintons huge dyke put forth this idea and ended up a laughing stock.
I think it could work and I believe the government should supply the junkies with the all the hard stuff they want and the problem will go away with a cheap government burial.
Anybody that thinks they can micro manage and keep control of the kids has never raised them.
Sorry folks but children ARE a shared risk and responsibility of society, just ask any lawyer about liability for their actions.
|
|
|
|
Pyrthian
|
MAY 25, 11:16 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Phranc:
84Bill shouldn't these kids be "free" to take kiddy meth? If its good for the dumbass its good for everyone right? Its all about freedom to put what you want in your body right? Dont you oh grerat guru of freedom think kids should have freedoms too? Or do kids not have rights and freedoms? |
|
yes, especially the freedom to vote. that would be perfect. presidential election campaign commercials would be cartoons. TMNT for president! while I still have a hard time making an absolute definition of when you are an adult - the key is adult. and, the base 18 years of age, does seem fairly adequate for most. I am sure there is an army of pedophiles just drooling at your suggestion of kids having consent.
no, kids do not have "rights" as adults do. they are little more than "pets" of their parents. they do not have the faculty or experience to make decisions.
but, anyways - should kids be free to take kiddy meth? yes. if it is ok by the parents of the kid - so be it. that's where it should end. if the parents dont care - thats that. I agree 100% that would be a poor choice. but, I am always on the side of the parents choice. even in cases of refusing medical treatment.
|
|
|
|
84Bill
|
MAY 25, 11:23 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Phranc:
84Bill shouldn't these kids be "free" to take kiddy meth?
|
|
Depends on how you want me to answer.
The PC method
You as the parent are responsible for endangering the welfare of your child and should be throw in jail and fined. Socilist
Constitutional Republic
You as the parent can let your children have kiddy meth becasue you as a parent can set your childs limits, or you can beat the hell out of them for doing it behind your back or you could literall lock them in a room for months on end and beat them on a regular basis OR you could just not give a rats ass if your genetic lineage will live long enough to propogate.
| quote |
If its good for the dumbass its good for everyone right?
|
|
Depends on weather you are for freedom or iron fisted socialism.
If freedom is the choice then the dumbass MAY not make it but atleast the country is free and the people are happy. I
f socialism is the choice then the iron fist invades privacy to enforce laws and freedom is a pipe dream and the people are oppressed and upset.
| quote |
Its all about freedom to put what you want in your body right?
|
|
Freedom IS the foundation of this country. Did you immagrate to this country Phranc?
| quote |
Dont you oh grerat guru of freedom think kids should have freedoms too? Or do kids not have rights and freedoms? |
|
Depends on who is permitted to make the rules and who is enforcing them
Socialism means the government controls all aspects of life
Freedom mean the individual parent is free to decide all aspect of his life with respect to fellow citizens rights.
In the case of drugs it took the U.S. government quite a few years to work around the Constitution becasue believe it or not the citizens of the era generally understood that in order to secure rights they had to respect the rights of another.. Drugs were not a "problem" UNTIL christian ministers sought to curtail moral malpractice and pressured congress to "DO SOMETHING" That simple call to government is a cry for Socialism / governmental control of PERSONAL behavior "for the betterment of society." Again, that is called Socialism.
|
|
|
|
Phranc
|
MAY 25, 11:53 AM
|
|
Yes or no questions, yes or no. Simply answer them yes or no.
Either freedom or not.
|
|
|
|
Pyrthian
|
MAY 25, 11:59 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Phranc:
Yes or no questions, yes or no. Simply answer them yes or no.
Either freedom or not. |
|
YES
FREEDOM
so, are you saying NO FREEDOM?
simply yes or no
|
|
|
|
84Bill
|
MAY 25, 12:15 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Phranc:
Yes or no questions, yes or no. Simply answer them yes or no.
Either freedom or not. |
|
I'm for freedom of choice. How about you Phranc?
|
|
|
|